GNU bug report logs - #48367
28.0.50; quit-restore-buffer may jam

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: pillule <pillule <at> riseup.net>

Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 20:27:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 28.0.50

Done: pillule <pillule <at> riseup.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: pillule <pillule <at> riseup.net>
Subject: bug#48367: closed (Re: bug#48367: 28.0.50; quit-restore-window
 may jam)
Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 10:35:01 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#48367: 28.0.50; quit-restore-buffer may jam

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 48367 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
48367: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=48367
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: pillule <pillule <at> riseup.net>
To: 48367-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: pillule <pillule <at> riseup.net>, rudalics <at> gmx.at
Subject: Re: bug#48367: 28.0.50; quit-restore-window may jam
Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 10:34:16 +0000
martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at> writes:

>> Here an alternative version using subr.el instead :
>
> I've pushed this and the other change now to master in commit
> 0a681590268a4039f95a5a919b6b6d4f4e880d4c, converting your 
> ChangeLog
> exercises to our style.  Please have a look and close this bug 
> if
> everything is alright.

Looks fine to me, thanks.

Looking at https://debbugs.gnu.org/Developer.html how to close 
this bug, I hope it worked.

-- 



[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: pillule <pillule <at> riseup.net>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 28.0.50; quit-restore-buffer may jam
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 20:26:08 +0000
[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello there,

I think there is a small bug with quit-window / 
quit-restore-window :

with emacs -Q

;; set some rules
(setq display-buffer-alist
     '(("\\*\\(Backtrace\\|Messages\\)\\*"
       (display-buffer-in-side-window)
       (window-height . 0.2)
       (side . bottom))))

;; trigger a logical error to display the *Backtrace* buffer
(> vim emacs)

;; display the *Messages* buffer
(view-echo-area-messages)

;; mess the `quit-restore' window parameter
(kill-buffer (get-buffer "*Backtrace*"))

;; which looks now like that in the *Messages* window :
;; ((quit-restore) (window-slot . 0) (window-side . bottom))

;; try to quit the *Messages* window
(progn (select-window (view-echo-area-messages))
      (quit-window))

;; nothing happens :

The first `cond' of quit-restore-window end up to 't,
it calls (switch-to-prev-buffer window bury-or-kill)
but there is no previous-window available.

The first patch adress this, and a similar one : when there is a previous-buffer available, but it referes to the 
same buffer. (eg: try the recipe again but exchange the role of 
*Messages* and *Backtrace*, you will finish with a blank buffer for backtrace, that you can quit again to end up to the same point)

The second patch is a proposition to clarify a little the code.

[quit-restore-window.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]
[quit-restore-window2.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]
[Message part 7 (text/plain, inline)]
--

This bug report was last modified 4 years and 86 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.