GNU bug report logs - #47949
Failed to produce output path for guix-package-cache

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>, Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant <at> debian.org>
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, 47949 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Roel Janssen <roel <at> gnu.org>
Subject: bug#47949: Failed to produce output path for guix-package-cache
Date: Wed, 03 May 2023 18:44:45 +0200

Hi Maxim,

On Fri, 28 Apr 2023 at 12:47, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> I think I may have experienced this issue

Well, I think it’s different from the issue reported by Vagrant; IIUC,
something related to mixed branches and/or locations of repository from
where Vagrant pulled.

Instead, your issue seems related to channels.

>                                            the symptoms:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> $ guix pull
> [...]
> \builder for `/gnu/store/zliavnqgx3jxp8yc44nn1y34b3bjvlcw-guix-package-cache.drv' failed to produce output path `/gnu/store/0m2c2zrphqpmfhjb60k85yhfq704ay5r-guix-package-cache'
> la compilation de /gnu/store/zliavnqgx3jxp8yc44nn1y34b3bjvlcw-guix-package-cache.drv a échoué
> conseil : This usually indicates a bug in one of the channels you are pulling from, or some incompatibility
> among them.  You can check the build log and report the issue to the channel developers.
>
> The channels you are pulling from are: guix sfl-packages.
>
> Vous trouverez le journal de compilation dans « /var/log/guix/drvs/zl/iavnqgx3jxp8yc44nn1y34b3bjvlcw-guix-package-cache.drv ».
> cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/v5rszp4m1vv7zf20vrb1sghi4528d40j-profile.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
> guix pull: erreur : build of `/gnu/store/v5rszp4m1vv7zf20vrb1sghi4528d40j-profile.drv' failed
>
> $ tail /var/log/guix/drvs/zl/iavnqgx3jxp8yc44nn1y34b3bjvlcw-guix-package-cache.drv
>   1694:48  4 (thunk)
> In sfl/packages/sflvault.scm:
>     75:29  3 (propagated-inputs #<package python-sflvault-common <at> 0.9?>)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>   1685:16  2 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
>   1780:13  1 (_ #<&compound-exception components: (#<&undefined-vari?>)
> In unknown file:
>            0 (backtrace #<undefined>)
>
> (exception unbound-variable (value #f) (value "Unbound variable: ~S")
> (value (python-pycrypto)) (value #f))
>
> $ guix time-machine --commit=9ed65e6af77893b658a7159b091b5002892c2f95 -- show python-pycrypto
> name: python-pycrypto
> version: 2.6.1
> [...]
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> The problematic channel is pinned via an inferior at the above commit,
> so I'm surprised the error mentions python-pyrypto is unbound (it exists
> at least, according to the above time-machine invocation).

Could you share the link of the other channel, if it’s public?


Cheers,
simon

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.