GNU bug report logs - #48365
13.0.11; Dollars in distinct comments trigger math mode highlighting in text in-between

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Tassilo Horn <tsdh <at> gnu.org>
To: jfbu <jfbu <at> free.fr>
Cc: Ikumi Keita <ikumi <at> ikumi.que.jp>, 48365 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#48365: 13.0.11; Dollars in distinct comments trigger math mode highlighting in text in-between
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 09:44:42 +0200

jfbu <jfbu <at> free.fr> writes:

> It is now revealed you are only one entity (perhaps an A.I. based on
> quantum computing) pretending to be two humans only to justify
> coverage of all time zones !

Gosh, we're uncovered!

> But I notice something weird when comparing effect on those two files
>
> File A behaves as expected
> % -*- mode: latex; -*-
> %
> \def\foo_with_underscore{}
> \newcommand\foo{$}%
> % a comment
> A foo_bar^bar{$}
> % a comment
> B foo_bar^bar{$}
> % a comment
> C foo_bar^bar
> $
> %
> %
>
> File B seems to have a problem
> % -*- mode: latex; -*-
> %
> \def\foo_with_underscore{}
> \newcommand\foo{$}%$
> % a comment
> A foo_bar^bar{$}
> % a comment
> B foo_bar^bar{$}
> % a comment
> C foo_bar^bar
> $
> %
> %
>
> In case of file B, which differs only by an added %$ at end of the
> \newcommand line, the \newcommand for example is not highlighted and
> the B line changes colors without applying script style, see
> screenshot

Yeah, it appears that if math mode goes out of hands, it may also have
effects on the fontification before.  That has been the case already
before the latest commits.

But if you just add a space before the \newcommand and delete it again
to trigger re-fontification, it becomes fontified correctly.  Not sure
why that is.  I'll have a look when I find some spare time...

Bye,
Tassilo

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.