From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:32:30 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#48179 <48179@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#48179 <48179@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Reply-To: bug#48179 <48179@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 17:32:30 +0000 retitle 48179 bookmark-fontify [PATCH] reassign 48179 emacs submitter 48179 Boruch Baum severity 48179 normal tag 48179 patch fixed thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 02 20:14:09 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2021 00:14:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45573 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldMDx-0000RH-Jt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 20:14:09 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:42184) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldMDu-0000RB-KV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 20:14:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46766) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldMDu-0000og-8i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 20:14:06 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:45267) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldMDr-00010W-Ub for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 20:14:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1620000841; bh=utDF5kQtQBPxDmr9qJLgtg0d2OexyWtUj8qcsC89278=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Subject; b=SqogK3ZzbYwN3m05myn2wlAgYC4pQzpt8KvBo900O6McP0YvzJUNIB+dkoJxolNtF WFj18CzQa21wpmsmUiq5wWx+99XJEH1lXLxCOI//aioeag++/X+HJvptwWJUZN7JPj 2qhpqXwdi154K0hg6u9NTz3MCtyPDAhw90Ovolws= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([70.19.86.82]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MWici-1m5wlk2cKO-00X07x for ; Mon, 03 May 2021 02:14:00 +0200 Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 20:13:58 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: Emacs Bug Reporting Subject: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Message-ID: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="z5kmaqmaeiecnqzo" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:w5xBe/Rnpcs7J3ShtKtKLUKrj833YmKycwc642uwofkOz1xe9yh gvE/9ut4dFcauacmPUaRDAXpn7h3TPrsolYMSONDTjZg+kucvbMWLqGRmf2GC0zKzmvGaG3 TJ/+0nulMswLlDRqOOk2tmxxJ4rNpJnCtFvkzr9BI7Mgpsv7N9O1zAT8TLyWKZXZrcvYnBR WfkAQ7BaVZR2S44/RjpMw== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:WaC08JpFeag=:8quu3N5dkyhopI0FYD06oz +WtibAMFU8zt3Kb4zbfh2J0zUUD1xPeXZRjXTroZlkgoXNqLXOtGzRYS8CPfUbL1LvOoK4CC1 gp5KE86qzjq6i4SO6iNl3H1EYxl6KLP9c+M342I2qtjUnM6AXejNFy5RHIWzmREDKRvIqbkuP U9wSu61SLodDneRwYjY/UJGqkJ3BYqsBE8t6laRoNRVMOcv+VCUBZp9Xn+sLPH5Aya9otfFGr /d/YqjhojejP0G09czLSvpaZXedkp83Lz1EoQr6yhDTt778KYfWF8++PGnQnzWxeVbpLG1Lm9 UAgKTqFd67tINcth6RT4IqEFoFgVpkrc00elKFoIwVC5e4QNv6ODLBZxeRyspXCa8btpSyEEZ zBDo/qWqzVxzC9/faENZZtcKaaWZESIq7z9dsBsFnZJLnRtds7GFnAB/JntbVAezrUNA0VFiU 2O56XNFCaigbNBCaFlwVTF2SZeg93DHo5Y5WA3qFEnpuiwfneTe/8NLxKNzniIU+cxLU/Bsbb 3k1wTn+HrjH8fcJLhMaUb19d3lyu2qVrFupiaKDBoZJJRScSMtOjRo+Xmc7sRIYvzN33iwR0s XspzR4PyB1P669cmkinoykE/3RKwEHtsZuslIgPNzWqb1QW3L/oq+HL2N/2+sO1HSZUzJbGh8 wDC4IoODb/otju/HWSqGkBUlaMQ+36TC1I6v/nJHcs1Cis6LTfJzqsC7ezVV2XR71ZjRQjD9N zV21Oo8w6AT+cv60QgbvhfHLlW34S1kiHvHRL6WPd4+bzTelMXeDB4IuxtQEM2eD+zd0HyICd SQfEpzqEwQ0iAvvoEnDGnsM+ZDNOaTRAo9hhLbxzO51AYv4mXGqpZ5hcW7UQtQv6KXklq1Lm2 gFOYAk18RRPfOoKguIwfsvMg9FzM9SI0tK8BK0rbZ0B05GE+VdYNCwGDnhRwDaTczMn+WMBCF PwrRQWNmi5OMETahCx3vXJfSlsE3azv/LLbzWY6vIw+xR5poQrKWzpiKHYxPKDnULubD9KSrQ dfkZLbl/Ke14fM1QGAOW6UfZ8yjZt0lfV8l1/eYaECEPIjWpOzyj5j0u95q4JEy4NKpv/48HJ ADI86QOBGvMJTSgyYDS2PEGwTdfIM+zroG5SvgSC6rUNGvcbDCq2rs3kE4lyX/Q7itZsIJSRJ UKYbynkl3z6M6V1mE1mH2qAt76OACspgF1PFNHUzlB717rHaVlENHPqGXm5jzvCh++FFI= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.22; envelope-from=boruch_baum@gmx.com; helo=mout.gmx.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --z5kmaqmaeiecnqzo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The attached patch adds a feature to bookmark.el to colorize a bookmark's line, making it easily observable. The idea was adopted from package bm.el, available on MELPA. I was able to test this on Emacs 27, but there seem to have been some changes in snapshot to make it difficult to use that version of bookmark.el on my Emacs 27, so please verify that I performed the migration properly. OFF-TOPIC, but related: I've posted a pull-request to package bm.el adding to it a feature to make context-based suggestions for default bookmark annotations[1]. If Emacs wants that for package bookmark.el it should be possible to submit a parallel patch. [1] https://github.com/Boruch-Baum/emacs-bm/commit/dc1d8ad7eea64d94c345f3e= d3885eefd8ec72d65 =2D- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 --z5kmaqmaeiecnqzo Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="bookmark-fontify.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable diff --git a/bookmark.el b/bookmark.el index 206c872..197678d 100644 =2D-- a/bookmark.el +++ b/bookmark.el @@ -165,11 +165,28 @@ A non-nil value may result in truncated bookmark nam= es." "Time before `bookmark-bmenu-search' updates the display." :type 'number) +(defcustom bookmark-fontify t + "Whether to colorize a bookmark's line. +See face `bookmark-face'." + :type 'boolean + :version "27.2") + (defface bookmark-menu-heading '((t (:inherit font-lock-type-face))) "Face used to highlight the heading in bookmark menu buffers." :version "22.1") +(defface bookmark-face + '((((class grayscale) + (background light)) (:background "DimGray")) + (((class grayscale) + (background dark)) (:background "LightGray")) + (((class color) + (background light)) (:foreground "White" :background "DarkOrange1")= ) + (((class color) + (background dark)) (:foreground "Black" :background "DarkOrange1")= )) + "Face used to highlight current line." + :version "27.2") ;;; No user-serviceable parts beyond this point. @@ -418,6 +435,31 @@ In other words, return all information but the name." "Set the rear-context-string of BOOKMARK-NAME-OR-RECORD to STRING." (bookmark-prop-set bookmark-name-or-record 'rear-context-string string)= ) +(defun bookmark--fontify () + "Apply a colorized overlay to the bookmarked location. +See defcustom variable `bookmark-fontify'." + (let ((bm (make-overlay (point-at-bol) + (min (point-max) (+ 1 (point-at-eol)))))) + (overlay-put bm 'category 'bookmark) + (overlay-put bm 'face 'bookmark-face))) + +(defun bookmark--unfontify (bm) + "Remove a bookmark's colorized overlay. +BM is a bookmark as returned from function `bookmark-get-bookmark'. +See defcustom variable `bookmark-fontify'." + (let ((filename (assq 'filename bm)) + (pos (assq 'position bm)) + (buffers (buffer-list)) + buf overlays found temp) + (when filename (setq filename (expand-file-name (cdr filename)))) + (when pos (setq pos (cdr pos))) + (while (setq buf (pop buffers)) + (with-current-buffer buf + (when (equal filename buffer-file-name) + (setq overlays (overlays-at pos)) + (while (and (not found) (setq temp (pop overlays))) + (when (eq 'bookmark (overlay-get temp 'category)) + (delete-overlay (setq found temp))))))))) (defun bookmark-get-handler (bookmark-name-or-record) "Return the handler function for BOOKMARK-NAME-OR-RECORD, or nil if non= e." @@ -824,7 +866,9 @@ still there, in order, if the topmost one is ever dele= ted." ;; Ask for an annotation buffer for this bookmark (when bookmark-use-annotations - (bookmark-edit-annotation str)))) + (bookmark-edit-annotation str)) + (when bookmark-fontify + (bookmark--fontify)))) (setq bookmark-yank-point nil) (setq bookmark-current-buffer nil))) @@ -1349,6 +1393,7 @@ probably because we were called from there." (bookmark-maybe-historicize-string bookmark-name) (bookmark-maybe-load-default-file) (let ((will-go (bookmark-get-bookmark bookmark-name 'noerror))) + (bookmark--unfontify will-go) (setq bookmark-alist (delq will-go bookmark-alist)) ;; Added by db, nil bookmark-current-bookmark if the last ;; occurrence has been deleted --z5kmaqmaeiecnqzo-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 02 20:40:31 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2021 00:40:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45708 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldMdS-0002pg-Tw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 20:40:31 -0400 Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:38388) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldMdR-0002pY-4T for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 20:40:30 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 1430Z9sF088281; Mon, 3 May 2021 00:40:23 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=KDEqgrZ5Zyag4mY6IMieoYloEJdUV3eZQLIZ90t54us=; b=yCkPZFWU16UvC51zBq0EQguIDZ9Y04+nUW4GRehqavOc0uAbMPnDNRc05S0V0RD07z0c UNZY0b6qk9jc23wThiFuvgusa7Wo3OWW0V3ZVDWQhmZzqKdXrwtrrz7h2XTRXNAVVeHr OjPWSv8G5waSGV6b/v9nEmtek03rUQSSKpRJGE06MOvyICT4PbRE8WzIqUWHib/Nwa2f gliPxrQeLRCivDo3mI2fciGHVxayawhI4PbD/Ok8tEbcp5Fl8+0J05qI4PgSjtOvQvVg Uo2aE45Lt4uSE1EgUiBDyFHWEO8pcMs906zgwes0bh6Q9ulOXT7Y1EEzwrn55yQDbmfj yw== Received: from aserp3020.oracle.com (aserp3020.oracle.com [141.146.126.70]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 388xdrt8nx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 03 May 2021 00:40:23 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 1430UAB6068668; Mon, 3 May 2021 00:40:22 GMT Received: from nam10-mw2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-mw2nam10lp2102.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.55.102]) by aserp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 388xt1ku57-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 03 May 2021 00:40:22 +0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Tr6YLhKoMY44B8uVZtQz97JndBQaaiMvogsgHMSxHtZCXRAP5aaR0l2krs34sNbtouooxFSIVsVmpzfjdbs6rZWYVO0KVYQvug7Y15JOg8WtnabcDGuvWeBPLX75p5RpaGf9lzI/+8uGm+vBXIdp9rYWBHYSKblAZP0J02m3j6uErngXCytxzOEztRtubD33yS5fxtrBNFRX6ufnFZeQxkBaNDYk3g1xgJjJbOOKiVABVG0ITTrB13smKRpGHgGsc0KmqfuhEErGro7W+MLndY32mBKjJITLdJXShmkWu/1m/WF+ZU9tS1sBSV4WN445hTL6e4TXlg+8yH5Y9Z6GIA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=KDEqgrZ5Zyag4mY6IMieoYloEJdUV3eZQLIZ90t54us=; b=VQBh+g6nGZZZVlAtj3q0033SsW7yEvmpzt2XPtt6hZPnwMknem72ga0kAOknn65JFtGJrP0Itvp8AUYhU5wVPQLUUUVoOyF6QrjYach6ZBlFl0d/w2rkJ2WW/UiaKVOXDxIIUCXaT5Tu77RZuc4ySEJEc75eYeuHkfyPlW5jwmsd7Y0JHaOxfvEGnbp5TwKL39dd3NZg3WoQd+DqxuKc74Ki1JCuKBfoe6pTPEqWBM8M+yOsMW1953N+/V+0SHXMbc0r6oiZcs8fuaAFlD/yXP5/7kqUnXz4hCjXc79LzTlYxtGl+k9P/yrmTb9YIDLdcebiF20Au+A08U16BNlf5Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=oracle.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=oracle.com; dkim=pass header.d=oracle.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-oracle-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=KDEqgrZ5Zyag4mY6IMieoYloEJdUV3eZQLIZ90t54us=; b=BwYVzpvm5MMEsupqfCoixm0Ufk5bOLN3djm3TMINpKgvTNkdXvNdE9Wbv9CxJQwOzct7evoLV5Srex5lYJj09MiVimWH4aPNkrEtJAfbYPBBekdeSxBjPPvByZaliEVlgWpj+DwuNeZ+8M34gXe5W3/eWumIvKZAWYMAxXn7bbA= Received: from SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:11b::15) by SA2PR10MB4523.namprd10.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:113::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4087.39; Mon, 3 May 2021 00:40:21 +0000 Received: from SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2109:9725:fd4a:6494]) by SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2109:9725:fd4a:6494%6]) with mapi id 15.20.4087.043; Mon, 3 May 2021 00:40:21 +0000 From: Drew Adams To: Boruch Baum , "48179@debbugs.gnu.org" <48179@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: RE: [External] : bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Thread-Topic: [External] : bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Thread-Index: AQHXP7Ga17rbI6kP3EaS5OHCy8Q/DKrQ6VUA Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 00:40:21 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> In-Reply-To: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: gmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmx.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=oracle.com; x-originating-ip: [73.170.83.28] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c8453e3d-d057-49ca-18dd-08d90dcc0820 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SA2PR10MB4523: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:5516; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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 x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(396003)(136003)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(366004)(6506007)(5660300002)(38100700002)(7696005)(33656002)(71200400001)(122000001)(86362001)(478600001)(8936002)(4744005)(52536014)(66476007)(110136005)(186003)(966005)(44832011)(316002)(66446008)(8676002)(55016002)(66556008)(66946007)(64756008)(76116006)(2906002)(26005)(9686003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: =?us-ascii?Q?XQ+ceOm7DuuE/dolkFz8lvG7T2KBipQSJ+wxGA7aG8RA1VfRV+A2nqauwDt6?= =?us-ascii?Q?IXWIDmX0cdo2pBfYiAHNjEXFv862dciwnOmw5JAb6Hq3FDcoO0gcRI0/G5Sw?= =?us-ascii?Q?t7fJJzCHTozrCXJRpT3jLONH3RnsQjVpXU6qYthNzkBviOaOyc2WCLPfkJAe?= =?us-ascii?Q?dCEz8BD8cMa/1gG3Ru1FpUNbSgeqCuL2JtnsjSLKGRQXAORjZKLg1yeUV6s1?= =?us-ascii?Q?aeLXyCCHmqwzMRy53KtT5BO7yllOZpAy0nbtSVCT0U9X0F81lWqjhVallV1J?= =?us-ascii?Q?J5J6/k7a8WRhFUM3F52eVw5sBF28Eij/Cvz0dT8BOMlqQS9j9t/xR9SpxPUf?= =?us-ascii?Q?dtmSx9KfLzw81i89gFcjin1zYAI/5P+7EZ0nDI+1zwDBmd6z4XoU8kzvs+ni?= =?us-ascii?Q?2lkoztS/baZOT69gGMr0r68ZiG6FuIXd9YLs8qRo8CoJfP7HHHHiR5Ykxc6q?= =?us-ascii?Q?1/wX938NfXmZM/XMim8v9Y1rZ7/clJ2tZlfZog2rhpxcOcGPdHUGo8LnQoSa?= =?us-ascii?Q?DJbYES6Vxb+ZfwntRXtKjNfqulZYSwXG7E2ZDQbtLX7uTyzDajYDc9Sla9Xi?= =?us-ascii?Q?4M/G76nVU8LIec7q1uMqKGHiudI59nCBHM0RDtS0gLHPaSg4k9Gpo3SaNnxZ?= =?us-ascii?Q?P5TU1SOkbylUs5QG5W2JsfHftKm+pC3MI/YbDcWSm52sBf9ZHmx5oL35FVLV?= =?us-ascii?Q?EfK2z2+abBYHGeqIOY5JEDhuNyodJSQZPueVPxsRYJfLtaELPDSgyBXqS4cF?= =?us-ascii?Q?qKUmGYJP/g/ROYgMK94Y3uacXsqRTL9CYmJ13jOZd1pR4jKyZX9/ZTIlaDs9?= =?us-ascii?Q?opSzce3XTLAKBbJ2RiRHTp1W2FkhG+Rw2icNLPcPUMUX0HOj19ZSY/0tjTgi?= =?us-ascii?Q?L8Jdk92DGazlCYawmDTNJmlJ1Lhr3PW2fnxB9raStRBTWuA6mJAFcxcYVfAJ?= =?us-ascii?Q?ULeD+c3/TRMMjhxu80aMYN1yoS8N23Rs2XlHmVCXtmU+YWxti9TY16A62VWV?= =?us-ascii?Q?XunOcAfnKAQ4PrGf3YmGQB2j7O6Peq7MQbHI2N/g2EAigSC2uzJXkF430T3q?= =?us-ascii?Q?bohOV7MiL3D5nqcmMp2iMX/kQ485kpmJMtresknFJj6+c2ksjpa3KC8QtgxR?= =?us-ascii?Q?Z21IrY4KXy7PXyqmlX13kNfbTz5u/5tG5abJ/zibj8pz/tp7cFrX3ZWEn/Xo?= =?us-ascii?Q?XApsZwHxYdKltkIEEizFz5fDE+gzk3+MAQqrC8TXtXdGB85w8X7D+O8ZNcHG?= =?us-ascii?Q?FQyPQOvAsG3O1YNxLFSw7kGgpBL87B9nUzODko4NnZ8I98IGyr8S+r9y/Zz8?= =?us-ascii?Q?NKc=3D?= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: oracle.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c8453e3d-d057-49ca-18dd-08d90dcc0820 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 May 2021 00:40:21.0137 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4e2c6054-71cb-48f1-bd6c-3a9705aca71b X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: QRvIXvqU+9BExdSIuJnVmkRKVS1RbowO45NLa9FNIowgtLBZfqZDeaAJ3GChTQp6R6YwjvPaYu+UHWjnQTcWCA== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SA2PR10MB4523 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=9972 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=712 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104060000 definitions=main-2105030001 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 3WlY4DRALgnEKJ8xrYgAIKFkAtZaoYmP X-Proofpoint-GUID: 3WlY4DRALgnEKJ8xrYgAIKFkAtZaoYmP X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=9972 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104060000 definitions=main-2105030001 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) > The attached patch adds a feature to bookmark.el to colorize a > bookmark's line, making it easily observable. The idea was > adopted from package bm.el, available on MELPA. Yet another feature of Bookmark+. https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/BookmarkPlus#HighlightingBookmarkLocations https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/BookmarkPlus#UsingHighlightedBookmarks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 02 21:20:20 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2021 01:20:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45886 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldNG0-0005RA-Ir for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 21:20:20 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:41297) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldNFw-0005R0-N7 for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 21:20:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1620004805; bh=ttlw5a1cT+cXDSssN3fZVN3UUF0ykxm/WmSkX7dgIpg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=g/du5puS8kIr2jLnoyBEabJ/YzpYIDuRVrjjsLi2FMsJcxYEXknMNLWD6aZefUAYS kjvCxqhxHVxWFNxx+erTOl7wWA+OZlkLAH+CpIejnHtQOJYROVYOcRagBQ9NzMmfMd HdXloE8BOAUVbjJwsWl95w5gfUVRY9+H6slFHaZ8= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([70.19.86.82]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1McpNy-1l3lFm2TL8-00ZxOu; Mon, 03 May 2021 03:20:04 +0200 Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 21:20:02 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: Drew Adams Subject: Re: [External] : bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Message-ID: <20210503012002.auv3cs2he53x3leg@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:oS/1t3xTqs4WueCmtkYk6jmyrfaR6azYSZEwwCx5lzrTC6rOcV+ MUs5XsKThaep00rygY53Gz2BA4ECFrTp7F6vswumyOMIYnSsx2+av8NnmPjbHXcInl/HTe8 szBE7IwRHngnYzGQlOf3we73w++MdWjnk9kOPpEJGllVoEJI+wjGPK9QKAplKcoHAp9R4q6 2ecqfD1GOWxbjJLYd6tSA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:/ZXC7vOlzeQ=:2MIfhFeXfSwIXB6pcEhUTR 5IfqhTeOSiR75+UriaPmAFYwlxfuM7++LM0FPom3qcBgwYxLQA+izpfZ8bebu75xE2OaTO7sN yiiOGJaZrK3dBMfNSQt0LIPLTrgegm8EFOPMHu+4gOPILEl2bltawpLaKbu5wGrlnccESzE2y 6km905hM3MyLXNZU3mnoC3OO6YP5r3tsGOTon9I+O3QQFiGBBiExXT7eyJ4/6LRu8WlIui9nf /Hv1KxKjFIa5mYqmL/+/TieWof7tlxBi59yHMFhu8UruoxfuHFN8k0ydqdFQaJ73vmLghvnrS YdkAp0EsXF/y5T6k8o7o1yMzocLd0whlB+Ke6LszwcHEq10bW65FIi+pb6eX71PWjy/P7bDF/ OFkBPTZAB20KLhCMTxxaPKJXEFiANaysl+F+UPAAQctbLegsAHKsD2odguwwkR/Nbx/5lzOtw 1qQXI83Zw7iCfuxcsVfZvkeikQv6/IphUKRk/stJ5RKJCr9Ucqvg+olYSpmleDM05TqoRCdsZ eT1MJUOGTI50UY65RgmB4UoqjrgsnxqKnBKLrJ0NRYi4GsuuGPIQODPBC6rgJc39jEgwfmnt4 jLIpusobiFd5vPLAD5eShxJoAi+YCRdAXanzdwkBV5t0ObcMYHepR+f57riiQe/wp+9xOS4GM QnebTFsN/vmLYX8qhoY/esZwh97QHhyLCwpAaYf3esTH85CtSIUR8ShlINKfdgkLpSJDHIyL0 tQLkLj3qRzbKuOCsYXEBotJRnpTQVhAVnmGiRAWYfNW+nICP/Qijt4My9Vv4FZjOU45e7RIFb TXNgu8I92mbZhthvmBzuSKsx45UEavl0On8JdjYDSQkoDdfitddRQpK20QRGy1DJf0jpU7Hqz fetHScEQMOUxCflwCWgY0jhaez0OXT/5J9Z1+DyHun6Zcaq+bn1FhndzKD5hkTnniwSQyK4Xt uaexm0cw4Y843h3HWBoSvhiGFu/+u3o8bl0oeIMZd9jBIQV6DqFcqLNohhPzDcno6Wgf0/fpv uZcAQOErPAwa5ltDxO7hJ12OjnxFr27ifpkc0IrDXdH1AzsXWAScIjfsRdVs2HW4RHnHd51dc QCdyQ37ki8pgGW8PE8IV2/BE4OzrQQWRmSZn5hA+I37yXiWMh1ZBYYyYqTbyhyYw9oZLTJt4k JaW+BhZnB3VQMd09UKEoHHRnn+RxUjzRz1RG03pdd1uQ/Js8RmC5O2OB2al5mVmsd5AMU= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: "48179@debbugs.gnu.org" <48179@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2021-05-03 00:40, Drew Adams wrote: > > The attached patch adds a feature to bookmark.el to colorize a > > bookmark's line, making it easily observable. The idea was > > adopted from package bm.el, available on MELPA. > > Yet another feature of Bookmark+. After all these years, I'm still years behind... =2D- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 02 21:25:35 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2021 01:25:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45909 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldNL5-0005V5-4j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 21:25:35 -0400 Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com ([141.146.126.78]:36796) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldNL0-0005Ux-Vb for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 21:25:34 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 1431OuFn038170; Mon, 3 May 2021 01:25:21 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=c0ku5PbuNp+5SHAFfY0YXGsIwfLi0LUgfTp7hly1U24=; b=U/SWHtdaGxPbg571Uqb9sXt0VAltRbn17JACFBe9f1OBbEVobfa6flOOv/ocQQ3EKchU w6aOnF2GKym19HkyscMMOSzuHU9MKkG0s3E+GSy2iH3BK07W5tT0e5RBgBW+g3Pq9mq/ Wth5PbuYAS2Km31eVAwvwtIhg1UhWWBhMYm8f+J4kdDdkwYSGIpdsOzmODA330AVPnCR nqHlgMTIKn7v/DJY9p9UUsJiEwqeMMs7XVksbNxHgPqffrZycueHoDc6m7YJjFuZBqTC nQWdjahexihJj466oyESPCPRnsxFGMLxeyOkFLlK3/PMH5Mz5ps/2ayOAmT7r8p2gEIk sA== Received: from userp3020.oracle.com (userp3020.oracle.com [156.151.31.79]) by aserp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 388xxmt8uf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 03 May 2021 01:25:21 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (userp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 1431PBaL183999; Mon, 3 May 2021 01:25:20 GMT Received: from nam11-dm6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam11lp2171.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.57.171]) by userp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 389grq2us2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 03 May 2021 01:25:20 +0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=kiSVoWV3xCqML1kOPAN4Azg2WiBZ9nQOX5Gz8txVdgcmer14+DdA3QvXhEtaTxM5w91kQIy7DSC7mvywegVO4mUByLX+rMAjIRqEcA++pWCOYq3OMzldtR6H4qiH2WAGkieGsOKohHVUHGXnW0iOKcE3AL6ROBCoBiNLuKvUdzBQDcY8rOMdcY64kFufVs6nZ42mNcXsUSaMgtMvIF666VFhfu9P/IvpAijJjn7c1U4jvAOR7uwaS8I+9dDkCPRB+X1S3MsYGpih02lLybibXMrWBM2XnFAM87NGRV68wiw7ubRBNrwpfK+rjWOAt097VsV4lPgZ4xnLMDBz2oiE/g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=c0ku5PbuNp+5SHAFfY0YXGsIwfLi0LUgfTp7hly1U24=; b=h2n2zpkb61NgVfd+CW6AmcsSvhEan0Gy7kWP2fzlcvhFFUQ86LoFsed6EyLL7Qh9KJp2VUTUoN/0MtozQ6t6zRVsdY07K/pWwlWmSsiYCgL3bMmzCEJM2po4zgrgE0LeIjkKMrO/6wzcznoCxDuBLcRTR2kDuCYz/igVxXaJn650FfVBHzPa16+MfWfl/RWKBhmia0UCBDA84aC0sL3nqFN5CcS6Fn8Yat44Q2kYUXYRnK2UQY22kQnPkZR6VD7YI83k2tlKoXs3f+TXFf2aIfa02bp/ZdpcDMvQRVIpuj7I1q6UUuF8K4+ADr0lFTi0liT+R8nv64DouzWwkjFfFg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=oracle.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=oracle.com; dkim=pass header.d=oracle.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-oracle-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=c0ku5PbuNp+5SHAFfY0YXGsIwfLi0LUgfTp7hly1U24=; b=Thr6KxfuD3dX6UrotnayY6W6dQq7k9twm+XTKHJBXazUqTPW8MpEw0Czn93qgXSgxsa1IUDWMIunlljzrL4hzEuwA+U+4A4QuC/v4Y4HOd7wvHM4Mw1Kf52JiTfDJM3HOu6nHFcL9i3QVnk3RiKFWEr03ULFtztp3aTMv+kMNSs= Received: from SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:11b::15) by SN6PR10MB2894.namprd10.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:805:d7::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4087.41; Mon, 3 May 2021 01:25:18 +0000 Received: from SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2109:9725:fd4a:6494]) by SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2109:9725:fd4a:6494%6]) with mapi id 15.20.4087.043; Mon, 3 May 2021 01:25:18 +0000 From: Drew Adams To: Boruch Baum Subject: RE: [External] : bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Thread-Topic: [External] : bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Thread-Index: AQHXP7p3i89dKyqW40qYfPZq4l346KrQ9rIQ Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 01:25:18 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <20210503012002.auv3cs2he53x3leg@E15-2016.optimum.net> In-Reply-To: <20210503012002.auv3cs2he53x3leg@E15-2016.optimum.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: gmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmx.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=oracle.com; x-originating-ip: [73.170.83.28] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a2d6b656-135e-4e3f-df6b-08d90dd24fe8 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN6PR10MB2894: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:813; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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 x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(376002)(346002)(136003)(366004)(396003)(39860400002)(33656002)(55016002)(5660300002)(52536014)(9686003)(44832011)(6916009)(4744005)(186003)(4326008)(2906002)(7696005)(6506007)(86362001)(76116006)(66446008)(66476007)(64756008)(66556008)(66946007)(8936002)(8676002)(38100700002)(478600001)(71200400001)(26005)(122000001)(316002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: =?us-ascii?Q?N8RkYirymKLFlENrOD5cIHQmSWbdfDV5Fn3LmTuf1S9sG0xvociQW4UIYLKd?= =?us-ascii?Q?rpepLKhwS/QOlFczhC06B7MRITU8Fz37iGNgYWI3LovZGKlOtl7HHoXcMM6s?= =?us-ascii?Q?7hVoKmy+F1GCmvefZanAdWLB9xvO4fY5Q6/xxpeadnhPU+G1LpQMjYSwd5rD?= =?us-ascii?Q?5MxG6If7Ys32XyUOZn3I5HuUaGPYnhnZmRocDdHN0+HpZ0vDIexDWJA4DpyE?= =?us-ascii?Q?5GzQlCYpn454ObRfGmAICA4sk8G3rJyajpGgqIfqkT1HUui3gMVLIctqNOsK?= =?us-ascii?Q?x9ftfVmJNGF0FCuMYTiwvLnqAUiR2+410mfrrino/o+tROwPblbXgdAOoImK?= =?us-ascii?Q?HpVAW6TtcU2TVdLmVNEg24Givn5Zy4Pa9nI9YSxGoyaG+/10UsFynavi5lj1?= =?us-ascii?Q?ePlXYgIBrGa09LHxkFpKuv4X81UVADGFge9Hs52OCmGkpQVmxvPYh8YdkTlv?= =?us-ascii?Q?4+mbZ9hhAMTMNvBa0GKyVulunOK6KjcUjgXKScRNpldzCD9IrevHPWJbN3KH?= =?us-ascii?Q?IUxy/5uzfty8Bi6lAzFYdkrNI1u6mBjiRw56hfg68XG4RvqkaZaavHp35jYh?= =?us-ascii?Q?EnyLChganqkXpa5qDfSQ/v2N7Ixy6M8T8wOpp2KSewAhmflIPEh+W3w2s7OZ?= =?us-ascii?Q?XZ0SBSc4N94ujgG92WQEpt5Eh+WwpsO5WHhuC2zvv8AQXnVGPUmrsEpNDG14?= =?us-ascii?Q?TCnWS1sPgjOv+96NayY8ACHcVW1gnE/GXtg1N9QLcN7kPIwSS4NoVtqJs8R+?= =?us-ascii?Q?ABEOHPAff19eKHchCCt6gzCVyVYJrgwxLOlguTRgnSStlr5Vq+OQyuIRWQIw?= =?us-ascii?Q?AYaqJJU62bokHr6I7VReAB9jGaKnoWz0fvPniucloUxOU9lwhHlTCu6x1Ir6?= =?us-ascii?Q?sa7VXNsb7NKlp8SgyxyY2GUawLvNlpX0vCuofuiGzaLz2FwVn5lO3KytGZi9?= =?us-ascii?Q?h/lrNsr5ktFq8B4JaHBz05eg/tAp0/D87Fkem7eaVIyyL5/RXLWodVcUQ464?= =?us-ascii?Q?QBzF6qyWW+BLI/5Hl9Ep1WH7nvmB6ptwseKVRMkUWe9fLbUdp1RspvGUcyt9?= =?us-ascii?Q?Y1j7ZmIxUAASFzcMeMDnNxQBrT6JIr+tsQwtyxct+nBXFmWh7A5yr6r4inwq?= =?us-ascii?Q?m6Nycpwb7rGTLmZ2xBxiagbioL1QT/INM1YSvL2sik3lWEkXoOJeY1EYvKtc?= =?us-ascii?Q?zgpQfwS2lLZw/hcNm6mqcnWQk3pRGnRtGMdtwfL36BqczZKRJ+zjNOEpoZ0L?= =?us-ascii?Q?X2wtjJkvjMSI+rvhWKRJh2A36VfL8XajXg79aH0g3Dg0Cx1xQe917nnh/QzH?= =?us-ascii?Q?rVc=3D?= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: oracle.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a2d6b656-135e-4e3f-df6b-08d90dd24fe8 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 May 2021 01:25:18.3286 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4e2c6054-71cb-48f1-bd6c-3a9705aca71b X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: bzDHyGNilmR1SxSwk3Fiq0REdPANl55xeX+fLz7RqiNKBzJ1KD4ATKQcAWe8Xpg7KiGJb/W1314DzkprX/TQEg== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN6PR10MB2894 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=9972 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=726 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104060000 definitions=main-2105030006 X-Proofpoint-GUID: zZWy09va6WLlrZ7AO766yl4ZQkiBKScG X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: zZWy09va6WLlrZ7AO766yl4ZQkiBKScG X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=9972 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104060000 definitions=main-2105030006 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: "48179@debbugs.gnu.org" <48179@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) > > > The attached patch adds a feature to bookmark.el to colorize a > > > bookmark's line, making it easily observable. The idea was > > > adopted from package bm.el, available on MELPA. > > > > Yet another feature of Bookmark+. >=20 > After all these years, I'm still years behind... Same here. No shame in that. Bookmark+ features haven't been accepted for Emacs. You may have better luck. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 03 03:54:27 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2021 07:54:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46105 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldTPP-0002lm-HD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 03:54:27 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38780) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldTPN-0002ld-Ee for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 03:54:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=1R51lz0htoQSg1imy/L7toXuAsGU9mp9eRLedyDEATI=; b=Wb3QRyZXvYYAw8j7jptoifcksM l/skeI49ZiIksdT7qpliG3HDOs+ingzxMhxtqBR4BrpuKc81t8jFDKKDoV9bAjiL0+sPrKwJJQZHs gZmN/td1+EqudUR5TAVFHxh5tBtQ7jTiwD732eZRef+xiu2rNUOkHR89UhdeU6k28cZ0=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ldTPE-0001tH-QT; Mon, 03 May 2021 09:54:19 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> X-Now-Playing: Tied + Tickled Trio's _Constant RMX_: "Constant (von Blond)" Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 09:54:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Sun, 2 May 2021 20:13:58 -0400") Message-ID: <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Boruch Baum writes: > The attached patch adds a feature to bookmark.el to colorize a > bookmark's line, making it easily observable. The idea was adopted from > package bm.el, available on MELPA. I was able to test this [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Boruch Baum writes: > The attached patch adds a feature to bookmark.el to colorize a > bookmark's line, making it easily observable. The idea was adopted from > package bm.el, available on MELPA. I was able to test this on Emacs 27, > but there seem to have been some changes in snapshot to make it > difficult to use that version of bookmark.el on my Emacs 27, so please > verify that I performed the migration properly. The patch is against Emacs 27, I guess? (Because it didn't apply cleanly on Emacs 28.) We're not accepting new features for Emacs 27, though, so can you respin it for Emacs 28? Also -- it's slightly obscure what it's doing, but testing seems to indicate that it just puts a face over the current line when you're doing a `C-x r m' command? That's nice, but I think it would also make sense to restore these faces when jumping to a buffer from the bookmark buffer -- otherwise it's just a bit confusing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 03 05:12:15 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2021 09:12:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46220 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldUch-0001ZR-13 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 05:12:15 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:38561) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldUcf-0001ZJ-8F for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 05:12:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1620033127; bh=2Aj4MIPI3fR2iIrI3+eGp8Gx0nHVdeo74iSWZlsVuAU=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=hfYexYBs3ms4Ub9ph2o3EgTK/f4Wdr5EIOASquUZKzyPjb5LDFe56wdsuNSY5WbOi xmiRQZRUiSLWJaRXEz8XAd9kM3bpUDLv31MYXmP6HsBmCpvyjauMMGU20iA9TNU948 UZ4VsnyLQW842Ou/kGAcnsT8DpSjhcipVe+8H1gs= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([70.19.86.82]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mg6Zq-1l4fyS34hy-00hgk3; Mon, 03 May 2021 11:12:07 +0200 Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 05:12:04 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Message-ID: <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:4C6CCUpvGDUGqyJ2wWXWlWabZxWLjCxwoyV8bpU5IiTSnO+Fm+1 Ixi9dXgx13+oekic/oKgZI6s5NpJxiy1gN2e/wQses38MO0CxiTzNr3v62gUSiBg7FJqhHe zjpZ0AyJ4zuW44SmSjVo38BaLFoxNRjISolizFWcWbirrnRzef35gNoG7dwjrlo+3AHtexS EoV+Vc++0znQxn1t8zK7w== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:aOzCwhqXfq8=:ns0zMia4X6HkEhPb5b63i8 OfpkhaJ+vOJV572DrQXv0etHmyx5tQ45utyhSgvPpdLd6/JxoiAW0Wl/DPVXZ4jZrW2bcZiOu y3xd1AznzmiCwtlZyxkOlglGXpYhqrQ4kUO+9Vu6XbNIE27di4FaOCFlrkItht50vnIaMbDdH 8SyxTiGi0U6KmBTuqnbb96b9fkJY3g9tlURS7CCfjaVgwbNtsMIPZF1aIBcosP1smeKVRvJb0 uPXODUVjWNUI/aeIq+Y6Q9alWex9Emy5aL07st1Mw2PWoVFJKDneblF623foAjZ3MVRx0g9xZ +Vce+pxmEVHM8AHp7I8eP+y6iaACJ97s97azMQA0QOTtVsutDB95mOtlN2sDDpeU2aM8Pelm3 efELkKJ4RaDXsraakBF+TtKIw1ePyPIQHNOtPYRoTbrrzTVI9V4EwMUNi8lHpA7Ehk5dia+RF duJDt14QHSBq5NCbXxQUKxx1HGAiYF4J43cA0yTbB7YhVBbA1nqO99APKWX/Y5WyM9tjtBAMz e/les93N81PAqxuZrr/uH0sXjLBVVZYMVxVD8PTnsTWuMVB8LY5qTWg4NYabaybbYHJ7Kvqzf iyXCPZ3lsFuH1m88pXj0zNxgJV4fUeUvobMkwgMKhBTQPe2rT7HKY7tLPY7v1xXwgrC3Zmf6M F9aQmK/Dn7WNpQJXvJ7sQ8RNOho5pxbBP8KX9IsyicDCTgb8Zlk0Tmy87b5M3TPvrFVQZmblO ks6tQGxIfCmoK/7dzRk9gPjLhfhh5KLcLZKeKk3eivMdPW0lYZrXC8mxNN2xW5n9gta27//Ej 9b4I0an5iJcOS5RIuxZuLtKkqsp2RC9hQXzt7ekvl/haGQqTJzg01qRtAN/IQ0aq6Jcp9C6Kd EZAzn6WF9swFHkaPCbYWl6iR09quqZXiwNxQ4/gK6Q78DARjakI3n97ict8IzyCAHE5xP3JEK 4IVxNWvvedOo+LJykQPgYzO1WVSy5Ygt1EIn1n+6lQq6cNpLXTeGNjf8qQtGpOo2XmxPeegN/ IJkasBB/A1sct4eRPajhISwEcQYSTK7akqDipUqchkTh5XnfBeSJ2m+TIBjkLykAbzEPiumqP 8loxl0VUzC4WyXv0/O1jev9mgJc9Ftq02TX4XR4reYDPn0i5S5OBocO7mpcpkZT477Yo9Ci0U WDV26yk0Q8PmhY3/Hbm7sJFronJUA/3SIHKku898qoG7EsF3RJqBbPS/dGcN7H1l+VQUQ= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2021-05-03 09:54, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Boruch Baum writes: > > > The attached patch adds a feature to bookmark.el to colorize a > > bookmark's line, making it easily observable. The idea was adopted fro= m > > package bm.el, available on MELPA. I was able to test this on Emacs 27= , > > but there seem to have been some changes in snapshot to make it > > difficult to use that version of bookmark.el on my Emacs 27, so please > > verify that I performed the migration properly. > > The patch is against Emacs 27, I guess? (Because it didn't apply > cleanly on Emacs 28.) We're not accepting new features for Emacs 27, > though, so can you respin it for Emacs 28? I thought I did base the patch on yesterday's gnu.org cgit version... Here's what the on-line log is showing me... Age Commit message (Expand) Author = Files Lines 2020-09-07 Use format-prompt in read-file-name calls that Lars Ingebri= gtsen 1 -3/+3 have a default 2020-09-06 Use `format-prompt' when prompting with default Lars Ingebri= gtsen 1 -1/+1 values > Also -- it's slightly obscure what it's doing, but testing seems to > indicate that it just puts a face over the current line when you're > doing a `C-x r m' command? Just. Yes, that is the entire point: "colorize a bookmark's line". > That's nice, but I think it would also make sense to restore these > faces when jumping to a buffer from the bookmark buffer -- otherwise > it's just a bit confusing. Yes. If someone deletes the buffer after creating the bookmark, the overlay will be lost. What you're asking for is a simple two or three lines to add to the jump function, but there's no sense if you can't even apply the current patch. If you can figure out what the problem is with that, I can add the trivial code for the jump. =2D- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 03 05:20:06 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2021 09:20:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46224 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldUkE-0001dw-TU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 05:20:06 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:39672) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldUkD-0001dV-KX for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 05:20:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=rmdsawHwtTCWXcw6LN2S0ryWhKMRK6LcK4jUyLMCN8o=; b=pyz+diOU2cHCkH9VYd/3wJHZuP cof09NoD+6QY8YcVSfKff2WjZbirD8Pr9M3pWuvxEB7O0Kvw9aUHjeH+jbwSSVSSb5AmC6zj657QS q3YA/Wo62DMqo5hJ2L+cqPZxz2oniS9rw2J4U7oXXr5+CDTSuY2Rt9D6t4z9Fg+UZT9k=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ldUk4-00037B-Vc; Mon, 03 May 2021 11:19:55 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEWqVytOIgrOokbH p6j///8RjwGeAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+UFAwkROsoMwSIAAAF7SURBVDjLfZOLrcMw CEWBLADuAsQTpMr+uz2+jlupz0qjxsdcvgb4Z7H9SLU+Ziz7JyL2AXOe4osREqB/0UR7AthJO93A jihLAVNGl/ITDmQtDikCDdFSElYskFEo5LYME32ATsAWQhgbINwdbFIekhvhN3AD0srpG5SbT+BZ aKVOYw/XNqG9u9ECp22YZ3RXLvck6IW0tNsKIItsFh6Uy4CXn8qCDYyJIIQZ4UigXv1omZfaAQfQ zMCz5+t4ywIny33c/lx8vzaAjMdx3a/jevP16kbSavy+2MdFhXmNEuXYWBBWZo7JOkAJLoCrtLKP 8NjADsKbb3HPXQB7JUmAD8DurAM8Gyh7tRnkGyAE6P5FdUeCjmQb0vBhQ7mnzt7BAKgfwIZvlgXv xfIoCkzzWJWrAwm068BElXb42ArEHV5Y6AKmVJIPyHGGrKDPxw6QKGY4LkKDuEoMcYFGgaWETKeH NdtCNRohKuqzywWyQXbsHBiGo8GP9RP8AddDTNzcWU0jAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIx LTA1LTAzVDA5OjE3OjU4KzAwOjAw0z61KAAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMS0wNS0wM1Qw OToxNzo1OCswMDowMKJjDZQAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Sector 27's _Sector 27 Complete_: "Can't Keep Away (bonus track)" Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 11:19:52 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Mon, 3 May 2021 05:12:04 -0400") Message-ID: <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Boruch Baum writes: > I thought I did base the patch on yesterday's gnu.org cgit version... > Here's what the on-line log is showing me... > > Age Commit message (Expand) Author Files Lines > 2020-09-07 Use format-prompt [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Boruch Baum writes: > I thought I did base the patch on yesterday's gnu.org cgit version... > Here's what the on-line log is showing me... > > Age Commit message (Expand) Author Files Lines > 2020-09-07 Use format-prompt in read-file-name calls that Lars Ingebrigtsen 1 -3/+3 > have a default There's been half a dozen commits to bookmark.el after that one, so I think your Emacs is out of date. The latest is commit f5b172fb6e41e9bf75acd1fd94325a13d75987bf Author: Stefan Kangas AuthorDate: Mon Feb 15 00:43:15 2021 +0100 >> Also -- it's slightly obscure what it's doing, but testing seems to >> indicate that it just puts a face over the current line when you're >> doing a `C-x r m' command? > > Just. Yes, that is the entire point: "colorize a bookmark's line". It wasn't clear to me what that meant -- colourise the line in the bookmark buffer? Or somewhere else. > Yes. If someone deletes the buffer after creating the bookmark, the > overlay will be lost. What you're asking for is a simple two or three > lines to add to the jump function, but there's no sense if you can't > even apply the current patch. If you can figure out what the problem is > with that, I can add the trivial code for the jump. Great. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 03 05:58:41 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2021 09:58:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46256 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldVLd-00046z-FL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 05:58:41 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:40595) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldVLZ-00046s-B9 for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 05:58:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1620035911; bh=T/Daon9qUKCTjMil80aoQ6cfHF/SKnXRmrKhJ+Fqrt8=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=YAw7b1nwl6NW/kqiKYGFQrsadCbnpgXWWVrcCvFz9t/ZHtfM7LujgLkUJjxaHkd8+ T5czT95hNwz3MqKGv043wMgzwyetqxbP77lv3aXJdUHlUneFlGyfaLeb2/7B3fINZO ahhtDvnNBz4chaCDDZ2X0tErRNYBckUlJQJpQZCg= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([70.19.86.82]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N8XPt-1lYft12Xxp-014SVX; Mon, 03 May 2021 11:58:30 +0200 Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 05:58:28 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Message-ID: <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="snits2kjt3ul7pwp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:ojOIYfHXbUcrm7serwMpEvu4vZeLdL0szgzf0bc/KSGdPvXsSj8 TedY4oo7ArBmrs94e5VK9NfDvFwdsGdk3DylLFZwJYT/di0ecuCc4qbt9xL2Bphmuo9DTHp VFJIHzfQ7gF2D/IMLozuJ1WTcbxTDwsA+e3AfB41Y0HEQ7oEssG3p2ge+sdTjA1mxaPTEUJ dTXkMfLVGcVQf0XX+zLvw== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:ysnIcLIp9js=:l9pdnzqoPmFWxiuzPiAaBb 9wkkh/Aq7bviJnHkJ0cnJV02cesCfaZyJyylj/SRKEVoRbRmPv0IIAyB9AS2UUwjV2wC8jwvU E5SJnZuj3XkcUNFQIjXv3WvN00kUkVGOyoKHrC7FQLH+KancjKJ6YEOspwyJClXDKGiHj2wSC sy0EbKxJsGkyPimZaRceaufgNKw9ywmKmH+UgRnmD66EyeaKIk0kaqa8HcqT7mqHTuw8K/67l ON8qC7p0GhveGax+8nSJKwrZiI4qb1oZFigDflT1NzoDaSgxNCcOsE+fipGx6sM5IN8M8SmhY y27wdUZ3FFgAaNKuUVH+XuDcs+zyE2xcaZDZttNgGAlfClyG9L62Qb0AFV3WHl7ovQEzpP7pO blHd8gq1/xSE3qydjEyTdsZb/I2RDvmRkw764wY03CX3gmTzOESSdrPixxRtcSxD5ay9soT5W q1Y3ixpTUQdxf2pB8ODk5jYAowGgAOw1qSN5kucdcDrTSpRmrwaP9MEi7w/4VfdapkR2b5/bn n71Gs6lYpKfdhwksLe+neMNZeE4F2+In2XrImhPR4zs333G5+309YLAbKEgsVynbiMXaUuBiS vleIbzyD9kPUpO2cf10TDW4X6sN/gZS4WAKcDH1rurH3j/qrxVt2LK9CpW/SYis3lIBsIyHGR 0BNK2muVauWrQDbd1CTVWKR3iEszMutjGwcniyiP+9zIP17uOsDeRkUWxN4QRpon4QusTyeaw VEQvEulRigE33BJQFyQO6ktclJgRLUsC+O6TLrs8Q4fk+fH72u/JlzxjxwgkhE3f6oF88qgS8 Jpq8NQDhHWe00AkaJQApNaKMgOP/lkA3o4ikFHSXaf4L2McTVxz7Hf8kUwQG/XrmxKL/2piJC yBm7Cj5oO1KLN4umGYa80L6OQDgDxOuLs4jQz9yFA0Czu7/t+6gI5I+tDqo2Oheapaje637rI HCOFPWTImXYkkKqOi+KMJ+Uy6sdwujG7isyYs2ZGVoKb6/L9bZjixikM/BasPALfpSzZ7WjKE KBFZHsdin/dMFaEI+Ut+qISeQCd3EofmWCjoligJjsenOIFMP8HBs3GwwqXmfp7nPPGzf2JW6 tIWgizCUf3Z3gfFZ0agCrsa5EyxGox8ZNm23902K7T5lSF91VXocFU2hA3ChwO0GEBvfunuIT RRsfua+ca7n5Vvdn0h+caDQYLHLddhH9YNh2MErdXi7ur/h4dcwgmg92z8wMtXykK1LoU= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --snits2kjt3ul7pwp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2021-05-03 11:19, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Boruch Baum writes: > > > I thought I did base the patch on yesterday's gnu.org cgit version... > > Here's what the on-line log is showing me... > > > > Age Commit message (Expand) Aut= hor Files Lines > > 2020-09-07 Use format-prompt in read-file-name calls that Lars Ing= ebrigtsen 1 -3/+3 > > have a default > > There's been half a dozen commits to bookmark.el after that one, so I > think your Emacs is out of date. The latest is It's not *my* emacs. I only have access to debian emacs locally; the data I gave you was from the URL I had for the on-line cgit repository for emacs, at gnu.org. Here's a second patch, based upon hopefully the most current URL, and with the additional jump code. =2D- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 --snits2kjt3ul7pwp Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="bookmark-fontify-2.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable diff --git a/bookmark.el b/bookmark.el index 98797a0..af91a6e 100644 =2D-- a/bookmark.el +++ b/bookmark.el @@ -167,12 +167,29 @@ A non-nil value may result in truncated bookmark nam= es." "Time before `bookmark-bmenu-search' updates the display." :type 'number) +(defcustom bookmark-fontify t + "Whether to colorize a bookmark's line. +See face `bookmark-face'." + :type 'boolean + :version "27.2") + ;; FIXME: No longer used. Should be declared obsolete or removed. (defface bookmark-menu-heading '((t (:inherit font-lock-type-face))) "Face used to highlight the heading in bookmark menu buffers." :version "22.1") +(defface bookmark-face + '((((class grayscale) + (background light)) (:background "DimGray")) + (((class grayscale) + (background dark)) (:background "LightGray")) + (((class color) + (background light)) (:foreground "White" :background "DarkOrange1")= ) + (((class color) + (background dark)) (:foreground "Black" :background "DarkOrange1")= )) + "Face used to highlight current line." + :version "27.2") ;;; No user-serviceable parts beyond this point. @@ -427,6 +444,31 @@ In other words, return all information but the name." (defvar bookmark-history nil "The history list for bookmark functions.") +(defun bookmark--fontify () + "Apply a colorized overlay to the bookmarked location. +See defcustom variable `bookmark-fontify'." + (let ((bm (make-overlay (point-at-bol) + (min (point-max) (+ 1 (point-at-eol)))))) + (overlay-put bm 'category 'bookmark) + (overlay-put bm 'face 'bookmark-face))) + +(defun bookmark--unfontify (bm) + "Remove a bookmark's colorized overlay. +BM is a bookmark as returned from function `bookmark-get-bookmark'. +See defcustom variable `bookmark-fontify'." + (let ((filename (assq 'filename bm)) + (pos (assq 'position bm)) + (buffers (buffer-list)) + buf overlays found temp) + (when filename (setq filename (expand-file-name (cdr filename)))) + (when pos (setq pos (cdr pos))) + (while (setq buf (pop buffers)) + (with-current-buffer buf + (when (equal filename buffer-file-name) + (setq overlays (overlays-at pos)) + (while (and (not found) (setq temp (pop overlays))) + (when (eq 'bookmark (overlay-get temp 'category)) + (delete-overlay (setq found temp))))))))) (defun bookmark-completing-read (prompt &optional default) "Prompting with PROMPT, read a bookmark name in completion. @@ -825,7 +867,9 @@ still there, in order, if the topmost one is ever dele= ted." ;; Ask for an annotation buffer for this bookmark (when bookmark-use-annotations - (bookmark-edit-annotation str)))) + (bookmark-edit-annotation str)) + (when bookmark-fontify + (bookmark--fontify)))) (setq bookmark-yank-point nil) (setq bookmark-current-buffer nil))) @@ -1094,6 +1138,14 @@ and then show any annotations for this bookmark." (if win (set-window-point win (point)))) ;; FIXME: we used to only run bookmark-after-jump-hook in ;; `bookmark-jump' itself, but in none of the other commands. + (when bookmark-fontify + (let ((overlays (overlays-at (point))) + temp found) + (while (and (not found) (setq temp (pop overlays))) + (when (eq 'bookmark (overlay-get temp 'category)) + (setq found t))) + (unless found + (bookmark--fontify)))) (run-hooks 'bookmark-after-jump-hook) (if bookmark-automatically-show-annotations ;; if there is an annotation for this bookmark, @@ -1357,6 +1409,7 @@ probably because we were called from there." (bookmark-maybe-historicize-string bookmark-name) (bookmark-maybe-load-default-file) (let ((will-go (bookmark-get-bookmark bookmark-name 'noerror))) + (bookmark--unfontify will-go) (setq bookmark-alist (delq will-go bookmark-alist)) ;; Added by db, nil bookmark-current-bookmark if the last ;; occurrence has been deleted --snits2kjt3ul7pwp-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 03 20:36:01 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2021 00:36:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49624 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldj2f-0000xH-47 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 20:36:01 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f176.google.com ([209.85.215.176]:36795) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldj2d-0000xB-0o for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 20:35:59 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f176.google.com with SMTP id c21so913551pgg.3 for <48179@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 03 May 2021 17:35:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ntB4BgDzrZRHzr4AqQIcJkZuW2i6qQ0VjJ5AIgf8rps=; b=bV62yHMqSMhrPodaH97ciQZOsZx+ueN6Vd+mJIegXzs6/q/ybqVLqQZOR4ZxRtwJ7D fxJ/KMK7EBL9c4FpeUYzD/qIYOAnhb7qTwaIIlnwWFohkdiRSaaFdp6BZXCAUtMWmjOh N5CMsguEnlZ7+dVYgrTzC1kfL+yZO7uDm5MN+CVuWQEZl+qdu+KotiEnr1P46xpmfBtT 7AWU//7N6lvpiEH9hqinuVPqz+oBQqDVeROw9TuOU3GQxmqGsAczIknkIGATIHC3TVJk NCZHLZXGqZydajj+Zn2vTI/ff7MlC0peiuPq23WTnbfkQZni/XIERl0RTHYNjR7DRX5B X5Gw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531c/9k7ICnfo/9FXsyhQhOf/mvEhNSSjqMbtzDkUHpKohj4OGwP MPGbp4SCC/GljwXWRj1WgHhRJEGM6PpJFNpHr2E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzZbsIg3x1g+UX1hpYAYmSU1EPTLLb/W6W/I9ZL/+v4Q0n9d5xjsnYZG5Gh+C8pGSn/4+4YIbj/k5C7+/9/9G4= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:d81:: with SMTP id bg1mr23782498pjb.179.1620088553426; Mon, 03 May 2021 17:35:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Mon, 3 May 2021 19:35:53 -0500 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 3 May 2021 01:25:18 +0000") References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <20210503012002.auv3cs2he53x3leg@E15-2016.optimum.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 19:35:53 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] To: Drew Adams Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Boruch Baum , "48179@debbugs.gnu.org" <48179@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) Drew Adams writes: > Bookmark+ features haven't been accepted for Emacs. > You may have better luck. That's too bad, as I would really like to see some (but not all) of its features in Emacs. Which features are you talking about more specifically? Could you show us the corresponding bug reports? Thanks in advance. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 04 04:59:33 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2021 08:59:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51866 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldqtx-0004dd-8l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 04:59:33 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50964) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldqtv-0004dX-TN for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 04:59:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=wudqvSyVCZLTFbn0j/zMnJsXe0jMaPg3i9sg5bJG2u0=; b=FldHd0/N4djtxUYWYyGbHCYhjU Fwwp8igCJN1MYb9AREdExPMCtPMBaABWrDAKPVWD8juRhAlaa7pC0LX0DaziQRzrh6cvLHb8PHxvn SN+WCQyIA0FHzxhfe07h6tgu8c85GLavXpg97dQt92maDJoCfNStKkccLBPbOKFkh9gc=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ldqtn-0000Kw-0V; Tue, 04 May 2021 10:59:25 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> X-Now-Playing: Working Week's _Working Nights_: "Venceremos" Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 10:59:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Mon, 3 May 2021 05:58:28 -0400") Message-ID: <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Boruch Baum writes: > It's not *my* emacs. I only have access to debian emacs locally; the > data I gave you was from the URL I had for the on-line cgit repository > for emacs, at gnu.org. Here's a second patch, based up [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Boruch Baum writes: > It's not *my* emacs. I only have access to debian emacs locally; the > data I gave you was from the URL I had for the on-line cgit repository > for emacs, at gnu.org. Here's a second patch, based upon hopefully the > most current URL, and with the additional jump code. Thanks; applied to Emacs 28 without any problems. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 04 04:59:40 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2021 08:59:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51870 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldqu4-0004dq-H0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 04:59:40 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50978) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldqu2-0004dk-Rs for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 04:59:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KwO5o/+08PpK3uWVzMfWWmSMS6n92x52BCAYTxEJ4Oo=; b=PxdVFuYm+eBKqlBMrQ93kbtDLK NqzD1Jx264N79Jm7JOMnesSHRWxA0ldiXXImXXNQeU1OK8JmJmsZXJm4z1mzYc7nUhj/3WamvBnoh +r5wegydjfjmt7lUECxGD9vSJQ0Om5WvFqbDSkRQH2cYi4lvyu4wP1f7Xr/yuqrAtwGo=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ldqtv-0000L3-8q for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 10:59:33 +0200 Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 10:59:30 +0200 Message-Id: <87tunian7x.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #48179 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 48179 fixed close 48179 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 48179 fixed close 48179 28.1 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 04 05:02:51 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2021 09:02:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51893 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldqx9-0004hg-4A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 05:02:51 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:51030) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldqx7-0004ha-EG for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 05:02:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=F+Nz7Vyje+rXt/SOHI4ctrCTxVz01CF3dVQGRp7v/4I=; b=lXMMJS+tEmO+5U5NZ7aiJhchxU QYNgixVRgRATAynPtE/YVlZcfkAXnmeuyqtsE2bsGtIUklUNb1OuxVMt2DhQW7KJ30BARK0SPCp56 DpHSzywJayFqfa+DJCY4KbpiwWnKNFjojQI7mBJeUQxbymNXx9l1BZ0uIR1kQmk6meDQ=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ldqwz-0000M8-IN; Tue, 04 May 2021 11:02:43 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAgMAAAAqbBEUAAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAADFBMVEUNDxEoQ1A3bYz/ //+S0I8SAAAAAWJLR0QDEQxM8gAAAAd0SU1FB+UFAgYqKy/uLrAAAAE/SURBVCjPhZDPasJAEMZn Q7bnFIxQz/WgTzEWc58tO0I8WTCF+BR5hBxKQU85JFL7lJ1ZVwy00D0s+5s/33yzALAmuB8D/539 6J18jaEf6+CvRvxL7R5FmMjtHXsJNaDKh9MwtOmsgTpAfUCYASwEltv6pLabqRTn1Se3MpLUfApu LZcoBBvfFT1gXMqc3xqDJguwOs9bA1ZErGYqAmPdtc75DMG4kTMTvigj0UW6ApCw6SECM+FzhJRZ lollWQhGQObXjxG4XuYEp4XBl85EsFLWxUxq3R2smqEb6CIiQI0ErfZ5dZ0g5KwOgMxOgk/HYaAb LMvqIpkswHzLR8lwon60hyZQlB2Kln9MxWXqWgWuuPAgaZ3yXggYZr/LAeqNZ7a8afXry1IkHE+p WgFMciyYD0W/57Cs9XzJ/YJ/ABgqU3MYWWtfAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIxLTA1LTAy VDA2OjQyOjQzKzAwOjAwA/XC7gAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMS0wNS0wMlQwNjo0Mjo0 MyswMDowMHKoelIAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Working Week's _Working Nights_: "No Cure No Pay" Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 11:02:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 04 May 2021 10:59:22 +0200") Message-ID: <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Thanks; applied to Emacs 28 without any problems. One thought -- perhaps it should restore all the marked lines (if you have several bookmarked lines in the same file)? Hm... or perhaps not. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Thanks; applied to Emacs 28 without any problems. One thought -- perhaps it should restore all the marked lines (if you have several bookmarked lines in the same file)? Hm... or perhaps not. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 04 05:58:29 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2021 09:58:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52206 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldroz-0003GQ-A2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 05:58:29 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f45.google.com ([209.85.128.45]:46815) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldrow-0003GK-I3 for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 05:58:28 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f45.google.com with SMTP id k4-20020a7bc4040000b02901331d89fb83so948293wmi.5 for <48179@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 04 May 2021 02:58:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd.ie; s=google21; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=P/rzzRK+B1e7cvozlj4SceuK75hzGm1n8GeYL8yTkgE=; b=CZDZfrUPd+7hh7pCRU41j6FA9AvmfHPtaPVQef1ovdVQoxgSM9M75lWgOs79zs45sm N8205rdvsNYviBdch9d5hF/6SPC2flTo0kE+dZisRQSrt42BCn/fik7vq0Fq1yav6NSx j2Jf78GhINQRGWgPbl5LoQGW0R1imwYLA0ceXf5TKBS54T97OB1kMu73ciDr4GF5fukN KD77GYFKIX+HWLE9US9f8y3EzmT+KElDU1nfYl42ZCdZZWxhhuPd1mUbzvLsoGmhVwDx /BbZp/jHGh0Dx/fgHWUsHXIymEhew6Zvjju2yf/IOqi7fCzfeuZ/s3CxPHM+mCIOqlHt W5LA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=P/rzzRK+B1e7cvozlj4SceuK75hzGm1n8GeYL8yTkgE=; b=C9KrE9NVUYy7ppyXD9yuHnH4GmLnjQTcU3LBWQEl4/ttBtj1rDYx+3kGdXpfRpql2K xpGhH3/Q7IgrPa+W4fHm0NoW1f/QNf7UsjNJKWJZHIU/ht2pc1mpL6orvJxJh2qH3SJY jW9ya17MjWQ4Z1OrA2yDodoBTmbeKUW9k9qRZ9rvNyFKE8+y6q4JyrIpHTMOi+wHr/h8 H3vg03cDzztcSAu2SHeNNGDL19AbWt3iZ2Q3WDWdWOfuiPqIX+gp/w9a7FVvjqLwySav dOwaeT7tk/dV/u5XpwrO29Uz337xTMREQPYNnC1p5YJN8hCxwaYjaF50UgqdWSBSS4LT bIKw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533vNYAyu10TmcQDC348IUK/UMOWzeRIEY99PtCxSYuJEwLgYReS IgROL/1qFVvq2OGUsbLYjxRFsA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyPte4uC+ylefvWji84SuvfAVl+nidHwfvcAzDQUQhOrhH9nm3PFjZAHF+FTKTbb1PiHdoqpA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:804a:: with SMTP id b71mr26522631wmd.82.1620122300557; Tue, 04 May 2021 02:58:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([64.43.128.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j13sm20938096wrd.81.2021.05.04.02.58.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 May 2021 02:58:19 -0700 (PDT) From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 10:58:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 04 May 2021 11:02:41 +0200") Message-ID: <87zgxan7lx.fsf@tcd.ie> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Boruch Baum , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > >> Thanks; applied to Emacs 28 without any problems. > > One thought -- perhaps it should restore all the marked lines (if you > have several bookmarked lines in the same file)? Hm... or perhaps > not. If you 'C-x r m' more than once in the same file, the first overlay remains even after deleting the bookmark. Shouldn't the first overlay be deleted when its bookmark position is overwritten? Thanks, -- Basil From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 04 12:37:47 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2021 16:37:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54195 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldy3O-0003IQ-Q0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 12:37:46 -0400 Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:50434) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldy3M-0003IK-In for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 12:37:45 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 144GKNWd142746; Tue, 4 May 2021 16:37:38 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=Oyo1pKjOJO4txO6rHkcKVZacE2sg2qgQQFOi/Qx2V/I=; b=aWWbxjIcJ8egWGOMCn9196lGuWd8GYtNDRsWVq5oTbi32u4YcvljGM5pyiQOJMqmO5lB xqWPPy67Mtkm3zgDfzX17KH73t08dOnRFauCTrqnD+aKwjI0BBDb9Rq0irVwCXp3SMQ6 ir0IIH+tALpFCb/fJnFLi4592FHe5RDMaqNYwR4aHyd4lcyc49bsGhRYIYX+ZFmRme8i KrGn4hmocZPyZ7nDhWoQapdx5mrTcJFxUub+Cqkv4qLCbXbBIiQXNB/6IEC0I3i9zt8x Lhwg8Gj3gv3TRGRBxHn/jIIYM0vM4XSyU/nYES9eJEF0aOd2KwvjrDf1JjcI17ZFAUJq vA== Received: from aserp3020.oracle.com (aserp3020.oracle.com [141.146.126.70]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 389h13xj5b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 04 May 2021 16:37:38 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 144GKGUM076961; Tue, 4 May 2021 16:37:37 GMT Received: from nam12-mw2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-mw2nam12lp2044.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.66.44]) by aserp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 388xt4br29-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 04 May 2021 16:37:37 +0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=oOLpAQnmVtNFDfT0zPzx14/rGJMASzasB6YJubXXlF1db8ZNclA8zoXONQNCOUPC87MZBHU5yqzqhGMrbkPBJn6qThvdUiJSOpQ7zaTmxkFRj0vI+u5sx2iBaLLikdB/xqmjoxG5FNqjOA0kShyhVPHdhEeVVMpVrRPgfVNszBl55/ElNz/0Vor9fqyxK1r1sXrFhizBSgupF/rEgt6Cby7dGjz7RrOkGItamE92z1HvuIxvQgZuhzAj4hG6+MN8COBzF4L/veyhmmrFyr1FeNdmf4KXmULaNmSK+769aYw1WZ2RcEwY2PFq02B2x8uXY6qmZNBOetj75BAjC4wcPA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Oyo1pKjOJO4txO6rHkcKVZacE2sg2qgQQFOi/Qx2V/I=; b=EG4A47tzE3PjregUSZAl6RM9arGnAX+YCBk30TGxbtuzji7TAGbO1Bb0q3+gJag6QwO9+oyu/BjiPFU36qq+0sj45+C9s8slXiYxbSTgCTniLetZZEu1SY/vsRfA6/5e8yO0/vXAQXg0PuDsww+sIcOm1o3ACx0gK/SqS59O6f3RJJBv4sAl1tusoXSROfbMWcuBf9mSFWPOnz3YbxkdcIkBHo6a+boqbhu3H5b/whkh4QwDJDotCV2b8QRb60pTBnsQIqYR8LVB4QSj3SiC6jmZd0PtcAFcyF7D3z2aVLmi7NPKw2668kjqOzR7S6utKWErMriHPVkRDLcCnXQBbA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=oracle.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=oracle.com; dkim=pass header.d=oracle.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-oracle-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Oyo1pKjOJO4txO6rHkcKVZacE2sg2qgQQFOi/Qx2V/I=; b=KpkE6HI4n+rIjBTfQDd2q9MJx28JNrV/Q91jsC9zlucyhMuZqNcnqZtM47ujWV1Py4XpMQ7qNtXVUCuEQ19kXblRhrINgOCMjCl1UWdZGknaxCyt5RZufyHyLmGIBzM+rG/BiZA32QcYRhuG2QcKE82j3h3IMfbAbh5mmtfYBsg= Received: from SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:11b::15) by SA2PR10MB4444.namprd10.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:11f::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4087.38; Tue, 4 May 2021 16:37:35 +0000 Received: from SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2109:9725:fd4a:6494]) by SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2109:9725:fd4a:6494%6]) with mapi id 15.20.4087.044; Tue, 4 May 2021 16:37:35 +0000 From: Drew Adams To: Stefan Kangas Subject: RE: [External] : Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Thread-Topic: [External] : Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Thread-Index: AQHXQH10/AkVNd48mEG4JJ+xljdpDKrThUhw Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 16:37:35 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <20210503012002.auv3cs2he53x3leg@E15-2016.optimum.net> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: marxist.se; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;marxist.se; dmarc=none action=none header.from=oracle.com; x-originating-ip: [73.170.83.28] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8e47b7c7-d6f9-47b2-3db7-08d90f1aec4f x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SA2PR10MB4444: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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 x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(39860400002)(346002)(376002)(366004)(396003)(136003)(26005)(86362001)(55016002)(64756008)(66476007)(4744005)(6916009)(8936002)(5660300002)(6506007)(122000001)(38100700002)(8676002)(316002)(33656002)(44832011)(71200400001)(66556008)(54906003)(9686003)(76116006)(2906002)(66446008)(4326008)(478600001)(7696005)(52536014)(66946007)(186003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: =?utf-8?B?M2ZyQzBOYWdiN1BJUG1lV1BmRkZOMVYrVjBRWEZWNWRUWE1XbmdhK002ZHhP?= =?utf-8?B?NXhJczhHNTJ1ZVdnckZDemRIYTR1b0V2VFEwM0tnckVDSzExc212N2JSWnd0?= =?utf-8?B?ZFllWHFaU285RGtZUUtoWUc1aHZoYWlKenA3WTB2U21qZVM3VWlYY1RCME1L?= =?utf-8?B?eWlrWE5taU8yVmlWbk5UTVh5WWo5SU5XQlNLM0Noa204RCtFSUdKVDkrZ1FL?= =?utf-8?B?dUNVTTJnVExWNmhFWjB3ZXBNUDUxZkd3WXBqb1NLMGIweUprR21hWHErRTNO?= =?utf-8?B?bjlxdzJGVDF1Mmt2VUsvZXpZUUdYOHZGVW1ERGVSdjVtamNnS0hSTHJCczFZ?= =?utf-8?B?b3BxNlBlYmpTcCticHh6ZC95UGltbnBOWXVFdmtMV3JxMWpDSmZJTzkzODhm?= =?utf-8?B?b2JMUEJZNGxxUG1zM1RHN24xZUtndFhiZDRjcWUvUkt6SERubStOcy9EYzZR?= =?utf-8?B?d0prRi91QTRqT3NQazJXelkxWVdCelAyTzJwejk1SFpCREZ6MjRkRmhHVjI4?= =?utf-8?B?R21SQ2dDeEh5ZTdSWnJTaVpqY05MZlphSEc2OVVndTBsU1g0SnMwWVRxendy?= =?utf-8?B?aURScnJwV3hUTUVFUXZGcjZja2NmUGRYbGJMcUdGcFBIM1k1TUdwSkJ3YUJY?= =?utf-8?B?RG1LbFJLTXRoakx5cjMvUHBnNlJaenVJQzRpK3U0WGw4dlhzbUV1OUVpSE41?= =?utf-8?B?c3VVYnQwU2N3SVVCbC9VM3gzbnVrTWZBS1pYZm0rOTVTanNBcG01S0xJT25D?= =?utf-8?B?UnNUU09OcjJyTFVMSUtyZHBJTjUrNkU2VmhweFE5TSs1YllkTGdXbkU3MktD?= =?utf-8?B?M1hHUlJIVU50RVpVK1N0eURTa1dJVWp3YzhMMkJmR1NzYkNLZHNwTjZWaTJE?= =?utf-8?B?QWlVcjl0VFpmYy9JVWZHb0h4OS9HREFDMVhxSi94VGQvMkVvVzdPTUpyaTRM?= =?utf-8?B?dzh3dWdXUDBCck1XZWRJRTF4eUIyaElBNEt1blQ1VXhnWW5ySHhFNmtNUlFn?= =?utf-8?B?dXQzdkN0VUl5Sk80emtibk1rMU9PYzk0VkRzM2N4MU5mcWw3UzdxVTVwenJv?= =?utf-8?B?TEM3c3JTKyt3cFh0T283eXFSQmxvQnBaSCtyUnpndnFNbHRodkcwYzltQ3Uw?= =?utf-8?B?M2hGZUh6dVRuM0lpcjhqRHpTbGZqS0RhcjRHd0VZSGVLTDY3SmhiQzZLQ21q?= =?utf-8?B?WEdycGhza0c2aktONmo2VGF1RTRicmhlSlR4Ti82Mnd3UzhxUmN6U2U1MGRy?= =?utf-8?B?T2NkRWxwVHBnMlh1MFhHMEJmN3c5OHJYM1VZa2hxbWlFMGh1MHZ0YXFRWURy?= =?utf-8?B?QytpN25OWHRyc1ZUMlcxZkVTdVJzZEtDTWJ2M1hWV2JUQitSNlRDT1dCV2V5?= =?utf-8?B?NXRoSUxtTTg3TUZkc2VHUFp2YStCYW1qcmFNUzhhMi9WWFFCYjg1NWUzMndy?= =?utf-8?B?cDdLZUo2eDkxR0Riejg0K3ZWQnAxYVBzYUdpTDc5WW93UlIvNXJDV2RuQUVE?= =?utf-8?B?SFBPNklmQWZ4aXBmb0FQWG5ub05vUTZ3K0NtUVQxcWZoc0w3eElQOEFXYmxp?= =?utf-8?B?aWRUSDZ0VkJCTEN1UXE4T2prMFBQSnJUL2cwWGN0VXJvcmQvNWlFN2NTb2RZ?= =?utf-8?B?M3h5QUpiZ0xZKy9oM0V5VUJkK0VnTGQ5aDduNjdoQ05ZSk9PM29hTkFjTFps?= =?utf-8?B?ZzRkTTlqd3N4ZlloODN4UjMwa1cydWYzWHl6UkxLNFl5UDJhc0g2ekVTeVVi?= =?utf-8?Q?UZ9D85jB7XMSxWPsJ+8M5aFWBMOyjPfbBYFttuk?= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: oracle.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8e47b7c7-d6f9-47b2-3db7-08d90f1aec4f X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 May 2021 16:37:35.7370 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4e2c6054-71cb-48f1-bd6c-3a9705aca71b X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: ApcDLNGD8OQP1yGf9EfQjurOh5RHoluoBWhDf/9vlj4xYwR2RynEElrH71UMKA5J4h8Rk+s4TcYavkrw1QcYVA== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SA2PR10MB4444 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=9974 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104060000 definitions=main-2105040115 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: Z6byvtD_JW6NomAv3cnmxg44HnmGL8jy X-Proofpoint-GUID: Z6byvtD_JW6NomAv3cnmxg44HnmGL8jy X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=9974 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104060000 definitions=main-2105040115 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Boruch Baum , "48179@debbugs.gnu.org" <48179@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) PiA+IEJvb2ttYXJrKyBmZWF0dXJlcyBoYXZlbid0IGJlZW4gYWNjZXB0ZWQgZm9yIEVtYWNzLg0K PiA+IFlvdSBtYXkgaGF2ZSBiZXR0ZXIgbHVjay4NCj4gDQo+IFRoYXQncyB0b28gYmFkLCBhcyBJ IHdvdWxkIHJlYWxseSBsaWtlIHRvIHNlZSBzb21lIA0KPiAoYnV0IG5vdCBhbGwpIG9mIGl0cyBm ZWF0dXJlcyBpbiBFbWFjcy4NCj4gDQo+IFdoaWNoIGZlYXR1cmVzIGFyZSB5b3UgdGFsa2luZyBh Ym91dCBtb3JlIHNwZWNpZmljYWxseT8NCg0KVGFrZSBhbnkgZmVhdHVyZXMgeW91IGxpa2UuICBZ b3UncmUgdGhlIG9uZQ0Kc2F5aW5nIHlvdSB3YW50IHNvbWUsIGJ1dCBub3QgYWxsLiAgVGhlIGxp YnJhcnkNCmlzIEdQTCBhbmQgSSd2ZSBzaWduZWQgcGFwZXJzLiAgQmUgbXkgZ3Vlc3QgLQ0KaGF2 ZSBhdCBpdC4NCg0KSWYgeW91IHRha2UgZmVhdHVyZXMgYXMgaXMsIHdpdGggbm8gc3Vic3RhbnRp dmUNCmNoYW5nZXMsIHRoZW4gSSBjYW4gcmVtb3ZlIHRoZW0gZnJvbSBCb29rbWFyaysNCihmb3Ig RW1hY3MgdmVyc2lvbnMgdGhhdCBoYXZlIHRoZW0pLiAgSWYgbm90LA0Kc28gYmUgaXQuDQoNCkFs bCBvZiBCb29rbWFyaysgY291bGQgYmUgaW5jbHVkZWQgaW4gRW1hY3MsDQpzdXBlcnNlZGluZyBi b29rbWFyay5lbCAoaW5jb3Jwb3JhdGluZyB0aGUNCmZ1bmN0aW9ucyBCb29rbWFyaysgdXNlcyBm cm9tIHRoYXQgZmlsZSkuDQo= From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue May 04 14:38:30 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2021 18:38:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54729 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldzwE-0004Xh-9M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 14:38:30 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:55733) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldzw9-0004XQ-UD for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2021 14:38:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1620153499; bh=oOFmP69DJkvizw8GG4dWWMh+e9pF6bJeACtL2UCiaLs=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=a+YVjS08jwWZuFJPLWh99kGISAIrXF6pbA2P/Zr6kiq3Ngkteg7A7MXh9J1YraZjs +bUhf5YvKFt28Y4dIKvmk1qiAdSlUObMH5h8vlRAP+sRCCxIXJkH3/TAqGAK3qV8Z9 QpwnXfK42qDoCowrcnUIvhwz4+w2fLyhPb0g9M2Y= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([70.19.86.82]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N4zAy-1lWGA30vX2-010vbd; Tue, 04 May 2021 20:38:19 +0200 Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 14:38:16 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Message-ID: <20210504183816.xztxbfi7af6mlbeb@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:FUH1smKI8jXkNt6MD9SEp9miScaHt2dT8zTOAlOlw27dXrNmrdv QGhW/kC+sLeZZ9L4tnwt/zsb7qzKK6nIQDN3CzfKPL2w31drl9xZdOQ8QKK7vqhtEJW7biY 72E9Ak3sbtERPTW713SlsE04dG2dWylRbvoMqhKHackbYT0uB9MIiSIJbeN9e8ZmY/dRGqO cJNBODF1mXLyLmQrn7hOA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:0PFxN3k/YIU=:QHF9BXzxgw6LIbTcUwsL6W mDk7BbX6G2Kt7Hk7mRG8JYodQ8gbeOWPRwfUHUKUasDU4h6ma2f9jN0R3fZ8+0s+zpd7OhcZ2 5n6OIxCL6ZD1UzZFTw8n/KU8g162qVtEY3+Dkl0zNwn270KrpI2Z4ZzOrCUkENFgMjagA5EHw r7o6VB5JWw2WA5Hmn5T1jry8INUvIViS1pMBfHyRjETGe4ZaR2N8TSqGtsrweIGE25xTQ/do2 ASii0StXbyHwZuOluLrQsbAMDw5Cj8HlSkXixDqPtWe22wW+34PLCwPRKsg8tSJo+hKIogDYj k76XJ1fYFLfOMuhOdIOPXGzj7HFO/RN1Dh6r5jtYqCu3sryqQSnZXbZGtaNKGytN8UNMBwb65 z6dQbRHM1XCXExbG/ZJjawRnbOp2omZEtY9kRe/TxfuMjM2LrENyTSEfPg4IbdiBtDUPW6HYV TCjePUCo1LH3o6Tw5RWvCpxUShjvvdz1VmIbAV2P3Cpb/whChlcpYd25rpixqChWlMRNEElR2 WQE5VoT8UlYNXH2txSMNcHRs578nhuxrZq2cshNEXpNwb8HsDebmW/FCJ8HApZsRpgBTdOia5 sPFWc+MES0XUJjKPaWr/qvG3Wqv2p7TypNLKVnl8+LOLC6GgU7Gigf33PdaICvkJ2VdiuFF2l tSmDmWjjm/u3Hkrr9Afh9pUxrlwxCF72eyPsmCfv9MNVeIeb1WsXxpiQ2PCtsm0NQKEk91KJA qCGSRLS0FnfjgUVbkHlz0dMs5YPChXm3x9Fk8uqERC7zpeCkMqsKcKTNCdK1jGznKLdz1owQK M1rlXS/8HA7WKxwaa6/XAa7zxyc0aUmk+oN9OK9dIoxygcekWGSX6FregvYoZLgnZZ4KxcpBb TBHsBNWbLUH75OVja/tmdxutsWuI2dgWxrerfTSkMI4oiPCBNogAbGSFJsU6fkCvOFxeczMAG f0vS27tnQIxAWsDsoCEgWMKXGJ1HKvXCB4P5STO5mnzah/UoiOKA6DSQiHwnksfIGBUEMpHih HQgoQnXHLrm/iT+TwNbJowEQw3rLldBv5X3i7SQbsuSWZBU5VJtcSBrs/vd2PDrayPnsRjnMN qXv6ehFOcEZUymZgsD3HUqAjZuxF9q01Ljw89Us4DA/bpZpXq3qWUBCziBmlv0AvFagvo23xh D3GIwhlMJPLD18fWNY/gwosE7NoLvwC9THEQsoOoWDBcdpH0k5BUF7RqxmrEb3uozOJ9g= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2021-05-04 11:02, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > > Thanks; applied to Emacs 28 without any problems. > > One thought -- perhaps it should restore all the marked lines (if you > have several bookmarked lines in the same file)? Hm... or perhaps > not. It's do-able, but if Drew's contributions are going to be accepted, that should take priority, and then if the addition is still necessary, it's just a matter of iterating over the bookmark list at the point of finding (re-loading) the file and applying overlays to all the bookmarks in the file. =2D- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 04:13:26 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 08:13:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58484 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leCes-0005Vs-Hc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 04:13:26 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:33362) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leCeo-0005V6-Ry for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 04:13:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=WNGODULYsdHSEsTD3Y6DxDLp8TZIpWVqFTgo0taBPvg=; b=X+wcbSxEbnsciS1t4TvSVI8KnV vRAWUoLUe7xyhgtunq90G1lbRs1hFITHcs8OISDjunUOHs4czSnzmt7CC4ugw/RxzYRmzabqvC5wj BPHkIraURxqtRO+an4rBdTbBPmvWXeyH5t34SNUUqJIu4dbYcqA1VKVzn+Ze2OmuXcio=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leCef-0006Y9-Lf; Wed, 05 May 2021 10:13:16 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgxan7lx.fsf@tcd.ie> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEX58u7Irq91bYUk FBb///9XP3FsAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+UFAggqJLXPHisAAAF/SURBVDjLtZNrcsUg CIXBbEB0A4IbiLL/vRXQJG1v+rMkM3H4wsujAP9p9O4uxJRf/NiJkd8CZmUs7TN/V2Uq09eekGit kETV/MoM+ADyR4SK6txlLiBEVIpFqexeokNCFRZxv94RBlAsh3YNG1EbN6h624wNuID/PTe5QHMQ OXauPcYD2s63apcH5HqnQptX+COCvMJ3gH2SwRjW/BeYoQUamOJGvOaQrVH3iAAxB85bLqtBniwA g166VAVeZIHe9kbXVfwBA/BbhJsnFuhXkaiBD6iaMdY+oMm5dpcEirZoGAOY8Y7IesYhSD55kdiQ BfpAD+kOzC2cNzjUVy4x+En1aEsmOScT2+fu16hojw2araqYwrNsUHuTpLNrW2I0qCEt1Hz2g+dM S3EbMzlAA0Mq0AnjMFFWk1Z6gSPjwJHsgC6xYjsqjJ70tBqQ2Bu775G9uXARj+/n+yXE8uMKRg/r +3pr8f7t9x3c+IMsB+EfIONrW6YbfBLM4noifAGZ+kMHzQ97zgAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUA MjAyMS0wNS0wMlQwODo0MjozNSswMDowMJAG8n0AAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjEtMDUt MDJUMDg6NDI6MzUrMDA6MDDhW0rBAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Nico's _Do Or Die_: "Femme Fatale" Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 10:13:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87zgxan7lx.fsf@tcd.ie> (Basil L. Contovounesios's message of "Tue, 04 May 2021 10:58:18 +0100") Message-ID: <878s4t8up2.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: "Basil L. Contovounesios" writes: > If you 'C-x r m' more than once in the same file, the first overlay > remains even after deleting the bookmark. Shouldn't the first overlay > be deleted when its bookmark position is overwritten? Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Boruch Baum , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) "Basil L. Contovounesios" writes: > If you 'C-x r m' more than once in the same file, the first overlay > remains even after deleting the bookmark. Shouldn't the first overlay > be deleted when its bookmark position is overwritten? You mean when giving the bookmark the same name? (You can have several bookmarks in the same file with different names.) Yes, that would make sense. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 04:15:51 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 08:15:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58497 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leChC-0005fN-Tp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 04:15:51 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:33394) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leChB-0005ev-Ox for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 04:15:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=phMnY7h5xt/9Xvv+B8IxqSP5knRZj2OiyzD1Gs97TP8=; b=s8rr+Qvp6X0N84GZT6mK2egsNO eMeeV2Id4VD0xOl150Iaepw6PsOfTmdvmJnA4k/tVa9irY2AExueqLWTYvAzaLM7GNuZL5tA5W1PR u7aDYOd5rFVnACJk42B8w2uQPIyjkxhekMrE/5+qKQTY6HSGeAdFULvtAPVOJ7nMiO+Y=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leCh3-0006Yk-Go; Wed, 05 May 2021 10:15:43 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> <20210504183816.xztxbfi7af6mlbeb@E15-2016.optimum.net> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEX58u7Irq91bYUk FBb///9XP3FsAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+UFAggqJLXPHisAAAF/SURBVDjLtZNrcsUg CIXBbEB0A4IbiLL/vRXQJG1v+rMkM3H4wsujAP9p9O4uxJRf/NiJkd8CZmUs7TN/V2Uq09eekGit kETV/MoM+ADyR4SK6txlLiBEVIpFqexeokNCFRZxv94RBlAsh3YNG1EbN6h624wNuID/PTe5QHMQ OXauPcYD2s63apcH5HqnQptX+COCvMJ3gH2SwRjW/BeYoQUamOJGvOaQrVH3iAAxB85bLqtBniwA g166VAVeZIHe9kbXVfwBA/BbhJsnFuhXkaiBD6iaMdY+oMm5dpcEirZoGAOY8Y7IesYhSD55kdiQ BfpAD+kOzC2cNzjUVy4x+En1aEsmOScT2+fu16hojw2araqYwrNsUHuTpLNrW2I0qCEt1Hz2g+dM S3EbMzlAA0Mq0AnjMFFWk1Z6gSPjwJHsgC6xYjsqjJ70tBqQ2Bu775G9uXARj+/n+yXE8uMKRg/r +3pr8f7t9x3c+IMsB+EfIONrW6YbfBLM4noifAGZ+kMHzQ97zgAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUA MjAyMS0wNS0wMlQwODo0MjozNSswMDowMJAG8n0AAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjEtMDUt MDJUMDg6NDI6MzUrMDA6MDDhW0rBAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Nico's _Do Or Die_: "Femme Fatale" Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 10:15:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210504183816.xztxbfi7af6mlbeb@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Tue, 4 May 2021 14:38:16 -0400") Message-ID: <874kfh8ukz.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Boruch Baum writes: > It's do-able, but if Drew's contributions are going to be accepted, that > should take priority, If Drew submits patches, they'll be evaluated like any other patches, but experience shows that that's unlikely to happen. So it's best to just ignore his comments about how foo+.el already does whate [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Boruch Baum writes: > It's do-able, but if Drew's contributions are going to be accepted, that > should take priority, If Drew submits patches, they'll be evaluated like any other patches, but experience shows that that's unlikely to happen. So it's best to just ignore his comments about how foo+.el already does whatever it is we're adding to Emacs -- he makes these comments about basically everything, but virtually never submits anything. > and then if the addition is still necessary, it's just a matter of > iterating over the bookmark list at the point of finding (re-loading) > the file and applying overlays to all the bookmarks in the file. Sounds good. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 06:48:26 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 10:48:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59353 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leF4s-000805-Hf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 06:48:26 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:41797) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leF4r-0007zz-CZ for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 06:48:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1620211699; bh=k5p/H3zJWuYF9LZJLjuatU/r9e2LNanum7UNkpfT+DA=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=B0dMvjMGL69u/qyEyTfPUJPuydp0vxm5HjD8+mjRcfyuGBcIlaM17es04Sv2eomkm TyPhtevpBKhK8ScbnlHGUgHQlCUQQrek8DLhtesfXCnQq3cKukoU1FrHRTe0nqpPlM 2pJDcVvKKQdkwKX40O08bMc5799T6b7npgqb7PMs= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([70.19.86.82]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MUXtY-1m4XLv03ge-00QV0a; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:48:19 +0200 Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 06:48:16 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Message-ID: <20210505104816.26i45urvktod3322@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> <20210504183816.xztxbfi7af6mlbeb@E15-2016.optimum.net> <874kfh8ukz.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874kfh8ukz.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:ecAYyZ4JfZVIsH7HEzi1HrharnOdlsaKINR5CAme6j0dr74Oh5L g0dkdIk3hZ3w1m9ApiTA7uQxmL0i3UO6VaYys1LhdpyeQYNSt/0VKjmxEuleS2Z+Ne1Kt1z YG/7tGU92heTHWcNfdEEGq/0ldbkOoSKw2VPKLMo8iDTz42MWUzX5Cs2esqWLfwAxK8F8XM bCrH46LAD+/KmfZQuxxHg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:qWOhUWrOz28=:+oluuIGKz9CY/coEdOda3X LBds+jI5tQD4xWsfMSR3/VAXyo93OVnYPHzmsp5SoJnGl56v83qnX5XZ2Bq8Fu7nLh7Rr7/Ps ppePZBkTNhh4nWmZbCyIEytjpyFogC2FZCi9HU72kgQzSl53FSGv73QdK2qKgp3AELY+gwqJv fpnMQ54CLs4GjnQSs78Ol7kImJ8UhM3j+XUl1OZvBZQ8m3mINUZzhkIqxBygVXg8ZDBC3cqWL jd45vPHttRDjUBWYzqJSGl4CFoumqCWGjxZO0tfwrLd3e9sev2D10jfA8/P/bZheJt04Y5SbB cxEVP2fTy2U2j4CeqnG4+87OHTqfQ/dnuiWh2YtNZri+jcdzMjwBbh3X26btornoHrY1mWVnF 2AA0/3+IJz77Ba+UNzvEt0/dsWxHnAeWlfBrqAlMrsNyYgpu6I3FZ91+MPWaI5uCItVRj3dLp w8mdGeQTEOyJpExQvfqW76Mn3oewO99qSPK8GlNlBZ3meX5jdUq13snqX9cQPpbptkMF97jOE 5aUGJH7xnYqjSICO23bvuWFjxmXvhM+1bR4RQvI47OwMFLe1zDtW1rqRuAut4fvmf1s4V1lev m7kBpcUdQ4O5Xf1CkBlzqo3vk7cM6T2HQ9826YMc+xnz0YblyiIz5kEc7HYP0YkV4afGMbABe xTQP+Qe8jsKuUa25pcj7I8AgTDPv+3L/LtBy4kI2M6bjXXj1plkucVvM6+/BuNLSISwNi6tHo QN8Pu+Xy9BHfYo6LMMYILJMm2qJgUE2yzdvyOsyndUaR4b4DhZfpKCWTX5ObskWPg9NnLBC5v VigxDqILKs10+0VX7AqqTNPTEAlfHU+kCwNh3bqz6puAr20GVuRAi3IOplh42EqIRNUrde1vt hoiAp+6DRRVFLc6fmQmhcI8JjPGEaMM2ICmajHKS7IP7+gfjDFf1ALsANlPaMsonw/jc9Wkzm R5redgsSk4TDVItK4FyxVKGa7nESzyHGk3QPzkG5+ioBoRKWMOKCZX6yiAuy17DL9892rkxul FyNLN12dEayLIzsWoUrXhUq7Y7YpqLgoybu+V+2lN70LyLeJMPeCkc7Flmh8RExTGKsWIsL6X MCG1Q7rjd3AbVEmK9jFfR/k/uYLrkph7WS2j3URd0tDkdbJoDj8oCnrXrL2qGpyYEfWpSUVFx feClFfUiX7nQWl4RSFaHDGTJ3Ua2F8FlWR9pp9kpckSzweN/2QQur2fm16lAm0TTQUlQQ= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2021-05-05 10:15, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Boruch Baum writes: > > > It's do-able, but if Drew's contributions are going to be accepted, th= at > > should take priority, > > If Drew submits patches, they'll be evaluated like any other patches, My reading of his email was that he was submitting an entire package. =2D- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 08:26:29 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 12:26:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59838 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leGbk-0002ki-WF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 08:26:29 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com ([209.85.221.42]:33596) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leGbi-0002kV-0e for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 08:26:27 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id n2so1657949wrm.0 for <48179@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 05 May 2021 05:26:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd.ie; s=google21; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=7Y/UCSy2DXEYTzIshoMOu+g6pWmix3Xoz6TRxPx2VQI=; b=UtyxdGXtsP15PMVEPEosJW6anR8xwgHF2kLNuaxdEY5E6UzBzJ97vJOBdHNiT6GePq b2Cko9H6Ok7kXRUpsD1UKrn5wm1ZHzqf5/MZGXStfRQtPlBeqRz2QK/WwL+A2SS6/SEp MgXkAvx89VQhR9EEfTJrdtfCxk2ZQuRSK9KSmZK3/Oh9gisRxgtt3bTV7PSXnJaprix7 wzndeo5ysx2PcTZEFZxtXkqfs0H9BrBw15qdWTaX+g3KfoPTwXthZrQD9ZlxGcc4UNsK NTIgJg6Cg2cK+xixbvHZh101Zx658y9ST6reqZ0ZwBNRBa3JBvNASW5Px9K/TS5LLGPy Ys/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=7Y/UCSy2DXEYTzIshoMOu+g6pWmix3Xoz6TRxPx2VQI=; b=p3DDcTLJtBlLpG8s7o6CX9coxhbOnH6VSfYtK6LC+POsb3g/8mBojaUS6iCK4HFkLv V8PqSPfyErPdxOBuWPhYRaAU59mLNmakU5Y5cmPKT9BeTlYbBHtCtjn2uUBv51nPPrp0 Darc85Abt/gRdzziCdAi+l+fgGv9hsSsZO2T/oUBNwxPyal6zqYkTBfkn0zlhls4Rk6K 8tQcJhVgl2KoWX4xBybHBzVmX1nxDWnJaP1sKojQWb1TOxlUSMviTIbp8dvYO3nbs3Wh LQAPKLyOgBohodArURL1IVF9yAPfWbSWlPmghOq4tww6eikxxYU0Tq+mqnnST8Cr2osn mb3g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5323Cg3nZPGsPHOvR4EsNSY33L+Lo5QsHuDFu634m9dVu/8WW9Cz WTSJuEekM8aL84Vk83KsVarf0g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx8SCZ3jWB1czoib+rF0DVBW59sVGCUZpc79LNuJxTkOFujxVIA1R7uY+4/yu1+OzCOM4gZxQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e404:: with SMTP id g4mr38030707wrm.240.1620217580154; Wed, 05 May 2021 05:26:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([51.37.55.64]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t7sm19180770wrw.60.2021.05.05.05.26.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 05 May 2021 05:26:19 -0700 (PDT) From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgxan7lx.fsf@tcd.ie> <878s4t8up2.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 13:26:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: <878s4t8up2.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 05 May 2021 10:13:13 +0200") Message-ID: <8735v1jrit.fsf@tcd.ie> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Boruch Baum , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > "Basil L. Contovounesios" writes: > >> If you 'C-x r m' more than once in the same file, the first overlay >> remains even after deleting the bookmark. Shouldn't the first overlay >> be deleted when its bookmark position is overwritten? > > You mean when giving the bookmark the same name? Yes, sorry, I meant multiple 'C-x r m RET' in the same buffer. > (You can have several bookmarks in the same file with different > names.) > > Yes, that would make sense. Thanks, -- Basil From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 11:39:53 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 15:39:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32824 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJcv-00019f-6i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:39:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36452) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leJct-00019Z-QK for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:39:52 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46914) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leJcn-00028j-K3; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:39:46 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e34:ec2b:7150:9cd4:6735:fc93:ecf2] (port=33498 helo=guerry) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1leJcn-0000W5-1g; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:39:45 -0400 Received: by guerry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0A1751A60ECC; Wed, 5 May 2021 17:39:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Bastien To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] In-Reply-To: <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 04 May 2021 10:59:22 +0200") Organization: GNU Message-ID: <87pmy5io91.fsf@bzg.fr> References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 17:39:43 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Boruch Baum , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Boruch Baum writes: > >> It's not *my* emacs. I only have access to debian emacs locally; the >> data I gave you was from the URL I had for the on-line cgit repository >> for emacs, at gnu.org. Here's a second patch, based upon hopefully the >> most current URL, and with the additional jump code. > > Thanks; applied to Emacs 28 without any problems. Just a quick warning: Org contains two features called "capture" and "refile". "Capturing" adds notes or tasks to an Org buffer from other Emacs buffers. "Refiling" moves a Org headline under another one, either in the current Org buffer or in another (declared) Org file. With this change, the Org refiled/captured headlines get fontified and it might surprise many users until they find out that fontification is related to this bookmark feature. There is also dired and, of course, normal bookmarked files: I guess some users may be really confused--at least those who don't know to M-x customize-face RET at point to guess what this is all about. What do you think? Shall we turn bookmark-fontify off by default? I for one do like the feature and customized bookmark-face to suit my needs, but I wonder about others. -- Bastien From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 12:30:53 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 16:30:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33185 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leKQG-0006Nw-PF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:30:53 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:43023) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leKQD-0006Ne-Lc for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:30:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1620232242; bh=X4aDMYHdo3Nu1vkhWDU9atVQZY8q7r+XUi/eOQFhOzI=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=LJCGUHmY2mpM4GdT7iak52xYqqDkZrM16S6ZaItwK4aZqKuNxbDrpooFk2GgZc0RA DzBfaKXoscISbvOGsoPccWupSD24uQCWp4kcaqdDTnxx4A1gz/2JSVnttrriMuYhuq fG+tLOkaiQmLB7QHwve9lNjE5b23+3/sYZPY+UPM= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([70.19.86.82]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MrhUK-1lAY693WcO-00ne77; Wed, 05 May 2021 18:30:42 +0200 Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 12:30:38 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Message-ID: <20210505163038.bq4oupkuiago6kcd@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgxan7lx.fsf@tcd.ie> <878s4t8up2.fsf@gnus.org> <8735v1jrit.fsf@tcd.