From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:51:43 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#47496: Very slow `guix environment -l nyxt/build-scripts/guix.scm Resent-From: Pierre Neidhardt Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 10:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 47496 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 47496@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.161709856425632 (code B ref -1); Tue, 30 Mar 2021 10:03:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Mar 2021 10:02:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50442 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRBCu-0006fM-2D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 06:02:44 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:36734) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRBCp-0006fA-MF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 06:02:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41942) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRBCo-0000hn-6k for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 06:02:39 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:40991) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRBCj-0003cL-Ba for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 06:02:37 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 92.169.147.163 Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1335-163.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.169.147.163]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D79BE000F for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 10:02:26 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 12:02:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87tuotez7x.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.196; envelope-from=mail@ambrevar.xyz; helo=relay4-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.499, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP=0.001, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.999, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nyxt provides a "guix.scm" to build Nyxt locally: https://github.com/atlas-engineer/nyxt/blob/3239b10d816861d329dce10863cb84f= 9d0bd76ed/build-scripts/guix.scm A few weeks ago (not sure exactly when and why), `guix environment -l guix.scm` started being extremely slow. By this, I mean that =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix environment -v 99 --pure --load=3Dbuild-scripts/guix.scm=20 =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- hangs for minutes, maybe hours before it proceeds. It does not display anything, not even with "-v 99". In one occurrence, it even hung completely after downloading a few substitu= tes: =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix environment -v 99 --pure --load=3Dbuild-scripts/guix.scm=20 13.0 MB will be downloaded downloading from https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/c3755727p11afak5azj52xv4h= v9jy0wj-libselinux-3.0-python ... libselinux-3.0-python 141KiB 1.1MiB/s 00:00 [#######= ###########] 100.0% downloading from https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/qlyzqdx6i50d3rfz6hapf53gp= jc43n7c-python-3.8.2-tk ... python-3.8.2-tk 30KiB 7.4MiB/s 00:00 [#######= ###########] 100.0% 15.3 MB will be downloaded downloading from https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/v2kdcv8d5dxsbb7s73nj020jr= y78mcvw-glib-2.62.6 ... glib-2.62.6 2.4MiB 1.7MiB/s 00:01 [#######= ###########] 100.0% downloading from https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/s5dlqhxqa36vax72mx341lhlr= z7b1mpz-python2-2.7.17 ... python2-2.7.17 9.5MiB 4.6MiB/s 00:02 [#######= ###########] 100.0% downloading from https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/gzip/d1n7p65d3k8ddj0pmydgrsbk2= 6xv5808-glib-2.62.6-bin ... glib-2.62.6-bin 149KiB 2.5MiB/s 00:00 [#######= ###########] 100.0% downloading from https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/wk4k3cnygif6is42iq5wgp1yi= hr5abv5-python2-2.7.17-tk ... python2-2.7.17-tk 28KiB 5.9MiB/s 00:00 [#######= ###########] 100.0% downloading from https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/rhwgqqg43jhwb4hzpzljp4b1a= x9i0786-serf-1.3.9 ... serf-1.3.9 78KiB 5.5MiB/s 00:00 [#######= ###########] 100.0% downloading from https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/9y6v4zy10pcanivd05chfryc2= nsxnian-subversion-1.14.1 ... subversion-1.14.1 2.5MiB 8.3MiB/s 00:00 [#######= ###########] 100.0% =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- (That's the full output, it hung there.) Something must be wrong, because I found a workaround that's fishy: if I comment out some inputs from the guix.scm and build the environment, then it works. Then I uncomment the commented inputs and this time the environment builds in a few seconds. Any idea? =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAEBCAAwFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAmBi9zISHG1haWxAYW1i cmV2YXIueHl6AAoJEJvc9Jeku8x/rhEH/0PDp2otzpUp7L4y9KiUQDcxVYoxpF64 1M07KmuAAZfFKwSvB55R09WlqLqE89rbt22sDnlvFf9CvCsVooSk87dEDgW3uD87 TU1ufO1VluuSiYtgk9VeIfbdZpKdmX9ERIt6qdJd1XpGfNDGuclqopXDhh4zp3Cf agCxurY2tHP5aI9prXGucfJUcLCgoL/B776S/FLKDJ66RqwnhDkImnkSklBuNNs1 JsgucQshaSi9n5v0oSWUhEfvKT0+D5DihI5nZhgkIoGPMsFrO+J4EofTOf6JV2Ep zkScr1mLiv8nj/JNwD08Bzs0qICHLY1jCYewgYYINRdhx3XkWiMysQg= =CHPn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:51:43 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#47496: Very slow `guix environment -l nyxt/build-scripts/guix.scm Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 07:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47496 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: 