From unknown Sat Aug 16 16:14:51 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#47480: gprolog: hash mismatch Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 47480 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 47480@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: Bug Guix Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.161703810518141 (code B ref -1); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:16:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Mar 2021 17:15:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49500 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQvTl-0004iW-Dz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:15:05 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:38438) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQvTj-0004iO-9U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:15:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60760) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQvTj-0002cW-44 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:15:03 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-xf35.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::f35]:46954) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQvTd-00076Q-Ut for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:15:02 -0400 Received: by mail-qv1-xf35.google.com with SMTP id j17so6789364qvo.13 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:14:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=RxUCAGe/F3JsJm+pED/t7Dz9oL2FI7iTb0qQqjC33wc=; b=KP9+Nt0tc1R+qySrFvSEtjJhbkBo5LfFGnBQmlA50ZL7WbRZ7NCXPdBfQ96OxE1FFV 6Ii6XtqXu4Ipal59w+Kzu+ACYcodPoEf+qBjGDqz2d2Veu7k4MC6jOeq3rwoAxeLgfpo aef6qzwsxdic9mWU06J1PUkrKt3mm4Ec2Z7mD4sBbZzSKLhQ4ypzuaDZJlUCXcIEbJMu pyYwG/6zPOvGJ7z1RIgYq0RnXBcO6YApOB3jjbryGCmXgM+HitrApKDvJkoSeLvTGvRD 1K638iWawFEn568BtRB7VOg0W8VNXghUWJhryHWfrEH/xFnuK/ktOIiQcwacTJ/8Ena5 N/Jg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=RxUCAGe/F3JsJm+pED/t7Dz9oL2FI7iTb0qQqjC33wc=; b=NVNXQ2WFWgTIp+Ldr1iK+uaUSE/2GlDRX8wnnoCHGzCfz/kYCxsCPKxjTcuagLtS4A WREBykBIPt/IhXT3SEuX4tAOmJmuBuWIcntg8c00ku1WFu5vdoBN0dJQQ9WtvcoaIWpS XGjzEhHyKfbLJUUihZXUm3BmVJq7sKoUpfSYA8DY1bLVsAcLsjImx10OHH/lfv7xItqN pR6S9vlirlwj6zFDA4xkqFT0aiSdGLhsTfDZO8VEH0LevANM8jyJ61u/XvjYpAEbdepF 3k1FASvm0e+8vaC9FVdlpxqXmxb6v/+4RR+QJuW5zB5bQ5atQhCHafJN0Lnd+jQMn/0A +6Cw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532aVLe5zgJc4xo2W5l0XlqGm2Z3Eb0mzxrQMDsSrKbMnpdefCEC 2C+sxVgvhYY3YOXq3Y48kf/vraZ6bjk/JsRZoRz4DEeD+h0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwojrrNo5jlgGfVlkO4l0gQ8tw4mxchb5Kr+vBh7OIbIFIAJsypR3nyGZQ+wSbOGhkC6Y4qPFps6knC+G5p5O4= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4991:: with SMTP id t17mr25857116qvx.33.1617038096912; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:14:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: zimoun Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:14:46 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::f35; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-qv1-xf35.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hi, Using Guix 55685e4, I get: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix build -S --no-substitutes gprolog The following derivation will be built: /gnu/store/yjrcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv building /gnu/store/yjrcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv... Starting download of /gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz >From http://gprolog.org/gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz... downloading from http://gprolog.org/gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz ... gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz 3.4MiB 50.1MiB/s 00:00 [##################] 100.0% sha256 hash mismatch for /gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz: expected hash: 0z4cc42n3k6i35b8mr816iwsvrpxshw6d7dgz6s2h1hy0l7g1p5z actual hash: 18mrmx44fll0g1qphadna9g6m7miw8d22lkjavah22vzc38kalyf hash mismatch for store item '/gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz' build of /gnu/store/yjrcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv failed View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/yj/rcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv.bz2'. guix build: error: build of `/gnu/store/yjrcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv' failed $ guix build -S gprolog substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% 3.6 MB will be downloaded: /gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz substituting /gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz... downloading from https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz ... gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz 3.4MiB 5.9MiB/s 00:01 [##################] 100.0% /gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- It is probably an upstream in-place replacement. This kind of thing is really annoying because it means that people using substitutes do not notice whereas people building from source do. All the best, simon From unknown Sat Aug 16 16:14:51 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#47480: gprolog: hash mismatch Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 21:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47480 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: zimoun Cc: 47480@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 47480-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47480.161705387326208 (code B ref 47480); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 21:38:01 +0000 Received: (at 47480) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Mar 2021 21:37:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49786 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQza5-0006oe-5y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:37:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45062) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQza3-0006oP-EL for 47480@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:37:51 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52558) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQzZy-000860-7b; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:37:46 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=50142 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lQzZx-0004pw-NF; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:37:46 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 23:37:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: (zimoun's message of "Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:14:46 +0200") Message-ID: <87h7ktljyv.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi! zimoun skribis: > It is probably an upstream in-place replacement. This kind of thing is > really annoying because it means that people using substitutes do not > notice whereas people building from source do. Could you send a diff of the two tarballs? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sat Aug 16 16:14:51 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#47480: gprolog: hash mismatch Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 12:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47480 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 47480@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 47480-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47480.161710767924392 (code B ref 47480); Tue, 30 Mar 2021 12:35:02 +0000 Received: (at 47480) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Mar 2021 12:34:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50565 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRDZu-0006LM-Oz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 08:34:39 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com ([209.85.221.45]:38469) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRDZs-0006L8-Tz for 47480@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 08:34:37 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id z2so16072575wrl.5 for <47480@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 05:34:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eYozYicC2X5bnP6wP8BSCHbesawrl/nw0i7EOXU00LE=; b=i95h9SkErl0ZWWOAZsd6reykmrhcWMq2qmZhkipxtUnagfBYXtr7/VmvD2ujHKbxjJ ffUssnl79ZpP0GAKv7dwtRgE86A96yT4fwtzl+bFRXurijr3dkuSetJo++7F4SXIFnwU ND78oXS2wS5kdskNvlbei3ytnaMJzoAUqIe9wdPyAhGHUQwuKz0522bwxg1JHF1cSV/d xZEbhycy+NE1Wm8TVwJH2I3OywPj/5Vs8BJwtRTZZcUOBOCs4G5hnl+uiZwXWKYZTtiJ QxVn1EqxeeOeNHOhr/WIn/+/YAmrJpyE3m3J9kESVYFFPk514XKRRhoKQjg8CaZ+dUSh T3dg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eYozYicC2X5bnP6wP8BSCHbesawrl/nw0i7EOXU00LE=; b=VmuuuQtNeHybnDCcQfateWpyVA6xu5a6fy8nbDl4WgIXvrrIpi/LuxSnveACytMmQa iU6JSBJgS/7e4DWKqnGHeWJ46v0qQtM1GT8wiCo+8atCz308ftncVXxMNXAy1eBGf4Xl P/kbIy5vMklQC98u586IRiFwE3/9izyyqfVzvwrUbr98hoUgpaKRScr3aPagYAsarm8Z +S9Ho+gyPOuXEi/VNJHWTk8v3724ZLstenOsJVwCMnNjsmh+dRW8FrVbZsB3LxloVkMP eHObZ/Gwq6qFoJGxaKpde1yecLcjnOVvKcu1ZSGeM4qiXRWw43Asnj6zTjLTwhjB4n52 WVrA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5330wSVMjtXQTxUjOQuP9fBReaC5PPwr88RuTmPag08uckP440za lWujQdVraeYd9Gp7FsbLyGmJ4fl2W6U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx1ztWyRmkwYg3uauNA4DrL8adAmbZLpqsSE29Y7QygjFjJnqAcTnwxRux/OOI0TF0xzayJIQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6602:: with SMTP id n2mr34589241wru.262.1617107671003; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 05:34:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 91sm37179414wrl.20.2021.03.30.05.34.