GNU bug report logs -
#47275
Emacs 27.2 RC2 "make check" segv, infloop (Solaris 10 sparc)
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 47275 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47275
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 20 Mar 2021 04:54:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Sat, 20 Mar 2021 04:54:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
I built Emacs 27.2 on Solaris 10 sparc with Oracle Studio 12.6 and ran
into several test failures.
Configuration was via the following, since libjpeg etc. are not available:
./configure MAKE=/usr/sfw/bin/gmake --with-jpeg=ifavailable
--with-png=ifavailable --with-gif=ifavailable --with-tiff=ifavailable
--with-gnutls=ifavailable
"make check" did not terminate. Its output is attached as
"make-check-log.txt". As can be seen, the following tests failed:
lisp/cedet/semantic-utest-ia
lisp/comint-tests
lisp/net/nsm-tests
lisp/progmodes/xref-tests
lisp/so-long-tests/so-long-tests
lisp/vc/diff-mode-tests
src/emacs-module-tests (segmentation violation)
src/process-tests (appears to be looping; 3 CPU hours so far)
I'm attaching logfiles.tgz, a tarball of the failing tests' log files.
[make-check-log.txt (text/plain, attachment)]
[logfiles.tgz (application/x-compressed-tar, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47275
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 20 Mar 2021 07:22:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 47275 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 21:52:53 -0700
>
> I built Emacs 27.2 on Solaris 10 sparc with Oracle Studio 12.6 and ran
> into several test failures.
Thanks. Are these issues new with Emacs 27.2, or were they present in
previous releases as well?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47275
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 20 Mar 2021 16:24:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 47275 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 3/20/21 12:21 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Thanks. Are these issues new with Emacs 27.2, or were they present in
> previous releases as well?
They're present in 27.1.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47275
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 20 Mar 2021 16:52:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 47275 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Cc: 47275 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
> Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 09:23:09 -0700
>
> On 3/20/21 12:21 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Thanks. Are these issues new with Emacs 27.2, or were they present in
> > previous releases as well?
>
> They're present in 27.1.
Thanks. Failures in xref-tests and diff-mode-tests are due tp
command-line options not recognized by the tools you have there, so I
guess installing GNU tools would help.
Of the rest, the only one that worries me is process-tests; any chance
you could look closer at that?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47275
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 20 Mar 2021 17:01:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 47275 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 3/20/21 9:51 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Thanks. Failures in xref-tests and diff-mode-tests are due tp
> command-line options not recognized by the tools you have there, so I
> guess installing GNU tools would help.
>
> Of the rest, the only one that worries me is process-tests; any chance
> you could look closer at that?
Don't have much time free now, unfortunately. Maybe later. Or perhaps
someone else could look into it.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47275
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 20 Mar 2021 17:34:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 47275 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Cc: 47275 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
> Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 10:00:36 -0700
>
> > Of the rest, the only one that worries me is process-tests; any chance
> > you could look closer at that?
>
> Don't have much time free now, unfortunately. Maybe later. Or perhaps
> someone else could look into it.
OK, TIA for anything you could find out and report.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47275
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 25 Jun 2022 12:04:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 47275 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> Don't have much time free now, unfortunately. Maybe later. Or perhaps
>> someone else could look into it.
>
> OK, TIA for anything you could find out and report.
This was a year ago -- Paul, do you still see this in recent Emacs
versions? (I vaguely recall there being some Solaris-related fixes
lately.)
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
Request was from
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 25 Jun 2022 12:04:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#47275
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 25 Jun 2022 20:56:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #28 received at 47275 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On 6/25/22 07:03, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> This was a year ago -- Paul, do you still see this in recent Emacs
> versions? (I vaguely recall there being some Solaris-related fixes
> lately.)
I still see problems with Emacs master, yes. Build log attached. I had
to control-C out of the lisp/eshell/esh-var-tests.log test since it
seemed to be hung (Emacs had a subsidiary zombie process but didn't seem
to be making any attempt to deal with it). The attached build log is
relative to current Emacs master (commit
4410f5d86997b6b238ff05c2ece338b28e1163b1).
I installed some patches in master to fix some of the issues I found,
and the build log assumes those patches. If we want people to run and
test Emacs 28 on Solaris we should fix at least the non-portable
distribution tarball <https://bugs.gnu.org/56222> and the "find ...
-path" portability bug
<https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=b0ed2d1f46d27885a19ae6941b6ea5276f0050e0>.
[build-log.txt (text/plain, attachment)]
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Request was from
Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 26 Jun 2022 15:06:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 359 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.