GNU bug report logs - #48042
26.3; Macros don't work with french-postfix input method

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Gregory Heytings <gregory <at> heytings.org>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 48042 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, harven <at> free.fr
Subject: bug#48042: 26.3; Macros don't work with french-postfix input method
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 13:13:45 -0400

>>> If you are asking how I'd like to proceed with this bug, then, as I wrote
>>> in another message, I'd like us to have a full understanding of why
>>> binding inhibit--record-char didn't work well enough in the case in
>>> point.  It did solve some of the problem we had before that change, but
>>> didn't solve all of it -- why?
>>
>> BTW, another possible way to attack the problem is to arrange for the code
>> that pushes to `unread-command-events` to use events of the form `(t
>> . EVENT)` so as to tell explicitly that we don't want them recorded.
>>
>
> I guess you mean '(no-record . EVENT)'?  The docstring indicates that '(t
> . EVENT)' means that EVENT is added to 'this-command-keys'.

Oops, indeed,


        Stefan

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.