GNU bug report logs - #48179
bookmark-fontify [PATCH]

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Boruch Baum <boruch_baum <at> gmx.com>

Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 00:15:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed, patch

Fixed in version 28.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Colin Baxter <m43cap <at> yandex.com>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: Bastien <bzg <at> gnu.org>, , Boruch Baum <boruch_baum <at> gmx.com>, 48179 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH]
Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 14:52:49 +0100
>>>>> Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:

    > Colin Baxter <m43cap <at> yandex.com> writes:
    >> I can't agree they overlap - bm-bookmark allows multiply
    >> bookmarks in one file. I don't believe that that can be done via
    >> the built-in bookmark.

    > I may be misunderstanding something, but setting multiple
    > bookmarks in the same file works without problems with the
    > built-in bookmark.el, as far as I can tell?  (You just have to
    > give the bookmarks different names.)

That's true, but, as you wrote, the user has to come up new names. This
is done automatically in bm-bookmarks, which inserts the corresponding
line as the name. The disadvantage is that bm-bookmarks can't easily
bookmark blank lines.

It seems to me that all the bookmarks, bm, built-in (including
emacs-28), bookmark+, have disadvantages. Personally, I would use
bookmark+ if were not for the fact that it writes unprompted to ~/.emacs.

Best wishes,

Colin Baxter.




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 352 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.