From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:11:52 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#48221 <48221@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#48221 <48221@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? Reply-To: bug#48221 <48221@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 06:11:52 +0000 retitle 48221 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? reassign 48221 emacs submitter 48221 Lars Ingebrigtsen severity 48221 normal tag 48221 fixed thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 04 05:59:55 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2021 09:59:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52218 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldrqM-0003HS-Sp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 05:59:55 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:60338) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldrqK-0003HM-SQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 05:59:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54080) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldrqK-0000bt-J2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 05:59:52 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:41472) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldrqI-0001Vb-FG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 05:59:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=HvcJD3Y6E7K7d3maHcCEvm7+Csh6RxaescWU4YaMaj4=; b=TF1eZaizQzsBbAyaTrUnnuB7KJ p2a60vG9Y259Dm7QNAjpgPquRnUXJcw5GKtzUpAR3AfHss+wEhdNeqcrbV37+HZZiyvfpq20OkT8i MgwrMsXi86M2B1YeVfswfYoIkWVYYq2cFSVGnRiSLzOJTK/0YjlyDPQmNmh+vIt8hRZQ=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ldrq5-0000qk-2H; Tue, 04 May 2021 11:59:39 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? X-Now-Playing: Zola Jesus's _New Amsterdam_: "Lady In The Radiator" Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 11:59:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: The following test has been failing the past few days. 1 unexpected results: FAILED help-fns-test-lisp-defsubst And, indeed, `C-h f' on the subst in question says: Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Andrea Corallo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) The following test has been failing the past few days. 1 unexpected results: FAILED help-fns-test-lisp-defsubst And, indeed, `C-h f' on the subst in question says: posn-window is a compiled Lisp function in =E2=80=98subr.el=E2=80=99. While a regular function is native compiled: last is a native compiled Lisp function in =E2=80=98subr.el=E2=80=99. In GNU Emacs 28.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.24, c= airo version 1.16.0) of 2021-04-30 built on xo Repository revision: 7c901d90e620b4d3651b86c13faf1e81eeb3db10 Repository branch: master Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12010000 System Description: Debian GNU/Linux bullseye/sid --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 04 12:03:49 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2021 16:03:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54002 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldxWX-0002xY-Hw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 12:03:49 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:59534) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldxWS-0002xR-Ca for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 12:03:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53880) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldxWS-00047U-3U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 12:03:44 -0400 Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:53060) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldxWP-0000ob-Lc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 12:03:43 -0400 Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 144G3YBI027333 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Tue, 4 May 2021 16:03:35 GMT From: Andrea Corallo To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 16:03:34 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 04 May 2021 11:59:36 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=akrl@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > The following test has been failing the past few days. > > 1 unexpected results: > FAILED help-fns-test-lisp-defsubst > > And, indeed, `C-h f' on the subst in question says: > > posn-window is a compiled Lisp function in =E2=80=98subr.el=E2=80=99. > > While a regular function is native compiled: > > last is a native compiled Lisp function in =E2=80=98subr.el=E2=80=99. Hi Lars, AFAIR having the defsubst non native compiled is what we want as we need the bytecode definition to have the inline to be performed. Actually the test is verifying that the defsubst is *not* native compiled. I tried to reproduce here (0c993ed1d3) but for me the test is passing, that's odd... Thanks Andrea From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 05:36:19 2021 Received: (at 48221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 09:36:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59025 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leDx5-00074t-32 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 05:36:19 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:34034) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leDx3-00074j-DT for 48221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 05:36:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=wDrIzxbBHDhPzcyxu1T5JkEAmpnmNhUaRoR+x0yY6c4=; b=gkVxjYp1uk7gYtiVt1UQYMH9ig a7/oBjoQtk+0cPauReOMZUDeE4t/SHkhFzyhn/yb1T2Nxs4KJmZ9NfS4uU+uWEzrzoymFXatZlaBi EGmC4ejJ6MPlfOgGFYSOnjgaCOtpR2ProBBKW2SkODgpvnKV7LsHgkzVm0/F/0+k/HVo=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leDwr-00079m-EA; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:36:08 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Andrea