GNU bug report logs - #48637
[PATCH] website: Add publications page

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Luis Felipe <luis.felipe.la <at> protonmail.com>

Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 23:36:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #98 received at 48637 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Luis Felipe <luis.felipe.la <at> protonmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>,
 "48637 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <48637 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [bug#48637] [PATCH] website: Add publications page
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 21:50:18 +0000
On Thursday, June 3, 2021 8:37 PM, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> Luis Felipe luis.felipe.la <at> protonmail.com skribis:
>
> > On Thursday, June 3, 2021 10:37 AM, Julien Lepiller julien <at> lepiller.eu wrote:
> >
> > > Yeah, good idea, though we need to make it accessible (alt="scientific" or something).
> >
> > So, a publication is either scientific or not, right? So just add "publication-scientific?", right?
>
> We can keep the categories you added, but I suppose only scientists care
> about the difference between “conference article” and “journal article”.
> :-) For the rest of us, “academic” vs. “non-academic” is probably what
> matters, and this is where a visual cue could help.
>
> WDYT?

So, you mean something like the following would suffice?

https://luis-felipe.gitlab.io/media/2021/06/guix-academic-publications-2021-06-03%2016-39-11.png

Personally, I'm fine with or without any of these distinctions because once you click on an article you can see how formal the article is. But I can provide a patch to make things look like in the image.




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 348 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.