GNU bug report logs - #47884
[PATCH] Add package: ibus-chewing

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: "Guu, Jin-Cheng" <jin-cheng.guu <at> stonybrook.edu>

Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:59:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Full log


Message #8 received at 47884 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Raghav Gururajan <rg <at> raghavgururajan.name>
To: 47884 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add package: ibus-chewing
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:21:11 -0400
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Jin-Cheng!

Congratulations on your first patch. \o/

You don't have to under-sell your work. I just cleaned up the pack-def 
and fixed the glib schema error. All others are your work. :-)

Also, if anyone helps you with code/snippet in #guix, you don't have to 
use the same code/snippet. You are free to adopt them in any way you see 
fit. Folks usually share a code/snippet, purely for informational purposes.

REVIEW:

[1] As Julien mentioned in #guix, it is better to make two patches, one 
for dependency package and one for the main package.

[2] Package gob appears to be a candidate for glib.scm. So its better to 
move this package to glib.scm.

[3] In Guix, we try to avoid bundled stuff, for better security and 
reproducibilty. It'd be great if you package cmake-fedora separately 
(like gob) and remove the use of `recursive? #t`, in ibus-chewing.

As usual, if you have any questions, feel to free to ask around in 
#guix. ;-)

Regards,
RG.

[OpenPGP_signature (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

This bug report was last modified 4 years and 56 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.