GNU bug report logs - #48404
28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Tassilo Horn <tsdh <at> gnu.org>

Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 20:51:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed

Merged with 48410

Found in version 28.0.50

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 48404 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, stefan <at> marxist.se, tsdh <at> gnu.org
Subject: bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 17:10:40 +0300
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
> Cc: tsdh <at> gnu.org,  48404 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  stefan <at> marxist.se
> Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 15:54:43 +0200
> 
> >> >> (version-to-list "28.1 Magit/2.5")
> >> >
> >
> > The main purpose is to compare versions.  How would you do that with
> > loose version strings such as the one above?
> 
> We're looking at the Emacs version (which we'd put first in the version
> string, while the rest is essentially a free text used as a comment).

What do you mean by "first"?  We already support the likes of
"28.3 Beta3", and "Beta3" is not ignored there as some free-text
comment.

And that is assuming the developers of 3rd-party packages can have
some reasonable way of associating their versions with Emacs versions,
which I still think is a problem with no solution.




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 364 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.