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8735v1jrit.fsf@tcd.ie> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:259qdofWAAtwGZFXi7+s93+XXn5ABNmlLJbmsxwcXQHRUBJGG2a QG5v+Ei4u0B5SdmKThobmUUES1syf50VxNZMBb6VGC7EIn55eeL+17jjwjxhCymeL76L0xo 89+W6Ngcdac8lGmruLb+pF3AL22qBAXF7nAWcRDag/E1wFrWK9cJhddsNUv/Nk1EKm8b5Cz Y9XQOeRkkM/EOHupS0h+Q== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:usatxDi92+I=:5llpCiqqSgBDIuqaTG1VWy c8CXWGeFH+oEf8w/jUF4v/Ri39JHHBlLxX8xlIwAWGxeZlt5xQQezix83qj5NYPk2Xoob/BZl oyyVJedABReTj1le2ERi6ppn8dhw5L05cLgjoR2J6PDfxe9ZO8eW0b2u86xsZi3PH81t+SMlW cEFfeiHMJ+WNuwCijskIvqGt1L/DnLYaew0eE0SpYijT7Sek6aGxaVnDY5VAfeRLwR1Od5zFO RGdFuPzhciFIVikdITQ44mlUjMrSOysLlEY75tXOs5n/GjJzbaWrMO7aq09njSio3K9OvOQBM Mij695c6gDSaWvh22rm67o1v1uochZtzA7prfPEubrUzqZpeqzPxPhOHXfcNqSJPbnPqn9S5G l/rBF7Kgzstjpfx16dQ+afKWW//AP6wrjs9UqppYHM+mdWfxI01K2FVlISGHomTPTyRxXKj2z +YqEAFIVjoG1edMkceN1Gpo6aqACGKvvBKMUBkrPve6hsolCtyKU47h05xF+BOCTT891iS+XI fW5QBFCNb8eF2wKPK894OO6DdrK2whMXb5OPMnHwPw3+bGabsIzq8Hkv9VSMjmroZDA/KP2fI rWJ8qNTmBD1cfSPPxDMdwhxP7bKdZFd5sIsCeOnaFa1akAhdniNwz/kGrfmpF3a1eHMdPdoWb /Sh25dxtry44LHN1EPjmXOLBJ3ynt52b5Y0uSQyWQH7Wx5QsNmk6UPSDBjDyAk5naD+Lxy2hD wBcA83Ojjk+QT8u/QqmGsxc9c6L/e36ZCFE+0X2SlkRI2hsDnwC13X9DnWWGwuFo+QPWS0h5z FHKi7dTMyqzHZgJOPwU2BjsuOBp2ale62IK7FcHC31ojDNWRGXu72J1DhsUuyZTdUAJBOODKO eKP56EAaJJkqUfxATuiwukqcnzV1JWROit5q2TbSKxBsgiVTOse/aIhAZ2YOVfvegahrW5xEB 3YZhDyR/mfqkQW9fw155M3sWYToNCh8cqPJZ5up0xxfpbdCYmsQu9wE8nnlOLMX1dAXV2j4ah vG4jWwaQH1RumV27tMkFMxPlUzoxiNS9CAPC7zSDIXZrRTiEO7+mj52/XTcXr9QXcnpwPuYeo +iPomxoK1e210a2FMXw+yZhBoEdOZ1iIqr584Ro1ANJSdnvXMGZofBkI9tzhfC4W46az38N16 VktBuVKa/w2lUlLBfTYYRUbGDy5lYyvMa99VMIE9eZ9vJMHQekLBMhqDHx2EGp5Wy/vDs= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2021-05-05 13:26, Basil L. Contovounesios wrote: > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > "Basil L. Contovounesios" writes: > > > >> If you 'C-x r m' more than once in the same file, the first overlay > >> remains even after deleting the bookmark. Shouldn't the first overla= y > >> be deleted when its bookmark position is overwritten? > > > > You mean when giving the bookmark the same name? > > Yes, sorry, I meant multiple 'C-x r m RET' in the same buffer. > > > (You can have several bookmarks in the same file with different > > names.) > > > > Yes, that would make sense. > > Thanks, Basil, I went to start doing more work on this and see you made a commit in the interim so let me coordinate before we end up cross-commiting (For me, this is especially important since I'm working with debian v27.1 locally and applying patches to v28 which you seem to using locally). 1) For function bookmark--unfontify If more than one buffer in the list can be acted upon, then variable 'found' @line ~472 should be set nil at this point. If only one buffer in the list can be acted upon, then @line ~469 should either check variable 'found' or @line ~476 should set the list nil, both easier using the prior pop idiom than the dolist idiom. 2) For function bookmark-delete-all This seems to be a new function in v28, that I don't have locally. I see it when performing a diff. Because it takes a (reasonable and efficient) 'short-cut' method, it won't delete any fontified overlays, so it needs a variation of function bookmark--unfontify: (defun bookmark--unfontify-all () "Remove all bookmarks' colorized overlays. This function is meant to be called by function `bookmark-delete-all'." (dolist (buf (buffer-list)) (with-current-buffer buf (save-restriction (widen) (remove-overlays (point-min) (point-max) 'category 'bookmark)))= )) 3) For function bookmark-set-internal Additional logic is required in order to account for argument variable 'overwrite-or-push'. If I'm understanding those features correctly, @lines ~875-878 should be amended to something like: ((eq overwrite-or-push 'overwrite) (when (setq prior-bm (bookmark-get-bookmark str t)) (bookmark--unfontify prior-bm)) (bookmark-store str (cdr record) nil)) ((eq overwrite-or-push 'push) (when (setq prior-bm (bookmark-get-bookmark str t)) (bookmark--unfontify prior-bm)) (bookmark-store str (cdr record) t)) For the above snippet, variable 'prior-bm' should be defined locally scoped @line ~861 4) I was expecting to find some sort of bookmark hook function in variable 'find-file-hooks'. The idea would be thatd when a file is read it's stored bookmarks are immediately fontified. (defun bookmark--find-file-hook-function () "Fontify all bookmarks in newly found file." (let (pos overlay) (dolist (bm (mapcar 'cdr bookmark-alist)) (when (and (equal buffer-file-name (expand-file-name (or (cdr (assq 'filename bm))= ""))) (setq pos (cdr (assq 'position bm)))) (save-excursion (goto-char pos) (setq overlay (make-overlay (point-at-bol) (min (point-max) (1+ (point-at-eo= l))))) (overlay-put overlay 'category 'bookmark) (overlay-put overlay 'face 'bookmark-face)))))) That should go some way to account for your catch and some other scenarios. There may be others that crop up. =2D- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 12:44:11 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 16:44:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33277 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leKd8-0006cj-V2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:44:11 -0400 Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]:60396) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leKd6-0006cZ-KM for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:44:09 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 145GdWka072862; Wed, 5 May 2021 16:44:02 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=e6NrDpvAg0M8lCihueXKcCJmr0q1spXbkvSHuC48NeE=; b=lVWiuMsu2jVYA+/0FeUjdFB6V3+tV38ofwx+XnFFslen/qQIuKT83Oaj0aFupEuWiBe8 gLUktp2UYfpkSWUcEktl5gWkGGy1yoiJ82s/pwbRE5EV+Cf/f8cyIjdK+R+Oo12ERgzL nJ/OwcTQ8HLRZudBUv1xYu1xCqMjDquLaw7Xs25vx/cH2mAWqdx4ihFvMBMZVXeJAtUX s1rB7Q2tkmcj+ri5M7j2xZAfnUu0mujUYJoOqeFYLZ3RwG8StRnaDUme5rWh15NIAEck RHTkuNIDCc+xXdBYwQR4G+2zsJCqIPjjfadymXenpzsvIL6+mgiDOdl0Rr5GiRqtOwD2 cA== Received: from userp3020.oracle.com (userp3020.oracle.com [156.151.31.79]) by aserp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 38begjaf8d-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 05 May 2021 16:44:02 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (userp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 145GfX0K068354; Wed, 5 May 2021 16:44:01 GMT Received: from nam10-dm6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam10lp2108.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.58.108]) by userp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 38bfus8bvd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 05 May 2021 16:44:01 +0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=fmsae1siMH24hI40cFcG43I654z06Io/fXCEb3cRXh3Cjt3EqnW5BCd88UFW0Moi2ewUI3sBCkSxkEf4ruQYanolOd4qTmAia6p3norgqZY+kTCk58sso9mKOZ7hQOuWFzt0zyzOnIFlqERS/Y0jn3HTOaJ/NAMdYoBl8SSpjlT3/sayLi3dDKo/zHacq0VlA09cSuMKMMHRBsyH8eJ48tfED0XAaFdV2w70/k3kSdHxtgkrJcILszF2KHmJ8NEkNvg+qRVcUMnCz9z9SmRybwRmqjDuesK8TvJqbTX+jlssg+SJSyD8qDWY1XWrTVeqOdFhFnumTRW8lnl1yfOi1A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=e6NrDpvAg0M8lCihueXKcCJmr0q1spXbkvSHuC48NeE=; b=fppAdAVS9pt5Y0JB0tlg6Sn1q6OVH50/aZYXZHFh02aqvvbfIe4wmemfRfXjQUAiUsZCpFWcU5kQWoFfJ/hPiZKUy+X1NxSevFNI3SvMK4R/L5C0PN4I4g4DHjN7AmI770LK+Zar2NzgbqrEmRxWZ7yoL+kahFksKyjumPsP9X1l+iPvU7uqzhJpV5k8Q/6LUHNB0yXJCn9RNQGT5+uIht1yhR7Kr73MhdaD/7UnxDGxWdq6yst+ErgoZjAWdgcA0kldC7D29NIHZ31LB16x+qYjmHqqFk9FpKnrr7gR4rWxKMnlO67BSpOR7Jp+HxNitPzQQKXnPOGEU/0RdVk83Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=oracle.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=oracle.com; dkim=pass header.d=oracle.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-oracle-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=e6NrDpvAg0M8lCihueXKcCJmr0q1spXbkvSHuC48NeE=; b=NAm23D8WTEuFotjoQMNGCI+0RwQQFPCOhmhVYzIb9bpzNVJ0fIRpxynKHzy08p4Hqs621KVjdGg6CveMXN/MXjwEWP0IXgYHcjfJhKQcm/dgJPVY0VH4AWLx0aLqoTWlaGDT4iMaoZ3X5N4PXNZklOBpfhtzffLvU3vb55hXf/c= Received: from SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:11b::15) by SA2PR10MB4539.namprd10.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:117::8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4108.25; Wed, 5 May 2021 16:43:59 +0000 Received: from SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2109:9725:fd4a:6494]) by SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2109:9725:fd4a:6494%6]) with mapi id 15.20.4087.044; Wed, 5 May 2021 16:43:59 +0000 From: Drew Adams To: Boruch Baum , Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: RE: [External] : bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Thread-Topic: [External] : bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Thread-Index: AQHXQZwnomYyqQOV2EqYXtYd30AHsKrVD1UQ Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 16:43:59 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> <20210504183816.xztxbfi7af6mlbeb@E15-2016.optimum.net> <874kfh8ukz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210505104816.26i45urvktod3322@E15-2016.optimum.net> In-Reply-To: <20210505104816.26i45urvktod3322@E15-2016.optimum.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: gmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmx.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=oracle.com; x-originating-ip: [138.3.200.14] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a9524695-ac5f-4407-dcac-08d90fe4fb98 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SA2PR10MB4539: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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 x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(376002)(136003)(39860400002)(346002)(366004)(396003)(4326008)(6506007)(7696005)(26005)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(86362001)(66476007)(66946007)(44832011)(33656002)(76116006)(110136005)(478600001)(38100700002)(8676002)(9686003)(55016002)(52536014)(5660300002)(71200400001)(8936002)(316002)(2906002)(186003)(122000001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: =?us-ascii?Q?0TqukxRSAMZzJ2iU5uSYkhroxTadSk/9lZggGjAVOIuZMbkxBO8o3RgL4MWl?= =?us-ascii?Q?J8ifCIh4vvvjoMd7VJvapYoVHqOTdjb1B4Wy4r3bZCJaPoOzkYrONN8h2ZcN?= =?us-ascii?Q?0o/8ThKO8fMsJUPEoM2Kb8jF3tkfzjTgEYK7Kcjw3TlPu9mGv41xNa4CXMzq?= =?us-ascii?Q?/TZri7Wnvomn53bNw68T1D7ZC0zMRAOSvNnUp++hSsMMeb5b6p/TEwg1+tHZ?= =?us-ascii?Q?JlTZxLOa4fnhpmp9kIdXO5pVEyfDYY6ATCShVveHhom4AqFeUcfHNDsbM9V7?= =?us-ascii?Q?2vWUnHeJLnIHBntaHcma/JhE419RmprrOvXFqpVd30BGSNPjMatwcc1NMHNO?= =?us-ascii?Q?OojxqKXZKEWw0apeRdvMZISV+ZRRxOrB3p362Q9bCJ5q1AHsN5D4/mr9ErP1?= =?us-ascii?Q?OYCsitLYYrEGBy5tB/aHiCHLF0Se1e/fVafruFtJfr+be6tRsAQ0djdWCr4B?= =?us-ascii?Q?s1Mr6L9w4xJg83KUjNrEPqDhjr821w5Tbf5ZM8qQ/dWXLKA3gbsk04drbTqB?= =?us-ascii?Q?52tke2AC3REGHBoeJzgoOrZV1EaPmllkx+tyBVBRtKYpJwsUv8bCONVev7X+?= =?us-ascii?Q?4tyRRqLwEXFJNPX0OqXNDQlPikMYdX9zE7GB+P5wDg3rNwXGh/d+4WR6zy60?= =?us-ascii?Q?ddai4wYYQcXMDQAF3WU4q0jWcyRqkOCUZjHa0JgVDr+pHcUgcyGw5/zqglh3?= =?us-ascii?Q?peiEqr1lY7IyDDVMd+4fzoCPribuag6rLir1wIscfyec0RZX8NekKCfis1xl?= =?us-ascii?Q?udBRMXHDAQeBhtJv8XzGcUZs2Eh1a1OySgREwYdcp2UQSwQ+VUehUEs4fvdS?= =?us-ascii?Q?OSlNU3xJvVcEjslJkLjuqoocWeiRDW+DswtZo4FfM3/ErJR0JcVcFBwdp4VT?= =?us-ascii?Q?SjpSHexDp0n+qAIppa8S0lTGjpPhWDuXXniKu56kWRcuGHKy6b66YX/yKdWw?= =?us-ascii?Q?mDrM4V3pcP33BD1JvrpHz3cvIl53StxOgmfCDw701QeMXchf4hVOCimnvlSX?= =?us-ascii?Q?HDYJB5g6zu6Z57N+FqvzSZTQvd3r8zd1iKsH3JzTJ29sfZC2ap6PS+9MlvQa?= =?us-ascii?Q?0z8GaX3EJtM38XBSG8QN180qFYOd+FumyKSsutNyu/dYeBToJj645f6OMLDD?= =?us-ascii?Q?5U/Fso8P9xMid2A6bQ7RyWJLhoAVHumnaHyJ4h1DlLqN3+xzlwa2itdlk32b?= =?us-ascii?Q?AHKMOZYJ+O9JNe+k6IbVUMJ69suY/K63ZYc0/mZi6B9AilEbKE6bBfWMUJOb?= =?us-ascii?Q?0HoTISLNz8dbL56tgQI+QKGRsPhOl9FewpFyqveXW3zTVXAE2B5/Mg1Giis9?= =?us-ascii?Q?2coU9vNhgi0HTgM9DThX9JQ8?= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: oracle.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a9524695-ac5f-4407-dcac-08d90fe4fb98 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 May 2021 16:43:59.7167 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4e2c6054-71cb-48f1-bd6c-3a9705aca71b X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 0MVojvGSoznzV8ucTlepZezmMEnQ7mxebU1qwmbvwkDLHNVnoSdwowjfgSbC3f3Bjj0e2n3xeVJGSDfdwS4ShQ== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SA2PR10MB4539 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=9975 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104060000 definitions=main-2105050116 X-Proofpoint-GUID: ZaKzC5Ioq4WxjNKKp_SqCybqAlaNWeWf X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: ZaKzC5Ioq4WxjNKKp_SqCybqAlaNWeWf X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=9975 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104060000 definitions=main-2105050116 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: "48179@debbugs.gnu.org" <48179@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > > > It's do-able, but if Drew's contributions are going > > > to be accepted, that should take priority, > > > > If Drew submits patches, they'll be evaluated like > > any other patches, >=20 > My reading of his email was that he was submitting > an entire package. To be clear - 1. I've submitted plenty of patches in the past. They've usually been ignored. I don't plan on submitting a patch along the lines of what you (Boruch) have done for this. 2. File `bookmark+-lit.el' provides the highlighting we're talking about wrt Bookmark+. It depends on code in the other Bookmark+ files. (But they don't depend on it, so if you don't want such highlighting then you need not load it. Someone other than I could either use code from `bookmark+-lit.el' to patch Emacs or use its features or implementation as inspiration or as food for thought. 3. If Emacs maintainers decide to replace `bookmark.el' with Bookmark+ then I'll be glad to (a) incorporate any `bookmark.el` code that's currently used by Bookmark+ into Bookmark+, and (b) clean up the Bookmark + code so it doesn't bother to be compatible with older Emacs versions and it doesn't try to accommodate 3rd-party libraries when they might be available. The resulting library would be renamed `bookmark', (same name we use now, for `bookmark.el') but it would comprise multiple files. File `bookmark+.el' would be renamed `bookmark.el', replacing that existing file. The existing doc is plain-text (in file `bookmark+-doc.el'). It would need to be rewritten to some extent. I could help with that. And I'd make myself available to help with questions etc. #3 would take a while. But I doubt that maintainers would agree to it anyway. They have not, in the past (though Stefan M. did say at one point that it would be good for that to happen). Hope things are clear now. I'm open to Bookmark+ _replacing_ `bookmark.el', and in that case I'd do the cleanup work needed for that. (Someone else would do the GIT fiddling, committing etc.) And I'm open to anyone grabbing and repurposing code from Bookmark+ piecemeal for vanilla Emacs. I won't be doing that, however. As for the replacement possibility, I'd need some reassurance that it would actually happen, before I'd bother to work to make it available. I'm not going to waste time again working on stuff that has no chance of inclusion. Sorry. Been there. Contributing - yes, I'm open to that. If that's not acceptable then, as I say, the code is there; it's GPL; and I offer it. You're free to take any of it you like for Emacs, and I'll even help you understand, if there are questions. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 13:09:11 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 17:09:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33398 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leL1I-0006yI-4g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 13:09:11 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:39567) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leL1D-0006xs-J6 for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 13:09:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1620234536; bh=VIgywxsBE2Zuddg65DN4pPJgJDZw+Tq1pbtaAY4RHyU=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=KQf/KMlmXp3BsfHj232hu7g5w+jqmQAW6GAfnf1uVmbzHv2Xjhi6Cl88BicxwB460 mxrb6k8yzZ5ntoNZbP2LNkEizI7g7zD/NpKQjF7Ju7X1VwLK7hJNwdKnVeQz1i0wki SuW0RU5u4RrxFYdk4eM3HP8Buc6Udo/I7Y4gpOhQ= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([70.19.86.82]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MAwXh-1lpebp0WZl-00BIRX; Wed, 05 May 2021 19:08:56 +0200 Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 13:08:53 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Message-ID: <20210505170853.locsnpxoth7fukeq@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgxan7lx.fsf@tcd.ie> <878s4t8up2.fsf@gnus.org> <8735v1jrit.fsf@tcd.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8735v1jrit.fsf@tcd.ie> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:doX8MsjtgEpHiQJRnX5eszQqZuDm5ca6bOjVJM1e39uqL159t84 xFXMPeIJZD4VHQp1J+cpadRfcdnSeBg2Z6m3VdHTwdu2BNMFzdou27os7sXB+SRMJTZlM8N /WMoz2KMulBO3129XDbCvZskd+kbd8+2DDbCXqA/qTGrRIGVGAu3VMMvHZWVgy9lY//2jEi huXmDcZFSHG/7i5b7VFQQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:yzhEEW3xRoY=:h7clNezzHBnCq88Ne+jNnU dE32h5Z+iWN9Q0zRtLk+/AZ6fj4bDbHRUh7MHxNVTpY72Hsxmh7VKPtLx78qvpzEtlenH7r99 dJsOuFCQdvsG6zwJsOhmMRBVYy8U4HX/GjvZxYIh7xqc6QD2mADFi3thncI1NMw9rXT+EkQG/ wXePRozGyjaDLsvBQ1L0D/Ns0BnyvyMp8MwUa9VKlmweaeVuhFKiVPIoquTL3Y4+Jkwuu25g6 75TP7Z0a2r785/Vh6/qcGsab7Btg0CFBrJeDNXOR7XpRWEAjxSR/NDEmai8M2UiJZvqKbrkiF miZSg9c+CZjybX34IlxXjIeDfjrj3DEWh0BneHMRR4kaIcarhNmuLFlduNlQTtfYfZbYLTH3p uWf7+IasOdkk/oWSpZnuvlIABcFS9ALSXWEH1SXtT4x7u55wUD3m/cEvYhSEJE9TS5E7ooAmA wUwsS4x+jD2sX55MK/nZYNtiPjZj43XDRg2JuTUQbTEFbfLkkLTi3Oci/cVj1FTEuG2BIWPdr 9PB4N0msr0LHwfmWgW8jYDAy+4R0TnvzDyR+nGuIpX2QYM9ouYqEI3Rq2ne0/MyrG+zG+cv2t qSvHmRB4aa9MbzvQbGOF+ZAB0Gfvwm6ge2lEQF+i0MxONG4V0wXIdB6y6x+Y4iQ20/ARO+RVx lN7eGyBM+6GM9nbXskVT9j7tsAtvupMYZ/UztVo7IZMIczLzAEkXyfIz2vNba56fhQQxHfYpO NoASwrwXu4iKWf19x1kUH+7//Qo1C1A92Hj1++G7KpiTjUsx0qIl5kdWcptdfcQZyWG+u9RQi KyQSz8mUqMiLRuOoC0ZSk1WNOv9x6qEwHj6xHpUyJAIuVgDg+KEM1OvSgZW8ceAzV9psbntwK y7OTaES4NLpmYhqjRM/0yjipe7ldRM0HQDg/0m9O9Cvvnt8/YfkZovWcJPF6L8lX8Gfus+9iY hWnqVO8BEuMVeac8HiKKG7IOQFRtDIvlK+k01EQn7A7ooK3KhpJXtVeENu6m8zcDIdVg/KtF1 hr5t3Wy+PXujfTX+ES5WBvDrd5WJVchEw0J+G1MTtuG2HYAtPEhAKOp4bTnMp5yzg4f084fVu VfpAPDJWiASDiOXVQ09CoShM7TZUPi1lJ95e7WzN39ElTmM6chGK9BMBkI3W3OEDP5c+gd4/1 4dR0k1ERnHSmQU5Opg1RNN3NWOlrE0nXEr+EO0jSxLUiKUka1kry/AE7RvsI++AYEp0p4= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2021-05-05 13:26, Basil L. Contovounesios wrote: > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >... Important follow-up: 5) Throughout my prior patches, I had been using variable 'buffer-file-name' to compare against the value for the 'filename' key in bookmarks' alists. That is wrong, in the sense that it's only correct for buffers visiting files. The correct comparator seems to be the output of function (bookmark-buffer-file-name), see there, which will cover all cases of all buffers. With that change, it's probably wrong to perform 'expand-file-name' when performing any comparison. =2D- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 13:25:20 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 17:25:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33474 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leLGy-00079Z-FX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 13:25:20 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:55249) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leLGv-00079Q-Tr for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 13:25:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1620235511; bh=ZHAl4lFynRZiyRkbFKJ1DD2+s2Ws5NsVqxuTZNbnkvE=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=AX3Rxd85HAOw3PDdYx/efvF4QxlFCorFnc6H2pWG8WhdUHmm07j7rmqqSvB6WnFSe J/Hn+AnaH4B49INQYY6lo2zr4ADZwTUR61r0r3/mja+zcIaWK3kPRIlqr6N9uo99hw AWsG2YkRCry/svVy5PG0AvYTyYeBDnUsFwRrq+wM= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([70.19.86.82]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MWRRT-1m2E280TOt-00Xtj5; Wed, 05 May 2021 19:25:11 +0200 Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 13:25:08 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: Bastien Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Message-ID: <20210505172508.doggiqhzlyibqhom@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmy5io91.fsf@bzg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87pmy5io91.fsf@bzg.fr> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:DTriQGA5eWNNTrkrwNRpWMDKlGNBipuYjsY8ReKE+vG+wk75ryx 9okwDcQYGkz9f9nTuofawvWRhddausZsFB+wObQD2z6j2KWPXKyBW3kbZ4WqJswBGW8jpNG 8eQIsdsMy9BWp0zYFS1qiwfwb28yM7XD3NOjUUMTF713NpCPforC7n7OJjzCvWg+tzi97Dq OX5CfBl5ZAvIW1kUPO29w== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:iVWBHloS6DY=:C6LTGJ209ObX7elgY/3W9L NN5qL0/CWPEkKFSXv3A/IlTIa4yxFsKc5oaXeM2B5OJbi+JGu0PgDoOIlPOE6e4ZXQeTgLAnV +zsBRP/sbpKM8sibea5Mv9JKnoTJMkLgswJgPxUO9EM2V1nkTw+2wFTNAL2UtcAfara2++Nx5 MsDrXlhXFktEqN9gsI7q0oitUjCW0OeJpXUH+PN80fpOqyhTFhokk2RRUuGfeOSDi7sY3ZunC hVyCQorpRT2ZZoCfh6lMf5zzunbpiSLFs/w9S6PevbXdoy6wIEUdGHSrJ2PG2IPdo0QA4zgFU r/oBlM300dJQpGMopvMvt1+0+QZtVL+4nLTTEh6Te2Ofsj3MVIKjSh7fpzWSPeVN5TkQuI4Fm qrIEyx59WaN2361aO2UsMc7vckr9CQV8pDpt33goqeYlP4LhfsvobDPTEMEZ/qmZ8nDJC3Gyt Qa7YyuNLyOLXvlglS1dlbzIrfmjDq9Hk8ITfUBo5Y6hLP2yftJqfA7WaXKKoJoZ1SqTLTD0CW 84W/7ChSBRiy7UQG7ETkAOxuedC9yInheMM7tXwrc7gW7xbYgSkBDj8lPRvFv6cf+ZMG0Lc1a aQeJRxaVfYD6LN9XxTdUdJKKrPZhCcLW11Dr6xmThYr3Zu8fA1m+mqYt/618kf4M09AUOJBKh IfqmMvI+r6SdfsQBCo5ERRf4+8L+6Eb7hMIUMBku5ZlLMtaj8tAwBkaJ2jyM+YlWPgwSD6vli UUZDluB2iiGC/A3A+bGN66hjh683qjHleh2ph0XCniAxDBXobKY1uAext0GXjedawgD7SQ/Az yxRfovCTpvZwF49EyJniWKJ+lzjRgA39wAJjDnszAqjD4ogHxmucoiPeboXDyxmf5rSQ1SrCe vwOqRhqt9LZPtrDI0h2b6GIkQ0Ss5tQhDJmEyRjVcPk+BQJWBmOw8Mi3LHX5WUa2CosOEK9Tr +6X9kuF11K7qelDQfm25WoJFOa06NyfcSBLs/jO+GQaOTjN6fsCh7wUJU8WjAhCSi6kXxRord b0Dnod+MuCPc76JpXm3QYGWAYbSai7dXWdBYd+NBnMNTuLRDraOuB9r8Bg1CH1qeloLGdYps6 vzAh7N2z1hIKJaZMcwVmKPAt10MQLh9I/nk0hKY6oBaIHuy7ZP15hpPgTwrC1q3F05z+BZB5l sqNUtzFIZXayqbi3Sr+SrJ/rJ94kFMUMWFKbazX2EyX0WNrQPIYcOjOfZaM4AqXPMDcoE= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2021-05-05 17:39, Bastien wrote: > With this change, the Org refiled/captured headlines get fontified and > it might surprise many users until they find out that fontification is > related to this bookmark feature. What are the steps to reproduce this? I don't use those org features, so I would be starting at square one. > There is also dired and, of course, normal bookmarked files: I guess > some users may be really confused--at least those who don't know to > M-x customize-face RET at point to guess what this is all about. I don't understand the confusion scenario. The scenario I imagine is: a) User navigates POINT to location of desired bookmark b) User creates bookmark c) User gets immediate (and prominent) visual feedback d) User recalls dictum "Correlation is not causality", coughs deeply, and lights up another cigarette. > What do you think? Shall we turn bookmark-fontify off by default? I understand the current emacs policy is not to surprise anyone with new behavior, so I expect Eli Zaretskii would insist it be off by default. =2D- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 14:54:42 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 18:54:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33857 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leMfS-00016K-AI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 14:54:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52194) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leMfP-00016E-Po for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 14:54:40 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49930) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leMfJ-00064D-CW; Wed, 05 May 2021 14:54:33 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2103 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leMfE-0005Ch-J7; Wed, 05 May 2021 14:54:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 21:54:16 +0300 Message-Id: <83h7jhf1uv.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Boruch Baum In-Reply-To: <20210505172508.doggiqhzlyibqhom@E15-2016.optimum.net> (message from Boruch Baum on Wed, 5 May 2021 13:25:08 -0400) Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmy5io91.fsf@bzg.fr> <20210505172508.doggiqhzlyibqhom@E15-2016.optimum.net> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: bzg@gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 13:25:08 -0400 > From: Boruch Baum > Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org > > > What do you think? Shall we turn bookmark-fontify off by default? > > I understand the current emacs policy is not to surprise anyone with new > behavior, so I expect Eli Zaretskii would insist it be off by default. As long as people are aware of the policy, I don't even need to insist. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 04:49:25 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 08:49:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37053 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leZhF-00054X-1d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:49:25 -0400 Received: from forward101p.mail.yandex.net ([77.88.28.101]:52329) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leZhC-00054Q-C4 for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:49:23 -0400 Received: from iva1-fcc2a0b4c175.qloud-c.yandex.net (iva1-fcc2a0b4c175.qloud-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0c:7ab:0:640:fcc2:a0b4]) by forward101p.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 1121F328162C; Thu, 6 May 2021 11:49:16 +0300 (MSK) Received: from iva8-a4a480c9f089.qloud-c.yandex.net (iva8-a4a480c9f089.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c0c:da5:0:640:a4a4:80c9]) by iva1-fcc2a0b4c175.qloud-c.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id cCkVkGtXEl-nFIeMTMf; Thu, 06 May 2021 11:49:15 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1620290955; bh=sRd6kcDQ5r/KtjYtGPOXviZz6PcRyyS0lci2VVeNZgc=; h=In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Cc:Cc:Date:References; b=DYOFeKe/y3ipVn0v1lUu5svaBFvUEVwdECHwbbdm0SSe+4XrUnl8WuucYRLFXG1N5 +KV2QMsqIe8q6PrmeIk3frgIQ+GH7Fd+E1Vzi2N3MsUidpwuCSxd7jbhVpMXYZxHjk CQYtXDJYh3zFqwmuMN6oUjo/qBW5sy9pIsPh8gBE= Authentication-Results: iva1-fcc2a0b4c175.qloud-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com Received: by iva8-a4a480c9f089.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id G2Q3tlq7Jg-nELC1lkP; Thu, 06 May 2021 11:49:14 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) From: Colin Baxter To: Bastien Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmy5io91.fsf@bzg.fr> X-Face: BHjiJOg/Qmj'BQgsAKL@])L)e62P)C"Y=6T Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 09:49:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87pmy5io91.fsf@bzg.fr> (Bastien's message of "Wed, 05 May 2021 17:39:43 +0200") Message-ID: <87a6p8fdrq.fsf@yandex.