GNU bug report logs - #47991
28.0.50; inconsistency between async-shell-command and shell-command

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Zhiwei Chen <condy0919 <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2021 10:39:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: wontfix

Found in version 28.0.50

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Zhiwei Chen <condy0919 <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 47991 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#47991: 28.0.50; inconsistency between async-shell-command and shell-command
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 00:38:10 +0800
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Zhiwei Chen <condy0919 <at> gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2021 18:38:12 +0800
>> 
>> 
>> shell-command pops a buffer in fundamental-mode while
>> async-shell-command is in shell-mode.
>
> That's a feature.
>
> Why do you want the buffer in shell-mode when the command is run
> synchronously?

The original intention is to make `async-shell-command` and
`shell-command` default to `evil-normal-state' by adding a hook in which
checks if `this-command' is `shell-command' or `async-shell-command'.

As a result, I found that they behave differently. It looks too odd that
`async-shell-command' is implemented in `shell-command' but it has a
different semantic.

Since the buffer is in `fundamental-mode', there is no way to access
`shell-mode-map' where user maybe define their own bindings.

I'm curious about the reason why it's a feature. Why the synchronous
`shell-command' should be in `fundamental-mode' while the async doesn't.

-- 
Zhiwei Chen




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 25 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.