GNU bug report logs - #47709
[PATCH 0/2] Augment build phases and build system doc

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 13:39:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #17 received at 47709 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
Cc: 47709 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#47709] [PATCH 2/2] doc: Document 'gnu-build-system'
 keyword parameters.
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 14:17:04 +0200
Hi,

Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be> skribis:

> On Sun, 2021-04-11 at 15:46 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> 
>> [...]
>> @@ -7307,6 +7307,84 @@ Coreutils, Bash, Make, Diffutils, grep, and sed (see the @code{(guix
>>  build-system gnu)} module for a complete list).  We call these the
>>  @dfn{implicit inputs} of a package, because package definitions do not
>>  have to mention them.
>> +
>> +This build system supports a number of keyword arguments, which can be
>> +passed @i{via}
>
> Why the italics?  I've heard some people italicise "via" because it's a foreign
> word (from Latin), but I'm not convinced.

Italicizing foreign words is a typographical convention.

> I don't see anyone italicising "broccoli", even though it is Italian
> (going by https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/broccoli).

True.  :-)

>> +@item #:out-of-source?
>> +This Boolean,
> ‘Boolean’ is miscapitalised.

I don’t think so: it derives from a family name, and my understanding is
that the convention is to capitalize such words; the lower-case variant
“boolean” is definitely widespread, though.

Thanks for taking a look!

Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 38 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.