From rgm@gnu.org Fri Oct 30 19:25:43 2009 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 31 Oct 2009 02:25:44 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n9V2PgVw031576 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:25:43 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N43ev-0001hP-Tt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:25:41 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N43er-0001fA-99 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:25:41 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56343 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N43er-0001f5-0H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:25:37 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:55938) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N43eq-0007ei-Nt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:25:36 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1N43eq-0001II-EY; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:25:36 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: with-fewer-warnings ? X-Spook: diwn Khaddafi Axis of Evil Saddam Hussein passwd Bush X-Ran: ~u39Eu':}2[^WI?/xpDJys[pC{`OkUIIiNEw:AzQ7=)1d~JPcBxH'*|?)-H&# User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) Severity: wishlist `with-no-warnings' suppresses all compilation warnings. I would like to add `with-fewer-warnings' (or some similar name) that suppresses only some warnings. Eg (with-fewer-warnings '(obsolete cl-functions) ...) would not warn about obsolete things or cl-functions in the body. The possible arguments are the members of byte-compile-warnings. I can implement this if it is considered worth it (it's very similar to with-no-warnings). From eliz@gnu.org Sat Oct 31 01:49:08 2009 Received: (at 4837) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 31 Oct 2009 08:49:08 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (mtaout22.012.net.il [80.179.55.172]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n9V8n6ku012522 for <4837@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:49:08 -0700 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KSD00400EZ6Y600@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 4837@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:49:00 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.37.193]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KSD000GDF5NXJD0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:48:59 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:49:00 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#4837: with-fewer-warnings ? In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Glenn Morris , 4837@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83aaz8dk3n.fsf@gnu.org> References: > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:25:36 -0400 > Cc: > > Eg (with-fewer-warnings '(obsolete cl-functions) ...) > > would not warn about obsolete things or cl-functions in the body. The > possible arguments are the members of byte-compile-warnings. with-suppressed-warnings sounds like a better name to me. From rms@gnu.org Sat Oct 31 19:31:25 2009 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 1 Nov 2009 02:31:25 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nA12VNcr013014 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:31:25 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N4QDz-0001cG-KA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:31:23 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N4QDw-0001bo-1E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:31:23 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41511 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N4QDv-0001bl-Rv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:31:19 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:49703) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N4QDv-0005Nf-KF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:31:19 -0400 Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1N4QDv-0008N3-Af; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:31:19 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 From: Richard Stallman To: Glenn Morris , 4837@debbugs.gnu.org CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Glenn Morris on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:25:36 -0400) Subject: Re: bug#4837: with-fewer-warnings ? Reply-to: rms@gnu.org References: Message-Id: Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:31:19 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Eg (with-fewer-warnings '(obsolete cl-functions) ...) would not warn about obsolete things or cl-functions in the body. The possible arguments are the members of byte-compile-warnings. I can implement this if it is considered worth it (it's very similar to with-no-warnings). I think it isn't worth doing, because it would only gain you very much if you put a lot of code inside with-no-warnings; we avoid doing that. From rgm@gnu.org Mon Nov 9 00:45:26 2009 Received: (at 4837) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 9 Nov 2009 08:45:26 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nA98jPZZ018307 for <4837@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 00:45:26 -0800 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1N7PsK-0000nr-Dn; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:45:24 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: rms@gnu.org Cc: 4837@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#4837: with-fewer-warnings ? References: X-Spook: condor DRM Bletchley Park Freeh CESID import Leuken-Baden X-Ran: qFNiTn\dH$gj@k7:VSC)IStI_%,o^8T~21nN1>:D4C8jnlUO>=xFl1J"|}V-lif+y33}>( X-Hue: red X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:45:24 -0500 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Richard Stallman wrote: > I think it isn't worth doing, (I'd already done it, locally, before posting.) > because it would only gain you very much if you put a lot of code > inside with-no-warnings; we avoid doing that. Perhaps because it is such a blunt instrument. This would make it a bit less blunt. I don't claim this is important, but it is easy to implement. Example usage: In the _implementation_ of an obsolete feature, it's ok to use an obsolete variable and there is no need to be warned about it being obsolete. However, you should still be warned about the variable not being defined, in case you remove it altogether but forget to update the code that uses it. From monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Mon Nov 9 06:38:54 2009 Received: (at 4837) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 9 Nov 2009 14:38:54 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.181]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nA9EcqPq022214 for <4837@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 06:38:53 -0800 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEANu390pMCpsp/2dsb2JhbACBTtt+hD4EiRU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,708,1249272000"; d="scan'208";a="48911172" Received: from 76-10-155-41.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.155.41]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 09 Nov 2009 09:38:46 -0500 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id EA63D7F0F; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:38:45 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: Glenn Morris Cc: 4837@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#4837: with-fewer-warnings ? Message-ID: References: Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:38:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:45:24 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >> I think it isn't worth doing, > (I'd already done it, locally, before posting.) >> because it would only gain you very much if you put a lot of code >> inside with-no-warnings; we avoid doing that. > Perhaps because it is such a blunt instrument. This would make it a > bit less blunt. I don't claim this is important, but it is easy to > implement. > In the _implementation_ of an obsolete feature, it's ok to use an > obsolete variable and there is no need to be warned about it being > obsolete. However, you should still be warned about the variable not > being defined, in case you remove it altogether but forget to update > the code that uses it. Actually, I think I agree (I hate with-no-warnings), but it should be even more precise, and specify which obsolete warning to silence. Stefan From rgm@gnu.org Mon Nov 9 18:09:45 2009 Received: (at 4837) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Nov 2009 02:09:45 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nAA29i2d022708 for <4837@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 18:09:45 -0800 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1N7gAx-00010G-EO; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:09:43 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: Stefan Monnier Cc: 4837@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#4837: with-fewer-warnings ? References: X-Spook: John Kerry AUTODIN militia SP4 Lon Horiuchi Belknap X-Ran: MCoE,@rI?LsFTxRA~5R?