47496@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 47496-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47496.161734940817226 (code B ref 47496); Fri, 02 Apr 2021 07:44:02 +0000 Received: (at 47496) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Apr 2021 07:43:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59083 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lSESl-0004Tl-U7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 03:43:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38822) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lSESk-0004TY-N2 for 47496@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 03:43:27 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44422) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lSESe-0008ST-40; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 03:43:20 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=59706 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lSESd-0006i9-AT; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 03:43:19 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87tuotez7x.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 09:43:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87tuotez7x.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of "Tue, 30 Mar 2021 12:02:26 +0200") Message-ID: <874kgp3ze2.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Pierre, Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > Nyxt provides a "guix.scm" to build Nyxt locally: > > https://github.com/atlas-engineer/nyxt/blob/3239b10d816861d329dce10863cb84f9d0bd76ed/build-scripts/guix.scm > > A few weeks ago (not sure exactl [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.51.188.92 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) Hi Pierre, Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > Nyxt provides a "guix.scm" to build Nyxt locally: > > https://github.com/atlas-engineer/nyxt/blob/3239b10d816861d329dce10863cb8= 4f9d0bd76ed/build-scripts/guix.scm > > A few weeks ago (not sure exactly when and why), `guix environment -l > guix.scm` started being extremely slow. > > By this, I mean that > > $ guix environment -v 99 --pure --load=3Dbuild-scripts/guix.scm=20 On a warm cache, I get: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ time guix environment -l /tmp/nyxt/build-scripts/guix.scm -v2 -n -- true 22.0 MB would be downloaded: /gnu/store/1dr7bkhy8f2v0kgpgm4swl0zrr740zwk-cl-webkit-2.4-10.0bc05cc /gnu/store/bpw4k590597g0n7n868qhlsf2cnclzl0-webkitgtk-2.30.6-doc /gnu/store/j67y7mzb5dyaqln90n3is85nz218bvxp-webkitgtk-2.30.6 real 0m6.060s user 0m7.152s sys 0m0.175s $ time guix environment -l /tmp/nyxt/build-scripts/guix.scm -v2 -n --no-gra= fts -- true La jena derivo estus konstruata: /gnu/store/apk1g220mh4g2fzddxy28ssmk6fy9wbm-profile.drv 0.0 MB would be downloaded: /gnu/store/1dr7bkhy8f2v0kgpgm4swl0zrr740zwk-cl-webkit-2.4-10.0bc05cc The following profile hooks would be built: /gnu/store/3qhdrwww3yidqk6w98md9w4yfqv7sx4l-xdg-desktop-database.drv /gnu/store/7dnznrkrn5rajf60gfj0kvkgz5bylkdc-xdg-mime-database.drv /gnu/store/86df5c3j48wg59yrrcqya1rskmwbqjqb-gtk-im-modules.drv /gnu/store/9xjd6ax9hlmskhyagf46l28258azra0s-ca-certificate-bundle.drv /gnu/store/bb583drg33kg138fb25cb0zd7hhgxzw2-glib-schemas.drv /gnu/store/gw13b4ivyfzzvpdik3mgghx6n4ql8b6h-info-dir.drv /gnu/store/p2srmzy6b08x7gbg8nvmxzrr6ypsrqiq-gtk-icon-themes.drv /gnu/store/p3l0f5imh4021khfrnaqgk0xl5w5zmnh-fonts-dir.drv /gnu/store/wsryc95x85d0qdavgiw4fy1qglam6b84-manual-database.drv real 0m4.497s user 0m5.719s sys 0m0.151s $ guix describe Generacio 179 Mar 30 2021 11:00:56 (nuna) guix 9098745 repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git branch: master commit: 9098745b181b3022587a35afd255f7ff1d41ac86 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- That=E2=80=99s still too long. The graft performance problem is what=E2=80= =99s discussed at . The =E2=80=98--no-grafts= =E2=80=99 performance is not great either, and I wonder if it=E2=80=99s suboptimal behavior in the presence of many propagated inputs. > Something must be wrong, because I found a workaround that's fishy: if I > comment out some inputs from the guix.scm and build the environment, > then it works. Then I uncomment the commented inputs and this time the > environment builds in a few seconds. There was temporarily a performance regression regarding substitutes: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47283 Given what you describe, this sounds like a likely culprit. Would be nice to see if after updating your daemon you still experience that kind of behavior. HTH, Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:51:43 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#47496: Very slow `guix environment -l nyxt/build-scripts/guix.scm Resent-From: Pierre Neidhardt Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 08:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47496 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 47496@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 47496-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47496.161735126028390 (code B ref 47496); Fri, 02 Apr 2021 08:15:02 +0000 Received: (at 47496) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Apr 2021 08:14:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59115 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lSEwe-0007Nq-GE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 04:14:20 -0400 Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.199]:48659) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lSEwd-0007Na-0d for 47496@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 04:14:19 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 92.169.147.163 Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1335-163.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.169.147.163]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A615FF808; Fri, 2 Apr 2021 08:14:11 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt In-Reply-To: <874kgp3ze2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87tuotez7x.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <874kgp3ze2.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 10:14:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87k0plw1bg.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Ludo, Thanks for testing! It seems that we are experience something slightly different. In my case, it's not seconds but hours(!). Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.183.199 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [217.70.183.199 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Ludo, Thanks for testing! It seems that we are experience something slightly different. In my case, it's not seconds but hours(!). Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.183.199 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [217.70.183.199 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ludo, Thanks for testing! It seems that we are experience something slightly different. In my case, it's not seconds but hours(!). Also I cannot test on a warm cache because once the environment has been built, then it's fast again. It's only hanging seemingly forever if the environment is not built yet. I suppose this has to do with substitutes indeed. I'll with with --no-grafts and --no-substitutes. =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAEBCAAwFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAmBm0lMSHG1haWxAYW1i cmV2YXIueHl6AAoJEJvc9Jeku8x/73oH/0JkK0Y8U6+qOXSNWyds0o9wJwkxSOOg hsJD3ye5ZPhBc3YV/He2Z7/x2p7p8NKT39xmqnMTz7z9KN7BGs8wK2DJP9b6CxcV unK9QkQbiS98zolll+AUVSzHYVTzWESK6gwriWstm8fzzw9BsF/rUiEdTdJdb6uI lfribwf8dolUmcNPEp7b7my8b5EH6KMbV8nzt0vScSermeJDTfkW5ltz0HY1WagI SciwzD8pOAJFUVgP5Z7XEH8KNM86RiQrYOrfLMX1XHETKkkGtVCJKk6fJ+4my2WT /a1Vd22Jz8ERhodVuXyF5Nv0vH/7SIDE2Rk+fOCIZkUOV4eEEXqRhcQ= =EbDD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:51:43 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#47496: Very slow `guix environment -l nyxt/build-scripts/guix.scm Resent-From: Pierre Neidhardt Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 18:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47496 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 47496@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 47496-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47496.161747533930972 (code B ref 47496); Sat, 03 Apr 2021 18:43:02 +0000 Received: (at 47496) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Apr 2021 18:42:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34422 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lSlDu-00083U-KR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 14:42:18 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:35627) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lSlDs-00083G-8S for 47496@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 14:42:17 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 92.169.147.163 Received: from mimimi (lfbn-idf2-1-1335-163.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.169.147.163]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6BB69E0004; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 18:42:08 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt In-Reply-To: <87k0plw1bg.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> References: <87tuotez7x.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <874kgp3ze2.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0plw1bg.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 20:42:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87mtufp5vj.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I just tried the following: --88--- guix environment -l ... --88--- was forever until I stopped it. Then Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.183.196 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [217.70.183.196 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I just tried the following: --88--- guix environment -l ... --88--- was forever until I stopped it. Then Content analysis details: (1.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [217.70.183.196 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [217.70.183.196 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I just tried the following: =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- guix environment -l ... =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- was forever until I stopped it. Then =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- guix environment --no-grafts -l ... =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- completed in a few seconds. After this,=20 =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- guix environment -l ... =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- again completed in just a few seconds too. =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAEBCAAwFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAmBotwASHG1haWxAYW1i cmV2YXIueHl6AAoJEJvc9Jeku8x/in4IAKnvrd7doNbYLnznK8HCYpjYXsVgWEIK cBPr3OSNy7KulqzSTY0tgqXpeFfRzg8g1DcZbPHnVGp/r3HNUu6gaABU8OSedmJB +6ca4inadY5OKGofnMMWCPqB+ZyxTTEaTSvTZm0FFGBER/Tt14YjL67YkgzQxK2j DPbPFLkxhgva3Pc8sgTf/KWy257FPsZlwHKg8Ij5KO7XYnQED/dLnb+OCYghGkgj qE+eKxDQ2UQs9h5U5s6tGkjrcBbDHXHQ+SmQOm1ifx+pf8WuXAqiwBN0nMVFZm5F 06Z2XJIyTCQ7l4j5SD4e9R+57ScvIiE6QCdal8Pwgfq1pS21LSf7rj0= =OfUe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Fri