GNU bug report logs - #48614
[PATCH 0/3] gnu: Add python-cartopy.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Björn Höfling
 <bjoern.hoefling <at> bjoernhoefling.de>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#48614: closed ([PATCH 0/3] gnu: Add python-cartopy.)
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 04:55:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Jun 2021 06:53:59 +0200
with message-id <20210623065359.450f512a <at> alma-ubu.fritz.box>
and subject line Re: [bug#48614] [PATCH 3/3] gnu: Add python-cartopy.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #48614,
regarding [PATCH 0/3] gnu: Add python-cartopy.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
48614: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=48614
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Vinicius Monego <monego <at> posteo.net>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Vinicius Monego <monego <at> posteo.net>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] gnu: Add python-cartopy.
Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 19:29:31 +0000

Vinicius Monego (3):
  gnu: Add python-pyshp.
  gnu: Add python-pykdtree.
  gnu: Add python-cartopy.

 gnu/packages/python-science.scm | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 gnu/packages/python-xyz.scm     | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 109 insertions(+)

-- 
2.31.1

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Björn Höfling <bjoern.hoefling <at> bjoernhoefling.de>
To: Vinicius Monego <monego <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 48614-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#48614] [PATCH 3/3] gnu: Add python-cartopy.
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 06:53:59 +0200

[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]

On Wed, 26 May 2021 18:00:10 +0000
Vinicius Monego <monego <at> posteo.net> wrote:

> Hi Björn,
> 
> Sending a v2 with your suggestions.
> 
> > Or is there a reason to have it in python-xyz.scm? WDYT?  
> 
> My personal preference is to have Python modules in python-* files,
> similar to how python-crypto and python-web are separate from crypto
> and web. But I'm not strong on this. Also, creating python-geo for
> this set would seem more controversial.

Pushed as

5ab7fbad27c652bb2a7143995970e8b5886a0cb6


Thanks.
 
> As a side note, there's a problem in python-shapely that it can't find
> libgeos and that will break cartopy at runtime :(

I tried out some examples from the gallery, they worked very nicely. Do
you still have problems? If so, would you fill out a bug report?

Björn

[Message part 5 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.