GNU bug report logs - #47949
Failed to produce output path for guix-package-cache

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org>

Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:39:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Full log


Message #59 received at 47949 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>, 47949 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org>, zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#47949: Failed to produce output path for guix-package-cache
Date: Wed, 03 May 2023 21:25:57 +0200
Hi Maxim,

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> $ guix pull
> [...]
> \builder for `/gnu/store/zliavnqgx3jxp8yc44nn1y34b3bjvlcw-guix-package-cache.drv' failed to produce output path `/gnu/store/0m2c2zrphqpmfhjb60k85yhfq704ay5r-guix-package-cache'
> la compilation de /gnu/store/zliavnqgx3jxp8yc44nn1y34b3bjvlcw-guix-package-cache.drv a échoué
> conseil : This usually indicates a bug in one of the channels you are pulling from, or some incompatibility
> among them.  You can check the build log and report the issue to the channel developers.
>
> The channels you are pulling from are: guix sfl-packages.
>
> Vous trouverez le journal de compilation dans « /var/log/guix/drvs/zl/iavnqgx3jxp8yc44nn1y34b3bjvlcw-guix-package-cache.drv ».
> cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/v5rszp4m1vv7zf20vrb1sghi4528d40j-profile.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
> guix pull: erreur : build of `/gnu/store/v5rszp4m1vv7zf20vrb1sghi4528d40j-profile.drv' failed
>
> $ tail /var/log/guix/drvs/zl/iavnqgx3jxp8yc44nn1y34b3bjvlcw-guix-package-cache.drv
>   1694:48  4 (thunk)
> In sfl/packages/sflvault.scm:
>     75:29  3 (propagated-inputs #<package python-sflvault-common <at> 0.9?>)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>   1685:16  2 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
>   1780:13  1 (_ #<&compound-exception components: (#<&undefined-vari?>)
> In unknown file:
>            0 (backtrace #<undefined>)
>
> (exception unbound-variable (value #f) (value "Unbound variable: ~S")
> (value (python-pycrypto)) (value #f))

Isn’t the advice above correct?  The unbound-variable error appears to
come from sfl/packages/sflvault.scm, not from the ‘guix’ channel.

HTH,
Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 45 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.