Jun 13 10:51:43 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#47496: Very slow `guix environment -l nyxt/build-scripts/guix.scm Resent-From: Bengt Richter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2021 02:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47496 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 47496@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Bengt Richter Received: via spool by 47496-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47496.161750210524007 (code B ref 47496); Sun, 04 Apr 2021 02:09:02 +0000 Received: (at 47496) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2021 02:08:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34684 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lSsBc-0006F8-PM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 22:08:25 -0400 Received: from imta-36.everyone.net ([216.200.145.36]:60844 helo=imta-38.everyone.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lSsBZ-0006Ey-CE for 47496@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 22:08:23 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0004960.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by imta-38.everyone.net (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 13423bLp029146; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 19:08:17 -0700 X-Eon-Originating-Account: 5xnY-mx1e_YGygGkuvttNu5c8BAJaGYnuNgIAvRU1uk X-Eon-Dm: m0116952.ppops.net Received: by m0116952.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2 - 53b92b82) id m0116952.60622040.78a23; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 19:08:16 -0700 X-Eon-Sig: AQMHrIJgaR+QPZL9YgIAAAAD,5453dbe1afaf0af5ce6c7fc4f4317641 X-Eip: 1-pOUxrzJmBtbeOi0rXaze-WvobE6eV_kfaOiiUfK6E Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2021 04:08:08 +0200 From: Bengt Richter Message-ID: <20210404020808.GA10840@LionPure> References: <87tuotez7x.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <874kgp3ze2.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0plw1bg.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87mtufp5vj.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mtufp5vj.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: fxm7ES2YYjY4DNaPQveXxbw2No08mhlM X-Proofpoint-GUID: fxm7ES2YYjY4DNaPQveXxbw2No08mhlM X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-04-03_13:2021-04-01, 2021-04-03 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=911 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1034 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104030000 definitions=main-2104040013 X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, On +2021-04-03 20:42:08 +0200, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > I just tried the following: > > --88--- > guix environment -l ... > --8< [...] Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [216.200.145.36 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, On +2021-04-03 20:42:08 +0200, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > I just tried the following: > > --88--- > guix environment -l ... > --8< [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [216.200.145.36 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: ambrevar.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders Hi, On +2021-04-03 20:42:08 +0200, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > I just tried the following: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > guix environment -l ... > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > was forever until I stopped it. > Then > > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > guix environment --no-grafts -l ... > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > completed in a few seconds. > > After this, > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > guix environment -l ... > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > again completed in just a few seconds too. > Could bash have cached a reference somwhere that made the difference? If you are running in bash, type hash to get a listing of things it has hash-table reference to see also help bash (unless your shell context is different, in which case, for convenience, the expected output is: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- hash: hash [-lr] [-p pathname] [-dt] [name ...] Remember or display program locations. Determine and remember the full pathname of each command NAME. If no arguments are given, information about remembered commands is displayed. Options: -d forget the remembered location of each NAME -l display in a format that may be reused as input -p pathname use PATHNAME as the full pathname of NAME -r forget all remembered locations -t print the remembered location of each NAME, preceding each location with the corresponding NAME if multiple NAMEs are given Arguments: NAME Each NAME is searched for in $PATH and added to the list of remembered commands. Exit Status: Returns success unless NAME is not found or an invalid option is given. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Usually this bites me by keeping on doing something old in spite of PATH changes, but if "something old" got established by your > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > guix environment --no-grafts -l ... > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- maybe it could have gotten hash-cached and remembered to make --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > guix environment -l ... > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > "work" ?? Anyway, apparently some state change is "remembered" in your sequence above, so I was reminded :) > -- > Pierre Neidhardt > https://ambrevar.xyz/ -- Regards, Bengt Richter