GNU bug report logs -
#48524
13.0.11; AUCTeX should not use LaTeX error message for non-LaTeX modes
Previous Next
Reported by: jfbu <jfbu <at> free.fr>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 16:17:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 13.0.11
Done: Ikumi Keita <ikumi <at> ikumi.que.jp>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Hi,
In tex-buf.el I see for example
("Use of [^ ]* doesn't match its definition." .
"It's probably one of the picture-drawing commands, and you have used
the wrong syntax for specifying an argument. If it's \\@array that
doesn't match its definition, then there is something wrong in an
@-expression in the argument of an array or tabular
environment---perhaps a fragile command that is not \\protect'ed.")
And this is triggered for example by this Plain tex file
\def\foo1{}
\foo.
\bye
But in the source for pdftex pdftex.web see at about line 9480
@ @<Report an improper use...@>=
begin print_err("Use of "); sprint_cs(warning_index);
@.Use of x doesn't match...@>
print(" doesn't match its definition");
help4("If you say, e.g., `\def\a1{...}', then you must always")@/
("put `1' after `\a', since control sequence names are")@/
("made up of letters only. The macro here has not been")@/
("followed by the required stuff, so I'm ignoring it.");
error; return;
end
I am of the opinion that AUCTeX should use the original Knuth
error messages.
Even for LaTeX the above error message is now really dated,
but this is not topic of this ticket.
I understand this is some work to extract from pdftex.web the
errors (perhaps someone in the last 30+ years or so has done so,
regarding the Knuth original messages, as pdftex adds some of its
own) and I am opening this bug ticket only for reference as for many
many years each time I have had errors playing around with
TeX I have always been slightly annoyed to see LaTeX specific
error messages. As a result, I most of the time execute etex or pdftex
in a Terminal bypassing auctex.
! Use of \foo doesn't match its definition.
l.27 \foo.
? h
If you say, e.g., `\def\a1{...}', then you must always
put `1' after `\a', since control sequence names are
made up of letters only. The macro here has not been
followed by the required stuff, so I'm ignoring it.
Best,
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 354 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.