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 30 Mar 2021 05:34:30 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun In-Reply-To: <87h7ktljyv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h7ktljyv.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:33:53 +0200 Message-ID: <861rbwhlce.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 23:37, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > zimoun skribis: > >> It is probably an upstream in-place replacement. This kind of thing is >> really annoying because it means that people using substitutes do not >> notice whereas people building from source do. > > Could you send a diff of the two tarballs? Hehe! I have opened the bug because I wanted to avoid to investigate myself. ;-) Basically, I think it is a classical upstream in-place replacement. >From upstream: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix build -S gprolog --no-substitutes The following derivation will be built: /gnu/store/yjrcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv building /gnu/store/yjrcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.d= rv... Starting download of /gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.= 4.5.tar.gz >From http://gprolog.org/gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz... downloading from http://gprolog.org/gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz ... gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz 3.4MiB 556KiB/s 00:06 [##################] 1= 00.0% sha256 hash mismatch for /gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolo= g-1.4.5.tar.gz: expected hash: 0z4cc42n3k6i35b8mr816iwsvrpxshw6d7dgz6s2h1hy0l7g1p5z actual hash: 18mrmx44fll0g1qphadna9g6m7miw8d22lkjavah22vzc38kalyf hash mismatch for store item '/gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-g= prolog-1.4.5.tar.gz' build of /gnu/store/yjrcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.d= rv failed View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/yj/rcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gpr= olog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv.bz2'. guix build: error: build of `/gnu/store/yjrcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gp= rolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv' failed $ guix download http://gprolog.org/gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz Starting download of /tmp/guix-file.aqmcFI >From http://gprolog.org/gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz... gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz 3.4MiB 557KiB/s 00:06 [##################] 1= 00.0% /gnu/store/59hpvhs8zk66g62yisx363fkl53svcnf-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz 18mrmx44fll0g1qphadna9g6m7miw8d22lkjavah22vzc38kalyf --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >From Guix CI: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix hash $(guix build -S gprolog) 3.6 MB will be downloaded: /gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz substituting /gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.= gz... downloading from https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib7= 9k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz ... gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz 3.4MiB 559KiB/s 00:06 [##################] 1= 00.0% 0z4cc42n3k6i35b8mr816iwsvrpxshw6d7dgz6s2h1hy0l7g1p5z --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Then, let get the content: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ tar -xf /gnu/store/59hpvhs8zk66g62yisx363fkl53svcnf-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz $ mv gprolog-1.4.5 from-upstream $ tar -xf /gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz $ mv gprolog-1.4.5 from-ci --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- and show which files are differing: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ diff -r --no-dereference from-{ci,upstream} diff -r --no-dereference from-ci/ChangeLog from-upstream/ChangeLog diff -r --no-dereference from-ci/doc/copyright.tex from-upstream/doc/copyri= ght.tex Binary files from-ci/doc/gprolog.dvi and from-upstream/doc/gprolog.dvi diff= er diff -r --no-dereference from-ci/doc/gprolog.html from-upstream/doc/gprolog= .html Binary files from-ci/doc/gprolog.pdf and from-upstream/doc/gprolog.pdf diff= er diff -r --no-dereference from-ci/doc/gprolog.ps from-upstream/doc/gprolog.ps diff -r --no-dereference from-ci/doc/html_node/gprolog001.html from-upstrea= m/doc/html_node/gprolog001.html [...] diff -r --no-dereference from-ci/doc/html_node/gprolog073.html from-upstrea= m/doc/html_node/gprolog073.html diff -r --no-dereference from-ci/doc/html_node/gprolog-idx.html