GNU bug report logs - #47843
28.0.50; Setting enable-local-variables to nil *appears* to inhibit lexical-binding (but doesn't)

Previous Next

Full log

Message #13 received at 47843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Phil Sainty <psainty <at> orcon.net.nz>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: 47843 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#47843: 28.0.50; Setting enable-local-variables to nil
 *appears* to inhibit lexical-binding (but doesn't)
Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 23:45:12 +1200

On 4/05/21 10:22 pm, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> `C-M-x' on the two forms failed, as expected.  (When enabling the
> variable, they are successful.)
> 
> So I think everything works as expected here?  That is, the buffer
> doesn't use lexical mode if you set enable-local-variables to nil.
> 
> Are you seeing something different?

I see the same thing.  I also note that `eval-region' produces the
same result as `eval-defun'.  (I'd only tested `eval-buffer' initially,
and that respects the `lexical-binding' setting.)

My main point was that I'm dubious that enable-local-variables should
be allowed to affect lexical-binding in any situation.

While it's strictly true that the lexical-binding implementation
utilises a file-local variable, I feel like this particular variable
should be guaranteed to be respected when set, because it fundamentally
changes how the code will be interpreted.

Are there are any other file-local variables in that same category?
I couldn't think of any offhand, and so this seemed worthy of having
an exception made.


-Phil

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.