Corallo Subject: Re: bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Nico's _Fata Morgana_: "Your Voice" Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 11:36:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Andrea Corallo's message of "Tue, 04 May 2021 16:03:34 +0000") Message-ID: <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Andrea Corallo writes: > AFAIR having the defsubst non native compiled is what we want as we need > the bytecode definition to have the inline to be performed. Actually > the test is verifying that the defsubst is *not* nat [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48221 Cc: 48221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Andrea Corallo writes: > AFAIR having the defsubst non native compiled is what we want as we need > the bytecode definition to have the inline to be performed. Actually > the test is verifying that the defsubst is *not* native compiled. > > I tried to reproduce here (0c993ed1d3) but for me the test is passing, > that's odd... Hm, odd. The two tests here are: ---- (ert-deftest help-fns-test-lisp-defun () (let ((regexp (if (boundp 'comp-ctxt) "a native compiled Lisp function in .+subr\\.el" "a compiled Lisp function in .+subr\\.el")) (result (help-fns-tests--describe-function 'last))) (should (string-match regexp result)))) (ert-deftest help-fns-test-lisp-defsubst () (let ((regexp (if (boundp 'comp-ctxt) "a native compiled Lisp function in .+subr\\.el" "a compiled Lisp function in .+subr\\.el")) (result (help-fns-tests--describe-function 'posn-window))) (should (string-match regexp result)))) ---- Unless I'm really misreading something here, they both seem to expect the native-compiled results? (A related question -- is (boundp 'comp-ctxt) really the best way to test for whether we have a native-compiled Emacs? That's just a defvar in comp-cstr.el...) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 10:58:09 2021 Received: (at 48221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 14:58:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60771 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leIyW-0004kA-T4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 10:58:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49350) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leIyR-0004jn-Bp for 48221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 10:58:06 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46050) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leIyL-0007k3-Ow; Wed, 05 May 2021 10:57:57 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1546 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1leIyK-0001UX-L7; Wed, 05 May 2021 10:57:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 17:57:44 +0300 Message-Id: <83im3x2pp3.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 05 May 2021 11:36:02 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48221 Cc: 48221@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 11:36:02 +0200 > Cc: 48221@debbugs.gnu.org > > (A related question -- is (boundp 'comp-ctxt) really the best way to > test for whether we have a native-compiled Emacs? That's just a defvar > in comp-cstr.el...) We could perhaps provide 'native-compilation in comp.c? WDYT? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 10:59:49 2021 Received: (at 48221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 14:59:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60787 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJ09-0004lO-LE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 10:59:49 -0400 Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:57661) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJ06-0004lH-BO for 48221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 10:59:48 -0400 Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 145ExiNV003968 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 5 May 2021 14:59:44 GMT From: Andrea Corallo To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> <83im3x2pp3.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 14:59:44 +0000 In-Reply-To: <83im3x2pp3.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 05 May 2021 17:57:44 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48221 Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 48221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen >> Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 11:36:02 +0200 >> Cc: 48221@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> (A related question -- is (boundp 'comp-ctxt) really the best way to >> test for whether we have a native-compiled Emacs? That's just a defvar >> in comp-cstr.el...) > > We could perhaps provide 'native-compilation in comp.c? WDYT? We can use since a while (featurep 'nativecomp), I probably missed this substitution, I'm preparing a patch. Andrea From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 11:00:28 2021 Received: (at 48221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 15:00:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60797 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJ0l-0004o9-Vc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:00:28 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:37794) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJ0k-0004o1-97 for 48221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:00:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ooBZaujeQZK5p1yllMZA12gZqpNAqWMUWYAqmeuucy4=; b=EVPAoMhhsicXrIe/CATtwhkbL7 RLgqQr8Jjp0bc83u87m/WcobM2a39UBOd8Kk42qfzjKRogroVm040pSgP/RqDmgu5dMD5w8+CjEKF zOlXp2eva5kwM35QfxbfVwvgM5+cq1RCnzcBYpwJTjLhSxg1DYycQtGvtNIWv2t8zYQk=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leJ0c-0002Yt-0N; Wed, 05 May 2021 17:00:20 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> <83im3x2pp3.fsf@gnu.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAElBMVEUaICwnLDcxOERV VFWXkIj///8n6tisAAAAAWJLR0QF+G/pxwAAAAd0SU1FB+UFBQ8AApAxecIAAAGGSURBVDjLdZTb lcMgDEQluwEkGgiwBRhEAZu1+69pxSs2ccJxfuYeMQNIAQAi76Wv5D21BVAIsddFQywCdHJb8I00 XT9DhJ/ArRCui9B8BgAGv4HvFc3IOogzaAnsQWBnUvUlJwLM21Sh7njsxYNlu3oYwnzEak4zwbwL uZpq0d3WTYzahXVTPTZAaJ9hlT0e2R6yB3HYzhEcupBYrFCIyRoZB7T2F9Y/yGRjObjJR38oWjaw JC5IdaVQS0rypI+xJOCQFDCLK1grNPcT0cbgxImq+VDdl7gsEdLa+4RYf9o3BZRbkBQ0lrV/zN6p 7tt5UQ/HgcT7vTXPAGAC8R7zzkMfANUvR73tG9B8GvJxB3rHWiTpHQAu4kwHXIHp7j+xaKWshD23 WvomqTX+uZX0jgpuBjaOFhR/Aer86kCbrhX28ZokCldwjgb72ePV5ez8nOqcpjdwQe8AXi4z0K5t NVyvahocM8KpztNsYJ8onj1Oq0+g7nYH2P4f2AcZD1VlJOiJRf4B/ilNHR107ioAAAAldEVYdGRh dGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMjEtMDUtMDVUMTU6MDA6MDIrMDA6MDBI2BHSAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlm eQAyMDIxLTA1LTA1VDE1OjAwOjAyKzAwOjAwOYWpbgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Chrome Hoof's _Pre-Emptive False Rapture_: "Astral Suicide" Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 17:00:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83im3x2pp3.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 05 May 2021 17:57:44 +0300") Message-ID: <87tunh445a.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > We could perhaps provide 'native-compilation in comp.c? WDYT? Yes, good idea. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48221 Cc: 48221@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: > We could perhaps provide 'native-compilation in comp.c? WDYT? Yes, good idea. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 11:03:05 2021 Received: (at 48221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 15:03:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60822 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJ3I-0004qj-Rt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:03:05 -0400 Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:57277) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJ3I-0004qd-4r for 48221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:03:04 -0400 Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 145F33m5017112 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 5 May 2021 15:03:03 GMT From: Andrea Corallo To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> <83im3x2pp3.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 15:03:02 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Andrea Corallo via's message of "Wed, 05 May 2021 14:59:44 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48221 Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 48221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" writes: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >>> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen >>> Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 11:36:02 +0200 >>> Cc: 48221@debbugs.gnu.org >>> >>> (A related question -- is (boundp 'comp-ctxt) really the best way to >>> test for whether we have a native-compiled Emacs? That's just a defvar >>> in comp-cstr.el...) >> >> We could perhaps provide 'native-compilation in comp.c? WDYT? > > We can use since a while (featurep 'nativecomp), I probably missed this > substitution, I'm preparing a patch. 3481903d13 Andrea From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 11:11:21 2021 Received: (at 48221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 15:11:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60872 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJBJ-0004wX-Cw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:11:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52984) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJBH-0004wR-FX for 48221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:11:19 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46350) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leJBB-0005vD-QW; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:11:13 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3379 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1leJB9-0003NT-OL; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:11:12 -0400 Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 18:10:58 +0300 Message-Id: <83h7jh2p31.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andrea Corallo In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Wed, 05 May 2021 15:03:02 +0000) Subject: Re: bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> <83im3x2pp3.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48221 Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 48221@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 15:03:02 +0000 > > >> We could perhaps provide 'native-compilation in comp.c? WDYT? > > > > We can use since a while (featurep 'nativecomp), I probably missed this > > substitution, I'm preparing a patch. > > 3481903d13 Thanks. I think the feature should be renamed to native-comp, like the other variables we talked about. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 11:14:10 2021 Received: (at 48221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 15:14:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60890 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJE2-0004yW-0R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:14:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53754) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJDz-0004xz-AY for 48221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:14:07 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46432) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leJDt-0006Gs-Tk; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:14:01 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3568 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1leJDr-0003s3-9X; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:14:00 -0400 Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 18:13:48 +0300 Message-Id: <83fsz12oyb.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: akrl@sdf.org In-Reply-To: <83h7jh2p31.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Wed, 05 May 2021 18:10:58 +0300) Subject: Re: bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> <83im3x2pp3.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7jh2p31.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48221 Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 18:10:58 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org > > Thanks. I think the feature should be renamed to native-comp Sorry, I meant native-compile. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 11:16:01 2021 Received: (at 48221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 15:16:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60904 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJFp-0005tD-Bv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:16:01 -0400 Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:54514) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJFn-0005qu-KN for 48221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:16:00 -0400 Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 145FFwNg006704 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 5 May 2021 15:15:58 GMT From: Andrea Corallo To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 15:15:58 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 05 May 2021 11:36:02 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48221 Cc: 48221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Andrea Corallo writes: > >> AFAIR having the defsubst non native compiled is what we want as we need >> the bytecode definition to have the inline to be performed. Actually >> the test is verifying that the defsubst is *not* native compiled. >> >> I tried to reproduce here (0c993ed1d3) but for me the test is passing, >> that's odd... > > Hm, odd. The two tests here are: Sorry, dunno why I was convinced your were talking about `comp-test-defsubst' :/ 31f64d862b fixes `help-fns-test-lisp-defsubst'. Thanks Andrea From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 11:22:00 2021 Received: (at 48221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 15:22:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60929 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJLc-0007DE-5N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:22:00 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38032) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJLa-0007D6-Ok for 48221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:21:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=fMxOG6HBkCeE/+ahui+diZj/u9gu1K64VlgaeldeaDg=; b=t8O4FnYUpHv7XbONP5h/ZvTzzB /fMtLPqEGUiPHQ0nCKW6gEwT2YXCFa4gJRNiqF0gS7RDEL5aM6FGgvn90zW1Jo/U7vDRsB/+CRUQB BtwJSIHh5AYhzNYPKA+yrbmw0EaNOCU6T3YHovZNRA3P34jOxmFLVlutYkZujxrfBnwE=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leJLS-0002pO-8o; Wed, 05 May 2021 17:21:52 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Andrea Corallo Subject: Re: bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAG1BMVEUrERcJBAhcOC2f aXLBr7fXzdX+/f2YVyX///99EY0lAAAAAWJLR0QIht6VegAAAAd0SU1FB+UFBQ8VJHWJGisAAAGj SURBVDjLddI9W4MwEADgC1VZE6uP6xGqmQVs1yoUdtvSXUtmTYf8fQ/km3KlA7zcHZcEgHMhhJSO RPpReHQLICCIwlchkjhK4kOcJNFuK0T04TMA4Kx8pQu6Y1xAOBOgr0fRh0OS5NdgT73uo3wK9JyC p2P4Ev9xn4/gndVyM4KgAfEygEJCA8sBfEtoJe/DyYDErlYHGQMl6zZ3fdiAY20NDz04K8Zci1Mo FBOKNonjCLShBItcGoLHfilbBgKWffpfdVL03KCjSljXENPfGgKa0bdUKq0hpEkDVBVY005+2K/e djQHpUh0Qtau1T6WfqTPl23Zw3e8qlLdI9dFZtAlkPy1nKKGM13mIh1lYOF7vNvBAy26tQocBC7F bbfnIcHCAKvOIVsPDkP2ZJAJXsLzADbyx3jVEWbLPhT25y1A4U9KEazQkRuqtRycxLMxFsD95cDS IQRWIbgebxLaUp8bWkCCukOXEZcATDQJbcYxNBWsR6CPFzoh0CW0kIYWV/n2ZQqZXel+NLA7XfKr EJ9SfRWynZ6BfAYSPQN6CslM/AHXQEkS1jzJwAAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMS0wNS0w NVQxNToyMTozNiswMDowMIW24N0AAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjEtMDUtMDVUMTU6MjE6 MzYrMDA6MDD061hhAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Shara Nelson's _What Silence Knows_: "One Goodbye in Ten" Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 17:21:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Andrea Corallo's message of "Wed, 05 May 2021 15:15:58 +0000") Message-ID: <87k0od435e.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Andrea Corallo writes: > Sorry, dunno why I was convinced your were talking about > `comp-test-defsubst' :/ > > 31f64d862b fixes `help-fns-test-lisp-defsubst'. Thanks; that fixes the problem here, too. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48221 Cc: 48221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Andrea Corallo writes: > Sorry, dunno why I was convinced your were talking about > `comp-test-defsubst' :/ > > 31f64d862b fixes `help-fns-test-lisp-defsubst'. Thanks; that fixes the problem here, too. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 11:22:09 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 15:22:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60933 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJLl-0007Dq-BU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:22:09 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38048) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJLj-0007Da-Qz for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:22:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=MgPu+9aXDpWsPRhMj4CSSZgYuW22MHggifhF/7p/hqc=; b=LUTZArsEu9R5al1fVkPtSYO7WD 14xdxub82EBHKbhS/hbSK+UmQElvRepCWG5+9x0uARtunPLtBmIyCa+HiDy+/C1cAkOg5yRCFm+bd KYSnDWCRm+Tw+BmpufMcBii3dBC7bn/cAXbTAoahiIda8XVLNlZPanpMkt7RFQkIO+Dw=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leJLc-0002pZ-E8 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 17:22:02 +0200 Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 17:21:59 +0200 Message-Id: <87im3x4354.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #48221 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 48221 fixed close 48221 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 48221 fixed close 48221 28.1 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 11:24:03 2021 Received: (at 48221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 15:24:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60947 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJNP-0007FD-Lm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:24:03 -0400 Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:52475) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJNN-0007F7-QE for 48221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:23:50 -0400 Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 145FNl9D021200 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 5 May 2021 15:23:47 GMT From: Andrea Corallo To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> <83im3x2pp3.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7jh2p31.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsz12oyb.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 15:23:47 +0000 In-Reply-To: <83fsz12oyb.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 05 May 2021 18:13:48 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48221 Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 18:10:58 +0300 >> From: Eli Zaretskii >> Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> Thanks. I think the feature should be renamed to native-comp > > Sorry, I meant native-compile. NP, BTW in the configure we use `native-compilation' shouldn't we use this? Thanks Andrea From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 11:32:12 2021 Received: (at 48221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 15:32:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60982 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJVU-0000je-0l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:32:12 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38122) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJVR-0000du-Qu for 48221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:32:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/5DYA1E3vJu6taCg8LaP4Vhfq8QfP1j/foLxvM5oYqE=; b=OqrPufb7YvQa5vLs2TV0iV26jK f7zEtnmv0LEiA5D0/7L1/cUHWC/M663nZY1K3/i6htZtZJX52o25MQ1qJvBVvVslmb8eBQlNHTvIS dQSC+M9SNCYjkA9w6lCI6fWa7ao0GPXtwSiWaWuwk6qwOROuWQxi1VWmwSCyErnHGRWw=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leJVG-0002we-PU; Wed, 05 May 2021 17:32:01 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Andrea Corallo Subject: Re: bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> <83im3x2pp3.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7jh2p31.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsz12oyb.fsf@gnu.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAG1BMVEUrERcJBAhcOC2f aXLBr7fXzdX+/f2YVyX///99EY0lAAAAAWJLR0QIht6VegAAAAd0SU1FB+UFBQ8VJHWJGisAAAGj SURBVDjLddI9W4MwEADgC1VZE6uP6xGqmQVs1yoUdtvSXUtmTYf8fQ/km3KlA7zcHZcEgHMhhJSO RPpReHQLICCIwlchkjhK4kOcJNFuK0T04TMA4Kx8pQu6Y1xAOBOgr0fRh0OS5NdgT73uo3wK9JyC p2P4Ev9xn4/gndVyM4KgAfEygEJCA8sBfEtoJe/DyYDErlYHGQMl6zZ3fdiAY20NDz04K8Zci1Mo FBOKNonjCLShBItcGoLHfilbBgKWffpfdVL03KCjSljXENPfGgKa0bdUKq0hpEkDVBVY005+2K/e djQHpUh0Qtau1T6WfqTPl23Zw3e8qlLdI9dFZtAlkPy1nKKGM13mIh1lYOF7vNvBAy26tQocBC7F bbfnIcHCAKvOIVsPDkP2ZJAJXsLzADbyx3jVEWbLPhT25y1A4U9KEazQkRuqtRycxLMxFsD95cDS IQRWIbgebxLaUp8bWkCCukOXEZcATDQJbcYxNBWsR6CPFzoh0CW0kIYWV/n2ZQqZXel+NLA7XfKr EJ9SfRWynZ6BfAYSPQN6CslM/AHXQEkS1jzJwAAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMS0wNS0w NVQxNToyMTozNiswMDowMIW24N0AAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjEtMDUtMDVUMTU6MjE6 MzYrMDA6MDD061hhAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Shara Nelson's _What Silence Knows_: "Uptight" Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 17:31:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Andrea Corallo's message of "Wed, 05 May 2021 15:23:47 +0000") Message-ID: <87eeel42oh.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Andrea Corallo writes: >>> Thanks. I think the feature should be renamed to native-comp >> >> Sorry, I meant native-compile. > > NP, BTW in the configure we use `native-compilation' shouldn't we use > this? Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48221 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 48221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Andrea Corallo writes: >>> Thanks. I think the feature should be renamed to native-comp >> >> Sorry, I meant native-compile. > > NP, BTW in the configure we use `native-compilation' shouldn't we use > this? "native-compilation" is a handful... would it make sense to change that to "--with-native-compile" instead? (I don't really have an opinion here, though.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 11:46:06 2021 Received: (at 48221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 15:46:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32873 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJiw-0002Eq-6a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:46:06 -0400 Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:49873) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJiu-0002C8-6i for 48221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:46:05 -0400 Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 145Fk2qj019390 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 5 May 2021 15:46:02 GMT From: Andrea Corallo To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> <83im3x2pp3.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7jh2p31.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsz12oyb.fsf@gnu.org> <87eeel42oh.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 15:46:02 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87eeel42oh.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 05 May 2021 17:31:58 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48221 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 48221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Andrea Corallo writes: > >>>> Thanks. I think the feature should be renamed to native-comp >>> >>> Sorry, I meant native-compile. >> >> NP, BTW in the configure we use `native-compilation' shouldn't we use >> this? > > "native-compilation" is a handful... would it make sense to change that > to "--with-native-compile" instead? (I don't really have an opinion > here, though.) FWIW I've really no preference here, I was asked for "--with-native-compilation", as long as we decide something it's all good by me. Andrea From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 12:08:29 2021 Received: (at 48221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 16:08:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33063 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leK4b-0003pT-4w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:08:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52114) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leK4Y-0003pC-K1 for 48221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:08:27 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47758) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leK4R-000376-4i; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:08:19 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2909 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1leK4P-0007VP-5n; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:08:18 -0400 Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 19:08:04 +0300 Message-Id: <83eeel2mfv.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andrea Corallo In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Wed, 05 May 2021 15:23:47 +0000) Subject: Re: bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> <83im3x2pp3.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7jh2p31.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsz12oyb.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48221 Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 15:23:47 +0000 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 18:10:58 +0300 > >> From: Eli Zaretskii > >> Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org > >> > >> Thanks. I think the feature should be renamed to native-comp > > > > Sorry, I meant native-compile. > > NP, BTW in the configure we use `native-compilation' shouldn't we use > this? I thought native-compile was better because we talked about renaming a bunch of variables to have that prefix, so it would be consistent. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 12:09:58 2021 Received: (at 48221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 16:09:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33075 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leK62-0003qw-GW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:09:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52576) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leK60-0003qn-9z for 48221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:09:56 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47787) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leK5v-0003rC-58; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:09:51 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3005 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1leK5u-0007cM-Fu; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:09:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 19:09:39 +0300 Message-Id: <83czu52md8.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andrea Corallo In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Wed, 05 May 2021 15:46:02 +0000) Subject: Re: bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> <83im3x2pp3.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7jh2p31.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsz12oyb.fsf@gnu.org> <87eeel42oh.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48221 Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 48221@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 15:46:02 +0000 > > > "native-compilation" is a handful... would it make sense to change that > > to "--with-native-compile" instead? (I don't really have an opinion > > here, though.) > > FWIW I've really no preference here, I was asked for > "--with-native-compilation", as long as we decide something it's all > good by me. I'm not sure it is worth our while to make small changes in this name, since I believe we will want to release Emacs 28.1 with that option being the default (if libgccjit is available). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 16:33:56 2021 Received: (at 48221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 20:33:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34321 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leODU-0004Fk-G7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 16:33:56 -0400 Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:65461) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leODO-0004Fc-Ty for 48221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 16:33:54 -0400 Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 145KXnS8027750 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 5 May 2021 20:33:49 GMT From: Andrea Corallo To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> <83im3x2pp3.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7jh2p31.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsz12oyb.fsf@gnu.org> <83eeel2mfv.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 20:33:49 +0000 In-Reply-To: <83eeel2mfv.