*br(Dm@b;&zm,j\=gc-mAjoU*x#!jlt.+:]gb_~^p/@"yRwNQ9 X-Hue: yellow X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:09:43 -0500 Message-ID: <4ivdhjxh94.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Stefan Monnier wrote: > Actually, I think I agree (I hate with-no-warnings), but it should be > even more precise, and specify which obsolete warning to silence. Do you mean, specify precisely which obsolete variable/function(s) not to warn about? That's probably doable via byte-compile-not-obsolete-vars/funcs, I'll have a look. A syntax like this? (with-suppressed-warnings '((obsolete read-file-name-predicate ...) cl-functions ...) body) Although the motivation for this was not _just_ obsolete warnings, and it might not be so simple to extend your request to eg specific free variables. From monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA Tue Nov 10 09:58:10 2009 Received: (at 4837) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Nov 2009 17:58:10 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca (chene.dit.umontreal.ca [132.204.246.20]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nAAHw8tf007191 for <4837@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:58:09 -0800 Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id nAAHw63H021354; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:58:07 -0500 Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E37453A1DA; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:58:06 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: Glenn Morris Cc: 4837@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#4837: with-fewer-warnings ? Message-ID: References: <4ivdhjxh94.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:58:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4ivdhjxh94.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:09:43 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3403=0 >> Actually, I think I agree (I hate with-no-warnings), but it should be >> even more precise, and specify which obsolete warning to silence. > Do you mean, specify precisely which obsolete variable/function(s) not > to warn about? That's probably doable via > byte-compile-not-obsolete-vars/funcs, I'll have a look. > A syntax like this? > (with-suppressed-warnings > '((obsolete read-file-name-predicate ...) cl-functions ...) > body) Yes, something like that. Also the `cl-functions' is too broad and should not be allowed. > Although the motivation for this was not _just_ obsolete warnings, and > it might not be so simple to extend your request to eg specific free > variables. I didn't say it was easy. BTW, maybe a good way to do it is to implement this in the function that outputs the warnings: currently it just received some kind of string, which is not very amenable to what we want, but if you change it to take a more structured description of the warning, then it might be doable (tho maybe it won't happen at the right place, I don't know). Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 12 10:56:03 2019 Received: (at 4837) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jun 2019 14:56:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33826 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hb4fT-0003mR-9C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 10:56:03 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:55002) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hb4fR-0003lm-IN for 4837@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 10:56:01 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.204.8.getinternet.no ([84.212.204.8] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hb4fN-0006wN-Bz; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:55:59 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#4837: with-fewer-warnings ? References: Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:55:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:25:36 -0400") Message-ID: <87wohqvon7.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Glenn Morris writes: > `with-no-warnings' suppresses all compilation warnings. > > I would like to add `with-fewer-warnings' (or some similar name) that > suppresses only some warnings. > > Eg (with-fewer-warnings '(obsol [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 4837 Cc: 4837@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Glenn Morris writes: > `with-no-warnings' suppresses all compilation warnings. > > I would like to add `with-fewer-warnings' (or some similar name) that > suppresses only some warnings. > > Eg (with-fewer-warnings '(obsolete cl-functions) ...) This is now implemented on master as `with-suppressed-warnings'. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 12 10:56:10 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jun 2019 14:56:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33829 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hb4fa-0003n7-Jl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 10:56:10 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:55030) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hb4fY-0003mz-KE for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 10:56:08 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.204.8.getinternet.no ([84.212.204.8] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hb4fU-0006wa-N1 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:56:07 +0200 Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:56:04 +0200 Message-Id: <87v9xavomz.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #4837 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 4837 fixed close 4837 27.0 Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 4837 fixed close 4837 27.0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 12 12:13:39 2019 Received: (at 4837) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jun 2019 16:13:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33952 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hb5sZ-0003ra-8h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:13:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40331) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hb5sY-0003rO-EK for 4837@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:13:38 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42075) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hb5sT-00070c-6P; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:13:33 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hb5sR-0003i9-1b; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:13:31 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#4837: with-fewer-warnings ? References: <87wohqvon7.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> X-Spook: Echelon Secure Border Initiative Mexico Mantis bullion X-Ran: ]Ej8Y}xvQ*yxYY^7yKsHf-t (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:55:56 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 4837 Cc: 4837@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > This is now implemented on master as `with-suppressed-warnings'. Thanks a lot! :) From unknown Thu Jun 19 16:21:14 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator