From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 08 07:28:31 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Apr 2021 11:28:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46092 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lUSpq-00024J-Fh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 07:28:31 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:43110) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lUMZa-0000Un-A5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:47:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58484) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lUMZa-0003ak-23 for bug-parted@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:47:18 -0400 Received: from mail.nuegia.net ([2600:3c01:e000:332:216:3eff:fe0c:df5c]:34090) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lUMZX-0005ik-RU for bug-parted@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 00:47:17 -0400 Received: from mail.nuegia.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nuegia.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 56b7f874 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 04:47:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=nuegia.net; h=date:from:to :subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=mail; bh=afPlSO 7uKukN00rO7s4l51aTU2s=; b=Jwf5LOyPm78K4J8fvNjSKXmseXjN4NKLJxvRH9 5ijUDRQ3Kpv/9ppp/e5umo5d7dNWQHGLui3eVUisw8yf0vX259WSEM1X260mbkk3 XLEqmpllvlP6MXxg2CY0ekMP02JTR1yqt4/HI2Zd6Jw4d6aHUMWlJjGONr3dr+Qr Qq9ok= Received: by mail.nuegia.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id d6792af8 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 04:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 21:47:12 -0700 From: Thomas Groman To: bug-parted@gnu.org Subject: Is this a bug? Message-ID: <20210408044712.rxfzh2d7kfqglqv5@viridi.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lqamc23ornjdxzgk" Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2600:3c01:e000:332:216:3eff:fe0c:df5c; envelope-from=tgroman@nuegia.net; helo=mail.nuegia.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 07:28:29 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --lqamc23ornjdxzgk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Is this a bug, or am I doing something wrong? I didn't know it was possible to make gpt partitions 0 sectors wide. (parted) print Model: ATA Samsung SSD 850 (scsi) Disk /dev/sdb: 1000GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: gpt Disk Flags: Number Start End Size File system Name Flags 1 1049kB 3146kB 2097kB linux-swap(v1) grub bios_grub 2 3146kB 540MB 537MB fat32 boot boot, esp 5 540MB 18.8GB 18.3GB linux-swap(v1) swap 4 18.8GB 105GB 85.9GB ext4 rootfs 3 105GB 1000GB 895GB (parted) mkpart fast 500GB -1 Warning: You requested a partition from 500GB to 1000GB (sectors 976562500..1953523215). The closest location we can manage is 1000GB to 1000GB (sectors 1953523712..1953523712). Is this still acceptable to you? Yes/No? No (parted) mkpart fast 500GB 1000GB Warning: You requested a partition from 500GB to 1000GB (sectors 976562500..1953125000). The closest location we can manage is 1000GB to 1000GB (sectors 1953523712..1953523712). Is this still acceptable to you? Yes/No? No --=20 _______________________________________=20 / Schshschshchsch. \ | | \ -- The Gorn, "Arena", stardate 3046.2 / ---------------------------------------=20 \ \ /\ /\ =20 //\\_//\\ ____ \_ _/ / / / * * \ /^^^] \_\O/_/ [ ] / \_ [ / \ \_ / / [ [ / \/ _/ _[ [ \ /_/ --lqamc23ornjdxzgk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEER/XdD9Sv6gknYFT1X/EUeN8JRzAFAmBuitAACgkQX/EUeN8J RzAUXg/+ImcYPVavxWG78PmWWfCPNgPdYZFaQARhYijF5UWvimP7F8w4AbsE0zJy XL3TtcfL/sILxqUpyZNlK33SMR6/vluNeWsl59U5dFm9p1lXIgG0qUHdzORIbQ8f QkV/b/SgQhxCebwxZ9t7OgCXUpvVPs5IWrZW//ZpbiVnXvcGwDXlAtFecQnoyJEw Do6uPRfTWscuDkPrOSzK1QAbK1YbkHI725Bc02+mkJbsuXA3SIKHhrvZ64MFznaM Jj20iU+XDpjfV9O4VMeX4Y9kGuoMGBCcWEp4y1pzFIKUXvwN9kBpiDNamZc1JQmx r6CNpes3dfSNwTmJzAbsulQBh324Ie2gRonPGH755MqrVaD99s4GdqH4j8vWSt5s ijAiJudmJ7OIIRvZ+DWdvE3o15kTL8Km7Jw09P9KpDnVMepJQuej4wgqBLqqZbtQ Nzs8+zV1xGBLYKN7U0XwJKLI0rsSY4e4EbYUtGEp/sYWWQSJCpP+diA4qBaruAqE hwu5U9p+W0aEaFLFdAGEdEfUuJHCKZWrNUlMz9VDfRHPHId+slTG7dmM6XEq8a1f hL9GxzjiM/mqo1FV+vyfqA8hB4eMVlhzSNrf1xeKWApi/jRZLnayiSepa02FBhyu I+tCWrbkINQXw6Hp5wCrS5hevSApupEO0wiX61N5ispir1Yv+7I= =05IM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lqamc23ornjdxzgk-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 08 11:57:41 2021 Received: (at 47653-close) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Apr 2021 15:57:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48028 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lUX2K-0000g7-QN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 11:57:41 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:52940) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lUX2G-0000fw-Li for 47653-close@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 11:57:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1617897456; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5ERJcohwc+NiwJ9uWLyoM6i5MXkYoSe4DfqXATZlwPs=; b=HkbBj13lpzgiSqpXqG3zpAH4DhVm1uon/Tt7oaTplzRrfqJlf+Uou7DfMFNmKIBtkXA0Ui SFBjGhcDKXeNwvr5z1LK9J1j7HCsGxQ/DzPf2jRXhOroGmOmHwm2LsYQRRerlfrLz6vBNA fh5HYFECk1SU1KPsbpmK9MChtGcE4zU= Received: from mail-pl1-f198.google.com (mail-pl1-f198.google.com [209.85.214.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-134-Kk_9wr8XNAiZHlXb-Hq0Aw-1; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 11:57:32 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Kk_9wr8XNAiZHlXb-Hq0Aw-1 Received: by mail-pl1-f198.google.com with SMTP id b7so1132540plr.23 for <47653-close@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 08:57:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=5ERJcohwc+NiwJ9uWLyoM6i5MXkYoSe4DfqXATZlwPs=; b=ioEdHSBwuItgcafasQWrtmKNsO2x1KFpMCXhOajMWdwAHUlJbqdA5dMjfxjoOGCYFS +LRRrklJ7oTp6qS6oZ9Z/lQhgxXvJkvatYOXJr3NdTqfNGIS4R/FHuuEntnH/sw4pNXj rA2e75h2zu8K8s4x4qKM+OeAAqba1vPenxk7dU/1J4A8C7ePret0zbxn2EbeoeRiIrgq Su2OZvfwL/OqdOxIl3wdiNda9SsS860WBIhJiQT4uMLD+eZWNBlp82bQf5m6Etr+S/k5 VGPnibrm7jHynT2/2OZepPP85JhQIqIF6ANWIn+HhGXKkCOb+J2kELsNKZVOg9+uV0y4 Ct3g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Jjxbhk20Yluuew+v3c69FVhPSYkytbNYlSMsHpG5D8QtxxGVR PHIRfknGV9jpw5Ko8d8gQDMnLr6hRRxh+5ZDgnOaxk2y2Q+RRMO62Mvvf6HsEHF+dfHxmY1dFjA x4vzuhnBH/ZmdhVhaOFv9GRk= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:94f:: with SMTP id dw15mr9299250pjb.3.1617897451286; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 08:57:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzx/TOm8wf0z4lcmY74tqIUUXXC9I+jtICZtJjbhgkowupoI9Z1C7TrCLvLU2VNAxpqKQXVEA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:94f:: with SMTP id dw15mr9299218pjb.3.1617897450939; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 08:57:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ohop.brianlane.com (c-73-157-26-10.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [73.157.26.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m9sm25491177pgt.65.2021.04.08.08.57.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 08 Apr 2021 08:57:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 08:57:28 -0700 From: "Brian C. Lane" To: Thomas Groman Subject: Re: bug#47653: Is this a bug? Message-ID: References: <20210408044712.rxfzh2d7kfqglqv5@viridi.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210408044712.rxfzh2d7kfqglqv5@viridi.lan> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=bcl@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47653-close Cc: 47653-close@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 09:47:12PM -0700, Thomas Groman via Bug reports for the GNU Parted disk partition editor wrote: > Is this a bug, or am I doing something wrong? I didn't know it was > possible to make gpt partitions 0 sectors wide. > > (parted) print > Model: ATA Samsung SSD 850 (scsi) > Disk /dev/sdb: 1000GB > Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B > Partition Table: gpt > Disk Flags: > > Number Start End Size File system Name Flags > 1 1049kB 3146kB 2097kB linux-swap(v1) grub bios_grub > 2 3146kB 540MB 537MB fat32 boot boot, esp > 5 540MB 18.8GB 18.3GB linux-swap(v1) swap > 4 18.8GB 105GB 85.9GB ext4 rootfs > 3 105GB 1000GB 895GB > > (parted) mkpart fast 500GB -1 > Warning: You requested a partition from 500GB to 1000GB (sectors > 976562500..1953523215). > The closest location we can manage is 1000GB to 1000GB (sectors > 1953523712..1953523712). > Is this still acceptable to you? > Yes/No? No > (parted) mkpart fast 500GB 1000GB > Warning: You requested a partition from 500GB to 1000GB (sectors > 976562500..1953125000). > The closest location we can manage is 1000GB to 1000GB (sectors > 1953523712..1953523712). > Is this still acceptable to you? > Yes/No? No What created this partition table? It looks like partition 3 is wrong, it covers 105GB to 1000GB but both partition 2 and partition 5 also use some of that space. This is likely confusing parted, so I'd say it isn't a bug, it's just trying to do the best it can with the available space. Brian -- Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT) - weldr.io - lorax - parted - pykickstart From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:33:15 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator