GNU bug report logs -
#48412
tracepointing and backtracing in the REPL sometime hang
Previous Next
Reported by: randomlooser <at> riseup.net
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 08:22:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: lloda <lloda <at> sarc.name>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report
#48412: tracepointing and backtracing in the REPL sometime hang
which was filed against the guile package, has been closed.
The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 48412 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
--
48412: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=48412
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Patch applied in f9f55b9ce74898d1b0a77dcc9b4aa260e5cd208d. Thanks!
> On 16 May 2021, at 09:09, Adriano Peluso <randomlooser <at> riseup.net> wrote:
>
> Il giorno ven, 14/05/2021 alle 11.13 +0200, Adriano Peluso ha scritto:
>> I just noticed someone sent a patch that seems relevant here
>>
>> It's in #43102
>>
>> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=43102
>
> I applied this patch
>
> It does solve the issue, it seems
>
> Now I can tracepoint my procedure
>
>
>
>
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
in Guile 3.0.5 installed with Guix (as a package manager on top of
Ubuntu)
In a file I have this simple procedure
(define (f n)
(if (< n 3)
n
(+ (f (- n 1))
(* 2 (f (- n 2)))
(* 3 (f (- n 3))))))
it's a variation of the one calculating the Fibonacci numbers, from an
exercise of the SICP (1.11)
At the REPL, I load the file normally
scheme@(guile-user)> (load "1.11.scm")
Now, I can trace this procedure
scheme@(guile-user)> ,trace (f 4)
trace: | (f 4)
trace: | | (f 3)
trace: | | | (f 2)
trace: | | | 2
trace: | | | (f 1)
trace: | | | 1
trace: | | | (f 0)
trace: | | | 0
trace: | | 4
trace: | | (f 2)
trace: | | 2
trace: | | (f 1)
trace: | | 1
trace: | 11
But I can't tracepoint it
scheme@(guile-user)> ,tp f
Trap 0: Tracepoint at #<procedure f (n)>.
scheme@(guile-user)> (f 4)
Trap 0: (f 4)
Trap 0: | (f 3)
Trap 0: | | (f 2)
ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception:
Wrong number of arguments to #<procedure return-handler (frame depth
values)>
Entering a new prompt. Type `,bt' for a backtrace or `,q' to continue.
scheme@(guile-user) [1]>
and now I can't even print a backtrace
scheme@(guile-user)> (f 4)
Trap 0: (f 4)
Trap 0: | (f 3)
Trap 0: | | (f 2)
ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception:
Wrong number of arguments to #<procedure return-handler (frame depth
values)>
Entering a new prompt. Type `,bt' for a backtrace or `,q' to continue.
scheme@(guile-user) [1]> ,bt
In /home/adriano/Documenti/SICP/1.11.scm:
64:9 4 (f 4)
64:9 3 (f 3)
While executing meta-command:
In procedure frame-local-ref: Argument 2 out of range: 1
scheme@(guile-user) [1]>
and now I can't even trace no more
scheme@(guile-user) [1]> ,q
scheme@(guile-user)> ,trace (f 4)
While executing meta-command:
Wrong number of arguments to #<procedure return-handler (frame depth
values)>
scheme@(guile-user)>
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 63 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.