GNU bug report logs - #47711
27.1; Deferred highlighting support in `completion-all-completions', `vertico--all-completions`

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Daniel Mendler <mail <at> daniel-mendler.de>

Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 20:52:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 27.1

Done: Daniel Mendler <mail <at> daniel-mendler.de>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
Cc: mail <at> daniel-mendler.de, 47711 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, 48841 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, dgutov <at> yandex.ru
Subject: bug#47711: bug#48841: bug#47711: [PATCH VERSION 2] Add new `completion-filter-completions` API and deferred highlighting
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 15:19:17 +0300
> From: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 13:02:04 +0100
> Cc: Daniel Mendler <mail <at> daniel-mendler.de>, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>, 
> 	Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>, 48841 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 47711 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 12:57 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> 
> > I was talking about the infrastructure that produces the completion
> > candidates, not about the application that uses them.  My point is
> > that your approach requires the applications using the candidates to
> > copy them, whereas previously they could use them without copying.
> 
> If it helps, I think that that is true of all alternatives presented
> so far

Yes, I know.  I was comparing the proposed alternatives to what we
have now, and specifically because Dmitry mentioned this aspect.




This bug report was last modified 225 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.