From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 13 07:47:05 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Apr 2021 11:47:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59108 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lWHVZ-0001bD-FM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 07:47:05 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:38802) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lWHVY-0001b5-16 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 07:47:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41524) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lWHVT-0004OP-OS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 07:47:03 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x52e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52e]:44948) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lWHVL-0001aW-Rs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 07:46:59 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id f8so19003336edd.11 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 04:46:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=user-agent:from:to:subject:reply-to:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=iPTPApvTzLNK1MfKfZohqVl1GLjheQzxwQsoiSlzTT0=; b=kqxo8UGktgcrpYlS1l6D5uq0u3hVqy/aO4arrjcZq3/v2/847LKuw1AJTe+ZnMUXQY QG/Jdz/RSSlK/uyHRSyOJtEXoZ3Z/PvQpw9Y7c+trACQ5cGSwU0DgYJdE1lC852FxhuP tlbK7wZO+8LB2HJ3r0tOuhgBnVzOEL7xoCOYgwdbxV/pLHwW3kK8xPF+p1PfXbmPfP9Z ZW1xxqgzBdH4gTmPEr/eTQwTNANqQSvCKHIZOd78ysK61rkw3ARJSQU/L1an63ZtjtaV Mn6wyTKK03DKfaIfqQCkI94q6dNLY5Rw2voKu2Jm5zl3oShg8ZF3XTgMzzZBeVcbpNkP znPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:from:to:subject:reply-to:message-id :date:mime-version; bh=iPTPApvTzLNK1MfKfZohqVl1GLjheQzxwQsoiSlzTT0=; b=Wdz8xKRegvGyGoaZc4ZF9pa5r3fVFkQfEe0irKWQpvlgCmd/a5rr2NkWdSmSL0++Hj GwgA81Bs3zYvtIejkMDrgRsidvG/iOkXx9jiB3//+HGWe/ilN1lP7VYepH2OnlA2okAR ucmL7fVurUzlv6FpHRq33f2QF7rDNBucQeCcDXl0jGyMm7LjO5oRyuNwVpYpjxRspbdi LCTODuKYDg6suEf/HiCvb39NtITzFMJmHLnS3gn5n37ehyUGDwKog/qenJtB/OcnbYnH 5WtHdEj1ulLE/BvfD0X5KCjD6efImQe7UmlRoX1WyyOTouRUwneCGRTIr1hBaw2VyJg8 eWLw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+YruJc+7k9DpWoVTAGsO8WZAzft0Lz4VciRu/36Y/FZ1kiV1B rnIihvHpHIUf7OAzXAKPqSpq9/IQQmg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwyen/p4yXsHCQHR/RVm9+ZBc39Zv303hBheFJ7A15PH36uxkbvFTMsHx1Ftn6h5Uz7krTi7g== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c9c8:: with SMTP id i8mr33820618edt.193.1618314404568; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 04:46:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from huette ([5.146.118.192]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o17sm8898364edt.10.2021.04.13.04.46.43 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 13 Apr 2021 04:46:43 -0700 (PDT) User-agent: mu4e 1.4.15; emacs 27.2 From: Sebastian Miele To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 28.0.50; `eval-defun' may evaluate previous sexp Message-ID: <87im4qque5.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 13:46:42 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::52e; envelope-from=sebastian.miele@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-x52e.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: sebastian.miele@gmail.com Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) With emacs -Q, a *scratch* buffer of ;; start of buffer (error "") ;; !!! point somewhere here !!! ;; end of buffer and point where indicated, invoking `eval-defun' (C-M-x) evaluates the expression (error ""). Expected: An error indicating that there is no top-level form containing point, or after point. (From `eval-defun's docstring: "Evaluate the top-level form containing point, or after point.") This is also happens in Emacs 27.2. In GNU Emacs 28.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.28, cairo version 1.17.4) of 2021-04-13 built on huette Repository revision: 6de79542e43ece9a12ebc032c275a6c3fee0b73b Repository branch: master Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12010000 System Description: Arch Linux Configured using: 'configure --with-x-toolkit=gtk3 --with-mailutils --with-cairo' Configured features: ACL CAIRO DBUS FREETYPE GIF GLIB GMP GNUTLS GPM GSETTINGS HARFBUZZ JPEG JSON LCMS2 LIBOTF LIBSYSTEMD LIBXML2 M17N_FLT MODULES NOTIFY INOTIFY PDUMPER PNG RSVG SECCOMP SOUND THREADS TIFF TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS X11 XDBE XIM XPM GTK3 ZLIB Important settings: value of $LC_CTYPE: de_DE.UTF-8 value of $LANG: C locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix Major mode: Lisp Interaction Minor modes in effect: tooltip-mode: t global-eldoc-mode: t eldoc-mode: t electric-indent-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (shadow sort mail-extr emacsbug message rmc puny dired dired-loaddefs rfc822 mml mml-sec epa derived epg epg-config gnus-util rmail rmail-loaddefs auth-source cl-seq eieio eieio-core cl-macs eieio-loaddefs password-cache json map text-property-search time-date subr-x seq byte-opt gv bytecomp byte-compile cconv mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231 mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader cl-loaddefs cl-lib sendmail rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-util mail-prsvr mail-utils iso-transl tooltip eldoc electric uniquify ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel term/x-win x-win term/common-win x-dnd tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list replace newcomment text-mode elisp-mode lisp-mode prog-mode register page tab-bar menu-bar rfn-eshadow isearch easymenu timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax font-core term/tty-colors frame minibuffer cl-generic cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese eucjp-ms cp51932 hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese composite charscript charprop case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev obarray cl-preloaded nadvice button loaddefs faces cus-face macroexp files window text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote threads dbusbind inotify lcms2 dynamic-setting system-font-setting font-render-setting cairo move-toolbar gtk x-toolkit x multi-tty make-network-process emacs) Memory information: ((conses 16 50702 9549) (symbols 48 6499 1) (strings 32 18069 1461) (string-bytes 1 598156) (vectors 16 13126) (vector-slots 8 174449 10296) (floats 8 23 37) (intervals 56 229 0) (buffers 992 12)) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed May 05 12:10:15 2021 Received: (at 47747) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2021 16:10:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33080 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leK6I-0003rm-O8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:10:14 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38660) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leK6G-0003rY-Pz for 47747@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2021 12:10:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Giy3Tr2IxFf2uyMRxIpDLGWTccZLNojUsGlCrUNKNv0=; b=c0dOSjOqz5ii0ZE6qi80EPaV4b zMDvKcaXQiJIU7AA72GzmOXOUXat9vU/KnLPBEmecYpDl2zxdZtMTB9+4ORuaB1qK25X6y+jm3HeB mpZ+83ATU8Kd6Emvi1IhkvDsudmc95Ib5mbZgI23PiQh3ywY+GEI8ir/M0ll0D7CVBjw=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leK66-0003Rh-W5; Wed, 05 May 2021 18:10:05 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Sebastian Miele Subject: Re: bug#47747: 28.0.50; `eval-defun' may evaluate previous sexp References: <87im4qque5.fsf@gmail.com> X-Now-Playing: Martina Topley-Bird's _Quixotic_: "Anything" Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 18:10:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87im4qque5.fsf@gmail.com> (Sebastian Miele's message of "Tue, 13 Apr 2021 13:46:42 +0200") Message-ID: <87mtt92mcl.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Sebastian Miele writes: > With emacs -Q, a *scratch* buffer of > > ;; start of buffer > (error "") > ;; !!! point somewhere here !!! > ; ; end of buffer > > and point where indicated, invoking `eval-defun' (C-M-x) evaluates t [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47747 Cc: 47747@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Sebastian Miele writes: > With emacs -Q, a *scratch* buffer of > > ;; start of buffer > (error "") > ;; !!! point somewhere here !!! > ;; end of buffer > > and point where indicated, invoking `eval-defun' (C-M-x) evaluates the > expression (error ""). > > Expected: An error indicating that there is no top-level form containing > point, or after point. (From `eval-defun's docstring: "Evaluate the > top-level form containing point, or after point.") If there are no forms after point, it'll eval the form before point -- and it's been that way for as long as I can remember, so I think the doc string is just wrong here. Does anybody else have an opinion here? Would it make sense to have the command signal an error if there's no forms at or after point? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 29 07:06:20 2022 Received: (at 47747) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jun 2022 11:06:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57752 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o6VWW-0004rk-5N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 07:06:20 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:58790) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o6VWU-0004rT-Pl for 47747@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 07:06:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=m18d4q7sNs7OF8yVgGNAki73rj+LrOBTE6rNwmvOpcY=; b=JQlou+IXriO4ULL1ib6JbzuFER RecNZ4C3J431xLYA5TYciYdug1UV7gyJA3dzrZAtXvKcNrO/NEOGcPZs+SCR2DpjgNKy/ept3odmu qxoh45E/VqAbEn92qKJcrnWUj1i64ZZAQZz3SiNJAmmRDZDhZnx8COdjOw3uQH5A99AY=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o6VWL-0006o4-Lk; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 13:06:12 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Sebastian Miele Subject: Re: bug#47747: 28.0.50; `eval-defun' may evaluate previous sexp In-Reply-To: <87mtt92mcl.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 05 May 2021 18:10:02 +0200") References: <87im4qque5.fsf@gmail.com> <87mtt92mcl.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Anna B Savage's _A Common Turn_: "Dead Pursuits" Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 13:06:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87czeriva6.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > If there are no forms after point, it'll eval the form before point -- > and it's been that way for as long as I can remember, so I think the doc > string is just wrong here. > > Does anybody else h [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47747 Cc: 47747@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > If there are no forms after point, it'll eval the form before point -- > and it's been that way for as long as I can remember, so I think the doc > string is just wrong here. > > Does anybody else have an opinion here? Would it make sense to have the > command signal an error if there's no forms at or after point? Nobody had an opinion, so I updated the doc string to reflect what it does in Emacs 29. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 29 07:06:25 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jun 2022 11:06:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57755 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o6VWb-0004s3-BW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 07:06:25 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:58804) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o6VWZ-0004rc-BL for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 07:06:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=RLh/ys6khVdxNxY+twbSq0TzxTLwMR4qTEWCVAU7dfk=; b=CestUAC/DfupaNFeNpsTGlLP+S 3OfZk9Z8NkOIm1FC05bVpmrNumYWw9BYD/g0al3PZ36KtKqgWjLD4uqUrkJQVUkU9Xd9o6IyMt7By FyyfNSoZWOIGUGRiwEf+1Z9vvEmjrKNVyYMc4ej2PK1wzM6eTgCfiONCbNu1YZsWc80Q=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o6VWR-0006oG-JY for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 13:06:17 +0200 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 13:06:15 +0200 Message-Id: <87bkubiva0.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #47747 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 47747 29.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 47747 29.1 quit From unknown Sat Jun 14 14:26:22 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator