GNU bug report logs - #47472
fe: hash mismatch

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 15:29:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#47472: closed (fe: hash mismatch)
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 13:54:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 01 Apr 2021 15:53:04 +0200
with message-id <87tuoqi01r.fsf <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
and subject line Re: bug#47472: fe: hash mismatch
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #47472,
regarding fe: hash mismatch
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
47472: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=47472
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Bug Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
Subject: fe: hash mismatch
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:27:38 +0200
Hi,

Using Guix 55685e4, I get:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix build -S --no-substitutes fe
The following derivation will be built:
   /gnu/store/12qcph6m26hlbyydsnl0ibl656397fld-fe-2.0.tar.gz.drv
building /gnu/store/12qcph6m26hlbyydsnl0ibl656397fld-fe-2.0.tar.gz.drv...

Starting download of /gnu/store/nmamm3hz4k3ln8876zdsnaaz2zr1amii-fe-2.0.tar.gz
From http://www.moria.de/~michael/fe/fe-2.0.tar.gz...
downloading from http://www.moria.de/~michael/fe/fe-2.0.tar.gz ...
 fe-2.0.tar.gz  232KiB                171KiB/s 00:01 [##################] 100.0%
sha256 hash mismatch for
/gnu/store/nmamm3hz4k3ln8876zdsnaaz2zr1amii-fe-2.0.tar.gz:
  expected hash: 1hwws7si1752z6hp61zxznvgsb6846lp8zl1hn5ddhsbafwalwb9
  actual hash:   10mk5wc3dsdp46b3hkjyd740gcdv6m1gvlr3p8xjxf55b3vfs0la
hash mismatch for store item
'/gnu/store/nmamm3hz4k3ln8876zdsnaaz2zr1amii-fe-2.0.tar.gz'
build of /gnu/store/12qcph6m26hlbyydsnl0ibl656397fld-fe-2.0.tar.gz.drv failed
View build log at
'/var/log/guix/drvs/12/qcph6m26hlbyydsnl0ibl656397fld-fe-2.0.tar.gz.drv.bz2'.
guix build: error: build of
`/gnu/store/12qcph6m26hlbyydsnl0ibl656397fld-fe-2.0.tar.gz.drv' failed
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

It is probably an upstream in-place replacement.

All the best,
simon


[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 47472-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#47472: fe: hash mismatch
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 15:53:04 +0200
Hello,

zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> writes:

> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> $ guix build -S --no-substitutes fe
> The following derivation will be built:
>    /gnu/store/12qcph6m26hlbyydsnl0ibl656397fld-fe-2.0.tar.gz.drv
> building /gnu/store/12qcph6m26hlbyydsnl0ibl656397fld-fe-2.0.tar.gz.drv...
>
> Starting download of /gnu/store/nmamm3hz4k3ln8876zdsnaaz2zr1amii-fe-2.0.tar.gz
> From http://www.moria.de/~michael/fe/fe-2.0.tar.gz...
> downloading from http://www.moria.de/~michael/fe/fe-2.0.tar.gz ...
>  fe-2.0.tar.gz  232KiB                171KiB/s 00:01 [##################] 100.0%
> sha256 hash mismatch for
> /gnu/store/nmamm3hz4k3ln8876zdsnaaz2zr1amii-fe-2.0.tar.gz:
>   expected hash: 1hwws7si1752z6hp61zxznvgsb6846lp8zl1hn5ddhsbafwalwb9
>   actual hash:   10mk5wc3dsdp46b3hkjyd740gcdv6m1gvlr3p8xjxf55b3vfs0la
> hash mismatch for store item
> '/gnu/store/nmamm3hz4k3ln8876zdsnaaz2zr1amii-fe-2.0.tar.gz'
> build of /gnu/store/12qcph6m26hlbyydsnl0ibl656397fld-fe-2.0.tar.gz.drv failed
> View build log at
> '/var/log/guix/drvs/12/qcph6m26hlbyydsnl0ibl656397fld-fe-2.0.tar.gz.drv.bz2'.
> guix build: error: build of
> `/gnu/store/12qcph6m26hlbyydsnl0ibl656397fld-fe-2.0.tar.gz.drv' failed
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> It is probably an upstream in-place replacement.

You're right. Upstream rebased 2.0 on top of 1.9 release.

I updated the hash. Thank you for the heads up.

Regards,
-- 
Nicolas Goaziou


This bug report was last modified 4 years and 52 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.