From unknown Mon Aug 18 11:20:11 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#48412: tracepointing and backtracing in the REPL sometime hang Resent-From: Adriano Peluso Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 08:22:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 48412 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 48412@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Reply-To: randomlooser@riseup.net Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16209804969325 (code B ref -1); Fri, 14 May 2021 08:22:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2021 08:21:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44950 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhT4g-0002QJ-SA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 04:21:36 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:40116) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhRq3-0006eo-Hq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 03:02:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44492) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhRq3-0004CD-3r for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 03:02:23 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:37086) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhRq1-0004wh-7e for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 03:02:22 -0400 Received: from fews2.riseup.net (fews2-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FhKGL3xJWzDrN2 for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 00:02:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1620975738; bh=XUzOEYzxW0SWOM2rihaQZViZojeD+jAHMHW7pq9NN5I=; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Date:From; b=bXB9aWaqDMgDv1daInF6LIuJdxVOCbvWn1I7oD40qg4lAGVFd8P2Egxjr9FGyiFaC 4aYqon/558/cAkGwrOE3n/8ub+k20se2WXtEUnn+VsJmb5m0+ChJJ4Y6Zr2+ZT+riZ 3r7flIm5Hc1cqMES5mUPqu11uUmzCDmFVWCMga2U= X-Riseup-User-ID: 29EFEDE15A57D1E425D66CEA9AC93E4FDD1D32F31A46C620B5EA562113102E21 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews2.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FhKGK65wqz1yjy for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 00:02:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4b37551977861fc4d2214dce713c6ff84763ddc8.camel@riseup.net> From: Adriano Peluso Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 09:02:14 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=randomlooser@riseup.net; helo=mx1.riseup.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 14 May 2021 04:21:34 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) in Guile 3.0.5 installed with Guix (as a package manager on top of Ubuntu) In a file I have this simple procedure (define (f n) (if (< n 3) n (+ (f (- n 1)) (* 2 (f (- n 2))) (* 3 (f (- n 3)))))) it's a variation of the one calculating the Fibonacci numbers, from an exercise of the SICP (1.11) At the REPL, I load the file normally scheme@(guile-user)> (load "1.11.scm") Now, I can trace this procedure scheme@(guile-user)> ,trace (f 4) trace: | (f 4) trace: | | (f 3) trace: | | | (f 2) trace: | | | 2 trace: | | | (f 1) trace: | | | 1 trace: | | | (f 0) trace: | | | 0 trace: | | 4 trace: | | (f 2) trace: | | 2 trace: | | (f 1) trace: | | 1 trace: | 11 But I can't tracepoint it scheme@(guile-user)> ,tp f Trap 0: Tracepoint at #. scheme@(guile-user)> (f 4) Trap 0: (f 4) Trap 0: | (f 3) Trap 0: | | (f 2) ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception: Wrong number of arguments to # Entering a new prompt. Type `,bt' for a backtrace or `,q' to continue. scheme@(guile-user) [1]> and now I can't even print a backtrace scheme@(guile-user)> (f 4) Trap 0: (f 4) Trap 0: | (f 3) Trap 0: | | (f 2) ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception: Wrong number of arguments to # Entering a new prompt. Type `,bt' for a backtrace or `,q' to continue. scheme@(guile-user) [1]> ,bt In /home/adriano/Documenti/SICP/1.11.scm: 64:9 4 (f 4) 64:9 3 (f 3) While executing meta-command: In procedure frame-local-ref: Argument 2 out of range: 1 scheme@(guile-user) [1]> and now I can't even trace no more scheme@(guile-user) [1]> ,q scheme@(guile-user)> ,trace (f 4) While executing meta-command: Wrong number of arguments to # scheme@(guile-user)> From unknown Mon Aug 18 11:20:11 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#48412: duplicate ? References: <4b37551977861fc4d2214dce713c6ff84763ddc8.camel@riseup.net> In-Reply-To: <4b37551977861fc4d2214dce713c6ff84763ddc8.camel@riseup.net> Resent-From: Adriano Peluso Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 14:52:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48412 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 48412@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: randomlooser@riseup.net Received: via spool by 48412-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48412.1621003890737 (code B ref 48412); Fri, 14 May 2021 14:52:04 +0000 Received: (at 48412) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2021 14:51:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46781 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhZA1-0000Bo-By for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 10:51:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:56034) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhTtS-0003sH-LW for 48412@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 05:14:05 -0400 Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FhNBD60cwzDq86 for <48412@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 14 May 2021 02:13:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1620983636; bh=SYR2/fJmL3S24Fc4UpwAt299VyybgFUlPAIrbLE0zmw=; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Date:From; b=N1/3UUQsb8jjoR4/OCYDUfk8NELzcxfBhscpE2Yvr7CIHf3rYCJ1lTJ5h7njzISjN toJh6+4lMzLXHBM3OsZGNe8ygLBE2KqGKlsOhk8b2f/SEzYApof6U3N4p8gQO3aOXF HFLmnFr+lOQoFDzAmd1Y60K5L/9K8qGidomekiBA= X-Riseup-User-ID: 141256DA2AE93332E34B648A374152E0BD73974B63C27C7C3C6D899CF88E6D9A Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FhNBD0N8Wz5vNL for <48412@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 14 May 2021 02:13:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <757b46c29f0cc9f3acbda912e2153edfeab4fd69.camel@riseup.net> From: Adriano Peluso Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 11:13:52 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 14 May 2021 10:51:28 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) I just noticed someone sent a patch that seems relevant here It's in #43102 https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=43102 From unknown Mon Aug 18 11:20:11 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#48412: duplicate ? Resent-From: Adriano Peluso Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 16:09:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48412 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 48412@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: randomlooser@riseup.net Received: via spool by 48412-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48412.162118129113490 (code B ref 48412); Sun, 16 May 2021 16:09:03 +0000 Received: (at 48412) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2021 16:08:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51388 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liJJL-0003VP-F6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 12:08:11 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:50552) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liAue-00086r-1y for 48412@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 03:10:08 -0400 Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FjYLL1gm9zDs7y for <48412@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 16 May 2021 00:10:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1621149002; bh=LVEB+9ZYmXHrgrs8LDAu33cbxBe2G8rydd5KBAZf/A4=; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=h8DT/yoMxQd8QGcyPqIcnQPIxwqayZSqq7XVy78jgCqPWQZRibKR4XfBbn2KKOaKL /MMPP7wxvUOXodJxt2Sp4GDKCeRQ9BTSRESG00p1KFBpZCS8wC2IZsYY70Lx6ByprV AIe/bi8tIGSyfgzZoZihA+kPDdNmK3BXFmxS+g/A= X-Riseup-User-ID: B6333CEA589DF797CE563DBA6C1BE1C0A27DC7FF7AC58D1138EE0A7CB8BF12FE Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FjYLK3S0Rz5vqb for <48412@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 16 May 2021 00:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <66a0348051a4f94bc8fd0dd22ca4e655b0837f98.camel@riseup.net> From: Adriano Peluso Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 09:09:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <757b46c29f0cc9f3acbda912e2153edfeab4fd69.camel@riseup.net> References: <757b46c29f0cc9f3acbda912e2153edfeab4fd69.camel@riseup.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 16 May 2021 12:08:09 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Il giorno ven, 14/05/2021 alle 11.13 +0200, Adriano Peluso ha scritto: > I just noticed someone sent a patch that seems relevant here > > It's in #43102 > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=43102 I applied this patch It does solve the issue, it seems Now I can tracepoint my procedure From unknown Mon Aug 18 11:20:11 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: randomlooser@riseup.net Subject: bug#48412: closed (Re: bug#48412: duplicate ?) Message-ID: References: <4b37551977861fc4d2214dce713c6ff84763ddc8.camel@riseup.net> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 48412 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guile Reply-To: 48412@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 19:34:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1621452842-19377-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1621452842-19377-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #48412: tracepointing and backtracing in the REPL sometime hang which was filed against the guile package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 48412@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 48412: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D48412 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1621452842-19377-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 48412-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2021 19:33:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60781 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ljRx3-00051p-Mh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 15:33:53 -0400 Received: from mta-14-4.privateemail.com ([198.54.118.206]:18393) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ljRx0-00051V-De; Wed, 19 May 2021 15:33:52 -0400 Received: from mta-14.privateemail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta-14.