From unknown Sun Aug 10 16:50:41 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#47537 <47537@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#47537 <47537@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: specification->package does not seem to support outputs Reply-To: bug#47537 <47537@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 23:50:41 +0000 retitle 47537 specification->package does not seem to support outputs reassign 47537 guix submitter 47537 fsdfsdfsd3 severity 47537 normal tag 47537 notabug thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 01 02:19:03 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2021 06:19:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55946 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRqfX-00053H-4P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 02:19:03 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:33952) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRoLh-0001Gh-6U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 23:50:25 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40264) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRoLg-00018b-Uy for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 23:50:24 -0400 Received: from mail-40131.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.131]:56965) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRoLb-0002lh-Qm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 23:50:23 -0400 Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 03:50:09 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1617249015; bh=bk+wKCcP2Gvp7OnCLJs0ij09e3+1m1SrNO0tSrvedQQ=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:From; b=BTcq+/F+XEdwee5NbWINnFfuE0+hgbY4CNnGzV1m75zhA5deNPbO00VdUNGmMHZWT M3fcUas6xpALyUvYl1nxDar8P3bDxH5rFiusus+IdL22I91OeIZTRXMtXldTnJbiWo wZ5EFh4qwMXzp3zwGzFAasc6lr6D//94GkDb0nXw= To: "bug-guix@gnu.org" From: fsdfsdfsd3 Subject: specification->package does not seem to support outputs Message-ID: <2D4cPuIPCu0T9VFO7m3XPX4PEvS5BvunxLytmBfJcec6KNPURmLC50fe6PS4ObwSgS7XKOHnR0K17HFKZZlIcLNVQxaoS9O-ffDt1uLbXcY=@protonmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="b1_szNAkGVSW3QwG9TRjYPmemIw5ebVKMAM0F8Sg8zsfc" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.131; envelope-from=fsdfsdfsd3@protonmail.com; helo=mail-40131.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT=0.25, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello, An example of this behavior in a guile repl is: (use-modules (gnu packages)) (specification->package "qemu") ; works (specification->package "qemu:doc") ; errors and closes the repl Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.5 FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL From: localpart has series of non-vowel letters 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (fsdfsdfsd3[at]protonmail.com) 0.2 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends in digit (fsdfsdfsd3[at]protonmail.com) 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (fsdfsdfsd3[at]protonmail.com) -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 1.9 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 02:19:01 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: fsdfsdfsd3 Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --b1_szNAkGVSW3QwG9TRjYPmemIw5ebVKMAM0F8Sg8zsfc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGVsbG8sCgpBbiBleGFtcGxlIG9mIHRoaXMgYmVoYXZpb3IgaW4gYSBndWlsZSByZXBsIGlzOgoK KHVzZS1tb2R1bGVzIChnbnUgcGFja2FnZXMpKQooc3BlY2lmaWNhdGlvbi0+cGFja2FnZSAicWVt dSIpIDsgd29ya3MKKHNwZWNpZmljYXRpb24tPnBhY2thZ2UgInFlbXU6ZG9jIikgOyBlcnJvcnMg YW5kIGNsb3NlcyB0aGUgcmVwbAoKKHNwZWNpZmljYXRpb24tPnBhY2thZ2Urb3V0cHV0ICJxZW11 OmRvYyIpIDsgd29ya3MgYXMgZXhwZWN0ZWQKClRoYW5rIHlvdSE= --b1_szNAkGVSW3QwG9TRjYPmemIw5ebVKMAM0F8Sg8zsfc Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGRpdj5IZWxsbyw8YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj48YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj5BbiBleGFtcGxlIG9mIHRo aXMgYmVoYXZpb3IgaW4gYSBndWlsZSByZXBsIGlzOjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pjxicj48L2Rpdj48 ZGl2Pih1c2UtbW9kdWxlcyAoZ251IHBhY2thZ2VzKSk8YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj4oc3BlY2lmaWNh dGlvbi0mZ3Q7cGFja2FnZSAicWVtdSIpJm5ic3A7IDsgd29ya3M8YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj4oc3Bl Y2lmaWNhdGlvbi0mZ3Q7cGFja2FnZSAicWVtdTpkb2MiKSZuYnNwOyA7IGVycm9ycyBhbmQgY2xv c2VzIHRoZSByZXBsPGJyPjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+PGJyPjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+KHNwZWNpZmljYXRpb24t Jmd0O3BhY2thZ2Urb3V0cHV0ICJxZW11OmRvYyIpIDsgd29ya3MgYXMgZXhwZWN0ZWQ8YnI+PC9k aXY+PGRpdj48YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj5UaGFuayB5b3UhPGJyPjwvZGl2Pg== --b1_szNAkGVSW3QwG9TRjYPmemIw5ebVKMAM0F8Sg8zsfc-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Apr 01 06:19:10 2021 Received: (at 47537) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2021 10:19:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56404 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRuPu-0002u1-KR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 06:19:10 -0400 Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:43944) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRuPr-0002tr-Nv for 47537@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2021 06:19:08 -0400 Received: from nijino.local (194-96-13-79.adsl.highway.telekom.at [194.96.13.79]) by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F9zgD12pZz1LgGm; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 12:19:03 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailrelay.tugraz.at 4F9zgD12pZz1LgGm DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1617272344; bh=B+QoVBrV+iuWruDmWZjX4hgKQj7CHrTM1GVDb2j3CeU=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JeHuJcXNeuIy2umt0FmfZMmBP+Eddcc1m3wAgcisZ8Zr9zllooRxc14w44Qot/4Oz VWITZu/hsBEKPTG5MoXfRw1MQNfnHg9C/A8xUNzsK8TDkYlgVGIUr5KTcrVsgW++Ss Ljldfw9DkpT3rTvyt4YpUYcdw90N+CmjGbf7gMm0= Message-ID: Subject: Re: specification->package does not seem to support outputs From: Leo Prikler To: fsdfsdfsd3 , 47537@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 12:19:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <2D4cPuIPCu0T9VFO7m3XPX4PEvS5BvunxLytmBfJcec6KNPURmLC50fe6PS4ObwSgS7XKOHnR0K17HFKZZlIcLNVQxaoS9O-ffDt1uLbXcY=@protonmail.com> References: <2D4cPuIPCu0T9VFO7m3XPX4PEvS5BvunxLytmBfJcec6KNPURmLC50fe6PS4ObwSgS7XKOHnR0K17HFKZZlIcLNVQxaoS9O-ffDt1uLbXcY=@protonmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUG-Backscatter-control: bt4lQm5Tva3SBgCuw0EnZw X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.117 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47537 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hello, Am Donnerstag, den 01.04.2021, 03:50 +0000 schrieb fsdfsdfsd3: > Hello, > > An example of this behavior in a guile repl is: > > (use-modules (gnu packages)) > (specification->package "qemu") ; works > (specification->package "qemu:doc") ; errors and closes the repl Given its docstring, that's to be expected: Return a package matching SPEC. SPEC may be a package name, or a package name followed by an at-sign and a version number. If the version number is not present, return the preferred newest version. > (specification->package+output "qemu:doc") ; works as expected In other words, use specification->package+output ;) Regards, Leo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Apr 02 03:16:29 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Apr 2021 07:16:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59060 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lSE2f-0001eo-Gu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 03:16:29 -0400 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:45336) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lSE2d-0001eZ-Fg for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 03:16:27 -0400 IronPort-HdrOrdr: =?us-ascii?q?A9a23=3ADHk7iqodMOeQ2Xc32z56gJMaV5r8eYIsi2QD?= =?us-ascii?q?101hICF9WMqeisyogbAnzhfykjkcQzUNntqHNamGTxrnlaJdy48XILukQU36qH?= =?us-ascii?q?KlRbsC0aLOyyDtcheUysdzzqFlGpITNPTVLXxXydn3+xO5FdFI+re62YSln/3X?= =?us-ascii?q?wXsobQwCUctdxjx0AAqaDUF6LTMubaYRLoaW5cZMulObFkg/U8LTPBQ4Y9Q=3D?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,299,1610406000"; d="scan'208";a="377583924" Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net (HELO ribbon) ([91.160.117.201]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Apr 2021 09:16:21 +0200 Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 09:16:21 +0200 Message-Id: <878s6140my.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: control message for bug #47537 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) tags 47537 notabug close 47537 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Apr 14 10:18:44 2021 Received: (at 47537) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Apr 2021 14:18:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35420 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lWgLr-0001KN-Me for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:18:44 -0400 Received: from mail-40136.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.136]:51242) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lWWnZ-0007Y6-Ui for 47537@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 00:06:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 04:06:29 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1618373195; bh=HwOh+WrMdkA8p8QoGbTcMukjhAPPdotmyoEUK8u9x34=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=M8Yd2pG+S8oxrvHf0kY4MDR0psbk/uQD7q4SxNERCJv5OoUeE9UKCEWCbYbHLi91M KRSwfi+eQiao5vAwiiZ4B9MZAsCWseaX2MV485UZhLZ1u9/HyEobqRwLaInTF2yHdm Pdm+Z9kh5Q8S4bVO/EGYJlN6pPS788aXAIF4Rwrg= To: "47537@debbugs.gnu.org" <47537@debbugs.gnu.org> From: fsdfsdfsd3 Subject: Re: bug#47537 acknowledged by developer (control message for bug #47537) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <878s6140my.fsf@gnu.org> <2D4cPuIPCu0T9VFO7m3XPX4PEvS5BvunxLytmBfJcec6KNPURmLC50fe6PS4ObwSgS7XKOHnR0K17HFKZZlIcLNVQxaoS9O-ffDt1uLbXcY=@protonmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47537 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:18:42 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: fsdfsdfsd3 Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Hello, I ended up testing my config file with nfs4 and that part did work fine. I = had earlier errors unrelated to this that threw me off thinking that would = not work. To clarify then, the issue here only seems to be with the mount function in= the (guix build syscalls) module. This results in a "NO route to host" err= or even though mount.nfs works fine on the command line. However perhaps I am assuming that mount.nfs does not make use of nfs4 behi= nd the scenes, even without nfs-utils installed, when it does. Thank you! =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me= ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 On Friday, April 2, 2021 1:17 AM, wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report > #47537: specification->package does not seem to support outputs, > which was filed against the guix package. > > Thank you for your report, which has now been closed. > You can view the full report at > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D47537 > > If you require further information, please followup to 47537@debbugs.gnu.= org. > > debbugs.gnu.org maintainers > (administrator, GNU bugs database) From unknown Sun Aug 10 16:50:41 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator