GNU bug report logs - #48325
update of julia to 1.6.1

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Jean-Baptiste Volatier <jbv <at> pm.me>

Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 00:43:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: Jean-Baptiste Volatier <jbv <at> pm.me>
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, 48325 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: [bug#48325] [PATCH v5 5/5] DRAFT gnu: julia: Update to 1.6.1.
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2021 23:01:04 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Jean-Baptiste Volatier schreef op zo 04-07-2021 om 17:47 [+0000]:
> 
[...]
> > Also, I wonder if this causes reproducibility issues --- if we try to rebuild
> > julia after, say, 50 years, e.g. by using "guix time-machine", wouldn't the
> > certificates become invalid, and would therefore the build of Julia fail?
> 
> I thought that guix build was running with time set 1st January 1970 so that
> should not happen? Or am I mistaken?

There is an issue on https://issues.guix.gnu.org on using time namespaces
to always run with with time set to 1970 (or some other date).  I can't
find it anymore though.  The problem was that the ‘real time’ clock could
not be adjusted.

Maybe we could rewind the other clocks anyway, even if the ‘real time clock’
cannot be adjusted?  Or maybe the inconsistency would cause problems ...

SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is set to 1 jan 1970 and likewise for the 'mtime'
and 'atime' of files in /gnu/store (or was it some other date?) though.

Greetings,
Maxime.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 349 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.