GNU bug report logs - #47648
cc-for-target makes --with-c-toolchain unusable for some packages

Previous Next

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 47648 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: raingloom <raingloom <at> riseup.net>
To: Guix Bugs <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
Subject: cc-for-target makes --with-c-toolchain unusable for some packages
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 02:33:29 +0200

I tried compiling lua with clang on a whim and found out about
cc-for-target. Not sure if that's the only instance of hardcoded gcc,
but it's certainly a prominent one.

What would be the idiomatic way to fix it? Detect clang dynamically? Or
move cc-for-target inside the build system module and make it available
at build time?

Message #8 received at 47648 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: raingloom <raingloom <at> riseup.net>, 47648 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#47648: cc-for-target makes --with-c-toolchain unusable for
 some packages
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 11:47:31 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 02:33 +0200, raingloom wrote:
> I tried compiling lua with clang on a whim and found out about
> cc-for-target. Not sure if that's the only instance of hardcoded gcc,
> but it's certainly a prominent one.

A little more information:
this is not specific to cc-for-target.  Try searching for "CC=gcc".

Most uses of "CC=gcc" are incorrect when cross-compiling.  When
cross-compiling, these should be "CC=ARCHITECTURE-linux-gnu-gcc" or
something like that.  The "cc-for-target" procedure outputs the correct
string.

> What would be the idiomatic way to fix it? Detect clang dynamically? Or
> move cc-for-target inside the build system module and make it available
> at build time?

To avoid massive rebuilds, perhaps the procedure "cc-for-target" could be
replaced with a macro "cc-for-target" that accesses the native-inputs of
this-package to determine whether it should output "CC=gcc" /
"CC=ARCHITECTURE-linux-gnu-gcc" or "CC=clang" / "CC=ARCHITECTURE-linux-gnu-clang"?

Also, moving cc-for-taget to the build system module would require changing
existing package definitions:
  ,(string-append "CC=" (cc-for-target)) --> (string-append "CC=" (cc-for-target))
  (string-append "CC=" ,(cc-for-target)) --> (string-append "CC=" (cc-for-targt))

Warning: I haven't tested whether this approach works with --with-c-toolchain.

Greetings,
Maxime.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.