From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 14 04:21:36 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2021 08:21:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44950 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhT4g-0002QJ-SA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 04:21:36 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:40116) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhRq3-0006eo-Hq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 03:02:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44492) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhRq3-0004CD-3r for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 03:02:23 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:37086) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhRq1-0004wh-7e for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 03:02:22 -0400 Received: from fews2.riseup.net (fews2-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FhKGL3xJWzDrN2 for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 00:02:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1620975738; bh=XUzOEYzxW0SWOM2rihaQZViZojeD+jAHMHW7pq9NN5I=; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Date:From; b=bXB9aWaqDMgDv1daInF6LIuJdxVOCbvWn1I7oD40qg4lAGVFd8P2Egxjr9FGyiFaC 4aYqon/558/cAkGwrOE3n/8ub+k20se2WXtEUnn+VsJmb5m0+ChJJ4Y6Zr2+ZT+riZ 3r7flIm5Hc1cqMES5mUPqu11uUmzCDmFVWCMga2U= X-Riseup-User-ID: 29EFEDE15A57D1E425D66CEA9AC93E4FDD1D32F31A46C620B5EA562113102E21 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews2.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FhKGK65wqz1yjy for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 00:02:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4b37551977861fc4d2214dce713c6ff84763ddc8.camel@riseup.net> Subject: tracepointing and backtracing in the REPL sometime hang From: Adriano Peluso To: bug-guile@gnu.org Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 09:02:14 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=randomlooser@riseup.net; helo=mx1.riseup.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 14 May 2021 04:21:34 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: randomlooser@riseup.net Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) in Guile 3.0.5 installed with Guix (as a package manager on top of Ubuntu) In a file I have this simple procedure (define (f n) (if (< n 3) n (+ (f (- n 1)) (* 2 (f (- n 2))) (* 3 (f (- n 3)))))) it's a variation of the one calculating the Fibonacci numbers, from an exercise of the SICP (1.11) At the REPL, I load the file normally scheme@(guile-user)> (load "1.11.scm") Now, I can trace this procedure scheme@(guile-user)> ,trace (f 4) trace: | (f 4) trace: | | (f 3) trace: | | | (f 2) trace: | | | 2 trace: | | | (f 1) trace: | | | 1 trace: | | | (f 0) trace: | | | 0 trace: | | 4 trace: | | (f 2) trace: | | 2 trace: | | (f 1) trace: | | 1 trace: | 11 But I can't tracepoint it scheme@(guile-user)> ,tp f Trap 0: Tracepoint at #. scheme@(guile-user)> (f 4) Trap 0: (f 4) Trap 0: | (f 3) Trap 0: | | (f 2) ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception: Wrong number of arguments to # Entering a new prompt. Type `,bt' for a backtrace or `,q' to continue. scheme@(guile-user) [1]> and now I can't even print a backtrace scheme@(guile-user)> (f 4) Trap 0: (f 4) Trap 0: | (f 3) Trap 0: | | (f 2) ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception: Wrong number of arguments to # Entering a new prompt. Type `,bt' for a backtrace or `,q' to continue. scheme@(guile-user) [1]> ,bt In /home/adriano/Documenti/SICP/1.11.scm: 64:9 4 (f 4) 64:9 3 (f 3) While executing meta-command: In procedure frame-local-ref: Argument 2 out of range: 1 scheme@(guile-user) [1]> and now I can't even trace no more scheme@(guile-user) [1]> ,q scheme@(guile-user)> ,trace (f 4) While executing meta-command: Wrong number of arguments to # scheme@(guile-user)> From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 14 10:51:30 2021 Received: (at 48412) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2021 14:51:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46781 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhZA1-0000Bo-By for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 10:51:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:56034) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhTtS-0003sH-LW for 48412@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2021 05:14:05 -0400 Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FhNBD60cwzDq86 for <48412@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 14 May 2021 02:13:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1620983636; bh=SYR2/fJmL3S24Fc4UpwAt299VyybgFUlPAIrbLE0zmw=; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Date:From; b=N1/3UUQsb8jjoR4/OCYDUfk8NELzcxfBhscpE2Yvr7CIHf3rYCJ1lTJ5h7njzISjN toJh6+4lMzLXHBM3OsZGNe8ygLBE2KqGKlsOhk8b2f/SEzYApof6U3N4p8gQO3aOXF HFLmnFr+lOQoFDzAmd1Y60K5L/9K8qGidomekiBA= X-Riseup-User-ID: 141256DA2AE93332E34B648A374152E0BD73974B63C27C7C3C6D899CF88E6D9A Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FhNBD0N8Wz5vNL for <48412@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 14 May 2021 02:13:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <757b46c29f0cc9f3acbda912e2153edfeab4fd69.camel@riseup.net> Subject: duplicate ? From: Adriano Peluso To: 48412@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 11:13:52 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48412 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 14 May 2021 10:51:28 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: randomlooser@riseup.net Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) I just noticed someone sent a patch that seems relevant here It's in #43102 https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=43102 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 16 12:08:11 2021 Received: (at 48412) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2021 16:08:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51388 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liJJL-0003VP-F6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 12:08:11 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:50552) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liAue-00086r-1y for 48412@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 03:10:08 -0400 Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FjYLL1gm9zDs7y for <48412@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 16 May 2021 00:10:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1621149002; bh=LVEB+9ZYmXHrgrs8LDAu33cbxBe2G8rydd5KBAZf/A4=; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=h8DT/yoMxQd8QGcyPqIcnQPIxwqayZSqq7XVy78jgCqPWQZRibKR4XfBbn2KKOaKL /MMPP7wxvUOXodJxt2Sp4GDKCeRQ9BTSRESG00p1KFBpZCS8wC2IZsYY70Lx6ByprV AIe/bi8tIGSyfgzZoZihA+kPDdNmK3BXFmxS+g/A= X-Riseup-User-ID: B6333CEA589DF797CE563DBA6C1BE1C0A27DC7FF7AC58D1138EE0A7CB8BF12FE Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FjYLK3S0Rz5vqb for <48412@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 16 May 2021 00:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <66a0348051a4f94bc8fd0dd22ca4e655b0837f98.camel@riseup.net> Subject: Re: duplicate ? From: Adriano Peluso To: 48412@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 09:09:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <757b46c29f0cc9f3acbda912e2153edfeab4fd69.camel@riseup.net> References: <757b46c29f0cc9f3acbda912e2153edfeab4fd69.camel@riseup.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48412 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 16 May 2021 12:08:09 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: randomlooser@riseup.net Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Il giorno ven, 14/05/2021 alle 11.13 +0200, Adriano Peluso ha scritto: > I just noticed someone sent a patch that seems relevant here > > It's in #43102 > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=43102 I applied this patch It does solve the issue, it seems Now I can tracepoint my procedure From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 19 15:33:54 2021 Received: (at 48412-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 May 2021 19:33:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60781 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ljRx3-00051p-Mh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 15:33:53 -0400 Received: from mta-14-4.privateemail.com ([198.54.118.206]:18393) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ljRx0-00051V-De; Wed, 19 May 2021 15:33:52 -0400 Received: from mta-14.privateemail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta-14.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E9180061; Wed, 19 May 2021 15:33:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (unknown [10.20.151.207]) by mta-14.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 165E68005F; Wed, 19 May 2021 15:33:43 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\)) Subject: Re: bug#48412: duplicate ? From: lloda In-Reply-To: <66a0348051a4f94bc8fd0dd22ca4e655b0837f98.camel@riseup.net> Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 21:34:26 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <757b46c29f0cc9f3acbda912e2153edfeab4fd69.camel@riseup.net> <66a0348051a4f94bc8fd0dd22ca4e655b0837f98.camel@riseup.net> To: randomlooser@riseup.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48412-done Cc: 43102-done@debbugs.gnu.org, 48412-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Patch applied in f9f55b9ce74898d1b0a77dcc9b4aa260e5cd208d. Thanks! > On 16 May 2021, at 09:09, Adriano Peluso wrote: > > Il giorno ven, 14/05/2021 alle 11.13 +0200, Adriano Peluso ha scritto: >> I just noticed someone sent a patch that seems relevant here >> >> It's in #43102 >> >> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=43102 > > I applied this patch > > It does solve the issue, it seems > > Now I can tracepoint my procedure > > > > From unknown Fri Sep 05 11:01:37 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 11:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator