GNU bug report logs -
#47789
[PATCH 0/6] Add TLA+ Tools (tla2tools)
Previous Next
Reported by: Mike Gerwitz <mtg <at> gnu.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 04:24:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Le 15 avril 2021 00:25:10 GMT-04:00, Mike Gerwitz <mtg <at> gnu.org> a écrit :
>This introduces a new package rather than upgrading the exist java-gson
>package because it is built using OpenJDK11; I didn't want to have to
>propagate that JDK dependency to the other packages that use it.
>
>OpenJDK 11 was chosen becuase this dependency was introduced for
>tla2tools.
>
>* gnu/packages/java.scm (java-gson-2.8.6): New variable.
>---
> gnu/packages/java.scm | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/gnu/packages/java.scm b/gnu/packages/java.scm
>index 207f136513..fe75404e9c 100644
>--- a/gnu/packages/java.scm
>+++ b/gnu/packages/java.scm
>@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> ;;; Copyright © 2020 Raghav Gururajan <raghavgururajan <at> disroot.org>
> ;;; Copyright © 2020 Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
> ;;; Copyright © 2021 Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com>
>+;;; Copyright © 2021 Mike Gerwitz <mtg <at> gnu.org>
> ;;;
> ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
> ;;;
>@@ -11724,6 +11725,48 @@ string to an equivalent Java object. Gson can
>work with arbitrary Java objects
> including pre-existing objects that you do not have source-code of.")
> (license license:asl2.0)))
>
>+;; This requires a different Java version than 2.8.2 above
>+(define-public java-gson-2.8.6
>+ (package
>+ (name "java-gson")
>+ (version "2.8.6")
>+ (source (origin
>+ (method git-fetch)
>+ (uri (git-reference
>+ (url "https://github.com/google/gson")
>+ (commit (string-append "gson-parent-" version))))
>+ (file-name (git-file-name name version))
>+ (sha256
>+ (base32
>+
>"0kk5p3vichdb0ph1lzknrcpbklgnmq455mngmjpxvvj29p3rgpk3"))))
>+ (build-system ant-build-system)
>+ (arguments
>+ `(#:jar-name "gson.jar"
>+ #:jdk ,openjdk11
>+ #:source-dir "gson/src/main/java"
>+ #:test-dir "gson/src/test"
>+ #:phases
>+ (modify-phases %standard-phases
>+ ;; avoid Maven dependency
>+ (add-before 'build 'fill-template
>+ (lambda _
>+ (with-directory-excursion "gson/src/main"
>+ (copy-file
>"java-templates/com/google/gson/internal/GsonBuildConfig.java"
>+
>"java/com/google/gson/internal/GsonBuildConfig.java")
>+ (substitute*
>"java/com/google/gson/internal/GsonBuildConfig.java"
>+ (("\\$\\{project.version\\}") ,version)))
>+ #t)))))
>+ (native-inputs
>+ `(("java-junit" ,java-junit)
>+ ("java-hamcrest-core" ,java-hamcrest-core)))
>+ (home-page "https://github.com/google/gson")
>+ (synopsis "Java serialization/deserialization library from/to
>JSON")
>+ (description "Gson is a Java library that can be used to convert
>Java
>+Objects into their JSON representation. It can also be used to
>convert a JSON
>+string to an equivalent Java object. Gson can work with arbitrary
>Java objects
>+including pre-existing objects that you do not have source-code of.")
>+ (license license:asl2.0)))
>+
> (define-public java-hawtjni
> (package
> (name "java-hawtjni")
Hi!
I think it would be easier to inherit from the existing package, right? Why do you need this package at all? I know that mixing JDKs can result in errors if you use a dependency that was built with a more recent JDK that what you use for a package, but the other way around should be fine, no?
What error do you get if you use the existing package?
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 78 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.