GNU bug report logs - #48637
[PATCH] website: Add publications page

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Luis Felipe <luis.felipe.la <at> protonmail.com>
Cc: "48637 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <48637 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: [bug#48637] [PATCH] website: Add publications page
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 11:40:49 +0200

Hello!

Luis Felipe <luis.felipe.la <at> protonmail.com> skribis:

> On Friday, May 28, 2021 11:06 AM, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> I see that you want to keep it open to non-academic publications, which
>> is a good idea. I wonder if there should be a visual distinction
>> between peer-reviewed scientific articles, journal articles, and other
>> types of publications?

[...]

> From ef4e97ec9a49e65d70c9ba8d4c1926b2eeec2cba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Luis Felipe <luis.felipe.la <at> protonmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:17:03 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] website: publications: Add publication type.
>
> * website/apps/media/types.scm (<publication>): Add "type" field.
> * website/apps/media/data.scm (publications): Specify publication types.
> * website/apps/media/templates/components.scm (publication->shtml): Show
> publication type.

Pushed, thanks!

Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu> skribis:

> The patch looks good, but how would people out of science understand what's a conference paper, or the difference between an article and a journal article? Are there better terms?

I was wondering whether we should just distinguish between “scientific
papers” (peer-reviewed, be it conference papers, journals, or book
chapters) and other publications.

Perhaps a visual cue for scientific publications, such as an English
graduate cap, would be enough?

Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.