GNU bug report logs -
#4789
leim-list.el needs to be included in the dumped images
Previous Next
Reported by: Dan Nicolaescu <dann <at> ics.uci.edu>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 05:35:05 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Tags: notabug
Merged with 910,
4881
Fixed in version 24.4
Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #59 received at 4789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
> Cc: 4789 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:34:10 -0400
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > But you need to do this again whenever Emacs is rebuilt, not just at
> > bootstrap time. Right? Are you relying on the fact that on Posix
> > hosts bootstrap-emacs and emacs are (currently) the same executable,
> > and that bootstrap-emacs is generated even when no bootstrap is
> > necessary, like when building a released tarball?
>
> Indeed I need to think about this more... My initial thought is that it
> should be treated like loaddefs.el (and finder-inf.el, cus-load.el,
> etc). All these are pre-built in the release tarfile, so maybe
> leim-list.el should be too. Now that I think about it, it's suprising
> that it isn't already.
Well, that goes hand in hand with the fact that the *.el files under
leim/ are not byte-compiled in the tarball. Basically, a remnant from
ye-old days when Leim was a separate package. I think we should
compile all the *.el files under leim/ as well, but Stefan once told
me something that I interpreted to mean he would rather go in the
opposite direction -- let the build process compile all the *.el files
under lisp/ and ship them uncompiled in the tarball. Maybe I
misunderstood.
> > So you just need _any_ emacs executable capable of code that generates
> > leim-list.el, is that right?
>
> Right. But when bootstrapping on MS Windows, there must still be two
> versions of the emacs binary, right? One that is called early on and
> loads uncompiled Lisp files (whether or not it is called
> "bootstrap-emacs"), and is used to generate the compiled Lisp files that
> are loaded by the final, "proper" Emacs?
Yes.
> If so, I mean the first one.
Yes, that part is clear.
This bug report was last modified 11 years and 177 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.