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAGQAAAAeBAMAAAAodabAAAAAB3RJTUUH1wQdAAY04/L8hgAA AAlwSFlzAAAewQAAHsEBw2lUUwAAAARnQU1BAACxjwv8YQUAAAASUExURc7OzpwAAAAAAP////8A AGNj/2aqqTQAAAA8SURBVHjaYzA2NnEBAmdj01D8wNgYpM7F2JiBgYFREAgEGJiU8AMGBpA6QaCG UVtGbRm1ZdSWUVsGjS0Aq20lJnMawnkAAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: , Lars Ingebrigtsen , Boruch Baum , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >>>>> Bastien writes: > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >> Boruch Baum writes: >> >>> It's not *my* emacs. I only have access to debian emacs locally; >>> the data I gave you was from the URL I had for the on-line cgit >>> repository for emacs, at gnu.org. Here's a second patch, based >>> upon hopefully the most current URL, and with the additional >>> jump code. >> >> Thanks; applied to Emacs 28 without any problems. > Just a quick warning: Org contains two features called "capture" > and "refile". "Capturing" adds notes or tasks to an Org buffer > from other Emacs buffers. "Refiling" moves a Org headline under > another one, either in the current Org buffer or in another > (declared) Org file. > With this change, the Org refiled/captured headlines get fontified > and it might surprise many users until they find out that > fontification is related to this bookmark feature. > There is also dired and, of course, normal bookmarked files: I > guess some users may be really confused--at least those who don't > know to M-x customize-face RET at point to guess what this is all > about. > What do you think? Shall we turn bookmark-fontify off by default? > I for one do like the feature and customized bookmark-face to suit > my needs, but I wonder about others. I have turned bookmark-fontify off because I found it too confusing with a feature of bm-bookmark , which I use. I believe bm-bookmark is popular. Best wishes, Colin. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 04:53:18 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 08:53:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37058 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leZl0-00056P-L5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:53:18 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:45380) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leZkx-00056J-NZ for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:53:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=NY6W2RQYUedaxRw8ccKd8LHB9cr5v814561kb/SXANw=; b=OwnRuBQVrvIkHHcCt08cuK1+WL 4L+39r3nbnP7q/ZM9YM4G15TI5o96Dxf6nrsGJxGBaPmKCF+Eu1yC7xNb3Hn/POqJQfpkbaPVW2Z2 cDLll02kwFettCgH+LEdTszOWzmRWaKAj+/mcoBfdIngPnVWLDZCFGM3coxff863aKZw=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leZko-00057U-Va; Thu, 06 May 2021 10:53:09 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> <20210504183816.xztxbfi7af6mlbeb@E15-2016.optimum.net> <874kfh8ukz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210505104816.26i45urvktod3322@E15-2016.optimum.net> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEXYzs+OjW41OT/R PD7///+EBMjBAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+UFBggnImZgUgQAAAGlSURBVDjLlVIBdusw CAP3AgZfIJALxOH+d5swXtfuvW3/0zaOKyOBMNG/Redve/wYHzq4NjtaPiSh3t8AzcMAQGSdXtgE OSI42+gA5/FCJYnS0TgTvgBQMwlTF8b3W2H/GYx8Tq4k+/OwSMe33uj51qm5nxGB7QPLjJkNux/U TG3KhBEJPAAIjdWcu5nYzriQC8C1J19GATMWlaRGPjZYyvuVRh4S8YgNgBDilu7zRQQRlJH2ubgO NdoMjgXaez6GjEyDBpZNWn3Yp9Z7wAtSjR1jDtTK7p66Ccz8WxYgNfFcRvU0ZURlwJuVMZ7Nbipk 93UNEJ6B1b7kFQBY1MWiL6+2AY3cY4rqAniWJaC/yTRu9yytx2Ou/mcBMtEo0sIij/inhv8QhIHf Jn4x1/BR7uVWwCznPUcLS6z5uJ0cl6EAHKlRcwGu66g8zpnmg6ovjR/F37d9eYX7pqsqjNlUVn3L 9hzsE5AFQK4LIfG1QWBazRvRL50f3FvNPMuVcetyIIGjObivOLnrjBvNnJEZDYAngOuVGhjoeW+q BCK2ODw/f+v8A+yNXZXEFav9AAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIxLTA1LTA2VDA4OjM5OjM0 KzAwOjAwM5tbOgAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMS0wNS0wNlQwODozOTozNCswMDowMELG 44YAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Games's _That We Can Play_: "Strawberry Skies (Gatekeeper Remix)" Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 10:53:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210505104816.26i45urvktod3322@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Wed, 5 May 2021 06:48:16 -0400") Message-ID: <87wnsc1bwt.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Boruch Baum writes: > My reading of his email was that he was submitting an entire package. But Emacs is not going to replace foo.el with foo+.el, so it's not a productive contribution to the discussion. (We've been over this many times before in many circumstances.) Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Boruch Baum writes: > My reading of his email was that he was submitting an entire package. But Emacs is not going to replace foo.el with foo+.el, so it's not a productive contribution to the discussion. (We've been over this many times before in many circumstances.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 04:55:04 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 08:55:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37062 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leZmh-00057U-Vr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:55:04 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:45406) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leZmg-000574-BY for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:55:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KAxz+V2lKDIpKVUubLhzoJfrtPIz8+3SbYpRh9ey9Ns=; b=uYuVuSkZp7PAc6mXx23adafqJy 3GZeRTlIFFrx29xDKKFiNZlkh7y1fZltpJzBzsHSjklMhH9w1SfAsWGJsZHzBT2HNQ/gxGZptxR5C SudkVtnDjil5uoxlBXdgAjfIHl9oCNiOQzxoJrFwBKqxH5gP1cW8NbszkNSx8cpqjEYw=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leZmY-00057x-4R; Thu, 06 May 2021 10:54:56 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmy5io91.fsf@bzg.fr> <20210505172508.doggiqhzlyibqhom@E15-2016.optimum.net> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAALVBMVEUyNzg9QUM5PkEt MjUnLC9dX2HRzs6wr6/Av75MT1Ftb3CQkZHp5uV+gID///9zwziWAAAAAWJLR0QOb70wTwAAAAd0 SU1FB+UFBgg1JPf3h+IAAAF0SURBVDjLrZQ/T4NAGMavvl26iU52UvkCr56adDMpDMXFpQNOTnXQ wZgUkuqscy1Li4ODmrS42oF2lZiUT+CnEXr8uTtg8x0IvD+ee+457iA1RVF2iVwbCvdA14XiG5C0 KRXaeVPQQNqnyK4oC6jsIgFaMhS7rxAAigIkWzVlfw8KFnrP6tmP9gi4cGtg3C/6vhUBlEG/S9xl GQias+u57RRyGOHtwdP7QxkIdkw3dEBeEiNc1T9uAgeKisv6ZyiAxDx83X4J46GktTJWp+REVLDk xreGZ4EVASmHfjV5O/ZsJwuIKbBn04n9pWY5MuB3ZxfzO7XwzfVpY+CNz1UuH3PvTDeXPyZRs9li IuksBk3/EGOAInDchT8kvDkDreeG92sOBZBEBE1jX59FQX7/8BsrVxQ2nCzhD0IVwNgxWlYKFOQj 0jLHw3FU3RGIIJ0HAUmR2yDKAjY3oAVASqw5EamoSlLi8B9V+hch5EhLqt0Wsv8BKqKedXq3OdkA AAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMjEtMDUtMDZUMDg6NTM6MzYrMDA6MDBbkxCZAAAAJXRFWHRk YXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIxLTA1LTA2VDA4OjUzOjM2KzAwOjAwKs6oJQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Zola Jesus's _New Amsterdam_: "Odessa" Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 10:54:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210505172508.doggiqhzlyibqhom@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Wed, 5 May 2021 13:25:08 -0400") Message-ID: <87sg301btu.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Boruch Baum writes: > I understand the current emacs policy is not to surprise anyone with new > behavior, so I expect Eli Zaretskii would insist it be off by default. There is no such policy. We add new functionality to Emacs all the time, and this new functionality changes behaviour, of course. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Bastien , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Boruch Baum writes: > I understand the current emacs policy is not to surprise anyone with new > behavior, so I expect Eli Zaretskii would insist it be off by default. There is no such policy. We add new functionality to Emacs all the time, and this new functionality changes behaviour, of course. We only default behaviour to "off" if we think it's going to be disruptive, and this bookmarking functionality is not disruptive. (Or at least it's not meant to be.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 04:56:08 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 08:56:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37066 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leZnk-00058H-8L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:56:08 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:45434) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leZni-00057n-9I for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:56:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=vUg/Enp5z+U5fInJwUsg+rw3eGZTPOnaW+tokzraii4=; b=EN74SOOpOrH7g2f0tdNni00JuX aFNUI8G/bu3EqKCrb/YEIVGSExGtP8B4QjYlbsKScxJlWAwixW5VNa+Paw4l3vKkCd/NgFqamWM+o NE0Jpl9ZFaCosT/kvoZGPrsMqrJynBkCe7adp9Z1LieleqcqOUiu4Cwb5gceftdv2ae4=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leZna-00058S-4l; Thu, 06 May 2021 10:56:00 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Colin Baxter Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmy5io91.fsf@bzg.fr> <87a6p8fdrq.fsf@yandex.com> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAALVBMVEUyNzg9QUM5PkEt MjUnLC9dX2HRzs6wr6/Av75MT1Ftb3CQkZHp5uV+gID///9zwziWAAAAAWJLR0QOb70wTwAAAAd0 SU1FB+UFBgg1JPf3h+IAAAF0SURBVDjLrZQ/T4NAGMavvl26iU52UvkCr56adDMpDMXFpQNOTnXQ wZgUkuqscy1Li4ODmrS42oF2lZiUT+CnEXr8uTtg8x0IvD+ee+457iA1RVF2iVwbCvdA14XiG5C0 KRXaeVPQQNqnyK4oC6jsIgFaMhS7rxAAigIkWzVlfw8KFnrP6tmP9gi4cGtg3C/6vhUBlEG/S9xl GQias+u57RRyGOHtwdP7QxkIdkw3dEBeEiNc1T9uAgeKisv6ZyiAxDx83X4J46GktTJWp+REVLDk xreGZ4EVASmHfjV5O/ZsJwuIKbBn04n9pWY5MuB3ZxfzO7XwzfVpY+CNz1UuH3PvTDeXPyZRs9li IuksBk3/EGOAInDchT8kvDkDreeG92sOBZBEBE1jX59FQX7/8BsrVxQ2nCzhD0IVwNgxWlYKFOQj 0jLHw3FU3RGIIJ0HAUmR2yDKAjY3oAVASqw5EamoSlLi8B9V+hch5EhLqt0Wsv8BKqKedXq3OdkA AAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMjEtMDUtMDZUMDg6NTM6MzYrMDA6MDBbkxCZAAAAJXRFWHRk YXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIxLTA1LTA2VDA4OjUzOjM2KzAwOjAwKs6oJQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Zola Jesus's _New Amsterdam_: "Odessa" Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 10:55:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87a6p8fdrq.fsf@yandex.com> (Colin Baxter's message of "Thu, 06 May 2021 09:49:13 +0100") Message-ID: <87o8do1bs2.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Colin Baxter writes: > I have turned bookmark-fontify off because I found it too confusing with > a feature of bm-bookmark , which I > use. I believe bm-bookmark is popular. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Bastien , Boruch Baum , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Colin Baxter writes: > I have turned bookmark-fontify off because I found it too confusing with > a feature of bm-bookmark , which I > use. I believe bm-bookmark is popular. Can you describe the confusion in the interaction between this package and the new fontification? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 04:57:42 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 08:57:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37070 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leZpG-00058w-Im for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:57:42 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:45456) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leZpE-00058q-Pi for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:57:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=VHgySo/Ydn8K2c73mR3TWkATcRG/6tkbB9SnyJC2uTk=; b=sF4vQCQqAy/LFysmU/63GnMu4h Suqq+WDBHTmOtFIQuOZC5MeMEg1Ry3NE1RclDlAIsEezZ5KtMPMKMhafsQI99axyakpIuCr1o/uNv hoUUw4aPLACoEoezgrtpN/2z3s7M4g2XJKSIiJkg2hQrGcFUY8yrUSaz9nPe1H035CH4=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leZp6-000590-Nf; Thu, 06 May 2021 10:57:34 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgxan7lx.fsf@tcd.ie> <878s4t8up2.fsf@gnus.org> <8735v1jrit.fsf@tcd.ie> <20210505163038.bq4oupkuiago6kcd@E15-2016.optimum.net> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAALVBMVEUyNzg9QUM5PkEt MjUnLC9dX2HRzs6wr6/Av75MT1Ftb3CQkZHp5uV+gID///9zwziWAAAAAWJLR0QOb70wTwAAAAd0 SU1FB+UFBgg1JPf3h+IAAAF0SURBVDjLrZQ/T4NAGMavvl26iU52UvkCr56adDMpDMXFpQNOTnXQ wZgUkuqscy1Li4ODmrS42oF2lZiUT+CnEXr8uTtg8x0IvD+ee+457iA1RVF2iVwbCvdA14XiG5C0 KRXaeVPQQNqnyK4oC6jsIgFaMhS7rxAAigIkWzVlfw8KFnrP6tmP9gi4cGtg3C/6vhUBlEG/S9xl GQias+u57RRyGOHtwdP7QxkIdkw3dEBeEiNc1T9uAgeKisv6ZyiAxDx83X4J46GktTJWp+REVLDk xreGZ4EVASmHfjV5O/ZsJwuIKbBn04n9pWY5MuB3ZxfzO7XwzfVpY+CNz1UuH3PvTDeXPyZRs9li IuksBk3/EGOAInDchT8kvDkDreeG92sOBZBEBE1jX59FQX7/8BsrVxQ2nCzhD0IVwNgxWlYKFOQj 0jLHw3FU3RGIIJ0HAUmR2yDKAjY3oAVASqw5EamoSlLi8B9V+hch5EhLqt0Wsv8BKqKedXq3OdkA AAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMjEtMDUtMDZUMDg6NTM6MzYrMDA6MDBbkxCZAAAAJXRFWHRk YXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIxLTA1LTA2VDA4OjUzOjM2KzAwOjAwKs6oJQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Zola Jesus's _New Amsterdam_: "Odessa" Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 10:57:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210505163038.bq4oupkuiago6kcd@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Wed, 5 May 2021 12:30:38 -0400") Message-ID: <87k0oc1bpf.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Boruch Baum writes: > Basil, I went to start doing more work on this and see you made a commit > in the interim so let me coordinate before we end up cross-commiting > (For me, this is especially important since I'm work [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Boruch Baum writes: > Basil, I went to start doing more work on this and see you made a commit > in the interim so let me coordinate before we end up cross-commiting > (For me, this is especially important since I'm working with debian v27.1 > locally and applying patches to v28 which you seem to using locally). Would it be possible for you to pull down a the git tree and work from that? That would be less work for everybody involved (including yourself), I'd have thought? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 04:58:28 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 08:58:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37074 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leZpz-00059a-RE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:58:28 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:45484) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leZpx-00059U-LR for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:58:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=v2d1zuOspGL3PFqzTVfzV9TkbqFeY2GQK6VaFu+h4mo=; b=TCEFsAJ7KNtSU3hgcxYqKIhoEH 7/m+ZvQfEf0xFzq37MepZxt2cRM0oRbrKC66CCsk98u2u7fVZu0s4n/UFss8L+4N3lvDqe59gi5rx 0vOb03/4W+2rj4Hs0lkQUJMePaMsiwDje3KxEcbfYH0Xb4E7txQffeixGF+qh8fv4sYw=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leZpp-00059Y-8y; Thu, 06 May 2021 10:58:19 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgxan7lx.fsf@tcd.ie> <878s4t8up2.fsf@gnus.org> <8735v1jrit.fsf@tcd.ie> <20210505170853.locsnpxoth7fukeq@E15-2016.optimum.net> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAALVBMVEUyNzg9QUM5PkEt MjUnLC9dX2HRzs6wr6/Av75MT1Ftb3CQkZHp5uV+gID///9zwziWAAAAAWJLR0QOb70wTwAAAAd0 SU1FB+UFBgg1JPf3h+IAAAF0SURBVDjLrZQ/T4NAGMavvl26iU52UvkCr56adDMpDMXFpQNOTnXQ wZgUkuqscy1Li4ODmrS42oF2lZiUT+CnEXr8uTtg8x0IvD+ee+457iA1RVF2iVwbCvdA14XiG5C0 KRXaeVPQQNqnyK4oC6jsIgFaMhS7rxAAigIkWzVlfw8KFnrP6tmP9gi4cGtg3C/6vhUBlEG/S9xl GQias+u57RRyGOHtwdP7QxkIdkw3dEBeEiNc1T9uAgeKisv6ZyiAxDx83X4J46GktTJWp+REVLDk xreGZ4EVASmHfjV5O/ZsJwuIKbBn04n9pWY5MuB3ZxfzO7XwzfVpY+CNz1UuH3PvTDeXPyZRs9li IuksBk3/EGOAInDchT8kvDkDreeG92sOBZBEBE1jX59FQX7/8BsrVxQ2nCzhD0IVwNgxWlYKFOQj 0jLHw3FU3RGIIJ0HAUmR2yDKAjY3oAVASqw5EamoSlLi8B9V+hch5EhLqt0Wsv8BKqKedXq3OdkA AAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMjEtMDUtMDZUMDg6NTM6MzYrMDA6MDBbkxCZAAAAJXRFWHRk YXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIxLTA1LTA2VDA4OjUzOjM2KzAwOjAwKs6oJQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Zola Jesus's _New Amsterdam_: "Dog" Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 10:58:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210505170853.locsnpxoth7fukeq@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Wed, 5 May 2021 13:08:53 -0400") Message-ID: <87fsz01bo7.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Boruch Baum writes: > 5) Throughout my prior patches, I had been using variable > 'buffer-file-name' to compare against the value for the 'filename' > key in bookmarks' alists. That is wrong, in the sense that it's only [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Boruch Baum writes: > 5) Throughout my prior patches, I had been using variable > 'buffer-file-name' to compare against the value for the 'filename' > key in bookmarks' alists. That is wrong, in the sense that it's only > correct for buffers visiting files. The correct comparator seems to > be the output of function (bookmark-buffer-file-name), see there, > which will cover all cases of all buffers. With that change, it's > probably wrong to perform 'expand-file-name' when performing any > comparison. Right. Can you submit a patch to fix that? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 05:42:05 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 09:42:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37134 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leaWC-0007kk-Ns for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 05:42:04 -0400 Received: from forward100p.mail.yandex.net ([77.88.28.100]:49237) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leaWA-0007kN-Sq for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 05:42:03 -0400 Received: from myt5-18f51d724ab0.qloud-c.yandex.net (myt5-18f51d724ab0.qloud-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c12:5726:0:640:18f5:1d72]) by forward100p.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 7C6FF5982402; Thu, 6 May 2021 12:41:56 +0300 (MSK) Received: from myt4-1dda227af9a8.qloud-c.yandex.net (myt4-1dda227af9a8.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c00:3c83:0:640:1dda:227a]) by myt5-18f51d724ab0.qloud-c.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id qvJxtNS7Kw-fuI0h4OX; Thu, 06 May 2021 12:41:56 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1620294116; bh=twfGDb/4cwtr9sLs/iFTE/rfK1VVmqtxa2V4jNe4diw=; h=In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Cc:Cc:Date:References; b=rn/JvI6rnoERGvZvZw/Q4ogEkBKjKPPmWxtDAEyZoi+1RDAqbqG8wE9L0gSEpaMTn P0Tvpiz0BS4U/Z9R8dGoOBB/O0gBBXeuQMZubdDQ3R13No/lGZ0tEldq6FeHqJN6BL X4fqjC5PoZsU5M6kMYOWj/w0Qpb/jkzjmV6Z+6hY= Authentication-Results: myt5-18f51d724ab0.qloud-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com Received: by myt4-1dda227af9a8.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id E3UKBrJfv0-fsKq2VXB; Thu, 06 May 2021 12:41:55 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) From: Colin Baxter To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmy5io91.fsf@bzg.fr> <87a6p8fdrq.fsf@yandex.com> <87o8do1bs2.fsf@gnus.org> X-Face: BHjiJOg/Qmj'BQgsAKL@])L)e62P)C"Y=6T Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 10:41:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87o8do1bs2.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 06 May 2021 10:55:57 +0200") Message-ID: <875yzwfbby.fsf@yandex.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAGQAAAAeBAMAAAAodabAAAAAB3RJTUUH1wQdAAY04/L8hgAA AAlwSFlzAAAewQAAHsEBw2lUUwAAAARnQU1BAACxjwv8YQUAAAASUExURc7OzpwAAAAAAP////8A AGNj/2aqqTQAAAA8SURBVHjaYzA2NnEBAmdj01D8wNgYpM7F2JiBgYFREAgEGJiU8AMGBpA6QaCG UVtGbRm1ZdSWUVsGjS0Aq20lJnMawnkAAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Bastien , , Boruch Baum , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >>>>> Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Colin Baxter writes: >> I have turned bookmark-fontify off because I found it too >> confusing with a feature of bm-bookmark >> , which I use. I believe >> bm-bookmark is popular. > Can you describe the confusion in the interaction between this > package and the new fontification? As I understand it, both "bm-bookmark" and the bookmark-fontify feature of the built-in "bookmark" use a colored bar in the bookmarked file to indicate that the file has been bookmarked. Whereas bookmark-fontify places the bar on the first line of the bookmarked file, bm-bookmark can place it at any user-selected position. I use both bm-bookmark and the built-in bookmark for different purposes and I prefer the colorising to be restricted to the former. Perhaps I should add in fairness that bm-bookmark does allow other means of indicating the presence of a bookmark, but the colored bar is the default. Best wishes, Colin. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 05:57:23 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 09:57:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37167 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leal0-0001cv-Se for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 05:57:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38972) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leakz-0001cp-CN for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 05:57:21 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54344) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1leakt-00086X-VA; Thu, 06 May 2021 05:57:15 -0400 Received: from [78.194.183.21] (port=45282 helo=guerry) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leakt-0006Uz-Pq; Thu, 06 May 2021 05:57:15 -0400 Received: by guerry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B1A2C1A60E9E; Thu, 6 May 2021 11:57:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Bastien To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] In-Reply-To: <20210505172508.doggiqhzlyibqhom@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Wed, 5 May 2021 13:25:08 -0400") References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmy5io91.fsf@bzg.fr> <20210505172508.doggiqhzlyibqhom@E15-2016.optimum.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 11:57:08 +0200 Message-ID: <8735v0w5fv.fsf@bzg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Boruch Baum writes: > What are the steps to reproduce this? I don't use those org features, so > I would be starting at square one. 1. C-x C-f test.org RET 2. C-c [ (to include test.org in the agenda files) 3. Add this contents to the buffer: * A headline to refile * A headline where to refile it 4. Put the point at the beginning of "A headline to refile" 5. C-c C-w (or M-x org-refile RET) 6. Select "* A headline where to refile it" Now the refiled headline is fontified with bookmark-face because Org adds a bookmark to help you go back to the refile location. >> There is also dired and, of course, normal bookmarked files: I guess >> some users may be really confused--at least those who don't know to >> M-x customize-face RET at point to guess what this is all about. > > I don't understand the confusion scenario. The scenario I imagine is: > > a) User navigates POINT to location of desired bookmark I would say that the confusion arises because 1. The user does not do anything regarding bookmarking 2. The buffer get fontified but he does not know why 3. The user cannot guess why it has been fontified because he does not know to M-x customize-face RET > I understand the current emacs policy is not to surprise anyone with new > behavior, so I expect Eli Zaretskii would insist it be off by default. I don't insist on anything. I'm open to turning org-capture-bookmark to nil by default in Org to solve the issue for Org. But again, this is not just Org. I think many people have bookmarks they don't even remember, e.g. in dired buffers. If they see such a fontified file in dired, they will just wonder what happened. My suggestion would be to interactively ask the user to customize bookmarks-fontify on the first C-x r m hit, so that he knows what's in there for him. -- Bastien From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 06:12:29 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 10:12:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37202 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leazd-0003yc-6M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:12:29 -0400 Received: from forward102o.mail.yandex.net ([37.140.190.182]:40486) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leaza-0003yW-N2 for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:12:28 -0400 Received: from iva7-b0912e7c43b6.qloud-c.yandex.net (iva7-b0912e7c43b6.qloud-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0c:2e8e:0:640:b091:2e7c]) by forward102o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 1B2B36681F1E; Thu, 6 May 2021 13:12:20 +0300 (MSK) Received: from iva1-bc1861525829.qloud-c.yandex.net (iva1-bc1861525829.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c0c:a0e:0:640:bc18:6152]) by iva7-b0912e7c43b6.qloud-c.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id M1iuznuDfr-CJJadlO9; Thu, 06 May 2021 13:12:20 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1620295940; bh=fG1dZs1De+3ox7BzoC+RZ5nqqr7NDDlqY8XIFNFtF44=; h=In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Cc:Cc:Date:References; b=H7GwXmYoN7hJzMEWWfClxjtS0Hwa/mqa2h5hvOXQxckYFP2JEIqTzZOQhlO59B6in W3wl8SQmtGHRoNnQlRymOaI2nJO95CIeNmf6haobjIeiSRenRTCKb9CUximS9DTbRx YGNkspkKKbuU0EbtgWRD154q12vtEF/3b8pZhOPs= Authentication-Results: iva7-b0912e7c43b6.qloud-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com Received: by iva1-bc1861525829.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id N4ONTs1MfX-CILWYtGG; Thu, 06 May 2021 13:12:19 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) From: Colin Baxter To: Bastien Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmy5io91.fsf@bzg.fr> <20210505172508.doggiqhzlyibqhom@E15-2016.optimum.net> <8735v0w5fv.fsf@bzg.fr> X-Face: BHjiJOg/Qmj'BQgsAKL@])L)e62P)C"Y=6T Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 11:12:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8735v0w5fv.fsf@bzg.fr> (Bastien's message of "Thu, 06 May 2021 11:57:08 +0200") Message-ID: <87y2csdvcu.fsf@yandex.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAGQAAAAeBAMAAAAodabAAAAAB3RJTUUH1wQdAAY04/L8hgAA AAlwSFlzAAAewQAAHsEBw2lUUwAAAARnQU1BAACxjwv8YQUAAAASUExURc7OzpwAAAAAAP////8A AGNj/2aqqTQAAAA8SURBVHjaYzA2NnEBAmdj01D8wNgYpM7F2JiBgYFREAgEGJiU8AMGBpA6QaCG UVtGbRm1ZdSWUVsGjS0Aq20lJnMawnkAAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: , Lars Ingebrigtsen , Boruch Baum , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) >>>>> Bastien writes: > Boruch Baum writes: >> What are the steps to reproduce this? I don't use those org >> features, so I would be starting at square one. > 1. C-x C-f test.org RET 2. C-c [ (to include test.org in the > agenda files) 3. Add this contents to the buffer: > * A headline to refile > * A headline where to refile it > 4. Put the point at the beginning of "A headline to refile" 5. C-c > C-w (or M-x org-refile RET) 6. Select "* A headline where to > refile it" > Now the refiled headline is fontified with bookmark-face because > Org adds a bookmark to help you go back to the refile location. >>> There is also dired and, of course, normal bookmarked files: I >>> guess some users may be really confused--at least those who >>> don't know to M-x customize-face RET at point to guess what this >>> is all about. >> >> I don't understand the confusion scenario. The scenario I imagine >> is: >> >> a) User navigates POINT to location of desired bookmark > I would say that the confusion arises because > 1. The user does not do anything regarding bookmarking > 2. The buffer get fontified but he does not know why > 3. The user cannot guess why it has been fontified because he does > not know to M-x customize-face RET >> I understand the current emacs policy is not to surprise anyone >> with new behavior, so I expect Eli Zaretskii would insist it be >> off by default. > I don't insist on anything. > I'm open to turning org-capture-bookmark to nil by default in Org > to solve the issue for Org. > But again, this is not just Org. I think many people have > bookmarks they don't even remember, e.g. in dired buffers. If > they see such a fontified file in dired, they will just wonder > what happened. > My suggestion would be to interactively ask the user to customize > bookmarks-fontify on the first C-x r m hit, so that he knows > what's in there for him. Good idea +1. Colin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 06:24:28 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 10:24:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37253 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lebBD-0006I9-Sm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:24:28 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:52657) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lebBB-0006I2-Fa for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:24:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1620296659; bh=ZMrPhZB8y9YH6MWaZmzspeNGjS4H53fuU6gWFfQJjFg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=NR5nkm47Q93rw/+X+NlwfmiNPOzW0DOha3fW+eQEOjg0li2VSurJDczrf/utDMv4l MbBrlPEs7ShErqRnVjgmJhOsD52V7isNuIxwrgp/0jkXoQKn/9EgCrbbjhu/22sdQC ppObZEQU4j/0lCzNhqkmUV9BPQBBCxyx3q51jbVc= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([70.19.86.82]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M5QFB-1lfQWd3LeP-001S2P; Thu, 06 May 2021 12:24:19 +0200 Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 06:24:16 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Message-ID: <20210506102416.u2ykzjtwffbfveis@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmy5io91.fsf@bzg.fr> <87a6p8fdrq.fsf@yandex.com> <87o8do1bs2.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87o8do1bs2.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Y5fxy3GZAMGDXqHjiOK0ky56Mr7uPxw0GlxkfUfJy72Uqysv2me pXWHeb76ybNUzByrJeqApXfgU1PxNPeGYgKL9oB0t8RavifNwMRSFTm1iFWzViBnwZM0zDt l4ZFCRQDnCUfJeAACACWtKoM3d5J8fuCIlbTH2BdZ32cXaj6kbnzYAjVAmskhI69QWnAEp3 froiu+s+GZFo0o1WResig== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:dcSMWOFFGVs=:65RqudTE4+7XktvULfNXPr oMsRd0Syt5FdjU6qwCsD+WWeXWHl1hkOgTV3mkze1Sf8OlRBarA4Q5MqH2kSwvc/oFui5G3Er 822JqW8751Jn05ZRXlYRmoaaneKRQmjiEtMWQV2TYMCbgvopxp6YcsKrvyrrieok4m7Z1NyNo IbTgfzVmJ/0bcNP1RBz7I4c8ivueUiHzZ7mQQMSyxQiiULP66j/x2I8oIFyz79OBba7f1TndE lHEeKITQi4YCWAREpG79JFNmwyelzddYBrbQ1i46V0oyfFK5u+TIIuj/dpzWofSU2CqyTagOi GhvIwhJyJvjXdGitAv/mbUpfk8h0hlyVCQOL8JdIgQTPvONIaRsInNIKMfm6T5j/WtCYoZyVc uwZNW03OBqW8jjzus/HKQUPxnOpA9Uo94dbh1pC6PSV8sdg7aptsdWwzTKCB7FvIGhSQF84oj 5kvg9SX3HXEeLRPPBJ91D1DoeTih6c9xMhHydbLQABjEWbmgJMT1KbjhnYtQxieZXEcouYzpr 3aNwfpipHQ1JD5nsu3X7T3vTbLEXSDd18cKGv5Z8fnliqy7oXvBsgk3RGH5zJdNFhp2GdZuOY b/dpn14YTvBlGitH2wl2+1S7bu1vvnK7zfE5ltMWvEevfiYco4vMh1jmVjymS+PVtVw8QDaKW utyFkSHFUgkxVVqbUeF5Zrrm3hN66t7ol7h3MzZ22d4FZpY0bMcQENfDuDLmUBqR9GlAnrNAH Hk/ZtihVX+pHq69Dmy9BEiEQmTriOsgBaALIKWnb0RAADK+ydl8OpummJhEnsk6uhWF7EIwel HHen6k7D0caLfMTVRaAgUz043tYjC1FZcrpPJp1KzX2PUZM8RZZ0cGX/KEv1TlPQW3avMsUSM S1E6djzSBiYDwCYsf4aCfPlDuVfF8N9H+HxLSjaOD2dC8aw3/K7z1UFmoEAjCm+yOikYGHBx4 iuZ3kHnEx4/4Tj2vp2UgpFAoFRXGOzNAPeYbJRGKiRAWgAe5XncJKVUlmOlVNBhVer+NsfpFS yK0TEPRmRrFXC/YIXe1fzd7Dp+VyHjc/foSlGs8+X5z7prqXnn3Bt9YPVzGHruumo2oZWwEyr YXQ5iVcdoqTuOs5M6D5a/igB7Y+cKgRbhVujLZXv/Yf+SUUfyF0e5Ciwq99uZSM6bl2vHeurl QsWCnQ9dJJvqtBm249wmNU/x84L41g8/2xuAbqYf76DW9syTfLznYDetJLqoWyTU/T+sI= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Bastien , Colin Baxter , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2021-05-06 10:55, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Colin Baxter writes: > > > I have turned bookmark-fontify off because I found it too confusing wi= th > > a feature of bm-bookmark , which I > > use. I believe bm-bookmark is popular. > > Can you describe the confusion in the interaction between this package > and the new fontification? I also use package bm.el. For me, it acts as a replacement of pacakge bookmark.el (once modified with two features that I've submitted as PRs to their upstream[1]. I can't speak for Robert, but I find the two packages totally overlap and so confusing to have in parallel that I unload one feature whenever I need to use the other libray. [1] https://github.com/Boruch-Baum/emacs-bm =2D- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 06:31:58 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 10:31:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37281 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lebIT-00081a-TO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:31:58 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:51551) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lebIQ-0007ui-7V for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:31:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1620297106; bh=HDHfFvYI9pMcZflvm3cECTIB4FkumzjecTPF7nhsvec=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=lC1dn6PSr5nYlLYpg3YUORThHveivNl83UuLbPLlh7fKqjOv+TgFzFTlPfTU7aCif OC89Ya0we26e33A89w1DgReSTuduDkRMMPVvVFadGjwc1TPnZV9Xcn7fba1GdEQKDV 9IAJRNVN/7AEC+RmyoFpsNjPGRAZbAWoXhwYr2+A= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([70.19.86.82]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mg6Zq-1l3de80Jt0-00hgoF; Thu, 06 May 2021 12:31:46 +0200 Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 06:31:43 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Message-ID: <20210506103143.tnmdjm3fszsfy5ll@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgxan7lx.fsf@tcd.ie> <878s4t8up2.fsf@gnus.org> <8735v1jrit.fsf@tcd.ie> <20210505163038.bq4oupkuiago6kcd@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87k0oc1bpf.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k0oc1bpf.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:m2/B3PHmjrRgRcuM0z9IGl/KO/x03no3qRBwdZyVnmy2gaVfQ5b B8icER0/yTg/M7UpNGC9aKAtLSL6hQfjtf3AZ9FQPt3eone6n3TqHODkcZJpiNLmp9B+ee3 7M0p9BcgjNqXE+b3OWUylw5Dy52q+2hL1fOwZqZks6P6EG/qClgB0sFVjCQcvhZb7kerdIh 4u5G4T/Dc8OL8jsvaf0ow== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:PKL/B7qAEuU=:EtZets8yMOwAEk6vqBJDJs FjPYamEPfoghS+JAoNrfgl5ghPntp1kqiBMnnvqFJcO25WMhMYCxfsHhWcRa8VIK4RWJ6+p64 JykmqzzbOq1eLqLvimQpl2PBlr2X7q0wq0Ku6mESCpvadct+yOjmE1YHMFmH5Fo4M6Ir0xjHe CiWG1q5zFTSVYue2znBb+AT7VVLdnyf+tAKz6cpihoihZXVGXHfQ6GjeznUBq1HIR27v3MwUz lNxz0Wl377btmoHcB7lvvnJ/evSie0WX7twkmMvhg+7stBKyK4zDOGHNCcjjm+8xNe9psDRCU h4WGoGxjetUBbaY4kC/gUhGb2VZo5RDbqoHMLH9w+hWx5V836ujLUdPS/1/2B/5vEZo8tq9LN 7ehSpMTMULK9u13Eo1HY3LIMB4D53GTSNxzeD0EzTenpubIf7nnKMKINxu0NVdIN330qWJI8c usomnwofAcEK6c/bBZPSoOLPbbXuKyD11Iqd0uiX5wWeQFc3C3De3kBMtY4cZd3TvU+j7EiVo akmCWoNlxBWLSrtELs0LLZQY7TRoZL8h05zhJAjYuKhJrbzCIGiKo+eFpcTUS30br+7BOXaT3 0ftVMiRCstuekehiNyXadHQ7C1qSx3qQ3Sx825SGcbJgAu3ku4WzrGqVJsrDTKXSHm/LWnTuZ r0NxwRyfW+dEJNapGz5gjFuyOH8Bvu//uwU6sf3W5Pay1+zevyplghJQEzRQsAUIqLdTJEFPf YBNBSg1llEYmFDeWdZBKiJZIHq71KgO+bdSunh3ncK0Zu/1QQiOc/39SUw8xqR6uzFMxw8oSM s37tCJt1Gfwic2FcYxvCFSSEhru+SpTtVGDrMgGf1VMN3ME3iAbgxDpD1GNceDPqaMG81/p0G zCOSQfqqYNLA6j7BACx1L5XPRjJzwYBssvVqJUw+ZkNc+Ac8cgDm+X7QEERAFZOu29xcEb3TJ iWYzBGlbIUlVkcrokiQoIDpDvoWQd0BmaKMbbuT44RatokcAMhjA7hNy2IAHoyrhHiR7GOvyu 3oFBBJAGawI4uvVh7W8Bz5BfSk4tYJt2N6KT6MbRBuI3xkafif2jnaJ3RH4UQTmhFcRk5ffs7 yzs2XW5rDngXt+i7wXfOcKpDN+fccVGH3TjSQUqbFrchI3nd9sFmHg4E04ZLFgHPzTwMXET4N hYCL9w+h9aFe1ri/qHGFbAV4vVyVHkBTVMAIts9ZggUikZYw1bFOzZJjjKrk8CXiRT5Zw= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2021-05-06 10:57, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Boruch Baum writes: > > > Basil, I went to start doing more work on this and see you made a comm= it > > in the interim so let me coordinate before we end up cross-commiting > > (For me, this is especially important since I'm working with debian v2= 7.1 > > locally and applying patches to v28 which you seem to using locally). > > Would it be possible for you to pull down a the git tree and work from > that? No. This has been something that I've discussed elsewhere on the Emacs for= um. =2D- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 06:38:50 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 10:38:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37314 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lebP8-0000MS-Jr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:38:50 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:60641) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lebP3-0000MM-FA for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:38:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1620297518; bh=5YpkryTpPOgv2Cs0er3Q8e21M7bAqNAgg6j8+Nwn2Ps=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=fAbZhmRRjwMC/9/TLXc2vJbQWxiABUzVgAQCHwPi4jbLbOCzuBk+esKeF2BUIsnca gIQTe2kiUE8J6BPZqHXuEv6Knh1r/jt8QEmHeBZCqSDN1OL+apeHzWIQP2IIEbiz6K aP6mQSjYkxj9MFjPxlFGk4ZTdfBcutOrxiUIAanU= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([70.19.86.82]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N2V4J-1lY6j30Ca7-013sYL; Thu, 06 May 2021 12:38:38 +0200 Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 06:38:35 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Message-ID: <20210506103835.iyo6ff4rwuzgbpxd@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgxan7lx.fsf@tcd.ie> <878s4t8up2.fsf@gnus.org> <8735v1jrit.fsf@tcd.ie> <20210505170853.locsnpxoth7fukeq@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87fsz01bo7.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fsz01bo7.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:WRW2Q/T9LfJuBTcb+19s2ndRn53l4TQruxxAQfjy9c07SqFM+2A NQkbXjUkRwtYKHLvJRPPp8POn9xeEAMXP03RD5rAPJilyE3mnDa1LIvqpDxNTIysunZRu5X 3sRPr59hKnwQfeq0wJ21uow+kRnYTgwEENLAan3KhWrKyoTq+eYIAkCrEUFxaO8LNSvoVzg flm3tp+CK5Sbzuk4iswJg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:IWqiTKLgJSk=:+NsZbYsOh7xgMTBKZL2l7t z87lZWrokDGB8BKpeG8vYkdBLtMix3eEsbfnxCve6S8SIMSeZz1qhOz3JpnA4P/Hze3GsVP6M yaC3fb6rRoEa9qwiXvk+rlo7kmDzz2cCuvmOa3TVTB2KTAtS39jwEHGIOIBe92he5Dh7sLK4a 3Vl98+JXp/V3WzE5Ea8MdE0VG5KN88w3Z+ihz9gAaX+zQ0UU9FmqSeoXOQEnSMnXK8GWf0aHR wbkzu4U30UFXHmHwFUrkzP5p6wPVgE4MjYEQwQnFjlUIqP1wkP2/+7Ec7WppI17+HSwh21cIV rJv5yYF8aOFmAlkt+XwOTv302v8Pa8CCbskt9gne8V1hBseQNMs+EMUbQnm+ksIN3VaLDDM7J O1Hsw2NI3kp4Z/sxGG4ZjYbcIftqNWZRacxWmfvmfXsNjrGDPWs1dQ0T2dQ9s2hkxZfAmE4vc Q9WGIob7RX6nUstrxdva1pR/TsdHlH6jjqMfHFWUmPgdVjKh7nOTVvhBAp+RSwIc7Y7G5CD8Q qDn5idp0tZIsOQgrY0vjMiqeFc+OM1lsjf14Vx21f7qvqmkUGikYS1ZHNaefBffnaMEQeC+UM DeUImlgFfg/HPYzs+XWYQOuPxkKo+eldsP/nNRUAHLTJkLyq7eu4er0PzAe9fF1NrD5eyCL7+ TgKN7YB/p553MStBMPlrt+iqgrJDpcvbIooHtb2FiwAjmU9alNIZbhv7biQt4XZXAAGmcDqmc 3D1mu77pAnhYAnXUJWYZEBedp7+X12x8qrso6XzE3goxisE/ykzBhbTG22a8aozYB9xzGN3Vf CsP2xtY8tFARH6dnWldrSi38U6a2pZ7b+EHb9LUlzBQ5ewM4tp50kbdouJdyL65OKzdmzD1FA +EtEm2B54PNyk8CMGpzGGukV8xOaRMPoRMOED84+x1e/TuKDHqpRNiJrUCE/2WnSCWea1tYpy bV0hhy5tq7FQ532Oc2oHilawo/8in90nSJ7KWLVUmKNZa7H6cQnczUprYS0DsFIHqYRZu2SxZ Vxm2twU7QF1j7YNPzsVHSwmHtbE3urj1n24LzXwOKBEiUgvzsq36sBBh80FN8N/eu8jcBoZIk XHRvPCDgRYAnXYspmfI5PoqQ5nEbfDPEFwZPZ4AJagZZm1hbshyFz8ddoDmasU/eIg1o9dvW/ D7dsxvPGjzPQb+QA33/l5A85a3OWEkFwQweFRPvI3mSaWerprJHnK1XS8iMnZ1HUnE7eE= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2021-05-06 10:58, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Boruch Baum writes: > > > 5) Throughout my prior patches, I had been using variable > > 'buffer-file-name' to compare against the value for the 'filename' > > key in bookmarks' alists. That is wrong, in the sense that it's onl= y > > correct for buffers visiting files. The correct comparator seems to > > be the output of function (bookmark-buffer-file-name), see there, > > which will cover all cases of all buffers. With that change, it's > > probably wrong to perform 'expand-file-name' when performing any > > comparison. > > Right. Can you submit a patch to fix that? Basil has taken the lead on this, and I'm waiting on a response from him with his integration patch before continuing. Once that happens, I'll suggest to him that patch and one or two other ideas (eg. a setting change should be respected immediately across all buffers, so it should be controlled by a toggle or -mode command; popping a bookmark should fontify the pop). =2D- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 06:47:09 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 10:47:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37340 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lebXB-0002Ap-0F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:47:09 -0400 Received: from forward100o.mail.yandex.net ([37.140.190.180]:49108) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lebX8-000243-B4 for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:47:07 -0400 Received: from forward101q.mail.yandex.net (forward101q.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0e:4b:0:640:4012:bb98]) by forward100o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id A0FEF4AC1B6A; Thu, 6 May 2021 13:46:59 +0300 (MSK) Received: from vla5-eeb6b78db372.qloud-c.yandex.net (vla5-eeb6b78db372.qloud-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c18:340d:0:640:eeb6:b78d]) by forward101q.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 9D732CF40026; Thu, 6 May 2021 13:46:59 +0300 (MSK) Received: from vla1-1bc5b51c612f.qloud-c.yandex.net (vla1-1bc5b51c612f.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c0d:89c:0:640:1bc5:b51c]) by vla5-eeb6b78db372.qloud-c.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id DYoXrwQNpa-kxG8iAC5; Thu, 06 May 2021 13:46:59 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1620298019; bh=MVb899DiLxkC9PcFrBiaZjkPttDSu7A0iNW0IxG2urU=; h=In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Cc:Cc:Date:References; b=yZ+ckyxb7/1/kfoFZIkqh3xopFVwtieUGV5Q+egA9yjU3uWZgF/kjVlm/a8qKYfiz SgGzxBGI67N0hPk68lSZDAlW4sFuRMgU9ynHOtlK05GFg3UOuDbuibvhmOnQrGc5Em nFm1AIxV2KdlWshgxbeU1bTOSXZjt0z4baNHN4BM= Authentication-Results: vla5-eeb6b78db372.qloud-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com Received: by vla1-1bc5b51c612f.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id ITOleGMFx7-kwLSBZVC; Thu, 06 May 2021 13:46:58 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) From: Colin Baxter To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmy5io91.fsf@bzg.fr> <87a6p8fdrq.fsf@yandex.com> <87o8do1bs2.fsf@gnus.org> <20210506102416.u2ykzjtwffbfveis@E15-2016.optimum.net> X-Face: BHjiJOg/Qmj'BQgsAKL@])L)e62P)C"Y=6T Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 11:46:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20210506102416.u2ykzjtwffbfveis@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Thu, 6 May 2021 06:24:16 -0400") Message-ID: <87tungdtr2.fsf@yandex.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAGQAAAAeBAMAAAAodabAAAAAB3RJTUUH1wQdAAY04/L8hgAA AAlwSFlzAAAewQAAHsEBw2lUUwAAAARnQU1BAACxjwv8YQUAAAASUExURc7OzpwAAAAAAP////8A AGNj/2aqqTQAAAA8SURBVHjaYzA2NnEBAmdj01D8wNgYpM7F2JiBgYFREAgEGJiU8AMGBpA6QaCG UVtGbRm1ZdSWUVsGjS0Aq20lJnMawnkAAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Bastien , , Lars Ingebrigtsen , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) >>>>> Boruch Baum writes: > On 2021-05-06 10:55, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> Colin Baxter writes: >> >> > I have turned bookmark-fontify off because I found it too >> confusing with > a feature of bm-bookmark >> , which I > use. I believe >> bm-bookmark is popular. >> >> Can you describe the confusion in the interaction between this >> package and the new fontification? > I also use package bm.el. For me, it acts as a replacement of > pacakge bookmark.el (once modified with two features that I've > submitted as PRs to their upstream[1]. I can't speak for Robert, > but I find the two packages totally overlap and so confusing to I can't agree they overlap - bm-bookmark allows multiply bookmarks in one file. I don't believe that that can be done via the built-in bookmark. Best wishes, Colin. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 06:52:13 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 10:52:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37358 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lebc5-0002iP-Cy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:52:13 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:47162) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lebc4-0002iJ-2w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:52:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33642) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lebc3-0001MV-R2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:52:11 -0400 Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:60496) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lebc2-0008GI-Br for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:52:11 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lebbx-0008C4-Qp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 12:52:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org From: Colin Baxter Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 11:52:00 +0100 Message-ID: <87pmy4dtin.fsf@yandex.com> References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmy5io91.fsf@bzg.fr> <87a6p8fdrq.fsf@yandex.com> <87o8do1bs2.fsf@gnus.org> <20210506102416.u2ykzjtwffbfveis@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87tungdtr2.fsf@yandex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:yYPF8+oIGTletS7GW08quVof2TY= X-Face: BHjiJOg/Qmj'BQgsAKL@])L)e62P)C"Y=6T Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAGQAAAAeBAMAAAAodabAAAAAB3RJTUUH1wQdAAY04/L8hgAA AAlwSFlzAAAewQAAHsEBw2lUUwAAAARnQU1BAACxjwv8YQUAAAASUExURc7OzpwAAAAAAP////8A AGNj/2aqqTQAAAA8SURBVHjaYzA2NnEBAmdj01D8wNgYpM7F2JiBgYFREAgEGJiU8AMGBpA6QaCG UVtGbRm1ZdSWUVsGjS0Aq20lJnMawnkAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) Set too hastily. I should have asked does the built-in bookmark allow multiply bookmarks in a single file to the same degree as bm-bookmark? Colin. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 07:00:10 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 11:00:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37380 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lebjm-0002uq-07 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 07:00:10 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:45221) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lebjj-0002nS-W1 for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 07:00:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1620298801; bh=wCHHhhFeES0oE/wOCje/dEPCNRQ7D81TDcvFKQ7yGuw=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=IW0k1Tq6zwFSU/xtu1b+g+SN8w9jW2bipHtQgTbBc/vPxlRzMDXsU4FfNAT4v722Y Z5F5qtnWjAnIU6gvm64ykMerxLxEq0DPNPTQ1fkg78kdLbR6S6H91fYhIFUmCg2NrZ PaP+tAlCxCYaR9XZCB3QqWDZ2gNocAdPiQEVvntc= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([70.19.86.82]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MORAU-1luUj03lNe-00PsmW; Thu, 06 May 2021 13:00:01 +0200 Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 06:59:58 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: Bastien Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Message-ID: <20210506105957.iff47r7gp5tuksx2@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmy5io91.fsf@bzg.fr> <20210505172508.doggiqhzlyibqhom@E15-2016.optimum.net> <8735v0w5fv.fsf@bzg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8735v0w5fv.fsf@bzg.fr> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:OBOLFxTQgzjoU2sXnYP8Mj0HaQp/fxVQ2B6fw4GUr/1hTHilKSw p/FWo72BjrAL1nQEemPrYZGhxz1VXJfGw56ZqkCBbTMRNO2prY4L2mUyDgmweGg92g5ZpFT 7DwjPy0w1/7RJRaZH3eSQvVwbcv9x3jwi1DcrAH0v/D+Ap/3Vl5ee+OxATBh7T1r+GF8czh Ms3+ZYfj/TPx11wYzu2UQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:YOHX3JHHY8M=:OGcagmXYMthnX3u3eT45m+ ZItYfJQIn3g496EWXQHgs1MRXb+DpJFtPcumMPKzeRljckhjSQTduSkhx1fWureeJr+vrK+8J O8i4sjMhL18JcX6OOc10t0emMFRQaraZhhcI5Bb8JgMJU2mWreV32l7QuZOv0yboqkl29n2jo nV0HysEbfrhbsLHWK4oTrllbzhkeFGenteELurJm8VT2FBaj99sH4S2FIflJGtTBHPwbVV9jz faU3YsdGATcpKW0ccrGQhFIpR2QRoxd9wZQs2FOZTjw5DwxCxh2lqfUfliplu3gD47odzjGGR zf1EOkj7JNb6SkzzY5oSd5S+evbrbNgyan2Wwoy4hS6CowAXNdwCHVp0yJttTVHF/dl9OctzH WJmEh2k9Hk/CmHx4qFj5gnBcIBnxo+x+aMHfnDccT4Jh5dxhxqTQb3AH2EoqF08hbDIkqZ0VY jii/wDipBkyIUo8yXUBBrBlMTSGMovcgT6DloBv27WGcB200yxVaS44MydOAZ+J83e46eCbjN i8IaaU7nx8joKTCX/fNuwF1gRjICOhsId7finf65AeN7V24MElbCtNYofD4gZLACY2Wnl0UvC DIDh7u8ykHrepJWVPw37N7/pmKpTQU2nF7n0buGoTDm4IGRfXNEnhtDn2pI46BBlWms5tHB+0 VO5poRpYxLuR/SzOXVSAmEu2TXHaBjEbtsHqHL9pOtOHXnSsGhHl5oFiXUpZWwG7djzMAlwUw ATv6eOgS0kxtPEDdOaQH+Iij2/Byu0/1w7rIo2fFNsvkkKF9OXuHAZJ+W9L+XMgmH/vgUYY44 +TjtMqL9c9Xw1mSnZPqaDns/XwdZXUOQwca+a5Omd4YjCSrKFszd7HZv6DxawEVfDq3DIhF0l wMFmeehroJ0TLsYDyNivWg8QYvecBwOYANa2T86PCcOv0gnZ9SjXpUf47bIk7Vo10PpGp4Uvr Bca/v1PITkXMaJbyPffPoVotY+fsH/hrItfHIkRS+ISQWlHmQfPL/RdLYu0OdwbfqfKndXt1a Js3ET6HLZ3uqRYHZgMYn6MARmZ8EibSuwbAD+1rbnGEC547dDiVe3i1iPN7kMDtdVdjjGPypz ILGAFxMFZ4ZQFnof+0zYgh9senRGomNlGCNlLQLEFpDr2MbsD9izHepekI2pdAqkNcGcswm+i DxIXNKdjEelgypvK+YG+TbroB7zNh8gHme35Runtda24FLlKy9iKFTPJc22Dcs0Ard6X4= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2021-05-06 11:57, Bastien wrote: > Boruch Baum writes: > > > What are the steps to reproduce this? I don't use those org features, = so > > I would be starting at square one. > > ... Thanks, Bastien. I'll try it. > Now the refiled headline is fontified with bookmark-face because Org > adds a bookmark to help you go back to the refile location. Is that behavior hidden from the user? What I mean is, does the user know that what org-mode is doing is creating bookmarks? If yes, then the user already associates the re-file process with creation of a bookmark. > .... > 3. The user cannot guess why it has been fontified because he does not > know to M-x customize-face RET You write further down that "many people have bookmarks they don't even remember". Is this a case of that? I agree with you that would be a point of confusion. It speaks to a deficiency in my proposal in that it doesn't include a clearly-identifiable bookmark icon on the fontified line. The presence of the icon wouldn't help the user remember how or when the line became bookmarked, but would clearly identify the line as a bookmark (and if the user is surprised, it's probably called for to delete the bookmark anyway). Having a clearly identifiable icon would also mitigate any confusion in the case of org-refile. > But again, this is not just Org. I think many people have bookmarks > they don't even remember, e.g. in dired buffers. If they see such a > fontified file in dired, they will just wonder what happened. Been there, done that. At some point, years ago, I changed my personal policy, deleted all my bookmarks, and have since only used them for very limited purposes. For me, it was the accumulation of bookmarks that led to confusion. > My suggestion would be to interactively ask the user to customize > bookmarks-fontify on the first C-x r m hit, so that he knows what's > in there for him. That would be a cool and very helpful idea for all new emacs features! =2D- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 07:03:20 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 11:03:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37384 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lebmp-00057C-Rn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 07:03:20 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:36681) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lebmn-000573-Mc for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 07:03:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1620298990; bh=M0E3cdBC5JsvyiE/Ng5EfuLdiou0axP+ZM+tNyYIeUs=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=egdHDfIUq817I9f+2mXimQxFkmh4Ss91VxU0JA5LKwN98lBGzU6fNObjBmP4m+a7U q6uFbjvEyluiu/UA65M41tZ77jyJVwPtmpvTbu8H2eF0pD5qbG4aodJwnqF5PYPnTS yUmSiwMS1jWCzE3WgB+5+WarQ5wZfn3JXhrSm+hg= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([70.19.86.82]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MqJmF-1l8tzh1e4Z-00nTqG; Thu, 06 May 2021 13:03:10 +0200 Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 07:03:07 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Message-ID: <20210506110307.f4g7p4typbctgd6v@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgxan7lx.fsf@tcd.ie> <878s4t8up2.fsf@gnus.org> <8735v1jrit.fsf@tcd.ie> <20210505170853.locsnpxoth7fukeq@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87fsz01bo7.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fsz01bo7.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Jy6qwLsIlY4aIAY0BjqsAmHL0HjkXoN+aLlsaXaINJNoIhis3nP yWRyUmWX69MRx7XfZhVsgJpTUfcgXIwWd4d4AJlnDv6i3lccRLa//oDOapeXzlrJFxbL/km NehsyTQbqI5hlzA5aIJg+OKwF0QTGC8mpskhqJuNHz5eyiHzWRxcGp/J8LK39f9h3ToLeJ/ wh00RlD3ZOEq7mIjIg+UQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:pHPUSTjxI7M=:Br+8yv2HaE8roKIGHDboB2 VpJrTnrc2GMSxPAsKl20c3BYsd5GKdqgqpgsi48tb4+SXS0LXElMX33pC32TWE68s+41FOg0a 5EJftbJvn4yscU7yqJ73JN3UnUmCdb2ud2plbsHOAIOhIEzxwYuO3oxsWNFSoQG1XWEN/J+Jg 8LO+xytB4LGE+ry4J9Zc/kYrzi+kXY8RjnPlmAG/buJyG/1TNbij/1sh4p7seYZsWkwGxU3KP n1oEbW2Tli31kmm1ePn+Pi8azP+YwKf7B8ZcJ3TuXFwLJwIvCzJ2rvbhMG3lh6v9e28r7Phsk Cq/v1BdYjU4UnzAnIPbn6I1Y+W3uNGetzP8KO+9edzRwmEwUP9cqMAUbGr6T9ZxoVaiGduSim SLvE8+2XNi39rRoQnSqj/9B+bspF5tSjUely6f1TydhgWXStw1U6u5CSt6GqpZ9ZftTYW3uHE ndDlMHrCXq92BdhmVjgq8Xwep9rbxbSnO/QdYOZqtMzttOUIALdhIap5MbyvmGZyEP3Y+Lolf cKZ4ZKFDSWCY9wikFpc2GneXDdRohQZH7WnjNsT+a96drDiCvvbeAr//KlN/tUS83yw/OM2wh /Xa04FAxnSJgr7YzfNZgS7Ln1uvQT+XQu9ujH+/gVfkkElo3IdU0sz1VxR5tx1Q7dYNS5EoCP PLTDk5sejxQkiWZyD6Wgt9vSX0KxYaxGOAyNN+PqKdh0dPgA+KcyQ6cCir2A4eFiirzBM0IgN h+652+ZwhO/+3tEPATjKyIrJecas+PltUQq1BvCyGkxnC9nK6YHHFajlAjA5OhQQB/GNPnJr0 exP1tHeVNJdevGajnE0GqvTN45lf1YD8pC2gRl8asq5s7nD5G0FSERuQPPicKxkpRWSvFNmTA FAH3GfZSRJw9s3kwH21w8B/OrBwQL7gnJb0VQOBwr/0i64hwE/FFmEhaiaCwTMFORo2ymXzMi Mqv8Gc/9P+V6eVy108CRj4UYtjFmIjag9m4QgLp1Zh3neLhipIoAxhso99QllXHRSbUaoiOuH /Duog3RK3OP6eO7uH7jHXFf4dp+fIV4FGqhSPsVsqRG4jHamvcg7nw9Jad4NXtwR7H7TtexJf 245mcZv3qGil2YDHnkKUZjELRL4qhhiVP2maCrRguzWB7DDeyNqm/zc76GscodvWMiT6HkIYz GoZGZ4eNHY+VrbOfnyk/QbHGKkIJ1yBe8NDYbWiSNlQKWCCLIdiuI2gEEifPV8Rn5TUwE= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2021-05-06 10:58, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Right. Can you submit a patch to fix that? Also in the wings is a version of a feature that I've submitted to package bm.el[1][2] to offer context-sensitive default suggestions for bookmark identifiers when creating a bookmark[2]. [1] https://github.com/Boruch-Baum/emacs-bm [2] https://github.com/joodland/bm/pull/38 =2D- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 14:52:18 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 18:52:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39079 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lej6g-0006gD-EO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 14:52:18 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f49.google.com ([209.85.128.49]:36504) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lej6e-0006g4-0B for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 14:52:17 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f49.google.com with SMTP id l24-20020a7bc4580000b029014ac3b80020so5847949wmi.1 for <48179@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 06 May 2021 11:52:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd.ie; s=google21; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=oly+WpsUTHBARKeHyyva7NpSj+4bTQ9q/49yhoYtpHY=; b=eKkgfXeoYpetvtoS9mEIyI9lVAHc3PzV9VHiVewOgICejDRr7fKGl9/zK0Q8pMUAis 1LpRNrawo8K9S5xhEZS8Ncq5TZue2Q+u/Ok57CME5H2/LGSM810f05es1FU7q6ZTVTd0 ceimszoUsSdkNjI8LpX0GJRSaLKLRP37sgNSMLdfVBKh7gGBwjXZydm5jxCgFzXlsVI1 oPeD246ExTDY1gYXh80T0IMjhfVo55CPgYZGFKqLoN3eK4xEN0f+avqb3xGW2e0lT4ym zq4jST14t2MZFTpvfzlOZamYGNgr6MER8CmFLND2C/0dKfIDX/OS763mY2HoJEiGRMXn s6Hg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=oly+WpsUTHBARKeHyyva7NpSj+4bTQ9q/49yhoYtpHY=; b=nqZENGe8jIDPbxW4hyCt4BHAe/YhjAdsvaOWwm5mySHmsjDvsEgshUM5ZZZ1iEibgO UAoXPew1BdLTJFJ8Kv0EfKqUMvsJz5fCoiRjeNNwd6Pfp1O3+TwEHtQGXkoaVEPq98+/ XV+C/COFDroZme7TB9XkMw+1yrNey3qX18nO59GzmYYubzKx8PGKZk59NrX/FvFV0PW+ 8+cfgbO1iqqtbhticzXUcdsNHmInXeaJuLVjDwfl/PHaMZuRUReCVUUVx972CfrVQNQF j5v3e1fYkEjQJcr/uf/SwJK9cfECvs4sh4pCWzqPCqLURpHx3opYIApTsaSXv5kW7DyJ WLgA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533xf6ZeEzuLau1Obv+Yewos6NpBaXc2yJNxuUXHBj8Sd2729Hfj k+2obiPa3NiBGFT+GdpGXXKvBw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyWjgTNtb7E397yRsFJenwCTPa5P27kC69O0zoLK/xVONtcunN7rv7o26RSxwdd/paFGL2pPw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:251:: with SMTP id 17mr17075453wmj.64.1620327130111; Thu, 06 May 2021 11:52:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a02:8084:20e2:c380:d15:339e:aa10:60f1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s5sm4515119wmh.37.2021.05.06.11.52.