GNU bug report logs - #47540
[PATCH] gnu: Add prips.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: david larsson <david.larsson <at> selfhosted.xyz>

Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 13:13:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: david larsson <david.larsson <at> selfhosted.xyz>
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
Cc: 47540 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#47540] [PATCH] gnu: Add prips.
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2021 15:09:23 +0200
On 2021-04-01 21:44, Maxime Devos wrote:

>> +    (arguments
>> +     '(#:make-flags (list "CC=gcc")
> 
> As "CC=gcc" is a constant, I would write '("CC=gcc") here,
> though admittedly this is largely a matter of taste.
> Another problem: when cross-compiling, "gcc" will be a
> compiler for the build system, not the host system (assuming
> I got the terminology right).  Instead, write
> 
>      `(#:make-flags (list (string-append "CC" ,(cc-for-target)))
>        ...)
> 
> (The quasiquote ` is important.)

Fixed.

>> +       #:phases (modify-phases
>> +                    %standard-phases
> 
> %standard-phases shouldn't be on a separate line here.

Fixed.

> 
>> +                  (delete 'configure)
>> +                  (delete 'check)
> 
> Prips has some tests, so don't delete this phase.

I tried to fix but this fails.

> 
>> +                  (replace 'install
>> +                    (lambda _
>> +                      (let*
>> +                          ((bin-dir  (string-append %output "/bin"))
>> +                           (bin-file (string-append bin-dir 
>> "/prips")))
> 
> The ((bin-dir ...)) should be on the same line as 'let*'.
> 
>> +                        (mkdir-p bin-dir)
>> +                        (copy-file "prips" bin-file)
>> +                        (chmod bin-file #o700)))))))
> 
> Why are you making bin/prips writable?  Shouldn't this be
> (chmod bin-file #o600) instead?

I don't know for sure why that happened, but it's fixed to #o600 now.

>> +    (synopsis "Tool that prints the IP addresses in a given range")
>> +    (description "Prips can be used to print all of the IP addresses 
>> in
>> + a given range.  This allows the enhancement of tools only work
> 
> ‘Enhancement’ is rather vague and leaning towards marketing-speak.
> I do not have an alternative suggestion however.

This was an exact quote from website or something.

>> +    (license license:gpl2)))
> 
> I looked at the source code and it seems prips is actually gpl2+.

Fixed.

> Greetings,
> Maxime.

Thanks for your review!

This is what it looks like now, and failing the check phase:

(define-public prips
  (package
    (name "prips")
    (version "1.1.1")
    (source
     (origin
       (method url-fetch)
       (uri (string-append "https://devel.ringlet.net/files/sys/"
                           name "/" name "-" version ".tar.xz"))
       (sha256
        (base32 
"1a33vbl4w603mk6mm5r3vhk87fy3dfk5wdpch0yd3ncbkg3fmvqn"))))
    (build-system gnu-build-system)
    (arguments
     `(#:make-flags (list (string-append "CC=" ,(cc-for-target)))
       #:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases
                  (delete 'configure)
                                        ;(delete 'check)
                  (replace 'install
                    (lambda _
                      (let*
                          ((bin-dir  (string-append %output "/bin"))
                           (bin-file (string-append bin-dir "/prips")))
                        (mkdir-p bin-dir)
                        (copy-file "prips" bin-file)
                        (chmod bin-file #o600)))))))
    (synopsis "Tool that prints the IP addresses in a given range")
    (description "Prips can be used to print all of the IP addresses in
 a given range.  This allows the enhancement of tools only work
 on one host at a time (e.g. whois).")
    (home-page "https://devel.ringlet.net/sysutils/prips/")
    (license license:gpl2+)))

The logs:
---------------

starting phase `check'
make: *** No rule to make target 'check'.  Stop.

Test suite failed, dumping logs.
command "make" "check" "-j" "2" "CC=gcc" failed with status 2



Best regards,
David

---------------




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 41 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.