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 05 May 2021 19:08:04 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48221 Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andrea Corallo >> Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 15:23:47 +0000 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> >> Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 18:10:58 +0300 >> >> From: Eli Zaretskii >> >> Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> >> >> Thanks. I think the feature should be renamed to native-comp >> > >> > Sorry, I meant native-compile. >> >> NP, BTW in the configure we use `native-compilation' shouldn't we use >> this? > > I thought native-compile was better because we talked about renaming a > bunch of variables to have that prefix, so it would be consistent. Okay, I've the impression we all agreed on native-compile for the feature name so I did the renaming with 40736357b8. The configure flag in any case is a different subject. Thanks Andrea From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 00:50:16 2021 Received: (at 48221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 04:50:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36617 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leVxo-0000C5-5H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 00:50:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49520) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leVxm-0000Bs-Cf for 48221@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 00:50:15 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40550) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leVxg-0008TG-On; Thu, 06 May 2021 00:50:08 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2747 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leVxg-0001fs-Aq; Thu, 06 May 2021 00:50:08 -0400 Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 07:49:58 +0300 Message-Id: <837dkcfouh.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andrea Corallo In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Wed, 05 May 2021 20:33:49 +0000) Subject: Re: bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> <83im3x2pp3.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7jh2p31.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsz12oyb.fsf@gnu.org> <83eeel2mfv.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48221 Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 20:33:49 +0000 > > Okay, I've the impression we all agreed on native-compile for the > feature name so I did the renaming with 40736357b8. Thanks. Btw, I'm waiting for the other renames to begin updating the documentation. I hope it will happen soon, okay? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 03:59:57 2021 Received: (at 48221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 07:59:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36960 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leYvM-0002M9-VE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 03:59:57 -0400 Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:62740) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leYvJ-0002Lv-MU for 48221@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 03:59:54 -0400 Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 1467xos9017118 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Thu, 6 May 2021 07:59:50 GMT From: Andrea Corallo To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> <83im3x2pp3.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7jh2p31.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsz12oyb.fsf@gnu.org> <83eeel2mfv.fsf@gnu.org> <837dkcfouh.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 07:59:50 +0000 In-Reply-To: <837dkcfouh.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 06 May 2021 07:49:58 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48221 Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andrea Corallo >> Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 20:33:49 +0000 >> >> Okay, I've the impression we all agreed on native-compile for the >> feature name so I did the renaming with 40736357b8. > > Thanks. > > Btw, I'm waiting for the other renames to begin updating the > documentation. I hope it will happen soon, okay? Sure, I've already started this, I'll be pushing commits today. Regards Andrea From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 04:09:24 2021 Received: (at 48221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 08:09:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36976 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leZ4W-0002VX-KZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:09:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38592) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leZ4U-0002VR-N8 for 48221@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:09:23 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leZ4P-0001DE-Bp; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:09:17 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2977 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leZ4O-00011u-W4; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:09:17 -0400 Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 11:09:07 +0300 Message-Id: <83y2cse124.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andrea Corallo In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Thu, 06 May 2021 07:59:50 +0000) Subject: Re: bug#48221: 28.0.50; defsubsts aren't native compiled? References: <87zgxa95vb.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeel7cal.fsf@gnus.org> <83im3x2pp3.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7jh2p31.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsz12oyb.fsf@gnu.org> <83eeel2mfv.fsf@gnu.org> <837dkcfouh.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48221 Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 48221@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 07:59:50 +0000 > > > Btw, I'm waiting for the other renames to begin updating the > > documentation. I hope it will happen soon, okay? > > Sure, I've already started this, I'll be pushing commits today. Great, that will pave the way for adding the necessary documentation to the manuals. From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:11:52 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator