GNU bug report logs - #48545
28.0.50; `icomplete-vertical-mode` does not support the `group-function`

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Daniel Mendler <mail <at> daniel-mendler.de>

Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 18:57:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 28.0.50

Done: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
To: Kévin Le Gouguec <kevin.legouguec <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Mendler <mail <at> daniel-mendler.de>, Gregory Heytings <gregory <at> heytings.org>, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>, 48545 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#48545: 28.0.50; `icomplete-vertical-mode` does not support the `group-function`
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 14:29:17 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021, 13:38 Kévin Le Gouguec <kevin.legouguec <at> gmail.com>
wrote:

> João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> FWIW (I didn't take the time to understand the ins and outs of the
> completion system nor the changes that are being made; sorry about
> that),


Don't beat yourself over it, it's not an easy or pleasent thing to
understand.

with this tentative patch, Icomplete seems to honour
> read-char-by-name-sort.  With icomplete enabled and
> read-char-by-name-sort set to 'code, try
>
>     C-x 8 RET CLOCK FACE
>
> - with the current master branch, the completions are sorted
>   alphabetically,
> - with the tentative patch applied, the completions are sorted by code
>   point.
>

Yes I think that's the idea. But do you think that's good or bad?

This seems to compose well with completions-group AFAICT (see e.g. C-x 8
> RET ROMAN).
>

 This is good, right?

João

>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 328 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.