GNU bug report logs - #47599
28.0.50; Feature request improve/update isearch

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Ergus <spacibba <at> aol.com>

Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 02:08:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Found in version 28.0.50

Done: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #40 received at 47599-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Gregory Heytings <gregory <at> heytings.org>
To: Ergus <spacibba <at> aol.com>
Cc: 47599-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Subject: Re: bug#47599: 28.0.50; Feature request improve/update isearch
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 11:33:53 +0000
>> And here is an updated patch which adds three options to isearch-exit: 
>> C-u RET moves point to the other end, C-u C-u RET activates region 
>> around match, C-u C-u C-u RET moves point to the other end and activate 
>> region around match.
>
> Hi Gregory:
>
> Maybe I am wrong but I think it makes no sense to add C-u RET for this; 
> because it is not better than C-r RET. Same applies to the other two 
> commands.
>

I have no strong opinion, I proposed this patch because of your request. 
But C-u RET is better I think, it's a single command instead of two (C-r 
RET and C-s RET).  For the two other commands, I don't know an easy way to 
mark the match.

>
> I am only interested in the first one really;
>

Yes, I was proposing something more general, with what I understood from 
the discussion.

>
> But IMO the C-u C-u C-u is not the way we should go..
>

I think it's easy to type, much easier than M-s RET for example, but as I 
sait I have no strong opinion on this, it's fine if my patch isn't 
applied.




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 46 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.