from-upstre= am/doc/html_node/gprolog-idx.html diff -r --no-dereference from-ci/doc/html_node/index.html from-upstream/doc= /html_node/index.html diff -r --no-dereference from-ci/NEWS from-upstream/NEWS diff -r --no-dereference from-ci/src/EnginePl/gp_config.h from-upstream/src= /EnginePl/gp_config.h diff -r --no-dereference from-ci/src/EnginePl/gprolog_cst.h from-upstream/s= rc/EnginePl/gprolog_cst.h diff -r --no-dereference from-ci/src/Ma2Asm/x86_64_any.c from-upstream/src/= Ma2Asm/x86_64_any.c diff -r --no-dereference from-ci/src/Wam2Ma/wam2ma.c from-upstream/src/Wam2= Ma/wam2ma.c --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Basically, most seems a Copyright update and a documentation regeneration. Except this: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ diff -r --no-dereference from-ci/src/Ma2Asm/x86_64_any.c from-upstream/sr= c/Ma2Asm/x86_64_any.c 213,214c213,216 < #if defined(M_x86_64_darwin) || defined(M_x86_64_bsd) || defined(M_x86_64= _linux)=20 < pic_code =3D 1; /* NB: on darwin and BSD everything is PIC code, last= gcc 6 needs this for linux */ --- > #if defined(M_x86_64_darwin) || defined(M_x86_64_bsd) > pic_code =3D 1; /* NB: on darwin and BSD everything is = PIC code */ > #elif defined(M_x86_64_linux) && __GNUC__ >=3D 6 /* gcc >=3D 6 needs PIC = for linux */ > pic_code =3D 1; $ diff -r --no-dereference from-ci/src/Wam2Ma/wam2ma.c from-upstream/src/Wa= m2Ma/wam2ma.c 514c514,516 < Syntax_Error("multifile or multifile expected"); --- > { > Syntax_Error("multifile or multifile expected"); > } --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Cheers, simon From unknown Sat Aug 16 16:14:51 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#47480: gprolog: hash mismatch Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 20:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47480 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: zimoun Cc: 47480@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 47480-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47480.161713539613758 (code B ref 47480); Tue, 30 Mar 2021 20:17:01 +0000 Received: (at 47480) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Mar 2021 20:16:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52945 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRKmy-0003Zq-9x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:16:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46562) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRKmw-0003Ze-V2 for 47480@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:16:35 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46190) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRKmr-0007pK-Nz; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:16:29 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=58290 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lRKmr-0007uu-6l; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:16:29 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87h7ktljyv.fsf@gnu.org> <861rbwhlce.fsf@gmail.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 10 Germinal an 229 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 22:16:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <861rbwhlce.fsf@gmail.com> (zimoun's message of "Tue, 30 Mar 2021 14:33:53 +0200") Message-ID: <87h7kscs84.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi! zimoun skribis: > Basically, most seems a Copyright update and a documentation > regeneration. Except this: > > $ diff -r --no-dereference from-ci/src/Ma2Asm/x86_64_any.c from-upstream/= src/Ma2Asm/x86_64_any.c > 213,214c213,216 > < #if defined(M_x86_64_darwin) || defined(M_x86_64_bsd) || defined(M_x86_= 64_linux)=20 > < pic_code =3D 1; /* NB: on darwin and BSD everything is PIC code, la= st gcc 6 needs this for linux */ > --- >> #if defined(M_x86_64_darwin) || defined(M_x86_64_bsd) >> pic_code =3D 1; /* NB: on darwin and BSD everything is= PIC code */ >> #elif defined(M_x86_64_linux) && __GNUC__ >=3D 6 /* gcc >=3D 6 needs PIC= for linux */ >> pic_code =3D 1; > > $ diff -r --no-dereference from-ci/src/Wam2Ma/wam2ma.c from-upstream/src/= Wam2Ma/wam2ma.c > 514c514,516 > < Syntax_Error("multifile or multifile expected"); > --- >> { >> Syntax_Error("multifile or multifile expected"); >> } Bah, sadness. Anyway, I guess that means we can update the hash, with a link to this report for posterity. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 02 12:48:46 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2021 16:48:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37057 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lzMLO-0001aG-Lr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 12:48:46 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f42.google.com ([209.85.128.42]:33788) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lzMLM-0001Zv-6f for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 12:48:45 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f42.google.com with SMTP id g8-20020a1c9d080000b02901f13dd1672aso6188996wme.0 for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 09:48:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:message-id:to:from:subject; bh=OJMYg7o6N9v50RO+J0u3ErJSoE1pOfhcu1RMJ8CPQO4=; b=mIKEV/87ArT/+pU6NwA2brECkOVBI2CB1uKnHTwyotZn3Oqz82RJFne5FL0+2NIMEq ZD7d40q6Rbgx9O/3/fO+jvMQTEq0znaXGWa2GkSVmTqV03OQRnWKnTlSl9LVu441p0Lq +FaoYuofvLe7kji4v6Mb3i2Efdc23RA++1AsEL7+SAmnwuA9wRexMYPrq0ZEF/+ZK4CK 98P7XehcObmnTDh4P9TFHuHo7FfQFtI4mO6BTByJ4LYQeGS1Nd29U58p5eD+Pen+V6kk AxE8HnPWgFMhWmHMnmsxXG69K9pcMFiBBgPI9CbEPVDwfpEUlTqX3cqSku+e2V50HiEq S0VA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:message-id:to:from:subject; bh=OJMYg7o6N9v50RO+J0u3ErJSoE1pOfhcu1RMJ8CPQO4=; b=mKvoK5KZiMQONuTLDW+7OdNHsmJQl07K/qphk8XhCQk8fb3HSuop6hKozKbmTBmEU0 3A5IHPWemOJYQfoLiP25HSO7TaLJjWl1mG/099loVdq93uL3FjC05QG7BauwTqI2GKmE kRHVdWKMmbwIxen3VfRzXd44FVHYmLSktGumOxCCx4pvXv9pGy+epclLcCRAvtvLD0+A rfWpvv6FSDscrz0Y7Ah2ZyY2AjpyZeI+hZA8NT+7uP+aiDohzNgPXoRO0kPgu5kkcsEi SdkLlUpF+bF8Kupkl1cZDkimj/2eYcUuxpsX89PmosOBGX47B+or5EPVYBlW1rvMqLYs xSKw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530460d+B+nvNPe7RyxxEQxogaNuyS91PesuwuPZG6nlZMiu0Tp3 4nsx7Tzsv6zssB/wd0Nln10HtabnevI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw8ULSZE5Jx+T+rtCYD5G6s3F0c/1XnciFwIZddhh+LI9VxIsTIaBopKlfMmI2fkkroiIlqlA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7ec3:: with SMTP id z186mr412240wmc.83.1625244518671; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 09:48:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pfiuh02 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b9sm4531214wrh.81.2021.07.02.09.48.38 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 02 Jul 2021 09:48:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2021 18:48:13 +0200 Message-Id: <87wnq8ll0y.fsf@gmail.com> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: zimoun Subject: control message for bug #47480 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 47480 + easy quit From unknown Sat Aug 16 16:14:51 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: zimoun Subject: bug#47480: closed (Re: logo gprolog: hash mismatch) Message-ID: References: X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 47480 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix X-Gnu-PR-Keywords: easy Reply-To: 47480@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 20:55:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1636059302-2556-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1636059302-2556-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #47480: gprolog: hash mismatch which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 47480@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 47480: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D47480 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1636059302-2556-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 47480-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2021 20:54:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43705 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mijkQ-0000e8-3S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 16:54:10 -0400 Received: from mail-40131.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.131]:49541) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mijkN-0000dc-Cq for 47480-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 16:54:08 -0400 Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 20:53:54 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1636059236; bh=awFuFGiz4u9V46ozBP2Lm5QAsElXoHAfl1Fdhedy/2o=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:From; b=KcnRBohjBh06fwX8v/X0WTccWVBv7KvIajWj2KmZvTx5IFJFq5CCdVJjuhE2fp4L2 hQWw2JSyUdDthDVpGGjI579DTiJbxHKCelOOGKnrXA+ddwOgXaXQX7pqooLQgK6/7F BvqkOdsB9h0sdkqrCFG+FKru+G3SUXShOo1Kxj2g= To: "47480-done@debbugs.gnu.org" <47480-done@debbugs.gnu.org> From: phodina Subject: Re: logo gprolog: hash mismatch Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 47480-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: phodina Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, I've looked at the package gprolog and it was updated by Efraim Flashner in= commit 1914d24b452ca6dad30fad6f1faa5f611fa740b0 to version 1.5.0. There's a note saying "Recent versions are not hosted on the GNU mirrors". Petr ------------=_1636059302-2556-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Mar 2021 17:15:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49500 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQvTl-0004iW-Dz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:15:05 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:38438) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQvTj-0004iO-9U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:15:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60760) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQvTj-0002cW-44 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:15:03 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-xf35.