From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 02 16:42:39 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2021 20:42:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44620 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldIvH-0000Zp-7k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 16:42:39 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:59686) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldIvC-0000Zj-Jx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 16:42:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44218) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldIvC-0008Ce-CO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 16:42:34 -0400 Received: from mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2a]:39493) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldIvA-0006C4-Gx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 16:42:34 -0400 Received: by mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com with SMTP id n74so842017vkc.6 for ; Sun, 02 May 2021 13:42:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=lN47883geswu4IPX+xwnpQpkQTzwqLGweoVFdE9/Z4o=; b=RUWQw7zElf5JJ5cAXD62h5EBonM9GpUP9MkrPv/nBn4Ygfs8yBoUgIjpfFYDih0Gwz +sPO/2o2vxCbnIsNetBNsedsuDPyYLpWt+F80KpG0GoFqPt5Y3/pfNg1aQf1CbgUUZeT uavv7s0f6Ki7sKkjGZFLxNNwuAVOoVHtqrjxG8uYoI+rp6RqEpwHefZpzM9ylBezHZwz 0BKvUbPx0y3kpODT86SGCZacygbXPhjQA9EtwEmyC9bbvrmx9sqh+0+g8fXDVRc84art fCTn5WOdqLybJT5F3GLczKy8G5DlbzonIvCUtMlqG7YE2gtkx49rUvskSkzIVyUifHIs m52w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=lN47883geswu4IPX+xwnpQpkQTzwqLGweoVFdE9/Z4o=; b=iIQeGn3pJ0Joma36QUdq91zOINmxVmDbfZORN/OYMnY0T43QjOkEGy9pMQz9tu/5k5 06/1J/gZLhSFc8TUPZU/JJCo+t/rD1gEoCe6uwNTHxLmFm7r6y74EvqQFPB5SdFW2ufi Xg7eHKRzGHAKByoun6XJgXWcCM0GVGMzaD3Xdzq0EcFTvA35y9AEWAIiAK05pxfunvFS SQJLYfQ4x10pi614BEbIBv/NB6lZZkwndTzRIYU9KXXBEuP/VxWfYpbY6Qk3t4iCQbkj hEcZRnBuktrCU8Ves2xwjEz4pknDVsNn/l8PZWm/NA09UZEOhDWG6HUDh2wU6vMWpvaI 2hZg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530K6PeaoXZLnckP2KFkAc+eR/qFTgGB10KNb8JTVSBNGE4bt5kn ugaQrMgG0AMenOuZfqFY2Z6lGJ6Ho3lKXNOp2DRmfpCsESdTWg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwTzApqmsivp97EhMuX0+HMJhCJkEO15huVdg2NmaEtURJSq2rPbFIp4Euq7CO5BEs5vjxjrX2NBtx5y4khTcY= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:d283:: with SMTP id j125mr12667285vkg.9.1619988150588; Sun, 02 May 2021 13:42:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Radon Rosborough Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 13:41:54 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: next-line on large lines or images skips unexpectedly to next logical line To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2a; envelope-from=radon.neon@gmail.com; helo=mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hi all, I believe I've identified a bug in the implementation of `line-move-partial' which occurs with certain pixelwise vertical scroll positions. The bug is that (under certain circumstances) when using `next-line' on a long, visually-wrapped line, instead of moving to the next visual line, point moves to the next logical line. The "certain circumstances" are as follows: 1. Point is within a long logical line that is visually wrapped onto at least two visual lines (the visual line containing point, and at least one subsequent visual line). 2. The window line containing point is the bottom-most window line that is fully visible. 3. The next window line is partially visible, and the pixel height of the visible part of that line is less than the default line height (as returned by `default-line-height'). This bug can be reproduced in either release 27.2 or the latest development branch (83a915d3dfafd5f3d737afe1e13b75e4dd3aef96 of 2021-04-25). It does not require any configuration or third-party packages (emacs -Q). Because the default line height is fairly small (36px), it is difficult to set up the pixelwise vertical scroll position appropriately to trigger the bug, at least by default. Applying a face with an increased :height property and increasing the text scaling makes it easier, but I have confirmed that the bug reproduces even with the default font face, given precise enough positioning. I have uploaded a video demonstrating the behavior in the latest development version of Emacs: https://youtu.be/dYMjgLSbGNE I did some debugging in the course of identifying the conditions to reproduce the bug, and the problematic behavior seems to come down to something in the implementation of `line-move-partial'. There's a conditional check (<= this-ypos (- dlh)) in `line-move-partial' that gets triggered for certain combinations of window sizes and font heights, and the code gated behind this check appears to be buggy, resulting in the observed behavior. I would be happy to get input about whether others can reproduce this bug, and/or if you have ideas about the most appropriate way to fix or work around it. In case you're wondering how I ran into this issue: I am developing a music player for Emacs which displays albums in a grid view for selection, like iTunes. The implementation is to insert images via `make-image', all in a single logical line, with appropriate margin properties, and then let Emacs take care of the line-wrapping to form a grid. Unfortunately, images are essentially very tall lines, which makes it extremely easy to trigger this bug. The result is that when you use `next-line' at the bottom of the window, point gets moved all the way to the end of the buffer, which is no good. In case it's relevant, I'm running GNOME under Pop!_OS. Best, Radon Rosborough https://github.com/raxod502 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 03 13:02:36 2021 Received: (at 48170) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2021 17:02:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47546 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldbxr-0000ke-SU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 13:02:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38078) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldbxq-0000kX-15 for 48170@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 13:02:34 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57996) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldbxi-0007BX-KE; Mon, 03 May 2021 13:02:27 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3332 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ldbxZ-0008SK-Lm; Mon, 03 May 2021 13:02:19 -0400 Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 20:02:00 +0300 Message-Id: <8335v37nuf.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Radon Rosborough In-Reply-To: (message from Radon Rosborough on Sun, 2 May 2021 13:41:54 -0700) Subject: Re: bug#48170: next-line on large lines or images skips unexpectedly to next logical line References: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48170 Cc: 48170@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Radon Rosborough > Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 13:41:54 -0700 > > The bug is that (under certain circumstances) when using `next-line' > on a long, visually-wrapped line, instead of moving to the next visual > line, point moves to the next logical line. > > The "certain circumstances" are as follows: > 1. Point is within a long logical line that is visually wrapped onto > at least two visual lines (the visual line containing point, and at > least one subsequent visual line). > 2. The window line containing point is the bottom-most window line > that is fully visible. > 3. The next window line is partially visible, and the pixel height of > the visible part of that line is less than the default line height (as > returned by `default-line-height'). Thanks. Preliminary analysis indicates that this use case was never supported, since line-move-visual was introduced in Emacs 23. This is somewhat tricky to debug (and %$#@! Edebug doesn't help), so stay tuned. > I did some debugging in the course of identifying the conditions to > reproduce the bug, and the problematic behavior seems to come down to > something in the implementation of `line-move-partial'. There's a > conditional check (<= this-ypos (- dlh)) in `line-move-partial' that > gets triggered for certain combinations of window sizes and font > heights, and the code gated behind this check appears to be buggy, > resulting in the observed behavior. In my testing this part is never executed. And it shouldn't be, because it handles the case where the window is vscrolled and the current line starts above the top of the window. Which is not the case here, at least not with the default frame size and window that is not too small. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 03 13:18:10 2021 Received: (at 48170) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2021 17:18:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47647 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldcCw-00036T-4B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 13:18:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41702) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldcCu-00036L-HX for 48170@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 13:18:08 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58286) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldcCp-0006ZT-Ar; Mon, 03 May 2021 13:18:03 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4504 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ldcCn-00035n-M5; Mon, 03 May 2021 13:18:02 -0400 Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 20:17:44 +0300 Message-Id: <831ran7n47.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: radon.neon@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <8335v37nuf.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 03 May 2021 20:02:00 +0300) Subject: Re: bug#48170: next-line on large lines or images skips unexpectedly to next logical line References: <8335v37nuf.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48170 Cc: 48170@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 20:02:00 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 48170@debbugs.gnu.org > > Thanks. Preliminary analysis indicates that this use case was never > supported, since line-move-visual was introduced in Emacs 23. > > This is somewhat tricky to debug (and %$#@! Edebug doesn't help), so > stay tuned. I have an idea for a solution, but to test it, I'd like to have a test case with images, as in your original use case. Could you please prepare a simple test case that uses small images in a continued line, and post it here? TIA. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 09 13:40:52 2021 Received: (at 48170) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 May 2021 17:40:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56501 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lfnQB-0006io-Rs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2021 13:40:52 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-f43.google.com ([209.85.217.43]:39719) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lfnQ8-0006ii-NQ for 48170@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2021 13:40:50 -0400 Received: by mail-vs1-f43.google.com with SMTP id v188so7260625vsb.6 for <48170@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 09 May 2021 10:40:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vH/DdbMSoK8wuSeNHRo+Sql+ErSY2kAwb5v8kU7TtGs=; b=WwlByBUe/60D6PPSc/zX4ItjUWdkCOdVwP/YNOhWAeofjrDQlnPn4uTLnuMA9+9ZCR WNM/9vd1Hyik+gpuVfn2CVYMt8QDrXl4cTrp0jfnooYRExHuLf3LyniHSlsF2rlGXNqv e4d0yxkJsTHZJQvCNF6MtUMBdnc/IrS0vMhM14xFLaUhd0MBf3uiEkfnqaGgRFjQTN5E o8LdOOP8d17zf8mT/mgtd9wzbMiNERVmhI6cCabwNu4nVnicu1YD7cQ6fP+FeqSD5u43 n6A+aGj3JHA34JalJwT4qcjYdk97J7kzgnjrbF40wa8Nyvy4r+99dC0/8unoa6GncnbO /w7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vH/DdbMSoK8wuSeNHRo+Sql+ErSY2kAwb5v8kU7TtGs=; b=aiJqA88eaDdoiFTFI1OQ3ThG2WCuCJ7hJ94LBSyTZlcd6QXbzFZXXuXnbaUnZFbkv0 PDF+/bmSFndacVaVawtafxYOdtXTlp4uAT9md54IJbKW3xYJ9wGXjar7cpCto2hITtj6 t5WZIBvIsanuNu/6GTp6VKpyGuMZ8vy1UOgw7DKJVYGQTvIxP86Z9ONP3HgMfaajKqKf OhRHQ55PsS/PLnUbJZts0DcsuSDGgWgmKe6ZdymiJk3pIui1CRJOg9H9SFcAuzpPP0v2 uRkGCjarSqdpZQUcyl9OekqOs96od4YVCH2mE/MdixCxr6CC+E+MPsGAqiMO5Y/gOOxw qYLw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532HlkxYeoJoWWzMBcyPN2nX0/1vrZZtecUsA3fFbGZf7ahw4XIF oS4zTlj429nk8fuqE+VG4v7v/MlK2IJCMwNX6AFbS3UPPGtRUA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw1LX3w0JnyFs3aHhYEhhga+r9eZ9gYuySNkSkGl6aSHV34ZITOcRrzQ6v6pMCCubP30C+mP5641NN1ygHAFdA= X-Received: by 2002:a67:c401:: with SMTP id c1mr16801466vsk.51.1620582043236; Sun, 09 May 2021 10:40:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8335v37nuf.fsf@gnu.org> <831ran7n47.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <831ran7n47.fsf@gnu.org> From: Radon Rosborough Date: Sun, 9 May 2021 10:40:07 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#48170: next-line on large lines or images skips unexpectedly to next logical line To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000043c2905c1e92958" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48170 Cc: 48170@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --000000000000043c2905c1e92958 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sure thing: you should be able to reproduce the issue simply by cloning https://github.com/raxod502/bug48170-repro.git and evaluating the form in code.el. --000000000000043c2905c1e92958 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sure thing: you should be able to reproduce the issue simp= ly by cloning=C2=A0https://github.com/raxod502/bug48170-repro.git and evaluating the fo= rm in code.el.
--000000000000043c2905c1e92958-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 13 09:14:01 2021 Received: (at 48170) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2021 13:14:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41652 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhBA9-00009d-O8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 May 2021 09:14:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60732) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhBA7-00009B-Qv for 48170@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 May 2021 09:14:00 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42692) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhBA2-0006iv-Li; Thu, 13 May 2021 09:13:54 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2320 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lhB9y-0007Kn-FB; Thu, 13 May 2021 09:13:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 16:14:00 +0300 Message-Id: <83bl9e22uf.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Radon Rosborough In-Reply-To: (message from Radon Rosborough on Sun, 9 May 2021 10:40:07 -0700) Subject: Re: bug#48170: next-line on large lines or images skips unexpectedly to next logical line References: <8335v37nuf.fsf@gnu.org> <831ran7n47.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48170 Cc: 48170@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Radon Rosborough > Date: Sun, 9 May 2021 10:40:07 -0700 > Cc: 48170@debbugs.gnu.org > > Sure thing: you should be able to reproduce the issue simply by cloning > https://github.com/raxod502/bug48170-repro.git and evaluating the form in code.el. Thanks. Please try the latest master branch, I hope I fixed this. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 13 09:23:21 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2021 13:23:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41705 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhBJB-0000R5-Na for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 May 2021 09:23:21 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:42872) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lhBJ8-0000Qr-OF for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 May 2021 09:23:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=URCxlXFErSBT0ciwaVuKip513fTuZWEk8t3wxezLhUw=; b=Su0tMphOahzAEF01ovQPqZQTmU L7Pmr0IWIZf5gF0pKjbMOL9FfO/ZDzI/hCAmkhwQUrPibVA/blOvGRFaE53yBy4AC+SlSNmUlDUPI LcTCNYgfy/JnZtefEGgL7mYtucNyOQIXPPWCItuYuMIKA3XIPy3bmnNRmHDJXGIeq+EI=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lhBJ1-0005k4-CM for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 May 2021 15:23:13 +0200 Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 15:23:10 +0200 Message-Id: <877dk2oji9.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #48170 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 48170 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 48170 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 15 19:35:35 2021 Received: (at 48170) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2021 23:35:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49411 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1li3ol-0003FK-Cq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 May 2021 19:35:35 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-f47.google.com ([209.85.217.47]:43940) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1li3ok-0003F8-KY for 48170@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 May 2021 19:35:34 -0400 Received: by mail-vs1-f47.google.com with SMTP id m17so1348646vsn.10 for <48170@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 15 May 2021 16:35:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=U7G0C6mBIneXcwMEGeBZbhnzKrfY9W5WsDAvxdRebJk=; b=I0LgF/be9eyvx3dqHK74Shtechd6Z+BTKXOUvJUmaiBgnR1gM4KvXCK3GGGLGpM0zd dzyBcibnkzEUelqgJVOQYea72a4o6cARN+sMQBPKtiwv2xEwFzSNAVM7Xb4dLElYBwCW aeW8SJyKDXt/XZZ2Bdby6iTKAeke72knUddh1YgtaqRH1Ppw1HEelce0ZvOV1A2v3dTI eCX2Y+FC81kG6Pt3doY4UjsiGwO0AAw9F5EQqWcoUHjZ93Qk2j+0GNR6xFcFSq5APxXk H9t2N8io05p+gQ1iyuvWB2Tmn7idVxV7aMKfxkR5V4ebcP25I1DEAE7Z3HM+lqj+A4yF nQjw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=U7G0C6mBIneXcwMEGeBZbhnzKrfY9W5WsDAvxdRebJk=; b=tdw3KTlGF/FAkxDoOgwdGozcpoJ2oouoKvB08HyJMKPHMX3WWd4De+Tvf305mZbgLK 296mqNU8IiHvV/ZhxHXzP9YuJcnwa+NMExNzhVKOEesYyOCVRt7t14jmCjhKi70m2ToH tW+x5STiKDQZEMdvUvf9o1TBd3JX4BPoNnv6JBAYI/psEqOMhiwZn71CDPFqRXC4L7vZ 06x54OHVBdFdOha628ogOJUaRdsQgBaGFmuIKq8+8l2k2ehoUzns6NzdtrMeMGI+7540 DT+wEpBXMnCtjYxQS43x0B5OUnVZ/a59VTR1A0AOen1ILnT4BvItzqrWU0iPy6Wo+KkN rBOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533wD6/uZoH1z/EXQABcTAdp/a+8+7NisYb8LXHQmSYpb9fqfTe1 4cn6uDtjJhzPqnAGOoq7JgwRr1uH1C3eddQIfk4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy5XJLCzPei60MWUO7e2+mKLYCXRfCOPTQJHRuC4EAe9U32g1P5ifc6JtS61AMfyir0uy7y5VeXcvN1L6JvJ70= X-Received: by 2002:a67:fb94:: with SMTP id n20mr11701561vsr.11.1621121729087; Sat, 15 May 2021 16:35:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8335v37nuf.fsf@gnu.org> <831ran7n47.fsf@gnu.org> <83bl9e22uf.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83bl9e22uf.fsf@gnu.org> From: Radon Rosborough Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 16:34:53 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#48170: next-line on large lines or images skips unexpectedly to next logical line To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48170 Cc: 48170@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) > Please try the latest master branch, I hope I fixed this. It sure looks fixed to me. Thanks so much, Eli! From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 16 00:15:26 2021 Received: (at 48170-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2021 04:15:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49502 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1li8Ba-0003Xl-6T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 00:15:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59946) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1li8BX-0003XX-Q1 for 48170-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 00:15:24 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1li8BS-0002Yi-Jt; Sun, 16 May 2021 00:15:18 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2352 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1li8BR-0000OF-L4; Sun, 16 May 2021 00:15:18 -0400 Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 07:15:18 +0300 Message-Id: <837djzwbzd.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Radon Rosborough In-Reply-To: (message from Radon Rosborough on Sat, 15 May 2021 16:34:53 -0700) Subject: Re: bug#48170: next-line on large lines or images skips unexpectedly to next logical line References: <8335v37nuf.fsf@gnu.org> <831ran7n47.fsf@gnu.org> <83bl9e22uf.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48170-done Cc: 48170-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Radon Rosborough > Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 16:34:53 -0700 > Cc: 48170@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Please try the latest master branch, I hope I fixed this. > > It sure looks fixed to me. Thanks so much, Eli! Thanks for testing, I'm therefore closing this bug report. From unknown Sat Aug 09 15:54:56 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 11:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator