GNU bug report logs - #48220
[PATCH] gnu: xfce4-session: Add xset to propagated-inputs.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Brendan Tildesley <mail <at> brendan.scot>

Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 09:22:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #14 received at 48220 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: Brendan Tildesley <mail <at> brendan.scot>
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, 48220 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#48220] [PATCH] gnu: xfce4-session: Add xset to
 propagated-inputs.
Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 15:03:06 +0300
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 04:38:58AM +0200, Brendan Tildesley wrote:
> 
> > On 05/05/2021 3:23 PM Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> > 
> >  
> > Hi Brendan,
> > 
> > Brendan Tildesley <mail <at> brendan.scot> skribis:
> > 
> > > * gnu/packages/xfce.scm (xfce4-session):[propagated-inputs]: Add xset so
> > > that xflock4 can turn off the monitor.
> > 
> > Can’t we instead patch ‘scripts/xflock4’ so that it refers to ‘xset’ by
> > its absolute file name?
> > 
> 
> I can. It felt weird just patching one command and not others though.
> 
> > However, my understanding is that the xset code is already a fallback:
> 
> > 
> > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> > # else run another access locking utility, if installed
> > for lock_cmd in \
> >   "xlock -mode blank" \
> >   "slock"
> >   do
> >     set -- $lock_cmd
> >     if command -v -- $1 >/dev/null 2>&1; then
> >         $lock_cmd >/dev/null 2>&1 &
> > 	# turn off display backlight:
> > 	xset dpms force off
> >         exit
> >     fi
> > done
> > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> > 
> > Probably we should ensure the first ‘for’ loop works as expected.
> > Perhaps we need to replace ‘xfce4-screensaver-command’ by its absolute
> > file name there.
> > 
> 
> Currently xfce4-screensaver is not installed in the xfce package at all by default,
> so it isn't used. I could add it, but for me it was glitchy/flickering and I would keep 
> clearing the password as I was entering it so I couldn't log back in. It even does it
> in a VM. I do have a recent amd graphics card with proprietary linux though, my computer
> can't boot otherwise :(.
> 
> If you run guix environment --ad-hoc xfce4-screensaver
> then
>  xfce4-screensaver &; xfce4-screensaver-command --lock
> does it work for you?
> 
> I'm not sure what is best, should we be maximal and include xfce4-screensaver in the xfce
> package, or be minimal and make people have to install it manually?
> > WDYT?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Ludo’.

Are you using %desktop-services in your OS config? By default they come
with a screen-locker-service for both slock and xlockmore.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 4 years and 16 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.