GNU bug report logs - #47472
fe: hash mismatch

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 15:29:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#47472: closed (Re: bug#47472: fe: hash mismatch)
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 13:54:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#47472: fe: hash mismatch

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 47472 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
47472: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=47472
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 47472-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#47472: fe: hash mismatch
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 15:53:04 +0200
Hello,

zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> writes:

> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> $ guix build -S --no-substitutes fe
> The following derivation will be built:
>    /gnu/store/12qcph6m26hlbyydsnl0ibl656397fld-fe-2.0.tar.gz.drv
> building /gnu/store/12qcph6m26hlbyydsnl0ibl656397fld-fe-2.0.tar.gz.drv...
>
> Starting download of /gnu/store/nmamm3hz4k3ln8876zdsnaaz2zr1amii-fe-2.0.tar.gz
> From http://www.moria.de/~michael/fe/fe-2.0.tar.gz...
> downloading from http://www.moria.de/~michael/fe/fe-2.0.tar.gz ...
>  fe-2.0.tar.gz  232KiB                171KiB/s 00:01 [##################] 100.0%
> sha256 hash mismatch for
> /gnu/store/nmamm3hz4k3ln8876zdsnaaz2zr1amii-fe-2.0.tar.gz:
>   expected hash: 1hwws7si1752z6hp61zxznvgsb6846lp8zl1hn5ddhsbafwalwb9
>   actual hash:   10mk5wc3dsdp46b3hkjyd740gcdv6m1gvlr3p8xjxf55b3vfs0la
> hash mismatch for store item
> '/gnu/store/nmamm3hz4k3ln8876zdsnaaz2zr1amii-fe-2.0.tar.gz'
> build of /gnu/store/12qcph6m26hlbyydsnl0ibl656397fld-fe-2.0.tar.gz.drv failed
> View build log at
> '/var/log/guix/drvs/12/qcph6m26hlbyydsnl0ibl656397fld-fe-2.0.tar.gz.drv.bz2'.
> guix build: error: build of
> `/gnu/store/12qcph6m26hlbyydsnl0ibl656397fld-fe-2.0.tar.gz.drv' failed
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> It is probably an upstream in-place replacement.

You're right. Upstream rebased 2.0 on top of 1.9 release.

I updated the hash. Thank you for the heads up.

Regards,
-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Bug Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
Subject: fe: hash mismatch
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:27:38 +0200
Hi,

Using Guix 55685e4, I get:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix build -S --no-substitutes fe
The following derivation will be built:
   /gnu/store/12qcph6m26hlbyydsnl0ibl656397fld-fe-2.0.tar.gz.drv
building /gnu/store/12qcph6m26hlbyydsnl0ibl656397fld-fe-2.0.tar.gz.drv...

Starting download of /gnu/store/nmamm3hz4k3ln8876zdsnaaz2zr1amii-fe-2.0.tar.gz
From http://www.moria.de/~michael/fe/fe-2.0.tar.gz...
downloading from http://www.moria.de/~michael/fe/fe-2.0.tar.gz ...
 fe-2.0.tar.gz  232KiB                171KiB/s 00:01 [##################] 100.0%
sha256 hash mismatch for
/gnu/store/nmamm3hz4k3ln8876zdsnaaz2zr1amii-fe-2.0.tar.gz:
  expected hash: 1hwws7si1752z6hp61zxznvgsb6846lp8zl1hn5ddhsbafwalwb9
  actual hash:   10mk5wc3dsdp46b3hkjyd740gcdv6m1gvlr3p8xjxf55b3vfs0la
hash mismatch for store item
'/gnu/store/nmamm3hz4k3ln8876zdsnaaz2zr1amii-fe-2.0.tar.gz'
build of /gnu/store/12qcph6m26hlbyydsnl0ibl656397fld-fe-2.0.tar.gz.drv failed
View build log at
'/var/log/guix/drvs/12/qcph6m26hlbyydsnl0ibl656397fld-fe-2.0.tar.gz.drv.bz2'.
guix build: error: build of
`/gnu/store/12qcph6m26hlbyydsnl0ibl656397fld-fe-2.0.tar.gz.drv' failed
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

It is probably an upstream in-place replacement.

All the best,
simon



This bug report was last modified 4 years and 52 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.