Subject: bug#47813: 28.0.50; Confusing new calling convention for define-minor-mode

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 13:49:13 +0200

Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]> writes:

> I went with
>
>     (mode doc [keyword val ...] &rest body)
>
> since it's allowed to have no keywords (if body is empty).

It still kinda looks like the keywords are optional, even if you have a
body.  What about:

  (mode doc [keyword val ... &rest body])

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no