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E9180061; Wed, 19 May 2021 15:33:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (unknown [10.20.151.207]) by mta-14.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 165E68005F; Wed, 19 May 2021 15:33:43 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\)) Subject: Re: bug#48412: duplicate ? From: lloda In-Reply-To: <66a0348051a4f94bc8fd0dd22ca4e655b0837f98.camel@riseup.net> Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 21:34:26 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <757b46c29f0cc9f3acbda912e2153edfeab4fd69.camel@riseup.net> <66a0348051a4f94bc8fd0dd22ca4e655b0837f98.camel@riseup.net> To: randomlooser@riseup.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48412-done Cc: 43102-done@debbugs.gnu.org, 48412-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Patch applied in f9f55b9ce74898d1b0a77dcc9b4aa260e5cd208d. Thanks! > On 16 May 2021, at 09:09, Adriano Peluso wrote: > > Il giorno ven, 14/05/2021 alle 11.13 +0200, Adriano Peluso ha scritto: >> I just noticed someone sent a patch that seems relevant here >> >> It's in #43102 >> >> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=43102 > > I applied this patch > > It does solve the issue, it seems > > Now I can tracepoint my procedure > > > > ------------=_1621452842-19377-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2021 08:21:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44950 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhT4g-0002QJ-SA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 04:21:36 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:40116) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhRq3-0006eo-Hq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 03:02:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44492) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhRq3-0004CD-3r for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 03:02:23 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:37086) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhRq1-0004wh-7e for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 03:02:22 -0400 Received: from fews2.riseup.net (fews2-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FhKGL3xJWzDrN2 for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 00:02:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1620975738; bh=XUzOEYzxW0SWOM2rihaQZViZojeD+jAHMHW7pq9NN5I=; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Date:From; b=bXB9aWaqDMgDv1daInF6LIuJdxVOCbvWn1I7oD40qg4lAGVFd8P2Egxjr9FGyiFaC 4aYqon/558/cAkGwrOE3n/8ub+k20se2WXtEUnn+VsJmb5m0+ChJJ4Y6Zr2+ZT+riZ 3r7flIm5Hc1cqMES5mUPqu11uUmzCDmFVWCMga2U= X-Riseup-User-ID: 29EFEDE15A57D1E425D66CEA9AC93E4FDD1D32F31A46C620B5EA562113102E21 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews2.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FhKGK65wqz1yjy for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 00:02:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4b37551977861fc4d2214dce713c6ff84763ddc8.camel@riseup.net> Subject: tracepointing and backtracing in the REPL sometime hang From: Adriano Peluso To: bug-guile@gnu.org Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 09:02:14 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=randomlooser@riseup.net; helo=mx1.riseup.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 14 May 2021 04:21:34 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: randomlooser@riseup.net Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) in Guile 3.0.5 installed with Guix (as a package manager on top of Ubuntu) In a file I have this simple procedure (define (f n) (if (< n 3) n (+ (f (- n 1)) (* 2 (f (- n 2))) (* 3 (f (- n 3)))))) it's a variation of the one calculating the Fibonacci numbers, from an exercise of the SICP (1.11) At the REPL, I load the file normally scheme@(guile-user)> (load "1.11.scm") Now, I can trace this procedure scheme@(guile-user)> ,trace (f 4) trace: | (f 4) trace: | | (f 3) trace: | | | (f 2) trace: | | | 2 trace: | | | (f 1) trace: | | | 1 trace: | | | (f 0) trace: | | | 0 trace: | | 4 trace: | | (f 2) trace: | | 2 trace: | | (f 1) trace: | | 1 trace: | 11 But I can't tracepoint it scheme@(guile-user)> ,tp f Trap 0: Tracepoint at #. scheme@(guile-user)> (f 4) Trap 0: (f 4) Trap 0: | (f 3) Trap 0: | | (f 2) ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception: Wrong number of arguments to # Entering a new prompt. Type `,bt' for a backtrace or `,q' to continue. scheme@(guile-user) [1]> and now I can't even print a backtrace scheme@(guile-user)> (f 4) Trap 0: (f 4) Trap 0: | (f 3) Trap 0: | | (f 2) ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception: Wrong number of arguments to # Entering a new prompt. Type `,bt' for a backtrace or `,q' to continue. scheme@(guile-user) [1]> ,bt In /home/adriano/Documenti/SICP/1.11.scm: 64:9 4 (f 4) 64:9 3 (f 3) While executing meta-command: In procedure frame-local-ref: Argument 2 out of range: 1 scheme@(guile-user) [1]> and now I can't even trace no more scheme@(guile-user) [1]> ,q scheme@(guile-user)> ,trace (f 4) While executing meta-command: Wrong number of arguments to # scheme@(guile-user)> ------------=_1621452842-19377-1--