From unknown Sun Aug 17 09:10:44 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#48133 <48133@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#48133 <48133@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 28.0.50; [native-comp] time-to-days throws wrong-number-of-arguments error Reply-To: bug#48133 <48133@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2025 16:10:44 +0000 retitle 48133 28.0.50; [native-comp] time-to-days throws wrong-number-of-ar= guments error reassign 48133 emacs submitter 48133 Ihor Radchenko severity 48133 normal tag 48133 fixed thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Apr 30 21:43:16 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2021 01:43:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60110 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcef6-0000S8-IW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 21:43:16 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:45078) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcef5-0000S1-Fl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 21:43:15 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49586) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcef5-0002Rp-7Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 21:43:15 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]:45880) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcef3-0004jj-EF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 21:43:14 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id d10so12199069pgf.12 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 18:43:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=M0SGESD6y7wjnZJRB5u8woJx0Z4ciFBBYEdAd2sCO5U=; b=VN1SKpILP/FFjzTERkj8HsK48lF1FEkAZqbiga6mgutpb2knGO48dmRWTQFj46syAz TZqGlWdUTWnzeEBuP6UiXUXZnuywc7IleHMBcVzpE+fW0YoVMcx8WYtZgm0ElInYSIp1 FSvaZ2Lr+cGsr+WebF6jwJSUYeBMYOFGZILPgRG51vKHEaT32lkF45/F9iNeIaQ20LH+ OYVMOtZpgm5pTWpGtzCXzatxfuDVf538dUXVQ3jj8QbNK4qPGL2/N/IQyi4TfAHa77Mk RIispqh0qDpaVNXvd5l8FagQFHVW/9YtC5FEpe42+18f3Ai4Ws7vjpQ2y/7GSYnxbDT3 fc8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=M0SGESD6y7wjnZJRB5u8woJx0Z4ciFBBYEdAd2sCO5U=; b=MWYFnNKPiP+zDb7YqOMn9pcqy/LCiqzXQGCS6Tj9pTKyirxy2ZTxRiQmK15P+JOArw 5PM3d0tK2itmveJ0xzUnbvNOfmIsFMTwXYrITbZVwxm0iaajCpOjhtFq7ve2dwGgzgvv 2dXD4h1HvOFxn/eZmJ/s8yQQW+ch6UDKLZWU5VF9EfeiHXY4D65AuY5tuqa07mzjHKRV +t+eM0EwOGsYo+GVY/UBu3yovIdi+/5mb7itGkz/PLcYFOr9tN0SdGzyfoQfnVBztKm+ 9IOkju167m2zoKWmTkza+6u9V+H4Lb1yGEn1BK/RtxZWSoTNqioobc8wTXDxvWDLIEAo fPoA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532yt6Le/YTTvrvcxZhz0BsFxWnct2Mt4CkxpVWYK5F/ZxE9Txor nQi1BtYZuGycbdA7ETP5Aerfj1yij9IT1SqUEAU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwC1yIzJbJlK9XyfAgW8p4tF9FBcvkLi05YXNaHFkOg75TjBhsD4+DrApE/UDAIH2ctvRo6lQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:ee0f:: with SMTP id e15mr7295690pgi.310.1619833390850; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 18:43:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([104.250.131.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j189sm3269174pfd.21.2021.04.30.18.43.09 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 30 Apr 2021 18:43:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Ihor Radchenko To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 28.0.50; [native-comp] time-to-days throws wrong-number-of-arguments error Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 09:47:35 +0800 Message-ID: <875z03mdhk.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::529; envelope-from=yantar92@gmail.com; helo=mail-pg1-x529.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) I just got the following error trying to run native-compiled time-to-days: Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-number-of-arguments (lambda (&optional time) (funcall # (or time G167))) 3) (decode-time (22352 22528) nil nil) (time-to-days (22352 22528)) Re-evaluating defun of time-to-days fixes the error. Best, Ihor In GNU Emacs 28.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, cairo version 1.16.0) of 2021-04-30 built on localhost Repository revision: fa65c044f2ebe666467166075c1507a8d0e1347f Repository branch: feature/native-comp Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12011000 System Description: Gentoo/Linux Configured using: 'configure --prefix=/usr --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --datadir=/usr/share --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var/lib --disable-silent-rules --docdir=/usr/share/doc/emacs-28.0.9999 --htmldir=/usr/share/doc/emacs-28.0.9999/html --libdir=/usr/lib64 --program-suffix=-emacs-28-vcs --includedir=/usr/include/emacs-28-vcs --infodir=/usr/share/info/emacs-28-vcs --localstatedir=/var --enable-locallisppath=/etc/emacs:/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp --without-compress-install --without-hesiod --without-pop --with-file-notification=inotify --with-pdumper --enable-acl --with-dbus --with-modules --without-gameuser --with-libgmp --without-gpm --with-json --without-kerberos --without-kerberos5 --without-lcms2 --with-xml2 --without-mailutils --with-native-compilation --with-selinux --with-gnutls --without-libsystemd --with-threads --with-wide-int --with-zlib --with-sound=oss --with-x --without-ns --without-gconf --without-gsettings --without-toolkit-scroll-bars --with-gif --with-jpeg --with-png --with-rsvg --with-tiff --with-xpm --with-imagemagick --with-xft --with-cairo --with-harfbuzz --without-libotf --without-m17n-flt --with-x-toolkit=no --with-dumping=pdumper 'CFLAGS=-march=native -pipe -O2' CPPFLAGS= 'LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed'' Configured features: ACL CAIRO DBUS FREETYPE GIF GLIB GMP GNUTLS HARFBUZZ IMAGEMAGICK JPEG JSON LIBSELINUX LIBXML2 MODULES NATIVE_COMP NOTIFY INOTIFY OLDXMENU PDUMPER PNG RSVG SECCOMP SOUND THREADS TIFF X11 XDBE XIM XPM ZLIB Important settings: value of $LC_COLLATE: C value of $LANG: en_US.utf8 locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix Major mode: ELisp/l Memory information: ((conses 16 2803364 652253) (symbols 48 82982 8) (strings 32 394883 248801) (string-bytes 1 13653046) (vectors 16 187919) (vector-slots 8 4341859 573177) (floats 8 17548 3388) (intervals 56 124000 2648) (buffers 992 103)) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 01 02:33:21 2021 Received: (at 48133) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2021 06:33:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60177 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcjBp-0001We-CZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 02:33:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41718) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcjBn-0001WN-AW for 48133@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 02:33:19 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40167) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcjBi-00072a-3P; Sat, 01 May 2021 02:33:14 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4607 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lcjBg-0001vG-VN; Sat, 01 May 2021 02:33:13 -0400 Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 09:33:09 +0300 Message-Id: <83lf8z9d5m.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Ihor Radchenko In-Reply-To: <875z03mdhk.fsf@localhost> (message from Ihor Radchenko on Sat, 01 May 2021 09:47:35 +0800) Subject: Re: bug#48133: 28.0.50; [native-comp] time-to-days throws wrong-number-of-arguments error References: <875z03mdhk.fsf@localhost> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48133 Cc: 48133@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Ihor Radchenko > Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 09:47:35 +0800 > > I just got the following error trying to run native-compiled time-to-days: > > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-number-of-arguments (lambda (&optional time) (funcall # (or time G167))) 3) > (decode-time (22352 22528) nil nil) > (time-to-days (22352 22528)) I cannot reproduce this. When was your time-date.el natively-compiled? What happens if you delete the .eln file and recompile it? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 01 03:07:20 2021 Received: (at 48133) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2021 07:07:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60196 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcjih-0002Nz-NI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 03:07:20 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f179.google.com ([209.85.208.179]:46620) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcjig-0002Nl-3Y for 48133@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 03:07:18 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f179.google.com with SMTP id u20so772037lja.13 for <48133@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 01 May 2021 00:07:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:cc:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=b3H9wL6/jQSpWr9LyhIHduTrWo2CA2lhMEu0ana9euI=; b=WSpDOtmROtaYtCNQE5Drhd2MOvysmB8JA9bZMBaRVNfw9kj6GPuTJ8UY+LfSUjU3Bd rTY3AlxXb9YYJPeprLwInonLr45NPJsiibhpN1ZxJ+lMvLaOL9FP71tLv+78v6ucmtx2 aEp/7QOS8TybPR7fSfLh6e8Cy5D6U0FbE/2LF4d2kpNodSHJ0jKdkypEAzhET2eNzyWt 8HQIkj3/yUYZ26PqRtiGkXa9LcyZCCj8BtkNbyCxuiAFUxGj5NpQgPh+y1Uv0kuo35bq FBzae0TGRjORnQo5LUhAIAGWlZWDEOom2idDDvGM0CqrTGXtOfLsbnDFrKxC6qF7nbcg 3/gw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:cc:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=b3H9wL6/jQSpWr9LyhIHduTrWo2CA2lhMEu0ana9euI=; b=EiHEYYmnqkPRKN/sX900XU5PEb58tKbI2xVRaw3/HGv5pzbPU8q5EKhDEhbgyfTAdJ OojCFitv8rxk6ijCcxGF8a3I+10fZ0mBMJpJqK9XM3G0MKDTrT/u2NDMYv0xCenwQPym 3GDHtN2Bld42esQ5eOtvZtJX6glbLw1CwQIkb6hUFTe29IzUGnd3i4c587vtMOgmFB3W sOgXwi8jbVsoOb7h5wDVnHa3jV9moaU/LT5aSWTrEBDzT4r6p+X6xqU/0RDZ/zOzzmPQ e5Kz3Wm92u/Z8C09xu14snZU2cnyqkXGsw2gpjxPv1K3X9SextPoSF2O3rmYJjBb92bd EETQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530JlQ8OQA10KqrraeST9Cc5oUOcq5uWcU25WIvyF7dOo3GCchDv kRs2afiMjYHhJ45Ic2xXRlc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQBAASbxCPSlTmTL5ajA1hTSkJf6boRiy69kQcOGz9HoFasy5t/yV5JGgYUnIjUMjFsCAb8Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:211e:: with SMTP id a30mr6459505ljq.18.1619852832098; Sat, 01 May 2021 00:07:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([141.105.67.194]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f25sm496890lfj.163.2021.05.01.00.07.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 01 May 2021 00:07:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#48133: 28.0.50; [native-comp] time-to-days throws wrong-number-of-arguments error In-Reply-To: <83lf8z9d5m.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875z03mdhk.fsf@localhost> <83lf8z9d5m.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 15:11:36 +0800 Message-ID: <87y2czx713.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48133 Cc: 48133@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) Eli Zaretskii writes: > I cannot reproduce this. When was your time-date.el > natively-compiled? It was compiled during emacs installation (I am on Gentoo): /usr/lib64/emacs/28.0.50/native-lisp/28.0.50-7ff4cc51: -rw-r--r--. 1 46K May 1 11:19 time-date-40951a48-0eafe94e.eln I am not sure if it is important, but the problem appears in one of org-mode tests. I just ran =make test= on current Org mode master. > What happens if you delete the .eln file and > recompile it? I deleted the file and restarted emacs -Q. The new eln file is in /home/yantar92/.emacs.d/eln-cache/28.0.50-7ff4cc51: -rwxr-xr-x. 1 59K May 1 14:58 time-date-40951a48-0eafe94e.eln The problem persist. I also tried to delete all the org eln files in my local .emacs.d as well as system-wide eln files generated during Emacs installation. It did not help. The full backtrace: decode-time((22352 22528) nil nil) time-to-days((22352 22528)) org-time-stamp-to-now("2016-06-03 Fri") org-deadline-close-p("2016-06-03 Fri" 0) apply(org-deadline-close-p ("2016-06-03 Fri" 0)) (setq value-13032 (apply fn-13030 args-13031)) (unwind-protect (setq value-13032 (apply fn-13030 args-13031)) (setq (if (unwind-protect (setq value-13032 (apply fn-13030 args-13031)) ( (let (form-description-13034) (if (unwind-protect (setq value-13032 (let ((value-13032 'ert-form-evaluation-aborted-13033)) (let (form-d (let* ((fn-13030 #'org-deadline-close-p) (args-13031 (condition-case (progn (org-mode) (let ((point (string-match "" inside-text)) (unwind-protect (progn (org-mode) (let ((point (string-match ") id 1lckSn-0003g0-0M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 03:54:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54356) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lckSj-0003fk-7L for 48133@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 03:54:55 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40571) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lckSd-0001f9-Sk; Sat, 01 May 2021 03:54:47 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1858 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lckSc-0007gV-Qs; Sat, 01 May 2021 03:54:47 -0400 Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 10:54:40 +0300 Message-Id: <83k0oiany7.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Ihor Radchenko In-Reply-To: <87y2czx713.fsf@localhost> (message from Ihor Radchenko on Sat, 01 May 2021 15:11:36 +0800) Subject: Re: bug#48133: 28.0.50; [native-comp] time-to-days throws wrong-number-of-arguments error References: <875z03mdhk.fsf@localhost> <83lf8z9d5m.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2czx713.fsf@localhost> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48133 Cc: 48133@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Ihor Radchenko > CC: 48133@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 15:11:36 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I cannot reproduce this. When was your time-date.el > > natively-compiled? > > It was compiled during emacs installation (I am on Gentoo): > > /usr/lib64/emacs/28.0.50/native-lisp/28.0.50-7ff4cc51: > -rw-r--r--. 1 46K May 1 11:19 time-date-40951a48-0eafe94e.eln > > I am not sure if it is important, but the problem appears in one of > org-mode tests. I just ran =make test= on current Org mode master. So maybe the problem is not in time-date.el, maybe it's elsewhere? Can you show the exact code of the test that fails and how to run it? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 01 04:18:15 2021 Received: (at 48133) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2021 08:18:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60233 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lckpL-0004GM-5m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 04:18:15 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f47.google.com ([209.85.208.47]:36684) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lckpK-0004G9-4p for 48133@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 04:18:14 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f47.google.com with SMTP id q6so720477edr.3 for <48133@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 01 May 2021 01:18:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:cc:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=98b8RBtOMwuy81bc7sHDJReSVYGY6bx3efo95QSdP6M=; b=ZD3YRWtrERmdFKkuDCqoUzSEnH661llz5JCXvbuOT+WuU382oAy0hQrTeFNyt1Z5b5 6DQMBldKBIuZSkFxxslByOEIJfZMe1NfwPLuJUekpKCfo5FTM7PqRERQt3fq1tzyIIdo lt8dl2f9PGxQvPOYTbo4EjIUOI2oFPgd+S1o62Wi70CQFyA2TjNwLBE0OW1fZCPuX9Nu Ceu4cSmyQ1lxinrZBMKtkp7h6i1CgtAPFfMLnCppajbai5DZj7no44fs04QwkeRn9RLq 0xXGQhrB8MazwLrPfWyklvizZw3DkTPIptGa8EtWmsPLXNDER6N4jq+9Sp5QKxlD2aIp XAMg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:cc:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=98b8RBtOMwuy81bc7sHDJReSVYGY6bx3efo95QSdP6M=; b=rB9E6uFZ9qn2WczmVAKG6uRvoZAY9bfR18KhIBsd3JuR4UKBbpAszShu0xv9wiMjQj u7/8iHMZC/jTAAydJF16bFfw9PUQbC9+d4uhziF2hSCseC1lgQwjQ8QX1oUgNCDmgfhU a9W9Atn6teGFv2bL22eAB0L8w1dOUfvbEf4LjqaNGVNWU2kTFZyoKLG6qQawCBdRKTbS 5TsXxhGwy610fQQabv+BojodgiIei+jPNoP2BrOPJ/4QrNchJHZMI4vZVcuAJKTT+gGI nGojFyH8lBLOKcwcDZoUp7Cax5jD/7m7IIv2huU4P8htcTJZhMvNqWx7Zemzu8Blp+yS 1t6A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530AObtTncHQA1BWFH7qlpQv2t2wqOLmgbMiYcoZc4h2CnjyLelh rcBkhlfv/67bDqrIxr0666s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzjhdodH87QjcXVNoKV5dfVsBvbpLUa+xucgM4G4bGKiPeDAfqX/ZI7nGvx7GTwM0D45Qb72g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:4a:: with SMTP id f10mr10191787edu.85.1619857088473; Sat, 01 May 2021 01:18:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([141.105.67.194]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r15sm270537edp.62.2021.05.01.01.18.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 01 May 2021 01:18:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#48133: 28.0.50; [native-comp] time-to-days throws wrong-number-of-arguments error In-Reply-To: <83k0oiany7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875z03mdhk.fsf@localhost> <83lf8z9d5m.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2czx713.fsf@localhost> <83k0oiany7.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 16:22:32 +0800 Message-ID: <87pmyayibb.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48133 Cc: 48133@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) Eli Zaretskii writes: > So maybe the problem is not in time-date.el, maybe it's elsewhere? > Can you show the exact code of the test that fails and how to run it? I run it by cloning Org mode repo from https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode.git and running =make test= The failing test is test-org/deadline-close-p failing at the first should assertion: (ert-deftest test-org/deadline-close-p () "Test `org-deadline-close-p' specifications." (org-test-at-time "2016-06-03 Fri 01:43" ;; Timestamps are close if they are within `ndays' of lead time. (org-test-with-temp-text "* Heading" (should (org-deadline-close-p "2016-06-03 Fri" 0)) (should (org-deadline-close-p "2016-06-02 Thu" 0)) (should-not (org-deadline-close-p "2016-06-04 Sat" 0)) (should (org-deadline-close-p "2016-06-04 Sat" 1)) (should (org-deadline-close-p "2016-06-03 Fri 12:00" 0))) ;; Read `ndays' from timestamp if argument not given. (org-test-with-temp-text "* H" (should (org-deadline-close-p "2016-06-04 Sat -1d")) (should-not (org-deadline-close-p "2016-06-04 Sat -0d")) (should (org-deadline-close-p "2016-06-10 Fri -1w")) (should-not (org-deadline-close-p "2016-06-11 Sat -1w"))) ;; Prefer `ndays' argument over lead time in timestamp. (org-test-with-temp-text "* H" (should (org-deadline-close-p "2016-06-04 Sat -0d" 1)) (should-not (org-deadline-close-p "2016-06-04 Sat -0d" 0))) ;; Completed tasks are never close. (let ((org-todo-keywords '(("TODO" "|" "DONE")))) (org-test-with-temp-text "* TODO Heading" (should (org-deadline-close-p "2016-06-03"))) (org-test-with-temp-text "* DONE Heading" (should-not (org-deadline-close-p "2016-06-03")))))) org-deadline-close-p code: (defun org-deadline-close-p (timestamp-string &optional ndays) "Is the time in TIMESTAMP-STRING close to the current date?" (setq ndays (or ndays (org-get-wdays timestamp-string))) (and (<= (org-time-stamp-to-now timestamp-string) ndays) (not (org-entry-is-done-p)))) org-time-stamp-to-now: (defun org-time-stamp-to-now (timestamp-string &optional seconds) "Difference between TIMESTAMP-STRING and now in days. If SECONDS is non-nil, return the difference in seconds." (let ((fdiff (if seconds #'float-time #'time-to-days))) (- (funcall fdiff (org-time-string-to-time timestamp-string)) (funcall fdiff nil)))) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 01 04:27:20 2021 Received: (at 48133) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2021 08:27:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60241 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcky8-0004U0-BZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 04:27:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59180) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcky6-0004Ti-Dp for 48133@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 04:27:18 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40965) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcky1-000140-5N; Sat, 01 May 2021 04:27:13 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3873 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lckxz-0007ew-Un; Sat, 01 May 2021 04:27:12 -0400 Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 11:27:08 +0300 Message-Id: <83eeeqamg3.