GNU bug report logs - #48592
[PATCH 0/2] Support plural forms of Author and Maintainer library headers

Previous Next

Full log

Message #20 received at 48592 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li>
Cc: 48592 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#48592: [PATCH 0/2] Support plural forms of Author and
 Maintainer library headers
Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 12:31:39 +0300

> From: Jonas Bernoulli <jonas <at> bernoul.li>
> Cc: 48592 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 10:43:40 +0200
> 
> >> this also adds support for using "Authors" and "Maintainers" as the
> >> names of the header fields instead of just the singular forms.
> >
> > Why do we need these additions?
> 
> OCD and grammar.
> 
> > Couldn't we keep using Author and Maintainer?
> 
> Of course. But why?

To keep Emacs smaller and less complex.

> > Having both variants immediately begs the question which is preferable
> > and why, arguments about style, and other bikeshedding.
> 
> The answer seems obvious to me.  Do it like (nearly?) all natural
> languages do it: If n=1 then singular, else (n>1) plural.
> 
> > Unless there's a good reason for adding new headings, I'd prefer to
> > make do with what we already have.
> 
> Grammatical mistakes tend to be distracting, especially if you see the
> same one over and over again, year after year.
> 
> I was expecting this to be noncontroversial.  ;)

See above.

But maybe I'm the odd one out here.  Does anyone else have an opinion
on adding these headers?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.