GNU bug report logs -
#47411
promotional: Add Flight of the Guix and GNU Guix Test Pilot art
Previous Next
Full log
Message #8 received at 47411 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 14:10 +0000, Luis Felipe via Guix-patches via wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This commit adds the source SVGs of the illustration used for the release announcement of Guix 1.2.0, and a new illustration intended to be used to call for testing before the release of version 1.2.1.
>
> ---
> Luis Felipe López Acevedo
> https://luis-felipe.gitlab.io/
A question about the color profiles:
+ <defs
+ id="defs2">
+ <color-profile
+ id="color-profile4"
+ name="Artifex-PS-CMYK-Profile"
+ xlink:href="file:///usr/share/color/icc/ghostscript/ps_cmyk.icc" />
+ <color-profile
+ id="color-profile6"
+ name="Artifex-PS-CMYK-Profile"
+ xlink:href="file:///usr/share/color/icc/ghostscript/ps_cmyk.icc" />
+ <color-profile
+ id="color-profile8"
+ name="Artifex-PS-CMYK-Profile"
+ xlink:href="file:///usr/share/color/icc/ghostscript/ps_cmyk.icc" />
+ </defs>
I don't think it makes sense to includes these file://usr/share/ URLs,
as they are rather useless on Guix System. If these xlink:href
attributes were simply removed, would SVG-displaying applications still
automagically find the colour profiles?
If not, then I guess we'll have to simply live with that
(and keep /usr/share for now). Or maybe we could copy "ps_cmyk.icc"
to the "promotional" directory and use a relative link?
But then copying the SVG would break the link ...
Alternative solution: would converting to sRGB make the colours look bad?
Greetings,
Maxime
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 46 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.