From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:10:33 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#47556: "really open? (y)es or (n)o or (l)iterally" vs. emacsclient -n Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 00:00:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 47556 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 47556@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.161732157329873 (code B ref -1); Fri, 02 Apr 2021 00:00:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2021 23:59:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58858 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lS7Dp-0007lk-Cy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 19:59:33 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:38636) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lS7Dn-0007ld-QM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 19:59:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40634) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lS7Dn-0007Bq-HW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 19:59:31 -0400 Received: from butterfly.birch.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.209.27]:1316) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lS7Dl-0002pf-P7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 19:59:31 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8C8480F60 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 23:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a14.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-16-41.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.16.41]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AA0B6481A08 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 23:59:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a14.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 100.96.16.41 (trex/6.1.1); Thu, 01 Apr 2021 23:59:25 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Eyes-Skirt: 486f55661f4a359d_1617321565832_114036443 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1617321565832:65511783 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1617321565831 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a14.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a14.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712767E3D6 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:59:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= jidanni.org; bh=xbHWbAjmiwo78OjM9vcp+52OUJM=; b=omVgXDB8pPi5JRgj ddNiGGoAduqbSORXzXGrbEcAdFDT03/kqloRAYVGen6tmmkmd2qtTejFKEMjXNZa xsztCpBzoRRHrcXTupvlpaAhEt4MjUdNFrH+eq6YKfD74ZKE6VzpKRCQiaDFsemP K4nPxg7CdC/gtneOaOGaud9dCNQ= Received: from jidanni.org (36-234-96-42.dynamic-ip.hinet.net [36.234.96.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a14.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 362537E3D0 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:59:22 -0700 (PDT) X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a14 From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 06:39:36 +0800 Message-ID: <87czvdwrx3.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=23.83.209.27; envelope-from=jidanni@jidanni.org; helo=butterfly.birch.relay.mailchannels.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) $ emacs -Q --maximized -eval '(server-start)'& $ emacsclient -n big.jpg big.jpg is large (14.5 MiB), really open? (y)es or (n)o or (l)iterally Alas in this case our y, n, or l's are not being read by the mini-buffer! And if we indeed switch to emacs and type "n", the question doesn't go away yet, until we type something into the *scratch* buffer. If we instead use --fullscreen, we can't even see the mini-buffer (at least in icewm.) emacs-version "27.1" From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:10:33 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#47556: "really open? (y)es or (n)o or (l)iterally" vs. emacsclient -n Resent-From: Jean Louis Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 06:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47556 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Cc: 47556@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 47556-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47556.1617344587771 (code B ref 47556); Fri, 02 Apr 2021 06:24:01 +0000 Received: (at 47556) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Apr 2021 06:23:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58989 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lSDCx-0000CJ-Rh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 02:23:07 -0400 Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]:49377) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lSDCv-0000Bc-Cy for 47556@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 02:23:02 -0400 Received: from localhost ([::ffff:41.202.241.58]) (AUTH: PLAIN securesender, TLS: TLS1.3,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 000000000001E1D1.000000006066B83E.00001206; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 23:22:53 -0700 Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 09:19:33 +0300 From: Jean Louis Message-ID: References: <87czvdwrx3.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87czvdwrx3.5.fsf@jidanni.org> User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.6 (2021-03-06) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) * 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson [2021-04-02 03:00]: > $ emacs -Q --maximized -eval '(server-start)'& I like when Emacs starts maximized. That is why I have put this in ~/.emacs.d/early-init.el: (add-to-list 'default-frame-alist '(fullscreen . maximized)) That way each time it starts maximized. > $ emacsclient -n big.jpg > big.jpg is large (14.5 MiB), really open? (y)es or (n)o or (l)iterally > Alas in this case our y, n, or l's are not being read by the > mini-buffer! I do not observe this in Emacs development version. I have tested this in Emacs development version and when I do that, I am shown the frame that I have started and the minibuffer and question in the minibuffer, and I could answer with "y" and see the large file. Jean Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns Sign an open letter in support of Richard M. Stallman https://rms-support-letter.github.io/ From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:10:33 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#47556: "really open? (y)es or (n)o or (l)iterally" vs. emacsclient -n Resent-From: Jean Louis Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 06:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47556 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Cc: 47556@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 47556-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47556.16173448791213 (code B ref 47556); Fri, 02 Apr 2021 06:28:02 +0000 Received: (at 47556) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Apr 2021 06:27:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58993 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lSDHi-0000JV-Kq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 02:27:58 -0400 Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]:47149) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lSDHg-0000JG-MX for 47556@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 02:27:57 -0400 Received: from localhost ([::ffff:41.202.241.58]) (AUTH: PLAIN securesender, TLS: TLS1.3,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 000000000001E1EA.000000006066B966.0000124C; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 23:27:49 -0700 Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 09:27:29 +0300 From: Jean Louis Message-ID: References: <87czvdwrx3.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87czvdwrx3.5.fsf@jidanni.org> User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.6 (2021-03-06) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) * 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson [2021-04-02 03:00]: > $ emacs -Q --maximized -eval '(server-start)'& > $ emacsclient -n big.jpg > big.jpg is large (14.5 MiB), really open? (y)es or (n)o or (l)iterally > Alas in this case our y, n, or l's are not being read by the mini-buffer! > > And if we indeed switch to emacs and type "n", the question doesn't go > away yet, until we type something into the *scratch* buffer. > > If we instead use --fullscreen, we can't even see the mini-buffer (at > least in icewm.) > > emacs-version "27.1" I am also using IceWM. I have tested in Emacs development version more of this, as you said --fullscreen, and I did not observe that behavior. I have tried answering Y and N and all is fine. So it is read by minibuffer in Emacs development version. It is true that message remains longer in minibuffer, this disturbs me sometimes. My hope is that my IceWm settings do not interfere with this testing, as I have in ~/.icewm/window this below inhibiting the title bar, I don't think it interferes. emacs.dTitleBar: 0 emacsclient.dTitleBar: 0 Jean Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns Sign an open letter in support of Richard M. Stallman https://rms-support-letter.github.io/ From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:10:33 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#47556: "really open? (y)es or (n)o or (l)iterally" vs. emacsclient -n In-Reply-To: <87czvdwrx3.5.fsf@jidanni.org> Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 07:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47556 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Jean Louis Cc: 47556@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 47556-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47556.16173472285359 (code B ref 47556); Fri, 02 Apr 2021 07:08:01 +0000 Received: (at 47556) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Apr 2021 07:07:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59038 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lSDtc-0001OM-AS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 03:07:08 -0400 Received: from beige.elm.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.212.16]:34313) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lSDta-0001OE-Gq for 47556@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 03:07:07 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF7934261A; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 07:07:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a45.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-17-139.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.17.139]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C38E634230D; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 07:07:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a45.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 100.96.17.139 (trex/6.1.1); Fri, 02 Apr 2021 07:07:05 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Company-Robust: 32a1da22061246ac_1617347225023_3162654559 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1617347225023:3795964868 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1617347225023 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a45.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a45.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D297F121; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 07:07:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=jidanni.org; bh=R0aItSwiuWotCAatLnk+GA15sLw=; b=dTY6fCtPLlypL 5exxpKqO2eXHjm5cBl7XNFrYNEeGxg/Pbrx5UPsjbhKG9dTZwgQ+78eFo0apqW4+ oVU5nOink1qvHH5DfCbVNYiYrp7H4gf0TCmchRk8gG2FMiDtqtTpKpMb16IIw/qP 56mxRh8p76AxKY1P0NwZ4qlpmVmVDg= Received: from jidanni.org (36-234-98-159.dynamic-ip.hinet.net [36.234.98.159]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a45.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA8D77F039; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 07:07:01 +0000 (UTC) X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a45 From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson References: <87czvdwrx3.5.fsf@jidanni.org> Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 15:06:57 +0800 Message-ID: <87im55xizy.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >>>>> "JL" == Jean Louis writes: JL> It is true that message remains longer in minibuffer, this disturbs me JL> sometimes. OK then just somebody fix that only please, as all the icemw stuff might be due to our icewm init files, and newer fixes with icewm upstream with various versions. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 18 12:43:07 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Apr 2021 16:43:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47592 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lYAVn-0007eV-0V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 12:43:07 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f176.google.com ([209.85.215.176]:34620) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lYAVl-0007dm-6G for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 12:43:05 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f176.google.com with SMTP id z16so22572453pga.1 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 09:43:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=iFDHTCEzE2Y3IE0nUGXII5BxCKi1o4CN7JO8CAxVwB8=; b=SHlsbF3XZas5pUDXEKwWzQF4q4Tlg+EVazp35Ucp51Amby3bDGoTjzQl0lWvoD0Wk4 Z2dYQ08tje/j3jpOhM+A961ATCwthVHxUZQ7er9UkutF6UGkE1I2S87aI8B1FykrKgyZ G6E5FVkWYSMkD94Nwxcbfdhqo7IeBOEB75rPTRVH1PctiXNCu57m46PUAgCWyEomhcBt jfWLRJa7U5SoNqQh3Hx7eBYVVtRz15dbaLrQjO87UPTEZaMH8EhPg7HKjYEIJBzZQhe9 c32q9ArWD8EI2mv31a1ocZZw0FXdgFjdaHpVnguwdG6zoBcebVXfIs4oM9g2USkPfBSB MBJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532AdPvw0Zjza9y701wKaD4EmhKIynEXgv682RcBDqA/xLdiNiUZ n5jruNLrA6QU9kz/PRdSY/b3IskmRD53fJlook7iXLzk X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxWB7Tnaj6FjeJWMXW1zU6oRahxW049ZPQloOtjU/zf1M/498gegj1ZzNQa9dgZaG76ALfAYxDFs64o5yw7kss= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:828f:0:b029:200:6e27:8c8f with SMTP id s15-20020aa7828f0000b02902006e278c8fmr15955156pfm.44.1618764179281; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 09:42:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 11:42:58 -0500 From: Stefan Kangas MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 11:42:58 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: forcemerge 45412 47556 thanks Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.215.176 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.215.176 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: forcemerge 45412 47556 thanks Content analysis details: (1.5 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.215.176 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.215.176 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines forcemerge 45412 47556 thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu May 06 04:28:35 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 08:28:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37019 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leZN4-0002hs-Rf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:28:34 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:45126) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1leZN3-0002hm-Fq for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 04:28:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=slDkqDXptGYPn3osbALgnLyvnXGo3/BzNk+sYN8Ua4M=; b=sUS9dOtSVvAh6fm4oz2QKFQLS6 SRc/XEHKQpXQAo9qVpHbTHGqcAWNtXCACJ7mRF+M7n0Mc3tIufLhdQyRCNk7jMwqXlfnxe/4wq7To JeMAGMKVZsWwzSGNH0O6J+mEuvpTt/qv9kZlNcaUTPjdeN4LIFFRStxr3zCdBPkBlYa0=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1leZMw-0004uz-2c for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 10:28:27 +0200 Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 10:28:25 +0200 Message-Id: <87czu42rme.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #45412 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 45412 fixed close 45412 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 45412 fixed close 45412 28.1 quit