From unknown Thu Sep 18 21:58:29 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#48611 <48611@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#48611 <48611@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Allow DEJAGNU TIMEOUT env var for slow arches Reply-To: bug#48611 <48611@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 04:58:29 +0000 retitle 48611 Allow DEJAGNU TIMEOUT env var for slow arches reassign 48611 dejagnu submitter 48611 H=C3=A9ctor Or=C3=B3n Mart=C3=ADnez severity 48611 wishlist owner 48611 jcb62281@gmail.com thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 23 11:08:35 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2021 15:08:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41628 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lkpiU-0003D7-QR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2021 11:08:35 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:60108) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lkjpN-00040j-Jb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2021 04:51:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57442) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lkjpM-0004hR-Ef for bug-dejagnu@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2021 04:51:17 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::236]:43592) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lkjpG-0006IH-Um for bug-dejagnu@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2021 04:51:16 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id w15so29409893ljo.10 for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 01:51:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VqXIhUvd2SRNRN/261i/Cof+Iji/I8dWczsvVAW/bZ4=; b=EoBezoq1YuhH58Ql+ClolA8jYx0Z3v8TFRYSrodIQ2IMKpU2rHMzl6vsg1QFgTL1Ei IiVjKVfuoPhhDluV66qduK1OmX2rM9v0XaVCl/wP0dj+6yTGrVkpiQwnbLevNOcg5IHB AnOajX7G8tPZ99COtnusEcTNZLMoeWIrXP86/Ro0UoF60C4uYfs9zmOBVvIk1tzKQyGv 0KQm5RM8x4dUoS0G/dG1QS8xc2Eu/Ft4QqZJRLtNBp5KQTqj42prFAF9ba2Le/vFb+DL 8CHo/KcuQocILbFKRl+Lwekjrz14mnFv55qrssrhXTRA11/3F9NlLJ/uCeZN3aqGgvxb Khlg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VqXIhUvd2SRNRN/261i/Cof+Iji/I8dWczsvVAW/bZ4=; b=qaFt+McmMOrBRo1sxpHz1xsgxOAiqL2snY/aqhkmABvCG67K4kFLLFoQ2EP8q2X1bN eaKzdmlmKpr2ZWXxBB8O9uTIysp5JIzP4/oVofrw1LqFMZHJjBgJwIqVv83jkJ5lhrHw Gnngb+JYo/vveKSpTxedgQjHL1306FUcrvNFHVqLXHBfuLE9gkC8eC/lEx/dCdezlOPu yIyKXN0XZeNt7c8yV2zt4RCTs8Rj/gzbkLSXww6e9P6jvk/ykKabdCwuyMih/Mm7rF3u Ka/wdoUs6EUaGXD4T07hnMgVwOKSvGpPKpijgk5ZUDuebJDM6fOjdYlkxgbcXKB6QHNK JJmA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532LZKPfQ0GVGSeIatJ0ZRselI1bNQQz9hCfYgI6axKd7AYO5UBu CpaQRYSd1MVARl7mT/uYSKjwAJJ9GMcrETTGGAQmNHs6lLDvIg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz4Su/GK7hwK6njeld1wdwf9NLBu9Q6lBBm5aANeYGqemtSKGcFDzCZgUQ83THKjRklHMrw4X0N4walsX1NhQo= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8e21:: with SMTP id r1mr12812080ljk.166.1621759866190; Sun, 23 May 2021 01:51:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?UTF-8?B?SMOpY3RvciBPcsOzbiBNYXJ0w61uZXo=?= Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 10:50:55 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Allow DEJAGNU TIMEOUT env var for slow arches To: bug-dejagnu@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::236; envelope-from=hector.oron@gmail.com; helo=mail-lj1-x236.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 23 May 2021 11:08:32 -0400 Cc: Ben Elliston , jcb62281@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hello, Please consider allowing custom timeout environment variable for slow architectures, such m68k. The following change we carry in Debian distribution: Description: timeout for m68k and maybe arm should be doubled The timeout in /usr/share/dejagnu/remote.exp:257 is too short for many of gcc's testcases, when run on m68k and arm. Include a hack to define a specific timeout via an environment variable. --- The information above should follow the Patch Tagging Guidelines, please checkout http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ to learn about the format. Here are templates for supplementary fields that you might want to add: Origin: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D182177 Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/182177 Last-Update: 2021-05-03 --- dejagnu-1.6.2.orig/lib/remote.exp +++ dejagnu-1.6.2/lib/remote.exp @@ -311,6 +311,8 @@ proc remote_exec { hostname program args # 300 is probably a lame default. if { [llength $args] > 3 } { set timeout "[lindex $args 3]" + } elseif { [getenv DEJAGNU_TIMEOUT] !=3D "" } { + set timeout [getenv DEJAGNU_TIMEOUT] } else { set timeout 300 } Thanks for considering! Regards --=20 H=C3=A9ctor Or=C3=B3n -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . = .-. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 23 20:27:52 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 May 2021 00:27:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42012 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lkyRj-00047T-Tq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2021 20:27:52 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f44.google.com ([209.85.210.44]:37564) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lkyRj-00047H-0p for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2021 20:27:51 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f44.google.com with SMTP id v19-20020a0568301413b0290304f00e3d88so23629642otp.4 for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 17:27:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+C8YA3Jcu69Kbiu4XXcm2NWkPIxyoEUYjQYVbyImYHc=; b=Csg5bMWJb8dcgGvqiCsK3IjMAXUKfMaNAw1OVNzciZzuUMaHG8pc0qF/3hFPEx/yYZ bZ0ZLH1WQ4sBw9AZ55RZW8etcwI9K8UhXOwExVhMwXPsD8R/eBYTUC7xFaSQMoWpPE/C 2c8VZVHJ8mdabzg5t2we23DTrEfeAr3Iut7OKjg1rxV0FAdZgS2fSFKzMRIVWhQy1YHU cHYpXKFvvx1k1QhsH/38KgfzUO5IqKSYGI9v9cHip2lkGvCIJbaLMvT3cUxfHxv12Mwg +eSUM8jYlrd1PFqzBenla7ignimuxHggdbhDDLRaGqUy1PeWNKfZKd6kk8+sdEQ3tH3y LuDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+C8YA3Jcu69Kbiu4XXcm2NWkPIxyoEUYjQYVbyImYHc=; b=XSwsb3u2YQnS7dn7lU8hFLckTdWKOrzPbthvy6UcIJLEJnCUsrDOFfdzJ+tmn0Rg4L tiG+7t8UPs7qQVuhIHUpE3ZHR/CP89kVHcEAfFHCM2rx3fev3gne+Y3oIUgMPh3UY3f0 bl9WHrTbJSCY9ousShrAauK71hH0oSKVfxSP7upcuGlZwPPCJJCzoTM0NIDKQkBub58E FHshLJUuEZB8DTMpTiZ4l7S14lYnrMXXA7GERAqZ7mpGuPpMnNpq7PqCWf7kQ4p3GVQV BHjiebBMWSmzSTxoXbPwMiHDw7AA/zjUYtqt1Rkv3l0ygcLngXYCfb86j7IBTBbU3w0A QByg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532cfD1T4ouI4tWKalix1WGEOY9Fh7E9q/UA2h9FVqmEOLkXvNir tg+gu86tTqghd4LFiS9mY5YB2oh02/52XA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxOuuMhQ9QDdNny+FlyNmpJopwmgA9qLEWu3QEdusAU+Mvw2iNEpwaO8nqwMKOh4Th06MlWeQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1df7:: with SMTP id b23mr16460482otj.163.1621816065273; Sun, 23 May 2021 17:27:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.42] (adsl-70-133-144-190.dsl.ablntx.sbcglobal.net. [70.133.144.190]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s187sm2491239oig.6.2021.05.23.17.27.44 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 23 May 2021 17:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <60AAF2FF.40702@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 19:27:43 -0500 From: Jacob Bachmeyer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090807 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.17 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: GNU bug tracker automated control server Subject: bug administrivia 2021-05-23 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: jcb62281@gmail.com Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) package dejagnu send-detail 48155 owner 48611 ! severity 48611 wishlist send 48611 thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 23 21:12:35 2021 Received: (at 48611) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 May 2021 01:12:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42036 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lkz91-0007Op-Jq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2021 21:12:35 -0400 Received: from mail-oo1-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:33734) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lkz8x-0007OZ-MC for 48611@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2021 21:12:34 -0400 Received: by mail-oo1-f41.google.com with SMTP id j17-20020a4ad6d10000b02901fef5280522so5989170oot.0 for <48611@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 23 May 2021 18:12:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OCV+nbJSFAn8ql+fVUKEPAJTTOdq08rg5n66CFv7snk=; b=fvqALSFQwr020xQo1P/L+optrFenRy79IUTZAqzwW17n7g6pgT2kPEUljb5/1ZaKOm PpJq8lCl+oRiYEZCPS0JkZcC8M9aXDj+RFL8ZKd86ehe+tiy1OlH0KKfFg5KHjvKsNKo CyW7zuv8pG6wib/GAlBUMLm48D/JcwNpoIymExIOersvpz0kkP2t8/xqeUIqRwBM5FDS +pg2BsTZC5jWrmxPkHzVsUxbZrEWSPf5J8zhAxQSKfvTiq259roT9bIuGZyV2NWcZyRa E8UYcJFHY0TAh2Uxs5BPL/wWDor3pmjgWBrRc29NXKfTp2oDbmUX3TXb4pFeXfFpfBSg Dadw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OCV+nbJSFAn8ql+fVUKEPAJTTOdq08rg5n66CFv7snk=; b=W0yIXghosu/XUGLWtqNKFPH1pHVOYVA+Jy51bafYsjZoInKc41TLc0rB97+/FbfN/x U4ClTC2MwC/B3in2G+03P72qCIbN8MQMsy3fcQoojDJAeybYUrVCbmQtr9p3nli3Fu6w jJMbRLM7cIVCsFQrUp0IUK87FHtLS7fxea6a7chU62LYSersG+SRgkBpo7fJAYuCZzvi hga42kMZIciX6ZEtosNpE0LIE/r9VMFviJyzcjWKJdgSYfWF07z+/bvojgbmfjl3Lp4r FOGW+n3jbp+8RuryoeoVKlT01ary7r50/X00lNrlwtRK3mpklwkJnf848DZabAfhD8Wo Tejg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5318iYeJVw2mlEzjeOCDkNqtlzPv6xkZEbb3ihuMASiQzZzo0saU /EvuLECWUZHp7Qek2jEgN9A2mIDN+Mng4w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzeaKTqoCfs6+OGSrrMDUxXyKKsYQso8UmaITCvuZKirGDXmKznqSTRHxWsrO81rAfvKLWvGw== X-Received: by 2002:a4a:ab83:: with SMTP id m3mr16094907oon.2.1621818745976; Sun, 23 May 2021 18:12:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.42] (adsl-70-133-144-190.dsl.ablntx.sbcglobal.net. [70.133.144.190]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w10sm2703024ott.75.2021.05.23.18.12.25 for <48611@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 23 May 2021 18:12:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <60AAFD78.8020803@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 20:12:24 -0500 From: Jacob Bachmeyer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090807 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.17 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 48611@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#48611: Allow DEJAGNU TIMEOUT env var for slow arches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.7 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: This patch mentions that the problem seems to be specific to certain target architectures and possibly certain testing sites. Would this be better solved by setting timeouts in a site or board configuration file? Content analysis details: (2.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jcb62281[at]gmail.com) 0.2 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends in digit (jcb62281[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (jcb62281[at]gmail.com) -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.161.41 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.85.161.41 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 2.2 FAKE_REPLY_A1 No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48611 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: jcb62281@gmail.com Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: This patch mentions that the problem seems to be specific to certain target architectures and possibly certain testing sites. Would this be better solved by setting timeouts in a site or board configuration file? Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.161.41 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.85.161.41 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jcb62281[at]gmail.com) 0.2 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends in digit (jcb62281[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (jcb62281[at]gmail.com) -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 2.2 FAKE_REPLY_A1 No description available. This patch mentions that the problem seems to be specific to certain target architectures and possibly certain testing sites. Would this be better solved by setting timeouts in a site or board configuration file? I recognize that the remote_exec procedure is not currently sensitive to that either, so there will be an enhancement here for 1.6.4 either way. I will say now that the DEJAGNU_TIMEOUT environment variable will *not* be accepted upstream because there are many different timeouts in various parts of DejaGnu and providing only a single "knob" to adjust all of them is not appropriate. If there are other components in Debian that will need to be updated, I recommend changing the environment variable used to DEJAGNU_REMOTE_EXEC_TIMEOUT as an interim measure as soon as possible. That name is acceptable for this purpose, although the possibility of instead setting a target configuration parameter is likely to be preferred. There is also little difficulty in allowing an environment variable to override a target configuration parameter, for ease of development. Also, does this need to be an environment variable or can it be a variable passed on the runtest command line? (What is the surrounding context here?) The latter would be preferred if feasible simply to reduce clutter in the environment: [...] + } elsif { [info exists DEJAGNU_REMOTE_EXEC_TIMEOUT] } { + set timeout $DEJAGNU_REMOTE_EXEC_TIMEOUT [...] and add "DEJAGNU_REMOTE_EXEC_TIMEOUT=600" to the runtest command line. Such variables are set early in runtest.exp while parsing the command line but are distinct from the environment. Backporting patches for this to 1.6.2 and 1.6.3 for Debian should be fairly easy once they land on Git master for 1.6.4. -- Jacob From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 24 20:02:51 2021 Received: (at 48611) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 May 2021 00:02:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44201 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1llKX5-0002jy-Ld for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 20:02:51 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f178.google.com ([209.85.167.178]:43776) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1llKX2-0002jh-6e for 48611@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 20:02:50 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-f178.google.com with SMTP id j75so28625032oih.10 for <48611@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 24 May 2021 17:02:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-transfer-encoding; bh=921aF+OlLF5Wc9fjhPD7siwUbtp4CmSPpTGc47oXebk=; b=hem4G0i4iB9Jezxo4J51PRasXkSoSoSCATs+hLuIU6qKRRyUL6d2bratzWb7idfaFW bKB8AYU2dkvHV1jVn/IPeJjNLW+IH165Azkvu5+d93r99HgBuFvyqTDXhP6erbGLfmvb nLFCKGAZHZWMZ21U/7lbmGVnAWMFmybooEIz9P5FkVpA9GpDDm9i6eqs67dQXtNa/tLm P7gCqHeOkJxoLNwXvNSNBE0J3uu/ub8Cubeoxp6WjbIMeUG64j7t5sX7Sfjs/v+L9Sp+ lA7zEgBZQ4dqryhy59Tk2Y/AX9uXq/wB5Ms+3i9Zld3Zx9ten7UVCq9m/UM7oSdWeV/7 ki9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:content-transfer-encoding; bh=921aF+OlLF5Wc9fjhPD7siwUbtp4CmSPpTGc47oXebk=; b=HGIJODXn02BUMW6pWYmy5xM2RYvyBhPm6CIBfLs1mnvIXvqmwAEMC6SOi3f6CVp9UP i1m+fATB+Lfw0UaG1E3OhU4p1miw24YBk54+Xv2velR+nBDRt9DcubJpkNlUHjxt0pcf fvlJArQzlm0eLE3Di5LjwmghYMQa4N0lPeHh18zSBHTldNzlHvD6SkZvNgmnHvupC1wB m24MIyELWhT43GUPSTL0izYYD6f9F3QRh1uhZPFZ/vsZnv+6aiz5+crxl0YvdwvhHGIq 5DvHfvb1AhPZgkM35/sOy6Y7emkOJcZkClRw4YkbFeoLJjtndmSyq7rn0Uz+NDFTfyPQ tAZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533AX6+4lyJBoPc4vGguCTPILyhBtQ/FoElbFKvni2VSdXohx9Gp bx5f9SVxHz8yj0QZfWI1IWWd0XVTbErkng== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzx/UhqCHChNxIx5pIB2ICnOcDgXOirvmLzqtyEbGEMYb1gJDEM9+6olVRgbUR4k81I6pRxkg== X-Received: by 2002:aca:1b14:: with SMTP id b20mr426606oib.174.1621900962266; Mon, 24 May 2021 17:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.42] (adsl-70-133-144-190.dsl.ablntx.sbcglobal.net. [70.133.144.190]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w13sm2933095otp.10.2021.05.24.17.02.40 for <48611@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 24 May 2021 17:02:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <60AC3EA0.3080902@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 19:02:40 -0500 From: Jacob Bachmeyer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090807 MultiZilla/1.8.3.4e SeaMonkey/1.1.17 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 48611@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#48611: Allow DEJAGNU TIMEOUT env var for slow arches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.7 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Now that I have had a chance to sleep on this, I will save you some trouble: an environment or command line variable will not be accepted upstream for this and 1.6.4 will add a board_info key for this [...] Content analysis details: (2.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.167.178 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends in digit (jcb62281[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jcb62281[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (jcb62281[at]gmail.com) -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.167.178 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 2.2 FAKE_REPLY_A1 No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48611 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: jcb62281@gmail.com Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Now that I have had a chance to sleep on this, I will save you some trouble: an environment or command line variable will not be accepted upstream for this and 1.6.4 will add a board_info key for this [...] Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.167.178 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.167.178 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends in digit (jcb62281[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jcb62281[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (jcb62281[at]gmail.com) 2.2 FAKE_REPLY_A1 No description available. -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Now that I have had a chance to sleep on this, I will save you some trouble: an environment or command line variable will not be accepted upstream for this and 1.6.4 will add a board_info key for this purpose. The rationale is that DejaGnu can support testing runs spanning multiple targets, and in the future will support multiple targets in parallel testing mode as well. There is no good way to limit the scope of an environment variable or command line variable to only one target, and different target boards may need different timeout values. The board_info structures are the correct place for this information. While 1.6.4 may possibly rework board_info internally, I will try to keep the changes to lib/remote.exp simple enough for Debian to easily backport them to 1.6.3 and/or 1.6.2. -- Jacob