GNU bug report logs - #47989
[PATCH] channels: Add a #:system argument to channel-instances->manifest.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Cc: 47989 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#47989] [PATCH] channels: Add a #:system argument to channel-instances->manifest.
Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 15:48:21 +0200

Hi Christopher,

Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> skribis:
>>
>>> This allows computing a manifest for a specific system. Previously this was
>>> possible, but only through changing %current-system, which caused the
>>> derivation to be computed using that system as well (so computing a derivation
>>> for aarch64-linux on x86_64-linux would require running aarch64-linux code).
>>
>> I remember discussing it, but I wonder if I was confused.
>>
>> I think you can always do the equivalent of (say):
>>
>>   guix time-machine -- build -s armhf-linux hello -d
>>
>> … where Guix itself is built natively but it then computes a derivation
>> for a different architecture.
>>
>> The equivalent code would be roughly:
>>
>>   (let ((inferior (inferior-for-channels …)))
>>     (inferior-package-derivation store
>>                                  (car (lookup-inferior-packages inferior "hello"))
>>                                  "armhf-linux"))
>>
>> Does that make sense?
>
> Not really,

:-)

> this is just about manifests for channel instances, so nothing to do
> with package derivations as far as I'm aware.

I re-read your message and must have misunderstood.  It’s the derivation
of channel instances that you want for a given system, right?  (What’s
the use case though?)  In that case something along the lines of the
patch makes perfect sense.

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.