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 May 2021 11:52:09 -0700 (PDT) From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgxan7lx.fsf@tcd.ie> <878s4t8up2.fsf@gnus.org> <8735v1jrit.fsf@tcd.ie> <20210505163038.bq4oupkuiago6kcd@E15-2016.optimum.net> Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 19:52:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20210505163038.bq4oupkuiago6kcd@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Wed, 5 May 2021 12:30:38 -0400") Message-ID: <8735uzvgo8.fsf@tcd.ie> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Boruch Baum writes: > On 2021-05-05 13:26, Basil L. Contovounesios wrote: >> Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >> > "Basil L. Contovounesios" writes: >> > >> >> If you 'C-x r m' more than once in the same file, the first overlay >> >> remains even after deleting the bookmark. Shouldn't the first overlay >> >> be deleted when its bookmark position is overwritten? >> > >> > You mean when giving the bookmark the same name? >> >> Yes, sorry, I meant multiple 'C-x r m RET' in the same buffer. >> >> > (You can have several bookmarks in the same file with different >> > names.) >> > >> > Yes, that would make sense. > > Basil, I went to start doing more work on this and see you made a commit > in the interim so let me coordinate before we end up cross-commiting I wouldn't worry, since I only set out to fix a couple of typos - I don't intend to work on bookmark.el any time soon. > That should go some way to account for your catch and some other > scenarios. There may be others that crop up. Thanks, any chance of a patch? ;) -- Basil From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 14:52:42 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 18:52:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39084 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lej73-0006gT-Nv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 14:52:41 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f44.google.com ([209.85.221.44]:38555) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lej71-0006gM-Vy for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 14:52:41 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f44.google.com with SMTP id l14so6703346wrx.5 for <48179@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 06 May 2021 11:52:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd.ie; s=google21; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=7E9HNy5xVlJ9+P9PDTuwUXLKHn7P9eu3hsOOCCZknWg=; b=B79RT+3eiQGBLP4QV+xctoXV4xOz2lD3PTE+SXwcf2EyUjCiHoFRm4vjZUmfQ0Ic/d eywza+biURJJB9JZiXdq1A3NcwV8gTKgimfwXv0kNECTQ9yzMZH8Hr9Tx1bWpWMJdbfe ytASTRF4zvRwml7aH084BC8dKXL8hJPHdb0j1xidtc9xV+O2yQtyzoTiaRqW2lz6H0Ic DDr4or6i7CqavWdhznES5LlC0ibQMUnw9Ln0pHsjEErJMIY8rag7yT8q6ROvZ9one6K2 xdn6UuozruSXOD1gT4hFSqy1kiBxgnL7TZzDFghbgIKvfvPBld+/Tj/zbo+kaFhB/oha idzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=7E9HNy5xVlJ9+P9PDTuwUXLKHn7P9eu3hsOOCCZknWg=; b=B6TU8+cagdzplPotuR9EEDUIhIAD8Makx2mJG+vaGjzGMhNiLvJctbrJOM0RTDXOSo d4NZYR6T5JotVcjt09uH7tLc+yzYLixqCV4ntjPTW65kZiVfw8r1HCvrJpU3UQhL2Ac4 88yYkGZ2y4Lo3VBXBes8oAsZ5BSCxSFgKC369ElDx9COu+DYr1L2aYykgvoKEVFKB/cN fVgjJdNJFlG/sT3cjZoBC7Mqr81QLmhV0PM09o+D8fmR/Gv78yC5EhV+0yUXiAl6qV0E eumEVbf1HiQ2IL3qkMVK4i+ToVHRN+ECcBzwb2EAbK/nhq2hoj2ZHOWKUhQU+A5ZqHF1 WoZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531V6I3Lt9bWRHfsVW/gvl2ZmjA1tWs88ei/NA5cT544scfw87Yt OCuRcikRzP7UJwNJUZYponCMaw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzllnjlY/sIkA7MenlJ8DJajgoPafha1ThGJc7CmBl6RvuMJzDitr6zm1u0LwVeKo1/LMDTHw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e783:: with SMTP id n3mr7322093wrm.154.1620327154286; Thu, 06 May 2021 11:52:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a02:8084:20e2:c380:d15:339e:aa10:60f1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i3sm3674895wmq.28.2021.05.06.11.52.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 May 2021 11:52:33 -0700 (PDT) From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgxan7lx.fsf@tcd.ie> <878s4t8up2.fsf@gnus.org> <8735v1jrit.fsf@tcd.ie> <20210505163038.bq4oupkuiago6kcd@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87k0oc1bpf.fsf@gnus.org> <20210506103143.tnmdjm3fszsfy5ll@E15-2016.optimum.net> Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 19:52:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20210506103143.tnmdjm3fszsfy5ll@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Thu, 6 May 2021 06:31:43 -0400") Message-ID: <87zgx7u233.fsf@tcd.ie> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Boruch Baum writes: > On 2021-05-06 10:57, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> Boruch Baum writes: >> >> > Basil, I went to start doing more work on this and see you made a commit >> > in the interim so let me coordinate before we end up cross-commiting >> > (For me, this is especially important since I'm working with debian v27.1 >> > locally and applying patches to v28 which you seem to using locally). >> >> Would it be possible for you to pull down a the git tree and work from >> that? > > No. This has been something that I've discussed elsewhere on the Emacs forum. FWIW, even if you can't clone/build all of Emacs 28 locally, you can still load/evaluate (most of) its version of bookmark.el without too much trouble, if that helps you when modifying it. Either way it's still possible to produce a clean patch against v28. Thanks, -- Basil From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 14:53:29 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 18:53:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39094 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lej7p-0006hH-1h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 14:53:29 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f46.google.com ([209.85.221.46]:42914) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lej7l-0006h7-IE for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 14:53:27 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f46.google.com with SMTP id l2so6686471wrm.9 for <48179@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 06 May 2021 11:53:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd.ie; s=google21; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=/aCTpE0pbDOalG/bG+8BCC32nVdQSa1omyby9eq2AuA=; b=K2XNPGy77A0+SA5egUs0kyZfCKLBVN7bA1fhm2Ib/a2BlO91JMdHkbFADE2N9voKV2 7ku8/8uCn+zuFPWfMnctWf/V+pqOtur7ioLBwM3/kRlzDATWqOiSCNV0mhn7/rpiR/YY 5Xe5xOv25TIaE3Wp//OB93Xus002pma8QD2qAmy2v90QwDDP065EEnRKBCbbDBXK6EDs 3GLe3d+gAd8NFmK13MfScre2NcNE78DRaJCSmApRubfwruXHCmDEeHyBUb+ifMJrD8rw ZC74iYGZM5wV0w3glmiSV1PCMbGn+sC/jm/oWZSyRBYyux/QO77mWwYnI/T32tmn7ES0 cssA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=/aCTpE0pbDOalG/bG+8BCC32nVdQSa1omyby9eq2AuA=; b=qalN1DwNIH599wlkyutH5gWX9i+D3oyCK4fsX6oOYlr27V+/xAw0gcbhwbn9yMP+uT 5vpatJxhOgRNSssGab8ZxLVaDESeHAYmdYN3Vu3v18T+0/d3Ng5HcHfXousB/2f45yAW KRtp0njQRPbW6PvfCgs7vGDLA2mAb2LlHaKgUlD7sPknNDTzfVRU0jzt2AHKb8+bFid1 1cmjfiG5mPiJxoxhGbeweM/zHpvO0WMyt/U+s2k0pvtCJj9HDprkG7uG39CHOmg1gPRm bRiuQNmPz9D4IbYqRHolQp3zat3icEkFxD0Uh28YOQiGBc3ue3X30f3o3eymsovR1Dnx OlCA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ueqiNeGh0QE5gg9UMLFMUinrYFhY4wIi+7pI9sZQFdBQmp+G+ H8aQ3/72k4FeTpBsRt0FjsCDu2aqpD2tBg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxN5FRwkvSwkgKYWpCSk0SUzAZhY1xCgp4yDevEgu90e3ySe5AIoQOBOf3XQ+46tVZGTussYA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:180a:: with SMTP id m10mr7145347wrh.215.1620327199963; Thu, 06 May 2021 11:53:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a02:8084:20e2:c380:d15:339e:aa10:60f1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l14sm5881130wrv.94.2021.05.06.11.53.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 May 2021 11:53:19 -0700 (PDT) From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgxan7lx.fsf@tcd.ie> <878s4t8up2.fsf@gnus.org> <8735v1jrit.fsf@tcd.ie> <20210505170853.locsnpxoth7fukeq@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87fsz01bo7.fsf@gnus.org> <20210506103835.iyo6ff4rwuzgbpxd@E15-2016.optimum.net> Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 19:53:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20210506103835.iyo6ff4rwuzgbpxd@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Thu, 6 May 2021 06:38:35 -0400") Message-ID: <87y2cru21t.fsf@tcd.ie> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Boruch Baum writes: > On 2021-05-06 10:58, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> Boruch Baum writes: >> >> > 5) Throughout my prior patches, I had been using variable >> > 'buffer-file-name' to compare against the value for the 'filename' >> > key in bookmarks' alists. That is wrong, in the sense that it's only >> > correct for buffers visiting files. The correct comparator seems to >> > be the output of function (bookmark-buffer-file-name), see there, >> > which will cover all cases of all buffers. With that change, it's >> > probably wrong to perform 'expand-file-name' when performing any >> > comparison. >> >> Right. Can you submit a patch to fix that? > > Basil has taken the lead on this, He's not taken the lead on this, he's just a very naughty boy. > and I'm waiting on a response from him > with his integration patch before continuing. ??? :) > Once that happens, I'll suggest to him that patch and one or two other > ideas (eg. a setting change should be respected immediately across all > buffers, so it should be controlled by a toggle or -mode command; > popping a bookmark should fontify the pop). I suggest that you suggest all of that to this list instead ;). -- Basil From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 15:13:21 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 19:13:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39176 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lejR3-0006ti-Dq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 15:13:21 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:44957) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lejQy-0006tb-Mn for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 15:13:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1620328388; bh=UlDhA2v++wm1pfmsOt7AT49tBRcUi4n9+QIOmbOTC0o=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=XjKycybg5plKWxHLkYgJjZBO00B+aLSMaQxqZQ/kOLc2TiVIRrRNs45R+/17shweL 6ilhOzsfdzDEovb/PQ1MD9do9OQAD2YL82T80DENl9hDBJ1AqUmEij5qzldIHGuu5K ZdXYSj85laRqKXXt2wKiCLbHA5ez9FqGyriSSpdE= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from E15-2016.optimum.net ([70.19.86.82]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mq2jC-1lAZE61pze-00nAXv; Thu, 06 May 2021 21:13:08 +0200 Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 15:13:05 -0400 From: Boruch Baum To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Message-ID: <20210506191305.udoxdyv3jfcta6x6@E15-2016.optimum.net> References: <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgxan7lx.fsf@tcd.ie> <878s4t8up2.fsf@gnus.org> <8735v1jrit.fsf@tcd.ie> <20210505163038.bq4oupkuiago6kcd@E15-2016.optimum.net> <8735uzvgo8.fsf@tcd.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8735uzvgo8.fsf@tcd.ie> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:s9QW2MEsGQqgkS+6yiKkAsGLklIuIY8yjqwljnngTTn9avuf77S LukS7Qi1kxQNYmB+8VShYrulhGNbJEY+gBj/IcJxQ3HGRB539qGZiW51phf4vful5avzv+m 7LS+p69DK0FGyVtagT+V7Ejb+uNQyhEW86FxZT3qXjhGXRX1WZ113VM0K3oMchsNdsF4H7R KZgENWAPCvj2UAkyNEXrw== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:L9dL0uL/5Yw=:MkDh/zflD3/faw12Q8zK0V GQDOSWoNIhvyO8Ew+4xMpWTwkOfdENdYE/eTS2uTlgIHUaU/6E+xStzyzmYXrxqkhuCIoOkFG ebdVWNtXlUg15rE+vSawlGZYqEMd5WS68e06sI3rpyqdUjxN1TP+YTlYpXX+CzpNLQWmdDsLP oby1FOokv5n28ISQNqhBaONaqSEfSUo81TCcmHbKmZVFLDQMJ2r3Id5anLRFQGwPQs48I2y26 7cSUnGbALLULKqhlpfRCnBMsWdpb9pUaGG+w4Cy38aopEWSAPYw1kuVud4cgFYo4R+Cp/6ZQA BcvejeW2LZAjW8AWE1PoF1yyc4PuvkknRMJZU24sNb18rvu9mYNd//lm2uFPUgNAtaJ0tz+uB iAWlNrqjnLvtRrKOQZUwodont4XzTUep3WdSnnLije9ySONP4+IvrfUupG6v5KJQv1cgJvG69 ZJ/eAmTf1VmYJ+FGuAW2eeyPpI7xuPm4HLYqFTdq7I3xly7OeUsBkMWP3mDiUbDqNjEcgWtjc SxjuxN7KWAcgL819m1BdxIweN27j8tj0fJO4uAga6XiKfQHCy4psClb9JftF+nKnOI4QetGlu B075XZDzpqvKSjTbvneyOmiF5wPyJXw2RXQqZwT7GIpBGbyrkkizDHl4BxawA/Vr9FmlxWDIz W9G2O/FqHaWybXreYxjA/0F16AUe6mvqESkXUD29HzXm1fvLCHbGynmlGi/s2fZSWToQxHXHR J798jn9V76UcmyGOMvLMVMwyA6RLoH8//oo0Rz7hX9x2L3T/O0A7MZpXdTYK96B5a320yy5xO fVO6yVwX7FXhnAcxDM6p7RyJDHOH/E5E/W5lsia/DZkcgK7GcaCwhyUGmrugsgAlMVuj/XQW7 8IX2o7W9VURWbGEwAFy70x3aA2Wil5OmRf4vU8bshpTYuEBcrzG5C0hNlzTkk4uldG993rE6a j1up/h5iCMn8VUYd5RCuYKnePPDc12f8adCdwW0DakGq548+FsCT4OJsgNrIliAeNSU5us5sB lJ1CrGAGv6n+auJD5CulIm1cxuG75LW3dKKd9GJncPbg93p4qL9d8OREHyQh+Ywah2pp1z1AM yg6rD5acbGPoBuXyoA8kwbVvwA65PJ7h9JQHns7M0hM1/OVTmWsKx+gGzW51hyYYdV4zmgHCH d5FuPzmpAul9NmMAXvaY8WMw/aOZYYAdw5H8BhmntYWlRSEGRkZ8eiS2v9/R5ur/oSA6A= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2021-05-06 19:52, Basil L. Contovounesios wrote: > I wouldn't worry, since I only set out to fix a couple of typos - I > don't intend to work on bookmark.el any time soon. Not what you did. =2D- hkp://keys.gnupg.net CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 15:41:46 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 19:41:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39316 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lejsX-0007CZ-TR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 15:41:46 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f41.google.com ([209.85.221.41]:39702) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lejsV-0007CT-K8 for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 15:41:45 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f41.google.com with SMTP id v12so6813135wrq.6 for <48179@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 06 May 2021 12:41:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd.ie; s=google21; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=D7QXeSFZZ5B+VR3llESwoC5bhnlqU7rBVAvE2gyA5Ns=; b=Xe8GbJcXoxQf5JztyoPMZzHO1eqZS8nNQ8v4h7jJzRgCwDsH5ynhLYbK6CbSt0EL0m HdJUIancYeRKhrRXRj64s6Pay2VgKX94vQVuIMxOkAO/ldtFzxf5JqZiGlhd+J9nChom FWbYiOR40j1FWihcAMeGmYk89axQR2WBD7BDOf+M31CewqlVM3P974usIt9+MgKV8FUW mOLOgxJ76/3XaD0NuD4DBpB49+uG4LcXwt+SoUv1/xeNCk6a2R62crBwdTrhFh//dy/v f6HVjU6bZ4jyGHkR6H4dVVF4jJzunxzZLMowycaxcYwv80Msiw+4CvKd3jviZPurVJBq D5Tg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=D7QXeSFZZ5B+VR3llESwoC5bhnlqU7rBVAvE2gyA5Ns=; b=jr6DeDySceBjzjJtAnuGUa/N5dldk9s5utqgW5CVWQPiCy7oqS5+jqJZ5xgi6voF+p ejC7EN+xbiyBJKyXGAvFNs4hAI7IL23kfXUb+ip5CC68GAmLM/7VmuQ31NB1zgaJbeNQ 0AbCwgNp1kJT2aEwOhjtn/uB+LHIZ4HXqFc8qNZFwsCow0lLNIimZq3FIziJsxFlNAU3 nuZ9LvNtJChDMAuRWbZQU6P82DKuyeCIcNFNZ/2LY4Rfs0krWPt9u4N/l0jtj7rlBcoK goLoYkB32tMXFp3VI+EA7rYOiYqb0xPvhzAJk7LBRZ0aD1rEzgQOukSuzwv+/wj1GTBw EIFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532OIQHfyRbo7LJt+XVU//C3UGOolqXVaQ29U9RfdGV2E9OGw7Ov xNpmj8eJKsXXUnuo0zuyx3C36A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwHiC4CZ3XH3wPCVyTInkKwJhDUfw7x5nTiIEitILXn9bAd4nhQs6JGBeGDXWRphMaKcaa0+g== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:674c:: with SMTP id l12mr7303977wrw.357.1620330097761; Thu, 06 May 2021 12:41:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a02:8084:20e2:c380:d15:339e:aa10:60f1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j18sm4143585wmq.27.2021.05.06.12.41.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 May 2021 12:41:37 -0700 (PDT) From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" To: Boruch Baum Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf8uan2m.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgxan7lx.fsf@tcd.ie> <878s4t8up2.fsf@gnus.org> <8735v1jrit.fsf@tcd.ie> <20210505163038.bq4oupkuiago6kcd@E15-2016.optimum.net> <8735uzvgo8.fsf@tcd.ie> <20210506191305.udoxdyv3jfcta6x6@E15-2016.optimum.net> Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 20:41:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20210506191305.udoxdyv3jfcta6x6@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Thu, 6 May 2021 15:13:05 -0400") Message-ID: <874kff645r.fsf@tcd.ie> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Boruch Baum writes: > On 2021-05-06 19:52, Basil L. Contovounesios wrote: >> I wouldn't worry, since I only set out to fix a couple of typos - I >> don't intend to work on bookmark.el any time soon. > > Not what you did. No, that's exactly what I did: I set out to fix a couple of typos. Once I'd set out to do that, I noticed that the new bookmark-face was using an old-fashioned face spec syntax and two docstrings referenced 'defcustom' without quoting it where the English phrase "user option" is more commonly used. While there, I noticed that bookmark--fontify could use 1+ and bookmark--unfontify could use dolist, to make it clearer to the next reader what that loop is doing, and when it will terminate. Just like the log message promises: ; Fix and simplify last change in bookmark.el. 7d0067f297 2021-05-04 10:54:24 +0100 https://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=7d0067f297b131c98a5198eb52d49891a83ac5aa -- Basil From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 07 07:22:57 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 May 2021 11:22:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43313 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leyZM-0003Ro-VK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 07:22:57 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:59274) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leyZL-0003Rf-U7 for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 07:22:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Wlsb3S7XHM7HXfnamlZCaNtYiiJgZT4bLJkAKEwbr0E=; b=Zr9xdtvDpLl16g3GPJ8jMi4GlB 3dRCr46XVYgaJF0Y4rAIHkxuLWlw9H6LPFxDv61FH2JNm05OrdO8YxW1+owUKy25qHYx8BvPBsW2h DfvJhdxE3xvOlQMkXhSsgowrz6RTaFDGDCo2vcgXqiiW4FE19go6PehGBMX9O7Q72PMQ=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leyZD-0006o4-GE; Fri, 07 May 2021 13:22:49 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Colin Baxter Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmy5io91.fsf@bzg.fr> <87a6p8fdrq.fsf@yandex.com> <87o8do1bs2.fsf@gnus.org> <20210506102416.u2ykzjtwffbfveis@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87tungdtr2.fsf@yandex.com> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAgMAAAAqbBEUAAAAIGNIUk0AAHomAACAhAAA+gAA AIDoAAB1MAAA6mAAADqYAAAXcJy6UTwAAAAMUExURZFsZ76Zl042MP///9rG5v0AAAABYktHRAMR DEzyAAAACXBIWXMAAFxGAABcRgEUlENBAAAAB3RJTUUH5QUHCwwSjDNG/QAAAF50RVh0UmF3IHBy b2ZpbGUgdHlwZSA4YmltAAo4YmltCiAgICAgIDI4CjM4NDI0OTRkMDNlZDAwMDAwMDAwMDAxMDAy NTgwMDAwMDAwMTAwMDEwMjU4MDAwMDAwMDEwMDAxChDG9fMAAAFJSURBVCjPbdDNasJAEAfw6WIl 7ElLc7CnWlqRfQopKnRPaUgEPRfBPsUqCrI3SwvqKQlWNvOUnc33oXtI9sf+Z7IZgHrdNvbAmtBN iMZeIXTo1YqyEoQQwGHGghMC4Ho4KhCOhMnCwiJA41mgxQwjb1PCR+Ub28xCIiY4pHrbjZ6IDtUT PE4HdIIWI4dfEQ3L0d5+U8yGIYCn34DywoK+nMqsR45YSjQFWCyzhjmMwCKGRXGOxsqg/8dWX+vY dnGpYEI/rrALZ2nV2qUZsBIBTWdTYtzx6tYd8CjG6aKCw33X+2hh8DM49V4J7uCCKzk9pALcd/dl jOPP9nm+gF7XXV5w+rA8HxC+Dmwykatd/23u21uLpPELNaJE6UdIIg2cw+b5BmLF9XGlJUQnuFuv E90+Etg+2vc5U0NHUYwKy8GBQSUqICpe4g/cmeV5+ShmDAAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAy MS0wNS0wN1QxMToxMjoxOCswMDowMKJgDgoAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjEtMDUtMDdU MTE6MTI6MTgrMDA6MDDTPba2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Mikel Rouse's _Swingers Castle_: "Share The World" Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 13:22:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87tungdtr2.fsf@yandex.com> (Colin Baxter's message of "Thu, 06 May 2021 11:46:57 +0100") Message-ID: <8735uyvldl.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Colin Baxter writes: > I can't agree they overlap - bm-bookmark allows multiply bookmarks in > one file. I don't believe that that can be done via the built-in > bookmark. I may be misunderstanding something, but setting multiple bookmarks in the same file works without problems with the built-in bookmark.el, as far as I can tell? (You just have to give the bookmarks di [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Bastien , Boruch Baum , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Colin Baxter writes: > I can't agree they overlap - bm-bookmark allows multiply bookmarks in > one file. I don't believe that that can be done via the built-in > bookmark. I may be misunderstanding something, but setting multiple bookmarks in the same file works without problems with the built-in bookmark.el, as far as I can tell? (You just have to give the bookmarks different names.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 07 09:53:01 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 May 2021 13:53:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44079 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lf0ub-00074F-2h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 09:53:01 -0400 Received: from forward102o.mail.yandex.net ([37.140.190.182]:39029) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lf0uY-000744-RV for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 09:52:59 -0400 Received: from iva5-f90c153e7fcb.qloud-c.yandex.net (iva5-f90c153e7fcb.qloud-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0c:7d80:0:640:f90c:153e]) by forward102o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 8037F66815FB; Fri, 7 May 2021 16:52:52 +0300 (MSK) Received: from iva8-174eb672ffa9.qloud-c.yandex.net (iva8-174eb672ffa9.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c0c:b995:0:640:174e:b672]) by iva5-f90c153e7fcb.qloud-c.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id mkR3vgjldz-qqJm0das; Fri, 07 May 2021 16:52:52 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1620395572; bh=Zkrmxrd4dJviQzzJSxgNUIHm/q8cJr1t7jSR0ENZcsw=; h=In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Cc:Cc:Date:References; b=t/ju9wF6kQuXeLQose/VOBhEaeZc4/QvFR57NKCaObT8HxcvEIUVlhpq3qZgqiVUA IXuS3vslvS2fYh2lVtNo7dSKt8sr5avWNnx/wpNo6NylKPgqiEUztn175Xus2HlBhA q6L5u/2j/eYtDGSb88fmJ1L+gPeJ6ncNgrQv0V24= Authentication-Results: iva5-f90c153e7fcb.qloud-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com Received: by iva8-174eb672ffa9.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id M7LB848G4P-qpMiZgPq; Fri, 07 May 2021 16:52:51 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) From: Colin Baxter To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmy5io91.fsf@bzg.fr> <87a6p8fdrq.fsf@yandex.com> <87o8do1bs2.fsf@gnus.org> <20210506102416.u2ykzjtwffbfveis@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87tungdtr2.fsf@yandex.com> <8735uyvldl.fsf@gnus.org> X-Face: BHjiJOg/Qmj'BQgsAKL@])L)e62P)C"Y=6T Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 14:52:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8735uyvldl.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 07 May 2021 13:22:46 +0200") Message-ID: <87mtt6slam.fsf@yandex.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAGQAAAAeBAMAAAAodabAAAAAB3RJTUUH1wQdAAY04/L8hgAA AAlwSFlzAAAewQAAHsEBw2lUUwAAAARnQU1BAACxjwv8YQUAAAASUExURc7OzpwAAAAAAP////8A AGNj/2aqqTQAAAA8SURBVHjaYzA2NnEBAmdj01D8wNgYpM7F2JiBgYFREAgEGJiU8AMGBpA6QaCG UVtGbRm1ZdSWUVsGjS0Aq20lJnMawnkAAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Bastien , , Boruch Baum , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) >>>>> Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Colin Baxter writes: >> I can't agree they overlap - bm-bookmark allows multiply >> bookmarks in one file. I don't believe that that can be done via >> the built-in bookmark. > I may be misunderstanding something, but setting multiple > bookmarks in the same file works without problems with the > built-in bookmark.el, as far as I can tell? (You just have to > give the bookmarks different names.) That's true, but, as you wrote, the user has to come up new names. This is done automatically in bm-bookmarks, which inserts the corresponding line as the name. The disadvantage is that bm-bookmarks can't easily bookmark blank lines. It seems to me that all the bookmarks, bm, built-in (including emacs-28), bookmark+, have disadvantages. Personally, I would use bookmark+ if were not for the fact that it writes unprompted to ~/.emacs. Best wishes, Colin Baxter. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 07 12:22:25 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 May 2021 16:22:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44761 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lf3FA-00005v-Kn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 12:22:25 -0400 Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]:46736) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lf3F4-00005l-Vi for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 12:22:22 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 147GJpqc135568; Fri, 7 May 2021 16:22:12 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=nfA2sNRaU8uVcqZ55EthhArEiiMNBmHrBkmgLYoJzMs=; b=RJwEkTUJWJN1k9vap7vkEhqCRR6qOXIc3Z3suDy1yT3kbj5EyMrZUlXVu8yHuJn/y8Yu dabop4Jj6wBLtOYnKDBd7Oz4wDw7tVRyEjMsK9oz07Rt6bjRnPtoyAEarr0yWIWM/A71 P5aSJMuK9+0Z1ngg2o2GeEgiluLTy8XQnFvP+4oztmTAJAP5Fu/5bcfmYj2Sz1UZ8y1o p0zn6Jq9nYEEFzAvpmmnz4lE5ZHFKUpksB2MOyjzuTfOaENISZyjLpXUAtQDiHhgF7e+ w6GDOjPi8wxs8y06nHsZ7aFV2mP9UPKlGeKNTRh4xx+91leim3TPPeBU0nKvFLrRhkHN jw== Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [141.146.126.71]) by aserp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 38csrda6e4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 07 May 2021 16:22:11 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 147GLoFM133179; Fri, 7 May 2021 16:22:11 GMT Received: from nam12-dm6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam12lp2175.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.59.175]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 38csrf9115-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 07 May 2021 16:22:11 +0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=nGWWDlqjkck7Sl20UDqLFemewEUqDKmxsTQRfZ8wl/2TJMo/ysSnZTLkwWjhLnnnAVWU2LEccdDkp1zPCG8HN3bYyMLMjdZ0eKtEru0A9ZzBZyehLoUqHfhHP/DCp9II9nCvVSyz/mFZLaMUARkwUAwWucqUuqsDWvEHnV74As7BfH/VP2hggybHjEAXxkl+IjopL2+FoGCaDFUFYztotb7Bd+Fqc42pBNRjEiZtrsdWTzU6rbduUDDOZochp44z+7qprZj92yZBDEvlJZ0SAJJavQKLS1JXNNI5nn+OxWRm7Ksb7DUSjsSp4RyI0AuXmLpgon+7n6oivSerlN9OEA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=nfA2sNRaU8uVcqZ55EthhArEiiMNBmHrBkmgLYoJzMs=; b=D+PrI9cYb0qu1dSp1VxkZgfLmraOJugjUtJSvL7TUpByMAbkhLUorUCgDGP3t+Bvx/qf3pV5nPnGBb5vQmwUI7XTQSF03Xaxs+tkoJdrwrTRYqGw28qfRHqD/bw5cA6e4LxBNqR44h3QFYyNTPTQOqst27xrdhUYJwy3A7mYjpG5kdSsykGm18K/Bmfbw+kzFGoK/6v9zJW6P+Sf9Esz0N7AuvO/9pMROoHdWl+1zoZS0y/+mW9Hov3WRlGUMwcq7t5vFAnXGFlw0jr9pqPiU+h+0hq1b8kpTwK48wtl1DZde/JCvjn+mtabfmGFRh7a9gPFWT46pFPMt/i89lbOsQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=oracle.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=oracle.com; dkim=pass header.d=oracle.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-oracle-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=nfA2sNRaU8uVcqZ55EthhArEiiMNBmHrBkmgLYoJzMs=; b=C8BGHEwjBW+/b1hHZvpjhuQLMB+BO47pFT7mmHkS5/7qgmui4K599mNgS1IqAaktdQfdgtv8klKJ2aLMDUZsVSiEGc/6+ZScnJs8FrqBY9Bp8mk8v8PStVKonXvL8+uLVn8dTSilz9cOcCv8NUmfD/wUS0yYfzGQYxU+kwrlQJg= Received: from SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:11b::15) by SN6PR10MB2992.namprd10.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:805:d7::10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4087.35; Fri, 7 May 2021 16:22:09 +0000 Received: from SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2109:9725:fd4a:6494]) by SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2109:9725:fd4a:6494%6]) with mapi id 15.20.4087.044; Fri, 7 May 2021 16:22:09 +0000 From: Drew Adams To: Colin Baxter , Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: RE: [External] : bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Thread-Topic: [External] : bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Thread-Index: AQHXQ0hEomYyqQOV2EqYXtYd30AHsKrYJTPw Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 16:22:09 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmy5io91.fsf@bzg.fr> <87a6p8fdrq.fsf@yandex.com> <87o8do1bs2.fsf@gnus.org> <20210506102416.u2ykzjtwffbfveis@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87tungdtr2.fsf@yandex.com> <8735uyvldl.fsf@gnus.org> <87mtt6slam.fsf@yandex.com> In-Reply-To: <87mtt6slam.fsf@yandex.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: yandex.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;yandex.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=oracle.com; x-originating-ip: [73.170.83.28] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d8f5d752-5774-4c9f-6244-08d9117443ae x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN6PR10MB2992: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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 x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(346002)(366004)(376002)(39860400002)(136003)(396003)(5660300002)(4326008)(55016002)(122000001)(38100700002)(6506007)(26005)(76116006)(52536014)(9686003)(66476007)(66946007)(66446008)(64756008)(8936002)(186003)(83380400001)(110136005)(316002)(33656002)(8676002)(478600001)(54906003)(7696005)(44832011)(66556008)(71200400001)(2906002)(86362001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: =?us-ascii?Q?Ei0ZGj/Ju71Kaltlxl3CA+uf5pO9IQZlx3AbikuHF9YnhW/vZrcI36MLKni4?= =?us-ascii?Q?XD0hwpMnO+uzmalmLfWnzfu1R+9yxOKH/rV0aNYtR7+G5er11SdeZ41uWwL6?= =?us-ascii?Q?k5SpQZYnhm/H/0xcx4muztaS3kZUTypJYMDaZaB+pLDO1dcmPGxx1cQj0RMA?= =?us-ascii?Q?YHGZsPA6zEhEojOQvQQ8+3gcUVub3lvDKGV5V4X3MfQdPm/SGsBJUnZZpZ92?= =?us-ascii?Q?y4eYm5j9Mn48u68bpBO1q9uEJZHEnaG+eCMrA3J2i0wtXVzHzbH0btAJ0aBS?= =?us-ascii?Q?UHmu/l91votcnDzNNgfoH0YmSxfMzWmbIZTcpZIR/yCVX5aPZ+cu6ZeCQnX2?= =?us-ascii?Q?6oGE57XL9z+Jq+l2LIdZC2yW20/gCeLWUcRVeF8RgGedBOZVIevi6HSqQnxh?= =?us-ascii?Q?K/I1v5hzmR01emSFWgpV5eUN6bSCz51Q4VNLSuE+R89XE6fypYsthW0WrkHS?= =?us-ascii?Q?weaPUvXePi6zhqYlDu7HEfeiF2Ph0uFO1hUUNQ36EjHIoF46T4gO2J9FKpWz?= =?us-ascii?Q?xsLb55NN9fV3C4m7rAzKSREjp/EoWBIAULDr8fNZZ7vJa2lHBVB4DqTfvONO?= =?us-ascii?Q?n8UQRCzXutAdErCH08CuLraXBaEsk6DAhjeaef7KuX7K8hG0js/Wem0mqD+Z?= =?us-ascii?Q?de/GI+3kHw+F3lLB+yvd8nlGk1IlmicV6lJiEjc2P4h/Ep/keWt04iWeASvE?= =?us-ascii?Q?ZWQ8fBgEw+Hzk46V0auWbFKQqN2V2hGZtuhaiKj3//d1QW9XOjBbykIYTo06?= =?us-ascii?Q?YwJBzAkKcJKs65xHMNMb0BbEU61rqTyyb44+xdnBJVT8pYQt230JvkXWQVzZ?= =?us-ascii?Q?AI6uY8kAPG5SFi/+zzVd3+0Wd0VBp3Hg4qNz5tl/X541ANaLeNMHl6eP1Mx3?= =?us-ascii?Q?EMTzLAZ1Fi8VxiFcfT1msDTnHhaXB8LeQ/uiBYDgs8OYKYcGWOOmXhCuP42s?= =?us-ascii?Q?/K+dO/lKZLo4FWupC7P01y1DRI5bMsO4lXiqh49UH0PEx1iPQ4z9qWniXWKw?= =?us-ascii?Q?z5wuBmojHg8wN+8vrlqxb8Man/02fSkbCJL5kkLi5Ahfv+V0xnTXNm2AEhFi?= =?us-ascii?Q?gEOTqi92X5i3HY+IivQu2OfIgwMy/0ncnWo9FO+W1epwuWygapjmdMOR9iAf?= =?us-ascii?Q?g+UofsTxhe4Ci0Xo/6zq/z2NSuMBuCgf+k8X2Kwxy1k0SeNxgHMXDn6U10zm?= =?us-ascii?Q?bkQanLagbhlbuFVsb4xupzGrKvF9mU+yRMr0Q+CAJ0OmS2IgSnzgBFgTA4op?= =?us-ascii?Q?Q11hhMXMFer22UaTjFemZQWgAaL3qqdcBfCs0S7w8vRRhMf+Q2GDXgyf7d0d?= =?us-ascii?Q?Z7ctgVyu5QPjoesUJXyeFYz4?= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: oracle.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d8f5d752-5774-4c9f-6244-08d9117443ae X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 May 2021 16:22:09.7821 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4e2c6054-71cb-48f1-bd6c-3a9705aca71b X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: ZJoEeYJmRzo6GjzUJ2WtsL1VXG293MhrID+Of80QgquqFjzhGoHksDt5y/5X0bWMZxFmgbXHNRpZwvQ5pidOug== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN6PR10MB2992 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=9977 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104190000 definitions=main-2105070110 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 6rh7bs28Zgz_8c3dxvsYcNdl49QtkCmg X-Proofpoint-GUID: 6rh7bs28Zgz_8c3dxvsYcNdl49QtkCmg X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=9977 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1011 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104190000 definitions=main-2105070110 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Bastien , Boruch Baum , "48179@debbugs.gnu.org" <48179@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) >> setting multiple bookmarks in the same file works >> without problems with the built-in bookmark.el, >> as far as I can tell? (You just have to give the >> bookmarks different names.) First, a correction of that, assuming I understand what it wants to say. You can have any number of bookmarks in the same file, and even with the same location in the file. And they need _NOT_ have different names. [This is true for both vanilla bookmark.el and Bookmark+. But in vanilla all but the first bookmark with the same name are unused/unavailable. With Bookmark+ you can use all bookmarks that have the same name. For instance, you can have two bookmarks named `foo.el', each named for a file named `foo.el', where those files are in different directories. That's the case for autofile bookmarks, for example.] > That's true, but, as you wrote, the user has > to come up new names. See above - the names need NOT be different. Secondly, if your point is about a user always needing to come up with names whenever s?he _wants_ different names (underlining "wants", because that's not an Emacs requirement): Sometimes you _want_ to name a bookmark. Sometimes you might prefer not to have to do that, and instead just hit a key to set a bookmark - no prompting for a name, no need to even hit `RET' to accept a default name at a prompt. With Bookmark+, by default `C-x x RET' does that. No prompting - autonaming. (Bookmarking keys are on a keymap that's bound, by default, to `C-x x'. You can instead of course put that command on a shorter key.) That's `bmkp-toggle-autonamed-bookmark-set/delete': If there is an autonamed bookmark at point, delete it, else create one. The bookmark created has no region. Its name is formatted according to option `bmkp-autoname-bookmark-function'. With a prefix arg, delete *ALL* autonamed bookmarks for this buffer. Non-interactively, act at POSITION, not point. If nil, act at point. So one key to either create or delete an autonamed bookmark at point. And a prefix arg deletes all. > This is done automatically in bm-bookmarks, which > inserts the corresponding line as the name. Bookmark+ lets users customize the autonaming, using option `bmkp-autoname-bookmark-function': Function to automatically name a bookmark at point (cursor position). It should accept a buffer position as its (first) argument. The name returned should match the application of `bmkp-autoname-format' to the buffer name. The default value of the option does this: Return a bookmark name using POSITION and the current buffer name. The name is composed as follows: POSITION followed by a space and then the buffer name. The position value is prefixed with zeros to comprise 9 characters. For example, for POSITION value 31416 and current buffer `my-buffer', the name returned would be `000031416 my-buffer'. It's trivial to define a function that returns any kind of name you want, including using the text of the current line as the name. The name of an autonamed bookmark matches option `bmkp-autoname-format', which is a format string. By default, the format string accepts a buffer name. The default value is "^[0-9]\\{9\\} %B". So a default bookmark name is the position followed by the buffer name. > The disadvantage is that bm-bookmarks can't=20 > easily bookmark blank lines. That's a problem only for BM's particular way of naming. The default Bookmark+ naming doesn't have that problem, for example. What's important is that users themselves can easily define the automatic naming they want. And that they can create bookmarks both by autonaming and by providing names explicitly. > It seems to me that all the bookmarks, bm, built-in (including > emacs-28), bookmark+, have disadvantages. Personally, I would use > bookmark+ if were not for the fact that it writes unprompted to ~/.emacs. I don't know what you mean by that. Could you elaborate? 1. It never writes to ~/.emacs, unless you've defined that as the bookmark file you want to write to. 2. It never writes to your bookmark file unprompted unless you've configured it to do so. You do that in the same way as for vanilla bookmark.el: option `bookmark-save-flag'. Set that option to `nil' and bookmarks will never be saved except when you explicitly ask to save, e.g. when using command `bookmark-save'. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 07 14:48:41 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 May 2021 18:48:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45387 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lf5Wj-0001pp-Bc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 14:48:41 -0400 Received: from forward104p.mail.yandex.net ([77.88.28.107]:42999) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lf5Wg-0001ph-NY for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 14:48:40 -0400 Received: from myt6-1d5cc1e732c7.qloud-c.yandex.net (myt6-1d5cc1e732c7.qloud-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c12:400d:0:640:1d5c:c1e7]) by forward104p.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 47FB14B006F1; Fri, 7 May 2021 21:48:32 +0300 (MSK) Received: from myt6-efff10c3476a.qloud-c.yandex.net (myt6-efff10c3476a.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c12:13a3:0:640:efff:10c3]) by myt6-1d5cc1e732c7.qloud-c.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id YPtD2xDcwE-mWIq5Rt8; Fri, 07 May 2021 21:48:32 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1620413312; bh=VRSBEkY6P/AbvQr3vs5bIhs52ux26HuYn5Gp8lZBKQk=; h=In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Cc:Cc:Date:References; b=LJ5LDfQw8OaJo7jQK1pEBhLwIV3VS2uvBKJMIqjddC2kweU1w866cz1hdb5ytdQSP KT9W9NwY1sYiYb9JSWJ+7sVKacLOyusBK/40QTnXc2s178ub5ftVEn12VlZC+REubs 8vbQaGrKBzR+ZAjUv4h8BfxZWkKgskS2Fn7MS2Ys= Authentication-Results: myt6-1d5cc1e732c7.qloud-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com Received: by myt6-efff10c3476a.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id TKvoVbk8NM-mUKO6wgx; Fri, 07 May 2021 21:48:31 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) From: Colin Baxter To: Drew Adams Subject: Re: [External] : bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmy5io91.fsf@bzg.fr> <87a6p8fdrq.fsf@yandex.com> <87o8do1bs2.fsf@gnus.org> <20210506102416.u2ykzjtwffbfveis@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87tungdtr2.fsf@yandex.com> <8735uyvldl.fsf@gnus.org> <87mtt6slam.fsf@yandex.com> X-Face: BHjiJOg/Qmj'BQgsAKL@])L)e62P)C"Y=6T Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 19:48:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 7 May 2021 16:22:09 +0000") Message-ID: <87im3us7lu.fsf@yandex.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAGQAAAAeBAMAAAAodabAAAAAB3RJTUUH1wQdAAY04/L8hgAA AAlwSFlzAAAewQAAHsEBw2lUUwAAAARnQU1BAACxjwv8YQUAAAASUExURc7OzpwAAAAAAP////8A AGNj/2aqqTQAAAA8SURBVHjaYzA2NnEBAmdj01D8wNgYpM7F2JiBgYFREAgEGJiU8AMGBpA6QaCG UVtGbRm1ZdSWUVsGjS0Aq20lJnMawnkAAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Bastien , , Lars Ingebrigtsen , Boruch Baum , "48179@debbugs.gnu.org" <48179@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >>>>> Drew Adams writes: >> It seems to me that all the bookmarks, bm, built-in (including >> emacs-28), bookmark+, have disadvantages. Personally, I would use >> bookmark+ if were not for the fact that it writes unprompted to >> ~/.emacs. > I don't know what you mean by that. Could you elaborate? > 1. It never writes to ~/.emacs, unless you've defined that as the > bookmark file you want to write to. Well I can only say what I saw, and bookmark+ did indeed write to custom-set-variables. It may be that something in ~/.emacs triggered it, but I don't intend to pursue the matter further. Best From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 07 20:25:55 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 May 2021 00:25:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46742 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lfAn5-0005Jm-LF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 20:25:55 -0400 Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:50494) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lfAn0-0005Je-Dn for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 20:25:54 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 1480K61d004964; Sat, 8 May 2021 00:25:44 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=l7Y9TkGxSk6tNQjuwzQPR0W65o5b+jSBWG+5hAylzy0=; b=Bl+h7xcrgk/+cgr6i+5TyUG/L+n/04xdCHW1RvqZ6PHC2xBeY2GlyWTc3xTcj5YzRw8D mpHO/LcYyO3Vpyf77YLMMNsWiOzldJDT6dadSqZDZQU8MhP5+7HezxVI5HX6yx/vSKY5 g8+US7aRklZu/44FD4J8eSRm0ICygG03+e7CJBzeaINRpXZPkpxOH+Gcxwt/jS2V5pH0 uY5GoYCQRB7KjCe+OvWCsW3E3ZLzvpBiB9IiU44fiNEFg1O3zsgqS49h1fkgGeStURRF P4+kuMT4McKSG0TiuGNdOX36mxfmUW68o627/IzjGd3bktU6jeaIF0Dstgs5fhrKyBFv mQ== Received: from userp3030.oracle.com (userp3030.oracle.com [156.151.31.80]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 38ctd8b24v-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 08 May 2021 00:25:44 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (userp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 1480Lbl6148216; Sat, 8 May 2021 00:25:44 GMT Received: from nam02-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2nam02lp2052.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.38.52]) by userp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 38dfrrgee9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 08 May 2021 00:25:43 +0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=b7WILomQdYrJPc5svo32m5XXNKD+jyfB+6f8u3w1MMK4sEFSGP6Dwu/GU7D/QUkrocKcaZYcWCYN2KhgZvTx/NIQU9rljpsYnZFG7jXQu00IbPzCTJn1A3xe0Cpy0uQR0s8rn9PwvJrEeX6bGr8JNQa4NvS+fNmTFHcWVY3V4+sI0SprVZT/UOPPNj5yBvcf1PP0gFVtFRjqGK64EMc1lcvOTF8aZ8oMGVPp7QbY0eyxmd7HW1hZZex4x5c9XyZfNk400Pfitu45biOjk82X48CG/fMaI5mb9LepmrCf7JGfnBKm/6H8iAkqUZ54TDahvvodkBPP5IKwcbqJjfjatA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=l7Y9TkGxSk6tNQjuwzQPR0W65o5b+jSBWG+5hAylzy0=; b=mdNX3IEkkwwLlnswIgX8JVyPpKgRTnFhM991fnaE2LbJxOpVBJQLoW72MaEpW8uQq1IbFYcx2rXAkNZURebhX+nZrvJmH0K/4YHvxbVaU2jSkaFyAXXnbsKBr5D2311iF7kFvyzAaK4uAXV8TSzaGir9mKWYib5EaVLGxxbdjgrn4LuQOgP7/Z3C+4hjj8kNFbnpEhvipZcs7kbEcdRuonMF3CWt8YGGYkwj4AUL7Tdj9ipbSrHuSEERyR5ejm01Tg+XQIX1ny12Bydkdul8Lm+V5gaaIvdHU19jk6kx0C55D5Pp+MQQF7ur2/cctL82irCnyqYcHp8EkeaQw4Ps9g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=oracle.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=oracle.com; dkim=pass header.d=oracle.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-oracle-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=l7Y9TkGxSk6tNQjuwzQPR0W65o5b+jSBWG+5hAylzy0=; b=jwstnWXzWjOTwzBDUYjU2hr+vvJHsXAeIxnwyPO1kVIC0pM9NmSHvEMsrRUZIFfDQMZzgv1wxDDv54B9SmPdSnD4MS/RP48SFrLk3ShLdNxx5rn8c2lLKbU6LoVJxz3ahDqtkmZxGZVcCbJ7WMwh5u3Fi87z2vabWMx++3ChbjU= Received: from SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:11b::15) by SN6PR10MB2639.namprd10.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:805:40::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4108.27; Sat, 8 May 2021 00:25:40 +0000 Received: from SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2109:9725:fd4a:6494]) by SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2109:9725:fd4a:6494%6]) with mapi id 15.20.4087.044; Sat, 8 May 2021 00:25:40 +0000 From: Drew Adams To: Colin Baxter Subject: RE: [External] : bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Thread-Topic: [External] : bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Thread-Index: AQHXQ3GRomYyqQOV2EqYXtYd30AHsKrYrhsQ Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 00:25:40 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmy5io91.fsf@bzg.fr> <87a6p8fdrq.fsf@yandex.com> <87o8do1bs2.fsf@gnus.org> <20210506102416.u2ykzjtwffbfveis@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87tungdtr2.fsf@yandex.com> <8735uyvldl.fsf@gnus.org> <87mtt6slam.fsf@yandex.com> <87im3us7lu.fsf@yandex.com> In-Reply-To: <87im3us7lu.fsf@yandex.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: yandex.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;yandex.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=oracle.com; x-originating-ip: [73.170.83.28] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 12bbfef3-95f4-4fdf-d9de-08d911b7cf7e x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN6PR10MB2639: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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 x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(39860400002)(366004)(346002)(396003)(136003)(376002)(83380400001)(33656002)(316002)(44832011)(5660300002)(64756008)(7696005)(71200400001)(76116006)(52536014)(66946007)(66556008)(66446008)(66476007)(86362001)(26005)(54906003)(6916009)(2906002)(186003)(4326008)(122000001)(478600001)(8936002)(8676002)(38100700002)(55016002)(9686003)(6506007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: =?us-ascii?Q?j5AGNZUq637VDkyRFFT8qANgyiXIiuRXfQ23JpPAMHEEfq/V2PrdCbiAI2zU?= =?us-ascii?Q?NSk4N9R7awHaMQkc8527dYlYYaHLnznJXPOOfvk27Rm7KOMnfrjjaPeZ0+VX?= =?us-ascii?Q?Pfidect4EdAVKPZIyENvs9W7H9TrxrVzQLK41m1Gq+KB74xdvoklr3nEyL25?= =?us-ascii?Q?VcYQnJiEx8q2lDO5CWQEXKbnYz/X+cOVtk3jBk0I8m/bcpI6cM2jvrOrbIHe?= =?us-ascii?Q?vC9xeT/19C8llyq8hn+fJc/OyFy6L4k6Qr1kEG+H1orE0qIV/3CGvG5UiAxt?= =?us-ascii?Q?YiZQ4UFHSMwVpGR9zYma+LhduDhYTNBke+R7i1v77+8clK9IGEOM7/jFbZpb?= =?us-ascii?Q?Fo+Pg7OKxHSLQvb2+N/5pPLr384hXzYZNta+ow2q2KwER1epv53zVbAA80Mg?= =?us-ascii?Q?FJ0/ShCwNE7B9ruMpGwaLDMO72vOLjTz4HmFpM8mM1q1b94Id2Q2RZGRXRuB?= =?us-ascii?Q?80KVniKQxhN8SPy2Y8oLNuYnzv13Y1ugFxPpC45kLL7/IBbfNqCsWjjRiHHg?= =?us-ascii?Q?aXkylxu5QCCjN+ugctAS7+XLKciiSYpoOrGBD67oCRoItyJRE5V+bJxnIwyS?= =?us-ascii?Q?FC9RbAzDYK+A+CyLPsmlupT02MzZt/lBodGjiLNgQwQp+Nz+IrdZ/vcyBDHz?= =?us-ascii?Q?nN1AexE/idulAKIBU23+XL4WXBWc+GkIu4/3rsgOrIV91TANbnZTRiVZMr4O?= =?us-ascii?Q?uEose/AFC9WVmTh7I65QnXwIS7DshZEzu6frQqdsgIrMh1xznoO5tqjc2aRN?= =?us-ascii?Q?jSADqAwSrfeBdZWIBf2ziJc6fObcu66hsANu4tqiOEQTNscvSwY3dTL+qurj?= =?us-ascii?Q?rsXYDzxvW45I1zR/50ZeEQbez0sFLM2oonXF7tRmWERetpYHouNvsK4rqTdH?= =?us-ascii?Q?1renbihJBhfBd99bGyINxT3nuq5K8etPEq7CMmaFHyrDHwDP9wsMwVu9RmGA?= =?us-ascii?Q?o8YPZgMiFtOFnErhLxsbEfQC2Qix43/VTkoE7zubt2V5eC+W40dhMQ2SWNsL?= =?us-ascii?Q?4Qn4hSIP2Uvrv5V5ixJIEu6xQmBoBAyGYxiTIUa59OWraN9uOuTzPQPWAQoB?= =?us-ascii?Q?DD2dVAPs0/f25fTvlnHT3ExMIppyJkoD7lufxb9AfWotjLlL+fr4vH3FLOFM?= =?us-ascii?Q?t0EPyWf2oPkvFvvaxJsLBCmWpMYxoJl/0J+vy1ZYPZlKwXFzCkh3PsHKLTqd?= =?us-ascii?Q?AFLpGQAzlFJqRQO43s/N7Ip2dx+zS4t37ojg56KqPhG8Ob50GmtlRxMQf/fB?= =?us-ascii?Q?N7UBIobVZQhyqGG2aLpzDBYW9EY6mujpW5ub1GQCKx2gQ1yV7ZbW+CiWuy9h?= =?us-ascii?Q?RtyISA2vJ57sxmnPVbnSu5hX?= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: oracle.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 12bbfef3-95f4-4fdf-d9de-08d911b7cf7e X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 May 2021 00:25:40.6255 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4e2c6054-71cb-48f1-bd6c-3a9705aca71b X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: WUZlsLzvP/87JbXmQvrWkO0yxMns8MAwaqc0kf56WkPXgDjBSVqSW/sgsdC23oQ1GYAObVUYDq5JdnpUHHiT+w== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN6PR10MB2639 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=9977 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104190000 definitions=main-2105080000 X-Proofpoint-GUID: B0rg4zm66HOsOxPvP5ieToitBqQUpyjg X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: B0rg4zm66HOsOxPvP5ieToitBqQUpyjg X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=9977 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104190000 definitions=main-2105080000 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 Cc: Bastien , Lars Ingebrigtsen , Boruch Baum , "48179@debbugs.gnu.org" <48179@debbugs.gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > >> It seems to me that all the bookmarks, bm, built-in (including > >> emacs-28), bookmark+, have disadvantages. Personally, I would use > >> bookmark+ if were not for the fact that it writes unprompted to > >> ~/.emacs. >=20 > > I don't know what you mean by that. Could you elaborate? >=20 > > 1. It never writes to ~/.emacs, unless you've defined that as the > > bookmark file you want to write to. >=20 > Well I can only say what I saw, and bookmark+ did indeed write to > custom-set-variables. It may be that something in ~/.emacs triggered it, > but I don't intend to pursue the matter further. (I mistakenly thought you meant that it writes your _bookmarks_ to your init file.) But I think I know what you might be referring to. And it's a good point. When your bookmarks are saved, if option `bmkp-last-as-first-bookmark-file' is non-nil then its value is updated to the current bookmark file. Likewise, when you load a bookmark file with overwriting (i.e. you switch bookmark files), if that option is non-nil then it's updated to reflect the new bookmark file. You can customize that option, but it's also updated when you save bookmarks or switch bookmark files. So it's a particular kind of user option. The doc string tells you about this unusual behavior (in the "NOTE" part): `bmkp-last-as-first-bookmark-file': Whether to use the last-used bookmark file as the first used. If nil then Emacs always uses the value of `bookmark-default-file' as the initial bookmark file, in any given session. If non-nil, Emacs uses the last bookmark file you used, in the=20 last Emacs session. If none was recorded then it uses `bookmark-default-file'. The particular non-nil value must be an absolute file name (possibly containing `~') - it is not expanded). NOTE: A non-nil option value is overwritten by Bookmark+, so that ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ it becomes the last-used bookmark file. A nil value is never overwritten. You can customize this variable. This is a feature (i.e., by design), not a bug. But if you customize it to nil then Bookmark+ should never update your init file with its new value. ___ [It's really unrelated, but I recommend using a separate `custom-file', and thus not letting Customize (or code like what I just mentioned) fiddle with your init file. Code written by code is better off relegated to a different file from one you write code in.] From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:32:30 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2021 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 05 21:35:12 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2021 01:35:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50353 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lphgz-0006mz-MF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 21:35:12 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f44.google.com ([209.85.166.44]:41888) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lpgif-0005OW-Mz for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 20:32:50 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f44.google.com with SMTP id p66so12638321iod.8 for ; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 17:32:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=wODeN2nbDMRnlWN25JFppHSbALzbxnxUNbns3IZmCno=; b=TvFZg9vqAb6FLzmYpOdWKv578LzdekJxep2x4ye4oLQuXUHmqul2stsRWsnbr6hn0w 3b3N9WFI8Ra1TOLFb6MN4YI6AT8QUizNstKnWbD1r5YJZsavZEu78oiCyPMJiG89IYqP ubBGrSnWb9GOJXYo2eUQ/2Nl4WQTRI/av9/m7bOPQVr3tZUZ5IQtb6ZNdeGr+DCnT8Lf L5lj9rd6AuXdSRiSM4q76pToagGxyLlVECvDaVQwIA4U6vCCytT+1jlZZr1ZOSvzaUgF vK37WqnvWJeFl0jxDXqxJUh0ztCjzKYMz56YtRIt7HW7IRKxvKm7BAw5B1tVq4RPEWAg NaBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=wODeN2nbDMRnlWN25JFppHSbALzbxnxUNbns3IZmCno=; b=lh2JW7QdIZG8E5YkCndtp9HOj69ImhLtalIklnUllSZdpHhPopjhtHDdIL7xpTJfS/ GfJSwErZxjFouuD5QBQzrNMwuvrr05oq1yJe9lv45glRhiyFgMzGsZJS4QZZZQxkNyi7 fVThgCCPjBThj6yuv45VSriNeJ9HU6mcXY9zWKxa9aLopPycSM+5FyC8RuiZRfVEbqQ2 zRRoCzDNlg8993/dSU9+6C33K4WuRdT4JpzZmyyXfK66I8xiq+F/gkbuOJzB2O+UeIzq m1R+mY8aa8g6SIYji+6Nf7mvDdg6mpxtbZYZ7FcQVdpcHNip2EV/WeuVvIZk8YP/h0zk jh4g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530uDO3I+Gr89W/q0S51qfjWCrFbXflfzP3pWWOD7FaGSJ73IKYD EL1mnmBv7/9eDw1F2d9HRNnoqD7vVyi2QSAWze+DoQPIJjpTlg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz5JIWClgD1fta7eZhyM2RfC10kWLbvsBtTG4AD0HWG0WHvi0VwpKZQ5TRq7rg/fCnnx7bSymtUTktuFRHm/EI= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8b97:: with SMTP id p23mr4546233iol.114.1622939564224; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 17:32:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Y. E." Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2021 03:32:08 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Unarchive 48179 To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 05 Jun 2021 21:35:09 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) unarchive 48179 # Trying to send a follow-up with suggestions. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 05 21:36:18 2021 Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2021 01:36:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50357 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lphi6-0006pE-54 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 21:36:18 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-f181.google.com ([209.85.166.181]:45690) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lpgdw-0005Gf-NM for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 20:27:58 -0400 Received: by mail-il1-f181.google.com with SMTP id b5so12679407ilc.12 for <48179@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 17:27:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=XQ59HAoAf3h5adIGWbninFXpVdTlmrxM7FywpObxYTE=; b=anSmGHePLSV8q9Gl5/yhN6kknNjEc4PJ555JVDNRSTOdG5wGi50d1JuYyBtiB+9Pgb Yq0UINOxJ5bRqYPoWuRDYctTkSVPTeT7ocOlBVVjKXunNwlvUp7VErdmad2iEXSVpQ1F jaSIZaReESBD6yxFcw9Gw9T7bpHCes30kwuXBAGYHGRnHTrQEyAGkb48RMpkQyX4ecOr NJ+AJFfJA2munKlhDZSEXbWCDGbwe4fmL0+XfBWAJ8QN8ByYAVIKu3bybIm4i88uG0+G jU1MlFKSwd1PLQaLvah0TkFWW0YPU+qmre2rPuLxL3o1kvKzP+SyQW4o3ij5IYKGdmuh rarA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=XQ59HAoAf3h5adIGWbninFXpVdTlmrxM7FywpObxYTE=; b=XLOpDGKjarVB8b3wfk/NUiO/0xDAAX7Vas+1JJQYR63USme+w6kQi+xuH1+2qMf6LH ar2rgWyNkIC5NptAQNnbVPjqJ8l6utrtfWeVhDvrvf1rlzd7C3BpvF5mn8QWBvKBXs3Q CTCfS74Fb3tWU1jL3CfcEopsVH+HP5ZNRpCvj31Z8zeLfUJFaxsI7C0Ddm8700Pc/MG3 PAutXbzvhvXH5msySep+jqKP0p1XsrfcqUBFg7aOcsG+YY84o/7WYEvsOq2evu7fAAv+ Gta1SyOEkPjcDcSMIoNsM6Nl2nvNVEb+x0T5DIYCIkl/ladvBVv3GoKtj5XtmAvbRKmb 8IXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533QHx/iAM19fdVfAzfhK2r3wjw2PTCRmEnE7Up3lkz/JSbkhD// 2qRGEnPQGBZ1KEL8iOa0VoFFU/ao52tIjhR2CeEv4eaK0mfbwg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxU0elOcw3KdrAHxzp6UL/JZf4rz2UG/W39Bfxwr1GlWKXqAfD4ePHkuzUjShsV6UlFFgGfFmMWRn8phGxltfA= X-Received: by 2002:a92:c78d:: with SMTP id c13mr9206420ilk.205.1622939271235; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 17:27:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Y. E." Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2021 03:27:15 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: bug#48179 bookmark-fontify disable by default To: 48179@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48179 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 05 Jun 2021 21:36:16 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) I _love_ the _idea_ behind the bookmark-fontify feature. Unfortunately, for me - not-a-pro-emacs-user - it appeared to be a source of confusion and frustration. Because of this, I suggest having it disabled by default, at least until its usability is improved. That would also be along the lines: > ... the current emacs policy is not to surprise anyone with new behavior The following are the issues I encountered: 1. When typing near the colored line, the color doesn't stay at the bookmarked line only, but spreads with the newly typed text. 2. It takes additional time and effort to understand why the line(s) is/are there. - According to my experience, bookmarks would appear as side information. - Supposedly, a mark on a fringe could potentially be a better choice. 3. A mark on a fringe would also allow fixing the issue of having a too bright default color (orange with misterioso-theme in my case grabs all the attention). Suggestions: 1. Disable bookmark-fontify by default 2. Probably not that easy to change, but maybe use fringe beside the line instead. 3. Maybe, as Bastien suggested: > ask the user to customize > bookmarks-fontify on the first C-x r m hit, so that he knows what's > in there for him. 4. Maybe to change default colors to something less bright. Thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 05 23:31:12 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2021 03:31:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50421 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lpjVH-0003ED-U7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 23:31:12 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:59096) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lpjVG-0003E5-59 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 23:31:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54698) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpjVF-0005iD-U0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 23:31:09 -0400 Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:35134) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpjVD-0001ti-PZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 23:31:09 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lpjVA-0008hf-F2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2021 05:31:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org From: Pankaj Jangid Subject: Re: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify disable by default Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 09:00:54 +0530 Message-ID: References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:EeGbMMDOim8G5Hyz8HMKCp1zvi4= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) > 2. Probably not that easy to change, but maybe use fringe beside the > line instead. Yes. I like this idea. For a glimpse may have a look at ‘cider’ package for Clojure. All the compiled forms have marks in the fringe. And if it is less intrusive, then we can keep it default-on. From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:32:30 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2021 11:24:11 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator