GNU bug report logs - #47639
28.0.50; In Gnus, missing In-Reply-To when saving a draft, re-editing it and sending the email

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Bastien <bzg <at> gnu.org>

Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 13:15:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 28.0.50

Fixed in version 29.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #11 received at 47639 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Bastien <bzg <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 47639 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#47639: 28.0.50; In Gnus, missing In-Reply-To when saving a
 draft, re-editing it and sending the email
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 13:01:01 +0200
Bastien <bzg <at> gnu.org> writes:

> In Gnus, when replying with S W and sending immediately, the
> In-Reply-To header is correctly set.
>
> But when saving the email as a draft then re-editing this draft
> (D e) before sending it, the In-Reply-To is missing in the received
> email.

The In-reply-to header isn't used by much, which is why it's not
pre-generated by default (unlike the References header, which is
useful).  (It mostly duplicates information that's in other headers.)

> Setting `message-generate-headers-first' to `t` does solve the
> issue by generating the In-Reply-To before saving it as a draft
> and reusing the In-Reply-To value when sending, but the default
> behavior when replying should be to preserve In-Reply-To, even
> when temporarily storing the email as a draft, and even with
> `message-generate-headers-first'.

Sure, why not.  I've now fixed this in Emacs 29.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 327 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.