GNU bug report logs - #48284
Dovecot <namespace-configuration> has two ‘location’ fields

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 13:03:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 48284 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#48284: Dovecot <namespace-configuration> has two ‘location’ fields
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 08:35:47 -0400
Hi Ludo,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> I just noticed this compiler warning:
>
> gnu/services/mail.scm:431:0: warning: shadows previous definition of `%namespace-configuration-location-procedure' at gnu/services/mail.scm:431:0
> <unknown-location>: warning: shadows previous definition of `namespace-configuration-location' at <unknown-location>
>
>
> I believe this comes from the fact that ‘define-configuration’
> automatically introduces a ‘location’ field (for the source code
> location of <namespace-configuration> instantiations), which clashes
> with this one:
>
>   (location
>    (string "")
>    "Physical location of the mailbox. This is in same format as
> mail_location, which is also the default for it.")
>
> I think this was revealed by the fix in commit
> dd0826fbf345dfe7289cf943ed2d29edc51d543f.
>
> Probably the only sane way to address it is by renaming the field above.

We could also rename the define-configuration produced %location field
accessor to something more explicit such as $name-source-location
instead of $name-location, no?

I don't think that field is being used much at all, given it was
effectively broken prior to the above commit, so renaming it should go
mostly unnoticed.

Maxim




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 70 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.