Subject: Re: bug#47425: 26.3; `plist-get', `plist-put' should accept a TEST function

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:41:44 +0200

Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]> writes:

> I'd be curious to hear of a use case where plists are better than alists
> while at the same time requiring a non-eq comparison.

They're equivalent in features, yes, but people prefer plists for
simple structures because they look nicer.  I'd say they've proven their
popularity over half a century.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no