GNU bug report logs - #48072
28.0.50: dired-read-shell-command: handle empty input properly [PATCH]

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Boruch Baum <boruch_baum <at> gmx.com>

Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 19:03:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 28.0.50

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Boruch Baum <boruch_baum <at> gmx.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 48072 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, kevin.legouguec <at> gmail.com
Subject: bug#48072: 28.0.50: dired-read-shell-command: handle empty input properly [PATCH]
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:21:36 -0400
On 2021-04-28 18:13, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:01:44 -0400
> > From: Boruch Baum <boruch_baum <at> gmx.com>
> > Cc: kevin.legouguec <at> gmail.com, 48072 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> >
> > 2.1.1) Try the following in a vanilla dired buffer: Navigate POINT to a file,
> >        let's say 'bar', and press '&' for the async command. Then type in some
> >        garbage command, let's say 'foo', and <RET>. The response I get is a
> >        message in the mini-buffer: "foo bar&wait: finished." (BTW, I haven't
> >        figured out where that message is being generated; anyone's help would be
> >        appreciated; I would like to see if it can report errors).
>
> I think the message comes from process.c:status_notify, which is
> called when the process is deleted after it exits.

Thanks. It was frustrating not being able to find it.

1) Is there a way to make it user-extensible?

2) Can it report some indication of STDERR or shell variable '$?' ?

3) The '&wait' shouldn't be reported. It's just confusing cruft to a user.

--
hkp://keys.gnupg.net
CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1  7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 331 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.