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::f35]:46954) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQvTd-00076Q-Ut for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 13:15:02 -0400 Received: by mail-qv1-xf35.google.com with SMTP id j17so6789364qvo.13 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:14:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=RxUCAGe/F3JsJm+pED/t7Dz9oL2FI7iTb0qQqjC33wc=; b=KP9+Nt0tc1R+qySrFvSEtjJhbkBo5LfFGnBQmlA50ZL7WbRZ7NCXPdBfQ96OxE1FFV 6Ii6XtqXu4Ipal59w+Kzu+ACYcodPoEf+qBjGDqz2d2Veu7k4MC6jOeq3rwoAxeLgfpo aef6qzwsxdic9mWU06J1PUkrKt3mm4Ec2Z7mD4sBbZzSKLhQ4ypzuaDZJlUCXcIEbJMu pyYwG/6zPOvGJ7z1RIgYq0RnXBcO6YApOB3jjbryGCmXgM+HitrApKDvJkoSeLvTGvRD 1K638iWawFEn568BtRB7VOg0W8VNXghUWJhryHWfrEH/xFnuK/ktOIiQcwacTJ/8Ena5 N/Jg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=RxUCAGe/F3JsJm+pED/t7Dz9oL2FI7iTb0qQqjC33wc=; b=NVNXQ2WFWgTIp+Ldr1iK+uaUSE/2GlDRX8wnnoCHGzCfz/kYCxsCPKxjTcuagLtS4A WREBykBIPt/IhXT3SEuX4tAOmJmuBuWIcntg8c00ku1WFu5vdoBN0dJQQ9WtvcoaIWpS XGjzEhHyKfbLJUUihZXUm3BmVJq7sKoUpfSYA8DY1bLVsAcLsjImx10OHH/lfv7xItqN pR6S9vlirlwj6zFDA4xkqFT0aiSdGLhsTfDZO8VEH0LevANM8jyJ61u/XvjYpAEbdepF 3k1FASvm0e+8vaC9FVdlpxqXmxb6v/+4RR+QJuW5zB5bQ5atQhCHafJN0Lnd+jQMn/0A +6Cw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532aVLe5zgJc4xo2W5l0XlqGm2Z3Eb0mzxrQMDsSrKbMnpdefCEC 2C+sxVgvhYY3YOXq3Y48kf/vraZ6bjk/JsRZoRz4DEeD+h0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwojrrNo5jlgGfVlkO4l0gQ8tw4mxchb5Kr+vBh7OIbIFIAJsypR3nyGZQ+wSbOGhkC6Y4qPFps6knC+G5p5O4= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4991:: with SMTP id t17mr25857116qvx.33.1617038096912; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:14:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: zimoun Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:14:46 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: gprolog: hash mismatch To: Bug Guix Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::f35; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-qv1-xf35.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hi, Using Guix 55685e4, I get: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix build -S --no-substitutes gprolog The following derivation will be built: /gnu/store/yjrcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv building /gnu/store/yjrcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv... Starting download of /gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz >From http://gprolog.org/gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz... downloading from http://gprolog.org/gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz ... gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz 3.4MiB 50.1MiB/s 00:00 [##################] 100.0% sha256 hash mismatch for /gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz: expected hash: 0z4cc42n3k6i35b8mr816iwsvrpxshw6d7dgz6s2h1hy0l7g1p5z actual hash: 18mrmx44fll0g1qphadna9g6m7miw8d22lkjavah22vzc38kalyf hash mismatch for store item '/gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz' build of /gnu/store/yjrcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv failed View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/yj/rcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv.bz2'. guix build: error: build of `/gnu/store/yjrcalnckwmi1ah217xh85sd7ksjcxfw-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz.drv' failed $ guix build -S gprolog substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% 3.6 MB will be downloaded: /gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz substituting /gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz... downloading from https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz ... gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz 3.4MiB 5.9MiB/s 00:01 [##################] 100.0% /gnu/store/wm72f18w1gvshkz39yp12vnmnkkib79k-gprolog-1.4.5.tar.gz --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- It is probably an upstream in-place replacement. This kind of thing is really annoying because it means that people using substitutes do not notice whereas people building from source do. All the best, simon ------------=_1636059302-2556-1--