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Ihor Radchenko , Andrea Corallo In-Reply-To: <87pmyayibb.fsf@localhost> (message from Ihor Radchenko on Sat, 01 May 2021 16:22:32 +0800) Subject: Re: bug#48133: 28.0.50; [native-comp] time-to-days throws wrong-number-of-arguments error References: <875z03mdhk.fsf@localhost> <83lf8z9d5m.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2czx713.fsf@localhost> <83k0oiany7.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmyayibb.fsf@localhost> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48133 Cc: 48133@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Ihor Radchenko > CC: 48133@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 16:22:32 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > So maybe the problem is not in time-date.el, maybe it's elsewhere? > > Can you show the exact code of the test that fails and how to run it? > > I run it by cloning Org mode repo from > https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode.git > and running =make test= > > The failing test is test-org/deadline-close-p failing at the first > should assertion: Thanks, I hope Andrea will be able to look into this soon. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat May 01 15:35:58 2021 Received: (at 48133) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2021 19:35:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38022 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcvPC-0004rJ-Fb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 15:35:58 -0400 Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:51631) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcvPA-0004rA-4r for 48133@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 May 2021 15:35:56 -0400 Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 141JZs0U027960 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sat, 1 May 2021 19:35:55 GMT From: Andrea Corallo To: Ihor Radchenko Subject: Re: bug#48133: 28.0.50; [native-comp] time-to-days throws wrong-number-of-arguments error References: <875z03mdhk.fsf@localhost> <83lf8z9d5m.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2czx713.fsf@localhost> <83k0oiany7.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmyayibb.fsf@localhost> Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 19:35:54 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87pmyayibb.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Sat, 01 May 2021 16:22:32 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48133 Cc: 48133@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Ihor Radchenko writes: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> So maybe the problem is not in time-date.el, maybe it's elsewhere? >> Can you show the exact code of the test that fails and how to run it? > > I run it by cloning Org mode repo from > https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode.git > and running =make test= Just to confirm I can reproduce this. Will look into it. Andrea From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 02 03:18:59 2021 Received: (at 48133) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2021 07:18:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41075 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ld6NW-0007Jd-UZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 03:18:59 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:54898) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ld6NU-0007JX-G6 for 48133@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 03:18:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=vygU4k9NmlcjN9Uyl75GA71wjVhvfyg8G+BP1NFtEmM=; b=ET6IrDgMQ5e2zRmYR9E19i+PCn gVEQE5PgP9xhwxqdk3UlAnXnV/0376triwgCTx83zXXtSuOziLeWyVgzYMnlAdE5PDdwUh2HDMbyZ HCBTn9LNbHz/Xi9D5+aiu8vajg6ZoWEiHhvHccxas2KZZENsecOq86/zswCK32HjIX2Y=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ld6NM-0003kR-AS; Sun, 02 May 2021 09:18:50 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Ihor Radchenko Subject: Re: bug#48133: 28.0.50; [native-comp] time-to-days throws wrong-number-of-arguments error References: <875z03mdhk.fsf@localhost> X-Now-Playing: CFCF's _That We Can Play_: "It Was Never Meant To Be This Way (Games Remix)" Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 09:18:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: <875z03mdhk.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Sat, 01 May 2021 09:47:35 +0800") Message-ID: <877dkhli20.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Ihor Radchenko writes: > I just got the following error trying to run native-compiled time-to-days: > > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-number-of-arguments (lambda (&optional time) (funcall # (or time [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48133 Cc: 48133@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Ihor Radchenko writes: > I just got the following error trying to run native-compiled time-to-days: > > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-number-of-arguments (lambda (&optional time) (funcall # (or time G167))) 3) > (decode-time (22352 22528) nil nil) > (time-to-days (22352 22528)) > > Re-evaluating defun of time-to-days fixes the error. I'm just taking a stab in the dark here -- but it's really odd that it seems to say that the signature of `decode-time' is (&optional time) Is it possible that the test code is mocking/redefining `decode-time' with the wrong signature, or something along those lines? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 02 03:39:32 2021 Received: (at 48133) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2021 07:39:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41211 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ld6hQ-0001Jh-2O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 03:39:32 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f170.google.com ([209.85.208.170]:36646) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ld6hO-0001Ja-77 for 48133@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 03:39:30 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f170.google.com with SMTP id o16so3175136ljp.3 for <48133@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 02 May 2021 00:39:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:cc:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=u0E558zaG48lb42z7IrxJl4qZxubFscQvpnixIzbzLE=; b=m/hMobo8Xer9VpfZgGQlcxkl1eK2bkZlyvdpY5pQX8x4JmS0uURGSyz4EU+BU7kwAL hrFYTqgPMSZcIETVhw+7pK3OD5lJnHDz6P8juc9+Si6EdA6IbbOVoT7h3+JeBpCI0iuW 98NhyMsT7kruWCnkl/6cpgdT9DyMkujFfi8NgQX8/2p8qAQBLtLOevSCczKny9SRmclT 7IaNkI2hh10KyMihndadgzXokcEVrikSoR36Q0b6LU3xNGrLgn8gOtWYGw6s0hR694u7 x1jtqtjdfV/ajFIBOLxrpl5A0o+Mr1zGlOa0A6oVamuxnQGNrRDS6ntnwN3YQ6wHxcqE k9rQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:cc:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=u0E558zaG48lb42z7IrxJl4qZxubFscQvpnixIzbzLE=; b=Ncwnrbdyrmqj/1G8gj0hBmLmenWU0Kg7KvMyAvSBBUwDjWuOiJMY/ZHKAPgqlTP/n/ vozNYkK+DodQ4MabXquLPkXG/2YFm/LxA7/HZKtTLLtReU8sv7I58WL6HAUSMaRUCl1J Yt3Aao3e+CgqZ36V4OYi5bj8OWU3reqim9amwMwSrv40EzAMcbzgpsiWCFokSI1yQeDr RX5YFx4woAnx2OP640Xha3FD1yPtfllPzV9/Kcs9WjrLbAIM2HgZKZN5lSSwC1vxKarN rEXNkufSTzJFSd9W8WpdwxxHlHJMaKvtDjsdMO5wbS6qnswpiMTilp9aVSUZ9hvhOIyP Q5DA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530PAn158G/wLXK3mEgzs+g0GPkJ3fVmdIQNQDsWnLn2GIGS0RYN nDZqsV4vbdBPC3aVU7HSqqw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJynyv7MuI5Xd0luex3IBDIqgZxZVu2I0XbOX9Te/PmfVOfxQZCoy0husyzqSvMlXLQIquEVng== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b524:: with SMTP id z4mr8492039ljm.62.1619941164220; Sun, 02 May 2021 00:39:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([91.210.107.197]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q29sm773545lfd.264.2021.05.02.00.39.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 02 May 2021 00:39:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#48133: 28.0.50; [native-comp] time-to-days throws wrong-number-of-arguments error In-Reply-To: <877dkhli20.fsf@gnus.org> References: <875z03mdhk.fsf@localhost> <877dkhli20.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 15:43:49 +0800 Message-ID: <87zgxdbmx6.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48133 Cc: 48133@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I'm just taking a stab in the dark here -- but it's really odd that it > seems to say that the signature of `decode-time' is > > (&optional time) > > Is it possible that the test code is mocking/redefining `decode-time' > with the wrong signature, or something along those lines? Yes, it is the case. `decode-time' is redefined via `cl-letf' form in `org-test-at-time' macro in org-test.el: ((symbol-function 'decode-time) (lambda (&optional time) (funcall ,(symbol-function 'decode-time) (or time ,at)))) Hope it helps. Best, Ihor From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 02 04:01:30 2021 Received: (at 48133) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2021 08:01:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41326 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ld72g-00050j-3q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 04:01:30 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:55438) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ld72e-0004uG-9r for 48133@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 04:01:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=TGXcOXFh4CeKv6nglcXhM6J2t6LIPw8IArWGr+8RxgI=; b=YwWg+csirVDx210GbwxYscJUF/ iUxasW3ik/mYzQLoHOxVnecAsCt/7TJ/8aqIgot/5W/yeIeR33aMpsO8noYKH8ex4gi7p4PI/vrcW cNnEwECaVppQvdJrPmXwk28BqrJOZfBkhyQdKJEr2K/xBu9a7qJiBuTUAoxJ81laSe8U=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ld72U-00047P-Bv; Sun, 02 May 2021 10:01:22 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Ihor Radchenko Subject: Re: bug#48133: 28.0.50; [native-comp] time-to-days throws wrong-number-of-arguments error References: <875z03mdhk.fsf@localhost> <877dkhli20.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgxdbmx6.fsf@localhost> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEUiHhsuKidaVlCf mI7////+hihIAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+UFAggAAZGgBkQAAAGySURBVDjLbZSB0ewg CITVCoQ0INjAi/Tf21tAc5ebP5m5JH4urotzpdLfVyl/jlIv5JKKn14+4l6ptHh2wJ6DgesoVVwZ k+KS+OXuoFJvugHrASRYoFc9hRIIAKMMdT0rywNq95vfAB5Ldz+d6Q3IzVfcB9QHhHN+QJONMhF9 SjE1jXoO1OfLA4QlFXhO9Tj9YlYhTQUPUtMNSJdClKA7OKV0SW3jKPhLYUJfYB7AasNHHMA6L91J QJExpF0VyQYBwKQeIMYiCWTq4gNQdw7d4FrpMCJxkLlXYc31EijeRybC8bGBLf00Ys11+gGwUCPa xGQfwHOtFHhf1L6ALeQW2XPHh3zA3Tx+7IbHD4hhVJKXwuyGSx9WlWsDnHgAn44Oo/c/oE/xwwlw twd4qX4h04pYr9Ggx2HeawwvleByUHxxVnd1M/Y1xyS4YvRgA7xfN4AoGZJz4NmaoVPzrjRvlgCx jwRjumJdAPYC/ywB/SiuG16IQ5GguFvzgeHGMcFih+5qrmkJ2gJYLzA1SlmCnS7Auhz0AH70Of4y cGAWghiZcwCSIt7luZDpKKVNGw7QmP+tMmlpD7J5ngAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMS0w NS0wMlQwODowMDowMSswMDowMF7qcjIAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjEtMDUtMDJUMDg6 MDA6MDErMDA6MDAvt8qOAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Burial Hex's _Burial Hex - Zola Jesus_: "Go Crystal Tears" Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 10:01:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87zgxdbmx6.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Sun, 02 May 2021 15:43:49 +0800") Message-ID: <87zgxdimya.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Ihor Radchenko writes: > Yes, it is the case. `decode-time' is redefined via `cl-letf' form in > `org-test-at-time' macro in org-test.el: > > ((symbol-function 'decode-time) > (lambda (&optional time) (funcall ,(symbol-func [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48133 Cc: 48133@debbugs.gnu.org, Amin Bandali X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Ihor Radchenko writes: > Yes, it is the case. `decode-time' is redefined via `cl-letf' form in > `org-test-at-time' macro in org-test.el: > > ((symbol-function 'decode-time) > (lambda (&optional time) (funcall ,(symbol-function 'decode-time) > (or time ,at)))) > > Hope it helps. Yes, indeed. :-) So this is a bug in the org test harness, I think? I've added Amin to the CCs. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 02 04:24:23 2021 Received: (at 48133) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2021 08:24:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41440 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ld7Op-00065f-Og for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 04:24:23 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f182.google.com ([209.85.208.182]:45580) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ld7On-00065Y-OK for 48133@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 04:24:22 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f182.google.com with SMTP id d15so3190416ljo.12 for <48133@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 02 May 2021 01:24:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:cc:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=2yVA5OeTbIi1rIRZkAREMOqQAVwF93xOfohLOXrcA1w=; b=t6NuthnwjYjXN5wWz0qIYn7Mj3ra7TSfzChu5ll8IwatIFGgwhjLojqQqLqmS45NhW iUTndztaCasLQ4/6gOynVg2NAduTYoJ5eLpQY+CNotsC5h9EBGuyf39CTyNwn7CduzJ6 mojBQgfq3jYTN6FVg6CUAVhgzeajNwUlkwdqzEjMrITJk5RLssyjkDgYXCyN264Vwqzn REnpnK+XrmMmL9HhXUJIX4absdRqRdHmh1TVSeJl1Xmocisdpx5Z3XArHBAxrItb8qy+ OIOrPfz2+fHDgVO7RVFzcWSR6bD+TUGPGLsq54TOODh0bdZzdNWIkQ7Lc8+ggMHYPt4X CJ+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:cc:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=2yVA5OeTbIi1rIRZkAREMOqQAVwF93xOfohLOXrcA1w=; b=g2jEPOaolNOp37/2JmzboiLwG+eJJ8N7sk8Tb+a788jowRaE0J8RaMeorCvh4/Ec4k lB/8TV8u2ZnvkGQs2y1rpjkyu6KYlovbTIOGQUoYj7x0f8XHYQSMZ1RJ+TkumVWZ9JiY dI5mJPX6LdQsespswE5y7jBz34FMkhm2fYgidM7KP3aXACZDx+s1oh53WoRwYZfUx8Hv tP11WFVAl3GPc+6PJcj1otm4Py8bvYsjQaxbAGQrkoFf2NCJjRByE/wxXf8y2hWTdkt+ LJHbm1YxZH0qwnS7t82zmUiISKeqlBtnL4YyyW/QmYOgcK3K5ELgk5TK6ftl6CaMtWwK KGEg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5334Eww8IqvI20nVUI+4S3X1xNXPsYbkabpeSxUOyXJWyRzvrwDy 7ZRIUZhwXZNi0w1/WZa7bFM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyuiWUuUVeyYGlZcDulRHmOSlQQD72h92WRwpQ52RvWB6bE6po/7nf1F45GmmPFJYDfsEVMEg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1306:: with SMTP id u6mr9880316lja.197.1619943855754; Sun, 02 May 2021 01:24:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([91.210.107.197]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v16sm741060lfd.110.2021.05.02.01.24.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 02 May 2021 01:24:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#48133: 28.0.50; [native-comp] time-to-days throws wrong-number-of-arguments error In-Reply-To: <87zgxdimya.fsf@gnus.org> References: <875z03mdhk.fsf@localhost> <877dkhli20.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgxdbmx6.fsf@localhost> <87zgxdimya.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 16:28:40 +0800 Message-ID: <87v981bkuf.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48133 Cc: 48133@debbugs.gnu.org, Amin Bandali X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Yes, indeed. :-) So this is a bug in the org test harness, I think? > I've added Amin to the CCs. While I agree that it is a bug on Org mode side, I am also wondering how to handle backward-compatibility with older Emacs versions in such cases. Is there any way to know in which Emacs version the function argument list was changed? Best, Ihor From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 02 04:27:51 2021 Received: (at 48133) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2021 08:27:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41456 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ld7SB-00067d-6B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 04:27:51 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:55714) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ld7S9-00067V-CS for 48133@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 04:27:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=gIP2hfZwSQ6+vizmGH5wWvqm4um4NdDlSpljDivVHDM=; b=eT5inmgkJ7k8R+F0t+PJCkgrfr WTpR9OYQ9mrUNuC+HeuUgyhIel356XsEnGLPD4C76hKG8v4bISjnYtFVBNGYwRimaTld9xHNzdRZr 8zH+vebyCcXnX1Wtrhvto+21qF7rxhEfzqgZ8wGxWp4xs91UT/mi31imTPZyBtM55YCY=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ld7S0-0004Km-JC; Sun, 02 May 2021 10:27:42 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Ihor Radchenko Subject: Re: bug#48133: 28.0.50; [native-comp] time-to-days throws wrong-number-of-arguments error References: <875z03mdhk.fsf@localhost> <877dkhli20.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgxdbmx6.fsf@localhost> <87zgxdimya.fsf@gnus.org> <87v981bkuf.fsf@localhost> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEUiHhsuKidaVlCf mI7////+hihIAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+UFAggAAZGgBkQAAAGySURBVDjLbZSB0ewg CITVCoQ0INjAi/Tf21tAc5ebP5m5JH4urotzpdLfVyl/jlIv5JKKn14+4l6ptHh2wJ6DgesoVVwZ k+KS+OXuoFJvugHrASRYoFc9hRIIAKMMdT0rywNq95vfAB5Ldz+d6Q3IzVfcB9QHhHN+QJONMhF9 SjE1jXoO1OfLA4QlFXhO9Tj9YlYhTQUPUtMNSJdClKA7OKV0SW3jKPhLYUJfYB7AasNHHMA6L91J QJExpF0VyQYBwKQeIMYiCWTq4gNQdw7d4FrpMCJxkLlXYc31EijeRybC8bGBLf00Ys11+gGwUCPa xGQfwHOtFHhf1L6ALeQW2XPHh3zA3Tx+7IbHD4hhVJKXwuyGSx9WlWsDnHgAn44Oo/c/oE/xwwlw twd4qX4h04pYr9Ggx2HeawwvleByUHxxVnd1M/Y1xyS4YvRgA7xfN4AoGZJz4NmaoVPzrjRvlgCx jwRjumJdAPYC/ywB/SiuG16IQ5GguFvzgeHGMcFih+5qrmkJ2gJYLzA1SlmCnS7Auhz0AH70Of4y cGAWghiZcwCSIt7luZDpKKVNGw7QmP+tMmlpD7J5ngAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMS0w NS0wMlQwODowMDowMSswMDowMF7qcjIAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjEtMDUtMDJUMDg6 MDA6MDErMDA6MDAvt8qOAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Zola Jesus's _Burial Hex - Zola Jesus_: "Julius & Ethel" Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 10:27:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87v981bkuf.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Sun, 02 May 2021 16:28:40 +0800") Message-ID: <87h7jlilqb.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Ihor Radchenko writes: > While I agree that it is a bug on Org mode side, I am also wondering how > to handle backward-compatibility with older Emacs versions in such cases. In this case, adding the additional optional arguments won't have an adverse effect in any Emacs version, I think? Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48133 Cc: 48133@debbugs.gnu.org, Amin Bandali X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Ihor Radchenko writes: > While I agree that it is a bug on Org mode side, I am also wondering how > to handle backward-compatibility with older Emacs versions in such cases. In this case, adding the additional optional arguments won't have an adverse effect in any Emacs version, I think? > Is there any way to know in which Emacs version the function argument > list was changed? You'd have to ask git. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 02 04:36:06 2021 Received: (at 48133) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2021 08:36:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41495 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ld7aA-0008MN-8f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 04:36:06 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-f44.google.com ([209.85.218.44]:45570) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ld7a9-0008M0-7y for 48133@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 04:36:05 -0400 Received: by mail-ej1-f44.google.com with SMTP id u3so3371771eja.12 for <48133@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 02 May 2021 01:36:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:cc:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=aj0UFZOQu3zGEJYrAzlKba2aOhLzcjKQu4Fpg0uzGGk=; b=MDphfzp1lNHWwR64rNHL2ZlVO898FhOlETZZC0NqAqC7F8wAd7ghytP1I9+bILg3FH CGB1h9FR0oabWekYh1vkHFQvlzpz08ILjkUfc4WVuootq7x/hQFSF5ZIFZe/pK32yWU5 jIQdLYdL7if+xJ4WeYu1V3VBs7Jg3tgplsxUlAk+kcVQTsU5EyRwva+uXZ+ikwPjYQLd nkIjKMUZ0vjrzpRBUgjzy74LcvI1iZeiL2A4zcsx9JUWZCGRNcGBRvO4zcMZShFb5XJv P7PX5GjU4So3qo1ojSweEh50zV34VCZ9qmQSEnL/FSQvTLa6ZBTjSz4bkpdqJr1sHEXW WdWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:cc:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=aj0UFZOQu3zGEJYrAzlKba2aOhLzcjKQu4Fpg0uzGGk=; b=Yddsk94todXnn+pBdx8eRR5Go9DVv4llNa8qmPAr9WSgS9Imvgn1UWkzwSxCS290SF aeKVOLeRCTVnXk65GLmC1QS2BDPk+KoC8Tl8+/yio4kIAozS+03up729DB5aCdAM9Vtv yHQFe5gXrPdBh3MTSyTAYokAl62K9ViPcgZ7ddleW/hRBER8179JZMcsMYL4pqfFvVJh 8/tvRDOvEONpQ+PpxbPPIixboq9cMo2aOM5+zRwC+AvEHqDZt9Zq5MxUd4SBxDZx4JqS lEEMXZtdcB32CP+cf4ipG3O7XJhDgr9tUIcRDnzddQUhTHFbBisfkYEwCbPCqgnvvhCS kXyg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530W3pHCf7z9/aEVUS7vy819q576MZhYx3iA8bVOCKYcyymCNPkH dv8nEkqUUTp2D84i7RKZDh8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyrecRVnHtME0H9XUcl2GwGLtgmIIMcVYw85nbkAaSCmG+V+5oOJ9QG108Jhe3P/KOHTAsZYw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1c8b:: with SMTP id nb11mr11376024ejc.327.1619944558294; Sun, 02 May 2021 01:35:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([91.210.107.197]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m9sm8858434ejj.53.2021.05.02.01.35.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 02 May 2021 01:35:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#48133: 28.0.50; [native-comp] time-to-days throws wrong-number-of-arguments error In-Reply-To: <87h7jlilqb.fsf@gnus.org> References: <875z03mdhk.fsf@localhost> <877dkhli20.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgxdbmx6.fsf@localhost> <87zgxdimya.fsf@gnus.org> <87v981bkuf.fsf@localhost> <87h7jlilqb.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 16:40:18 +0800 Message-ID: <87r1ipbkb1.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48133 Cc: 48133@debbugs.gnu.org, Amin Bandali X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > In this case, adding the additional optional arguments won't have an > adverse effect in any Emacs version, I think? Sure. I was thinking about more dramatic changes in argument list. Think swapped args. >> Is there any way to know in which Emacs version the function argument >> list was changed? > > You'd have to ask git. Fair enough. Though I was hoping for something like "Probably introduced at or before Emacs version 19.29.", but for argument list. Or even incorporating git changelog for given function into the help buffer. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 02 04:44:05 2021 Received: (at 48133) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2021 08:44:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41540 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ld7ht-0008Rj-3V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 04:44:05 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:55888) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ld7hs-0008RD-1m for 48133@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 04:44:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=9/VRVz3bCczr6jAYqCtw/PEfmLFICViPwC5LH/3wIu0=; b=E/PyVj8l+xXt4E5TLoLfeIBOE9 ivao07prQVQZX1ARQNMoGNoRU9DliOd2YxqUDnzTADv3pUfmB2VmsHK+IaF7kQxjFwTkGprZYlwnm ItGtxSXVvtkwgOxiGB/qBPnun8P2kqnP59gWJsjbtKKlDEg/uKu3bKL8jC3wfLrsucGY=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ld7hi-0004VO-MB; Sun, 02 May 2021 10:43:57 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Ihor Radchenko Subject: Re: bug#48133: 28.0.50; [native-comp] time-to-days throws wrong-number-of-arguments error References: <875z03mdhk.fsf@localhost> <877dkhli20.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgxdbmx6.fsf@localhost> <87zgxdimya.fsf@gnus.org> <87v981bkuf.fsf@localhost> <87h7jlilqb.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1ipbkb1.fsf@localhost> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEX58u7Irq91bYUk FBb///9XP3FsAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+UFAggqJLXPHisAAAF/SURBVDjLtZNrcsUg CIXBbEB0A4IbiLL/vRXQJG1v+rMkM3H4wsujAP9p9O4uxJRf/NiJkd8CZmUs7TN/V2Uq09eekGit kETV/MoM+ADyR4SK6txlLiBEVIpFqexeokNCFRZxv94RBlAsh3YNG1EbN6h624wNuID/PTe5QHMQ OXauPcYD2s63apcH5HqnQptX+COCvMJ3gH2SwRjW/BeYoQUamOJGvOaQrVH3iAAxB85bLqtBniwA g166VAVeZIHe9kbXVfwBA/BbhJsnFuhXkaiBD6iaMdY+oMm5dpcEirZoGAOY8Y7IesYhSD55kdiQ BfpAD+kOzC2cNzjUVy4x+En1aEsmOScT2+fu16hojw2araqYwrNsUHuTpLNrW2I0qCEt1Hz2g+dM S3EbMzlAA0Mq0AnjMFFWk1Z6gSPjwJHsgC6xYjsqjJ70tBqQ2Bu775G9uXARj+/n+yXE8uMKRg/r +3pr8f7t9x3c+IMsB+EfIONrW6YbfBLM4noifAGZ+kMHzQ97zgAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUA MjAyMS0wNS0wMlQwODo0MjozNSswMDowMJAG8n0AAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjEtMDUt MDJUMDg6NDI6MzUrMDA6MDDhW0rBAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Nico's _Do Or Die_: "All Tomorrow's Parties" Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 10:43:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87r1ipbkb1.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Sun, 02 May 2021 16:40:18 +0800") Message-ID: <878s4xikz9.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Ihor Radchenko writes: > Sure. I was thinking about more dramatic changes in argument list. Think > swapped args. I don't think we ever do things like that a lot. (If ever.) Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48133 Cc: 48133@debbugs.gnu.org, Amin Bandali X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Ihor Radchenko writes: > Sure. I was thinking about more dramatic changes in argument list. Think > swapped args. I don't think we ever do things like that a lot. (If ever.) > Fair enough. Though I was hoping for something like "Probably introduced > at or before Emacs version 19.29.", but for argument list. Or even > incorporating git changelog for given function into the help buffer. No, it's just too much work. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 02 09:02:20 2021 Received: (at 48133) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2021 13:02:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42692 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldBjo-00072n-2A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 09:02:20 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f170.google.com ([209.85.208.170]:35367) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldBjk-00072f-6I for 48133@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 09:02:18 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f170.google.com with SMTP id e12so1329399ljn.2 for <48133@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 02 May 2021 06:02:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:cc:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=23j8+MINV6KZWsQyqjCtE09MPQSRyxNDd2m38K5NfE8=; b=BahRbd9QL8yBPOKrbi7TajdaIK/PRqpCood+yhMXkzPz67XgyOEFQwdU8I/tZV+lor 9TOer+Cqyp1Bl2gdIszx56jf6p6g2cm2/Ih+lbhnZa9HrjKKbBgnFszGlu+nGulj+kVG qW/cdh3DT/i9LN3YWl9cQby4SPfnxx0/o82iIZpwkqxrpGI//MyNvY1d8Mhyxajh72Lg qQz1Rb7IunqX2DatXY3VgSF+Vh7YLOf/Gg+r/q9O1v30EzWDCvKW2J5CzO3dUEgjT+C6 FtIG/PcYB3gKlK8ghXBCVkbHg9rTVlI3aUsOpDmMae/ktMOd0WdiJSG9P0XdS5jzf0s+ jVNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:cc:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=23j8+MINV6KZWsQyqjCtE09MPQSRyxNDd2m38K5NfE8=; b=XA5XqfMObSuJMW8r0YmqQubWFLDPrn9tpn7mFJyrCXVJc6k+i47H0UQ4NKPDPGtfdG 69tNM2wV4QvbxhHkAPE7QY/PdxhQmL0zdmYWUGTAnYTAHMLWrRC+z35SRsmrD/OHCrDQ YGgD3M+44XJfVMHaupmsVioPhU0czLmmSIK0E4zQdXgHQTc2XkXhsYLfvkwkvqrpcUl6 H0pWRMJ4SQZp0PeOHruDINkDB/zBVN6Tgk50HKrxK9tnYgHisJ+iBoeeHt2ueYxo6yr5 WfHEePYvqPSQzZ0kjbiZhMHSVPZmztMBQpCcwllzzsij8nDYtajs9eNM4FHES1gatarf ptPg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531BMizAl8NDyn/Sek3KiZZUijsHgqLuyo4IrbVhmCgskPtOZqeE Je2wPHGgyNZ0ekpapFd+4Vs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzyvQhiJj381dq+Npsoq1/zn5SdOTHFEKScFg8pL3ThECjDZ7rX9021XdvAUPjTuKhz6j+4bA== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a36a:: with SMTP id i10mr10041666ljn.192.1619960530137; Sun, 02 May 2021 06:02:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([141.105.67.194]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q14sm908847ljj.79.2021.05.02.06.02.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 02 May 2021 06:02:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#48133: 28.0.50; [native-comp] time-to-days throws wrong-number-of-arguments error In-Reply-To: <87zgxdimya.fsf@gnus.org> References: <875z03mdhk.fsf@localhost> <877dkhli20.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgxdbmx6.fsf@localhost> <87zgxdimya.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 21:06:35 +0800 Message-ID: <87eeep1e04.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48133 Cc: 48133@debbugs.gnu.org, Amin Bandali X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) > Yes, indeed. :-) So this is a bug in the org test harness, I think? Just letting know that it is now fixed on Org mode master. This bug report can be closed. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 02 09:04:37 2021 Received: (at 48133) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2021 13:04:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42704 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldBm1-000741-DL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 09:04:37 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:58510) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldBly-00073r-O3 for 48133@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 09:04:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=onhjN/YpSYeEu6svhVYUcK4Eo9YKg0egm/7BKdX50Wk=; b=K6A6JP8T47Ytvq3gVBnlDDJKT8 94cvWrWZLLM6KW0EYn9KiyceX2aIVZ3rRh5ptEn0zo7zDL7TLI8fGdxpzRN7TIxJ4uiE5Y8sgAzcn pxssYynm+hCN+0x7l8E2++oZuH36MbMd4PRLGgqb/+6VJXljkQjJCskb18vozQSk1qjs=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ldBlp-00079h-BK; Sun, 02 May 2021 15:04:27 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Ihor Radchenko Subject: Re: bug#48133: 28.0.50; [native-comp] time-to-days throws wrong-number-of-arguments error References: <875z03mdhk.fsf@localhost> <877dkhli20.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgxdbmx6.fsf@localhost> <87zgxdimya.fsf@gnus.org> <87eeep1e04.fsf@localhost> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAFVBMVEX9+avysjPNQAtd FQsKAgL+/ef////IL+QyAAAAAWJLR0QGYWa4fQAAAAd0SU1FB+UFAg0EEJm3IVkAAAGrSURBVDjL nZRNktwwCIWlqfJe0PG+kXKAxPYFpu0DyAvd/yp5oB+7ayabYdGu4hPwQKid+5lRjJHCFzevh9ou 727/2I5myz3Ip+Oy/UbSsW4XeV3gWOWxqlX8dwD13ZIdzzv4NpmBe8yf/4G9q4I7fVcFICJiX4Qo Wq3PCmJa07avC8FPZKR2ifHhfBTCEFj4Kr8oQJ4wlVI8/RqKEZGWSHMxY0sWKoBfeKrglN89VwVS mjF3XTHp7bkOTtlajwpk7v6SLVeoxaNYheymPBV6tOY7cA7HgD+4VVdAJWd8nMOBk1r1BhhxWUOy Vn8NUD7wSx4hmZosBQH69csRuaz3AU42/wChg6xLiuE+S9EaqrelIhaU9xDut6q3Fcc9McrTM78B 028LP5mqL8A7fG9ADDDWYTpjv10DswINmX3gbRtAZWVSg6iHrl8HGFPxQWeVKV1Aouj4CLfhTl7f QJjyfPopBwX7SIXWAkCm0/loEW0kwhI8OYJeXu4g6tqqBUhO+ozCANigUP8I3oDozeq+64rro2gX ZSHVkkW8BhhkifpUbUuEe7JmAGjjHzzCps/ybCFfAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIxLTA1 LTAyVDEzOjA0OjE2KzAwOjAwJMqyjQAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMS0wNS0wMlQxMzow NDoxNiswMDowMFWXCjEAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: End's _Science-Fiction_: "Dead Media" Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 15:04:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87eeep1e04.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Sun, 02 May 2021 21:06:35 +0800") Message-ID: <87r1ipffs7.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Ihor Radchenko writes: >> Yes, indeed. :-) So this is a bug in the org test harness, I think? > > Just letting know that it is now fixed on Org mode master. This bug > report can be closed. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48133 Cc: 48133@debbugs.gnu.org, Amin Bandali X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Ihor Radchenko writes: >> Yes, indeed. :-) So this is a bug in the org test harness, I think? > > Just letting know that it is now fixed on Org mode master. This bug > report can be closed. OK; closing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 02 09:04:46 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2021 13:04:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42708 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldBmA-00074G-JV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 09:04:46 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:58524) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldBm8-000748-74 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 09:04:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Ek4ER4CpQrWAzfv2MMYvDXKqs5vjMETHYwUsNRJcbVM=; b=unsGubjV2uF0rcujwAix3TCfal RIK9YGEckqMTJLB2U6pkoiIjtxwXaKD0IaXtE05AeX8bYwoufr8zh74jQg+uaxT69uF/tjwimn+AS C6zPg6OYG0KyA2uKSOJOcpAXrXMpA1wvCqPkp0MGaba/IXcpU7zD/WxrdpmeIMm7lMeg=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ldBm0-00079p-RO for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 May 2021 15:04:38 +0200 Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 15:04:36 +0200 Message-Id: <87pmy9ffrv.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #48133 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 48133 fixed close 48133 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 48133 fixed close 48133 28.1 quit From unknown Sun Aug 17 09:10:44 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator